- - -
- - -
Dépôt Institutionnel de l’Université libre de Bruxelles / Université libre de Bruxelles Institutional Repository
Thèse de doctorat/ PhD Thesis Citation APA:
Danis, B. (2004). Bioaccumulation and effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the sea star Asterias rubens L. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Université libre de Bruxelles, Faculté des Sciences – Sciences biologiques, Bruxelles.
Disponible à / Available at permalink : https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/211171/4/61b21da4-ee03-482a-8ef2-495d4c088a3d.txt
(English version below)
Cette thèse de doctorat a été numérisée par l’Université libre de Bruxelles. L’auteur qui s’opposerait à sa mise en ligne dans DI-fusion est invité à prendre contact avec l’Université (di-fusion@ulb.be).
Dans le cas où une version électronique native de la thèse existe, l’Université ne peut garantir que la présente version numérisée soit identique à la version électronique native, ni qu’elle soit la version officielle définitive de la thèse.
DI-fusion, le Dépôt Institutionnel de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, recueille la production scientifique de l’Université, mise à disposition en libre accès autant que possible. Les œuvres accessibles dans DI-fusion sont protégées par la législation belge relative aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins. Toute personne peut, sans avoir à demander l’autorisation de l’auteur ou de l’ayant-droit, à des fins d’usage privé ou à des fins d’illustration de l’enseignement ou de recherche scientifique, dans la mesure justifiée par le but non lucratif poursuivi, lire, télécharger ou reproduire sur papier ou sur tout autre support, les articles ou des fragments d’autres œuvres, disponibles dans DI-fusion, pour autant que :
Le nom des auteurs, le titre et la référence bibliographique complète soient cités;
L’identifiant unique attribué aux métadonnées dans DI-fusion (permalink) soit indiqué;
Le contenu ne soit pas modifié.
L’œuvre ne peut être stockée dans une autre base de données dans le but d’y donner accès ; l’identifiant unique (permalink) indiqué ci-dessus doit toujours être utilisé pour donner accès à l’œuvre. Toute autre utilisation non mentionnée ci-dessus nécessite l’autorisation de l’auteur de l’œuvre ou de l’ayant droit.
--- English Version ---
This Ph.D. thesis has been digitized by Université libre de Bruxelles. The author who would disagree on its online availability in DI-fusion is invited to contact the University (di-fusion@ulb.be).
If a native electronic version of the thesis exists, the University can guarantee neither that the present digitized version is identical to the native electronic version, nor that it is the definitive official version of the thesis.
DI-fusion is the Institutional Repository of Université libre de Bruxelles; it collects the research output of the University, available on open access as much as possible. The works included in DI-fusion are protected by the Belgian legislation relating to authors’ rights and neighbouring rights.
Any user may, without prior permission from the authors or copyright owners, for private usage or for educational or scientific research purposes, to the extent justified by the non-profit activity, read, download or reproduce on paper or on any other media, the articles or fragments of other works, available in DI-fusion, provided:
The authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited in any copy;
The unique identifier (permalink) for the original metadata page in DI-fusion is indicated;
The content is not changed in any way.
It is not permitted to store the work in another database in order to provide access to it; the unique identifier (permalink) indicated above must always be used to provide access to the work. Any other use not mentioned above requires the authors’ or copyright owners’ permission.
f ^
D 03262
I___________________________________ ^
UNIVERSITE L ibre de B ruxelles - F aculté des S ciences
L aboratoire de B iologie M arine
Bioaccumulation and EfTects of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the Sea Star Asterias rubens L.
Bruno Danis March 2004
Thesis submitted in JiilJilment of the degree of:
Université Libre de Bruxelles 1
Supervisors:
Dr Michel Wamau Dr Philippe Dubois
X
U niv ' ersite L ibre de B ruxelles - F aculté des S ciences
L aboratoire de B iologie M arine
Bioaccumulation and Effects of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the Sea Star Asterias rubens L.
Bruno Danis March 2004
Thesis submitted in Jûlfilment of the degree of :
Doctor in Sciences
Supervisors;
Dr Michel Wamau
Dr Philippe Dubois
Si les pétroliers transportaient de l'eau de mer, on s'en foutrait qu'ils fassent naufrage...
