• Aucun résultat trouvé

For α = 0.3%

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "For α = 0.3%"

Copied!
44
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Chapter 2

(2)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -2 -1.8 -1.6 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -2.2 -2 -1.8 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-8 5 6 7 8 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.4534 0.4536 0.4538 0.454

Figure 2.1: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-6 0 2 4 6 8 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-6 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -10 0 2 4 6

Figure 2.2: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1and

(3)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.3: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.4: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(4)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -2.6 -2.4 -2.2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -4 -3.5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.4236 0.4237 0.4238 0.4239

Figure 2.5: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 4 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.6: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1and

(5)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094 0.4095

Figure 2.7: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.8: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(6)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -3.5 -3 -2.5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -5.5 -5 -4.5 -4 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.3942 0.3943 0.3944 0.3945 0.3946

Figure 2.9: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 8 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6

Figure 2.10: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1

(7)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -7 -6 -5 -4 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.3798 0.3799 0.3799 0.38 0.3800

Figure 2.11: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.12: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1

(8)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -3.5 -3 -2.5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -7 -6 -5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 3 4 5 6 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.3656 0.3657 0.3658 0.3659 0.366

Figure 2.13: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 4 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -7 0 0.5 1

Figure 2.14: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1

(9)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 3 4 5 6 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.3518 0.3519 0.352 0.3521

Figure 2.15: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 4 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 1.5 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -7 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.16: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1

(10)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V || (V) -2.5 -2 -1.5 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V ? (V) -2.2 -2 -1.8 -1.6 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-8 4 6 8 10 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 I || 0.4540 0.4541 0.4541 0.4542 0.4542

Figure 2.17: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-6 0 2 4 6 8 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-6 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.18: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1 and

(11)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.19: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Figure 2.20: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(12)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.4241 0.4241 0.4241 0.4242 0.4242

Figure 2.21: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 4 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.22: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1 and

(13)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094 0.4095

Figure 2.23: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.24: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(14)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) -3.5 -3 -2.5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) -6 -5 -4 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.3945 0.3945 0.3946 0.3946

Figure 2.25: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 8 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6

Figure 2.26: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1 and

(15)

t (s) 2 4 6 8 10 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 2 4 6 8 10 " V ? (V) #10-4 -7 -6 -5 -4 t (s) 2 4 6 8 10 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 t (s) 2 4 6 8 10 I || 0.3799 0.38 0.3801 0.3802

Figure 2.27: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 8 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.28: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1 and

(16)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) -3.5 -3 -2.5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) -7 -6 -5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 3 4 5 6 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.3656 0.3657 0.3658 0.3659 0.366

Figure 2.29: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -7 0 0.5 1

Figure 2.30: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1

(17)

t (s) 4 6 8 10 12 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 4 6 8 10 12 " V ? (V) #10-4 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 t (s) 4 6 8 10 12 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 3 4 5 6 t (s) 4 6 8 10 12 I || 0.3518 0.3519 0.352 0.3521 0.3522

Figure 2.31: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 1.5 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -7 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.32: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1

(18)

t (s) 5 6 7 8 9 10 " V || (V) -2 -1 0 1 t (s) 5 6 7 8 9 10 " V ? (V) -2 -1 0 1 t (s) 5 6 7 8 9 10 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-6 0 1 2 3 4 t (s) 5 6 7 8 9 10 I || 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47

Figure 2.33: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.34: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 1571 rad s−1 and

(19)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V || (V) #10-4 -10 -5 0 5 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 2 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 2 4 6 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 I || 0.437 0.438 0.439 0.44

Figure 2.35: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1

Figure 2.36: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(20)

t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1 2 3 4 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.4236 0.4238 0.424 0.4242

Figure 2.37: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 4 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.38: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 4712 rad s−1 and

(21)

t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 2 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1 2 3 4 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 I || 0.4091 0.4091 0.4092 0.4092 0.4093

Figure 2.39: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.40: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(22)

t (s) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 " V || (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 " V ? (V) -8 -6 -4 t (s) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2 3 4 5 t (s) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 I || 0.3944 0.3944 0.3944 0.3945 0.3945

Figure 2.41: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Figure 2.42: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 7854 rad s−1 and

(23)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 3 4 5 6 " V ? (V) #10-4 -8 -6 -4 -2 t (s) 3 4 5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2 3 4 5 6 t (s) 3 4 5 6 I || 0.3798 0.3799 0.38 0.3801

Figure 2.43: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 8 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.44: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 9425 rad s−1 and

(24)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V || (V) -5 -4 -3 -2 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V ? (V) -8 -6 -4 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 2 3 4 5 6 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 I || 0.3656 0.3657 0.3658 0.3659

Figure 2.45: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6

Figure 2.46: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 10 996 rad s−1 and

(25)

t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) #10-4 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) #10-4 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 3 4 5 6 7 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.3518 0.3519 0.352 0.3521 0.3522

Figure 2.47: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-4 0 0.5 1 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.48: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 12 566 rad s−1 and

(26)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -4 -3 -2 -1 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.49: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.50: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(27)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094 0.4095

Figure 2.51: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.52: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(28)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) -4 -3 -2 -1 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.437 0.438 0.439 0.44

Figure 2.53: ∆V and I vs t at U = 3 × 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.54: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 3 × 10−3m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(29)

t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V || (V) #10-4 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 50 100 150 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 0 50 100 150 I || 0.4091 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094

