• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ordering spectacles online : how good are patients at taking measurements?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Ordering spectacles online : how good are patients at taking measurements?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Ordering spectacles online: how good are patients at taking

measurements?

Hanssens JM1, Descôteaux C1, Richard D1, Bellemare MM1, Tousignant B1

1School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, Montreal (Qc), Canada

INTRODUCTION

•  Online spectacles ordering is increasingly common. Websites

offer low cost ophthalmic lenses and frames shipped to patients, after they enter prescription data and self-measured parameters, including pupillary distance

•  Other measurements traditionally measured by professional

dispenser (optometrist or optician), such as vertical optical centration, are often not measured on line

•  Spectacles dispensed with errors in pupillary distance and

vertical optical centration may lead to clinically significant symptoms

•  Alderson et al. showed that 13% of spectacles ordered online

had significant horizontal prism effect. However, there is no evidence that these prismatic effects are caused by

measurement errors, seizure errors, or fitting errors

PURPOSE

•  The purpose of this study is to compare patient-measured

pupillary distance during online ordering of spectacles with those of a skilled ophthalmic dispenser

•  To compare online manufacturers’ optical center heights with

those measured by a skilled ophthalmic dispenser

METHODS

RESULTS

•  For horizontal pupil distance measurements, differences between self-measured and dispenser-measured monocular measure were statistically

significant (Glassify® 1.69 ± 2.11mm, p<0.001 ; Clearly® 1.08 ± 0.74mm, p<0.001; Zenni® 1.33 ± 0.87mm, p<0.001 – one sample t-test, 0 vs.

difference between measurements).

•  Many measurements were outside of clinically significant tolerance limits (ISO norm, ±1.1mm for monocular horizontal centering): 46% (n = 33)

for Glassify®, 39% (n = 28) for Clearly® and 53% (n = 38) for Zenni®

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

•  Online spectacles ordering, using patient-measured pupil

distance and lack of personalized vertical optical heights, is often outside the recognized optical industry standards and may lead to significant optical errors

REFERENCES

1.  Alderson AJ, Green A, Whitaker D, Scally AJ, Elliott DB. A Comparison of

Spectacles Purchased Online and in UK Optometry Practice. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of

Optometry. 2016;93(10):1196-202

•  Thirty-six participants (n = 72 eyes), aged 18 – 35 and naïve to

optics and optometry •  On-line measures :

• Three simulated online spectacles orders in a randomized order, using each site’s method to self-measure their horizontal pupil distance

• A pair of -3.00D spectacles had previously been ordered from each site: their vertical optical height was compared to that measured by a skilled dispenser for each participant

•  Measures by a skilled ophthalmic dispenser

• Horizontal pupil distances were measured on each participant using a corneal reflection pupillometer and vertical optical centrations

were measured with a rule in a primary position

Web site Horizontal pupil

distance measure Vertical optical centration

Glassifyme.com® Face picture with a

credit card Pre-determined

Clearly.com® Printed ruler with a

mirror Pre-determined

Zennioptical.com® Printed ruler with a

mirror Pre-determined

Skilled ophthalmic dispenser

Corneal reflection pupillometer

Rule with vertical decentration of OC to compensate for pantoscopic angle ® Zennioptical.com® Glassifyme.com® Clearly.com® Glassify : 1.69 ± 2.11 mm, p<0.001 Clearly: 1.08 ± 0.74mm, p<0.001 Zenni: 1.33 ± 0.87mm, p<0.001

Absolute means of the decentrations

Monocular pupil distances

•  Differences between manufactured and measured vertical optical

heights also showed statistically significant differences

•  (Glassify® 4.50 ± 2.66mm, p < 0.001 ;

•  Clearly® 3.30 ± 2.47mm, p < 0.001 ;

•  Zenni® 4.22 ± 2.58mm, p < 0.001

•  one sample t-test, 0 vs. difference between measurements)

•  Most measurements were outside of clinically significant

tolerance limits (ISO norm, ± 0.84mm for vertical centering):

•  94% (n = 68) for Glassify®,

•  93% (n = 67) for Clearly®

•  90% (n = 65) for Zenni®

Horizontal pupil distance measure for each company

Glassify®

Clearly®

Zenni®

Monocular pupil distance (mm)

Monocular pupil distance (mm)

Monocular pupil distance (mm)

Monocular pupil distance (mm)

➤  1.69 ± 2.11 mm, p<0.001

Vertical optical centration Horizontal pupil distance measure for

vertical optical

heights

measured by

a skilled

ophthalmic dispenser

Références

Documents relatifs

Pour tout entier n, on note S((^—l)/2) l'ensemble des classes d'isomorphisme de fibres 5-stables uniformes de type 1 sur P(V), de deuxième classe de Chern n.. Il n'y a qu'un

Le but de l’exercice est de « construire » un espace vectoriel normé de dimension infinie, de le munir de deux normes non équivalentes mais qui font de cet evn un Banach. Soit (E , k

pour tout compact C ⊂ Ω, f |C est Lipschitzienne, le rapport de Lipschitz pouvant d´ ependre

En d´ eduire un intervalle de confiance asymptotique de niveau de confiance 95% pour le nombre de clients se connectant au serveur pour une dur´ ee inf´ erieure ` a 15 minutes

On souhaite projeter une mire, succession d’un grand nombre de bandes opaques et transparentes de même largeur a = 0, 25 mm grâce à une lentille de vergence V = 10 Dioptrie..

Une matrice diagonalisable est cyclique si et seulement si ses sous espaces propres sont tous de dimension 1 ce qui revient à dire que les éléments diagonaux de la matrice diagonale

Le tableau ci-après montre les étapes de l’algorithme pour créer la liste des nombres entiers naturels de 1 à 50 (repérés en bout de chaque ligne par la case jaune). Quand un

Si l'on diminue la longueur d'une suite convenable de 1 en y remplaçant les deux dernières composantes par une seule égale à leur somme, on obtient une nouvelle suite convenable