Philippe Geluck
A ceux qui nous manquent et qui veillent sur nous...
A
cknowxedgements-R
emerciementsA cknowledgements -R emerciements
Quand \âent le moment d’écrire les remerciements, des tonnes de souvenirs s’engouffrent dans votre tête, faisant apparaître les personnes sans qui une thèse ne serait pas ce qu’elle est, sans qui tous les éléments qui la composent ne se seraient pas ajustés comme ils le sont...
Beaucoup de mes phrases vont commencer par «je remercie le Dr... », mais bon c’est comme ça... [on se croirait un peu à une cérémonie de remise des Oscars...]
Je commence évidemment par remercier le Professeur Michel Jangoux, qui m’a ouvert les portes de son laboratoire il y a six ans déjà (!) et qui, j’en suis sûr, a gardé un œil bienveillant sur moi pendant les moments difficiles ou joyeux qui ont échelonné cette période.
Je remercie le Dr Philippe Dubois, mon copromoteur et voisin de palier. Ton sens critique affûté m’a plus d’une fois poussé à puiser au fond de mes ressources. Merci d’avoir été toujours présent dans les moments de doutes, et merci pour ta franchise.
Je remercie le Dr Michel Warnau, mon autre copromoteur, mon quasi-grand frère. Généreux et impartial, sans compter, tu m’as donné le goût de la recherche, celle que l’on mène en poussant toujours plus loin ses limites, celle pour laquelle on a tant besoin de ses proches.
Merci à Geneviève et aux trois petits warnouilles: Nathan, Luane et Max, pour la gentillesse sans fin que vous avez montré à mon égard.
Je remercie le Dr Scott Fowler, un autre protagoniste bienveillant de ma thèse, qui m’a accueillit au sein de son laboratoire à plusieurs reprises, et m’a permis de concrétiser mes fantasmes expérimentaux pratiquement sans limite.
Je remercie Jean-Louis Teyssié, technicien de l’extrême dopé à la salade qui, tel un compteur Geiger, détecte la moindre trace de radioactivité. Tu m’as appris tous les rouages de la manipulation « à chaud », et tu n’as jamais reculé devant les défis que je souhaitais que nous relerions ensemble.
Je remercie Olivier Cotret, autre technicien de l’extrême, qui a été ma main droite pendant
toute la durée des expérimentations monégasques. Merci pour tes Hénaurmes coups de main !
Je remercie le Dr Jean-Paco Bustamante, mon binôme Rochelais, avec qui nous avons bataillé
à mort, à coup de cerises, dans le jardin de M. Verola, ex-champion de boules de son petit
état.
ACKNOW’LEDGEMEXTS-REMERCIEMENTS
Je remercie le Dr Jean-Pierre Villeneuve pour son aide précieuse dans l’analyse des PCB
« froids », et pour sa grande patience.
Je remercie le Dr Chantal Cattini pour sa gentillesse, son aide, ainsi que pour le temps qu’elle a passé pour moi devant sa colonne, à voir couler de l’extrait d’étoile de mer.
Je remercie le Dr Véronique Flamand pour ses précieux conseils en matière d’ELISA et son ouverture d’esprit.
Je remercie le Dr Virginie De Backer pour son aide et ses conseils concernant la famille des dioxines.
Je remercie le Dr Patrick Flammang pour ses conseils pour la réalisation des Western Blots.
Je remercie le Dr Pascale Wantier pour sa gentillesse et pour m’avoir initié aux joies de l’analyse des PCBs.
Je remercie le Prof Robert Flammang pour son intérêt pour notre projet, et l’implication de son laboratoire pendant plusieurs années.
Je remercie le Dr^ Stanislas Goriely, qui m’a initié aux joies de l’ELISA, mais qui est surtout mon ami depuis quinze ans. Merci aussi à Nanou et au petit Kolya pour les inoubliables brunchs du dimanche. Je suis sûr que nos bambins joueront encore longtemps ensemble.