Figure 2.55: ∆V and I vs t at U = 3 × 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 1 2 3 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.56: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 3 × 10−3m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(30)

t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 " V || (V) -4 -3 -2 -1 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 I || 0.437 0.438 0.439 0.44

Figure 2.57: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−2m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.58: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−2m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(31)

t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 " V || (V) #10-4 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 0 10 20 30 40 I || 0.4091 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094

Figure 2.59: ∆V and I vs t at U = 10−2m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 2 4 6 8 10 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.60: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 10−2m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(32)

t (s) 5 10 15 20 " V || (V) -4 -3 -2 -1 t (s) 5 10 15 20 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 5 10 15 20 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 5 10 15 20 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.61: ∆V and I vs t at U = 3 × 10−2m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.62: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 3 × 10−2m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(33)

t (s) 0 5 10 15 20 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 t (s) 0 5 10 15 20 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 0 5 10 15 20 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 0 5 10 15 20 I || 0.4091 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094

Figure 2.63: ∆V and I vs t at U = 3 × 10−2m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 10 20 30 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.64: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 3 × 10−2m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(34)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V || (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 7 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.65: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Figure 2.66: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(35)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) #10-4 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.4092 0.4093 0.4094 0.4095

Figure 2.67: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 20 40 60 80 100 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.68: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(36)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 " V || (V) -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.69: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.25 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 !M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.70: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.25 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(37)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 " V || (V) #10-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 t (s) 2 3 4 5 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -5 -4 -3 t (s) 2 3 4 5 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 t (s) 2 3 4 5 I || 0.4091 0.4092 0.4092 0.4093 0.4093

Figure 2.71: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.25 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 50 100 150 200 250 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 1 2 3

Figure 2.72: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.25 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(38)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V || (V) -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 4 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 I || 0.438 0.4385 0.439 0.4395 0.44

Figure 2.73: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.5 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 !M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 1 2 3 4

Figure 2.74: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.5 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(39)

t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 t (s) 3 4 5 6 7 I || 0.4091 0.4091 0.4092 0.4092 0.4093

Figure 2.75: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.5 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Figure 2.76: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.5 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(40)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 " V || (V) -10 -5 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 1 2 3 4 t (s) 2 3 4 5 I || 0.437 0.438 0.439 0.44

Figure 2.77: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.75 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1

Figure 2.78: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.75 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1

(41)

t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 t (s) 4 5 6 7 8 I || 0.409 0.4091 0.4092 0.4093

Figure 2.79: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.75 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1 1.5

Figure 2.80: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 0.75 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1

(42)

t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V || (V) -10 -5 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 " V ? (V) -6 -4 -2 0 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 0 2 4 6 t (s) 2 3 4 5 6 I || 0.437 0.438 0.439 0.44

Figure 2.81: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 0.5 1 1.5 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -8 0 0.5 1

Figure 2.82: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 3142 rad s−1 and

(43)

t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 " V || (V) #10-4 -6 -4 -2 0 2 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 " V ? (V) #10-4 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 || " V|| 2 (V 2 ) #10-7 1 2 3 4 t (s) 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 I || 0.4091 0.4091 0.4092 0.4092 0.4093

Figure 2.83: ∆V and I vs t at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and α = 0.3 %.

!M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V || (V) #10-5 0 1 2 3 !M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 " V ? (V) #10-5 0 2 4 6 ! M (rad/s) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 || " V|| 2 -h || " V|| 2 i (V 2 ) #10 -9 0 2 4 6 8

Figure 2.84: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ωM at U = 1 m s−1, ω = 6283 rad s−1 and

(44)

Lire

Figure

Figure 2.17: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s −1 , ω = 1571 rad s −1 and α = 0.3 %.
Figure 2.20: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ω M at U = 0.1 m s −1 , ω = 3142 rad s −1 and α = 0.3 %.
Figure 2.21: ∆V and I vs t at U = 0.1 m s −1 , ω = 4712 rad s −1 and α = 0.3 %.
Figure 2.26: FFT spectral density of ∆V vs ω M at U = 0.1 m s −1 , ω = 7854 rad s −1 and α = 0.3 %.
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

L’hypothèse d’une action sur la décharge des hormones gonadotropes hypophysaires est étayée par le fait qu’une injection de PMSG provoque de même un effet

Weight and percentage of total muscle were explained - for 95 p. 912 ) wa.s estimated by weight of trotters, specific gravity of ham and eye muscle area.. The most

En d´ eduire un intervalle de confiance asymptotique de niveau de confiance 95% pour le nombre de clients se connectant au serveur pour une dur´ ee inf´ erieure ` a 15 minutes

DEUG STPI (2`eme ann´ee) – IUP GSI (1`ere ann´ee) Epreuve d’alg` ebre lin´ eaire?. Dur´ee de l’´epreuve:

Recent palaeoethnobotanical research carried out at the Clam Cove site in the Minas Basin region ofNova Scotia has added new information to the study of Late Woodland (1500-450

Les fonctions sont intégrables car elles sont majorées en valeur absolue par √ 1 t e −t qui est intégrable d'après la question précédente.. Il est clair que u est paire et v

Chacun de ces (petits) intervalles ne peut contenir qu'au plus un élément de G.. Par conséquent, l'intersection de G avec un tel intervalle (borné quelconque) est vide

• Les dépenses annuelles de gestion sont proches pour les deux premiers parcs (2 000 et 2 300 €/km/an) et plus élevées sur le troisième (3 800 €/km/an). Cette différence tient