Je remercie le Dr Drossos, dextre chirurgien de la main, à qui je dois le sauvetage de mon annulaire droit après une rencontre indésirée, un soir de noël 2003, entre les tendons de mon cher doigt et une rogneuse mal léchée de la marque Idéal, qu’au passage je ne remercie pas, car elle ne place pas de garde sur de tels engins.
Je remercie évidemment l’ensemble du Biomar, dans l’ordre du début à la fin du couloir
« Hippie» Chantal, « Cornez da Costa » Sergio, «DivX le Breton » Vinz, « le Dubbe » Phil,
« Sand » Cristi, « le Dim-Dim », « le Loron », « Chipito» CillesD, « Snore » Ceoff, « Mac Cuy-ver » Cuy, « Never-short-of-a-joke » Herwig, « Oui-oui » Richard, « Vivi » Viviane,
« Psycho » Marcelle, « Happy hour » Edwin, « Drine-drine » Sandrine, « Radar» Phil,
« Buffalo » Beber, « Coup’-coup’ » Dev, « MasterMind » Didje, « Isaac » CillesR, « Aussie » Raph, « Cotten » Cuillemette, « Never-steack never again» den Daaav-id, « Tam-tam » Tamar, « Civette » Yves, « Jedi » Eugene, « Chewbacca » Jean-Marc, « Batman » Walter, et
« Dites-Edith » Edith. Merci à vous tous de m’avoir supporté pendant toutes ces (courtes) années (six ans, je n’en reviens pas !).
Je remercie chaleureusement l’équipage du Belgica, composé d’hommes dévoués, qui me
laisseront des souvenirs de moments hors du commun, parfois surréalistes (surtout au cours de
nos premières sorties...).
acknovvxedgements
-R
emerciementsJe remercie les GMs de mon Comité d’Accompagnement, les Drs Christiane Lancelot et Cuy Josens, pour leur constante attention tout au long de ma thèse.
Je remercie le FRIA, qui m’a accordé une bourse de thèse pendant les premières années de celle-ci.
Je remercie la fondationVan Buuren qui m’a apporté un ballon d’oxygène non négligeable pendant les mois de disette.
Je remercie l’ONEM pour son soutien financier (pendant les nombreux mois de disette encore et quand le ballon d’oxygène s’est envolé...).
Je remercie la Communauté Française de Belgique pour la bourse de voyage qu’elle m’a accordée, et qui m’a permis de -presque- joindre les deux bouts au cours de mes séjours monégasques.
Je remercie le Dr Cwenaëlle Leclercq et le presque-Dr Crégory Sempo pour leur amitié si simple qu’elle m’a fait oublier bien des prises de têtes. Spéciale dédicace au petit Loup, dont les piles ne sont jamais à plat pour jouer avec ma petite Zoé.
Je remercie mon cousin David pour le soin avec lequel il a court-circuité mon ordinateur tout neuf au champagne -s’il vous plaît- à quelques semaines du dépôt de ma thèse (je t’avais dit que je te louperais pas !!).
Je remercie Chanda & Maxime, de chez Macline, et qui ont réussi à sauver in extremis toutes mes données après l’incident cité ci-dessus.
Je remercie ma sœur, Muriel, pour sa présence rayonnante dans les moments très difficiles qui ont émaillés la période de thèse. Cilles t’es quelques lignes au dessus...
Je remercie ma marraine Janine, ainsi que Jacques pour nous avoir accueillis mille fois autour d’un incroyable festin qui a toujours eu l’art de nous remonter le moral à l’infini.
Je remercie ma belle-famille, Monique -notre ange gardien-, Aude et Yvan, toujours prêts à nous changer les idées.
Je remercie évidemment tout le reste de la famille pour l’affection et l’attention qu’elle m’a toujours prodigué.
Je remercie mes parents-adorés qui m’ont soutenu sans faillir depuis de nombreuses années (je n’ose même pas les compter) et m’ont montré l’importance de l’ouverture d’esprit, de la curiosité, de la ténacité et du bon vin.
Enfin, bien sûr, je remercie Céline, avec qui j’ai traversé en très peu de temps les plus dures
tempêtes, mais aussi les plus grandes joies de ma vie. Je crois qu’après ce que nous avons vécu,
aucun ouragan ne pourra nous éloigner.
acknow
^
edgements-R
emerciemextsZoé, mon bébé-crabe, et Liam, mon bébé-grogne, papa vous dédie ce travail.
T
ableofC
ontentsT able of C ontents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS-REMERCIEMENTS...5
TABLE OF CONTENTS...9
SUMMARY... 11
I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION...15
1.1. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS...15
1.1.1. General information...15
1.1.2. Analysis...16
1.1.3. International recommendations...18
1.2. PCBS IN THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT...19
1.2.1. Caracterization ofPCB contamination...20
1.2.2. Biological effects ofPCBs... 22
1.2.3. Biomarkers ofPCB exposure... 27
1.3. Contaminationofthe North Seaby PCBs... 31
1.3.1. The North Sea...31
1.3.2. Origin and fluxes ofPCB contamination in the North Sea...32
1.3.3. PCBs in benthic ecosystems ofthe North Sea...33
II. OBJECTIVES...35
III. EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS... 37
III. 1 NON-COPLANAR VS. COPLANAR CONGENER-SPECIFICITY OF PCB BlOACCUMULATION AND IMMUNOTOXICITY IN SEA STARS...39
111.2 DELINEATION OF PCB UPTAKE PATHWAYS IN A BENTHIC SEA STAR USING A RADIOLABELLED CONGENER 59 111.3 COPLANAR PCB UPTAKE KINETICS IN THE COMMON SEA STAR ASTERIAS RUBENS AND SUBSEQUENT EFFECTS ON ROS PRODUCTION AND CYPl A INDUCTION... 73
111.4 CONTRASTING EFFECTS OF COPLANAR VS NON-COPLANAR PCB CONGENERS ON IMMUNOMODULATION AND CYP IA LEVEES (DETERMINED USING AN ADAPTED ELIS A METHOD) IN THE COMMON SEA STAR ASTERIAS RUBENS L... 95
IV. FIELD CONDITIONS... 113
IV. 1 Contaminantlevelsinsédimentsandasteroids (Asteriasrubens L„ Echinodermata) from THE BELGIAN COAST AND SCHELDT ESTUARY: POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS AND HEAVY METALS... 115
IV.2 Bioaccumulationandeffectsof PCBsandheavymetalsinseastars (Asteriasrubens, L.) FROM THE North Sea: asmallscaleperspective...141
IV.3 ECHINODERMS as BIOINDICATORS, BIOASSAYS andimpact ASSESSMENT TOOLS OF SEDIMENT- ASSOCIATED METALS AND PCBS IN THE NORTH SEA... 159
IV.4 LevelsandeffectsofPCDD/Fsandc-PCBsinsédiments, musselsandseastarsofthe INTERTIDAL ZONE IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA AND THE CHANNEL... 185
V. GENERAL DISCUSSION... 205
The BIOACCUMULATION ofPCBsinseastars... 205
Theeffectsof PCBsinseastars... 208
Conclusions-recommendations...211
VI. REFERENCES... 213
VII. ANNEX STUDIES...249
VII. 1 Bioaccumulationof PCBsintheseaurchin Paracentrotuslividus: seawaterandfood EXPOSURES TO a '“C-RADIOLABELLED CONGENER (PCB 153)... 251
VII.2 Bioaccumulationof PCBsinthecuttlefish Sepiaofficinalisfromseawater, sédimentand FOOD PATHWAYS... 263
T
ableofC
ontentsVII.3 M
easurementofEROD
activity: C
autiononthespectralpropertiesofthestandardsused... 279
VII.4 EFFECTS
ofPCBS
onréactivéOXYGEN SPECIES (ROS)
productionBY THE IMMUNE CELLS OF P
aracentrotuslividus(E
chinodermata)... 287
APPENDIXI : CAPTIONS TO HGURES... 299
APPENDIX II : CAPTIONS TO TABLES... 304
APPENDIX in : CAPTIONS TO EQUATIONS... 308
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
PCBs are among the most problematic marine contaminants. Converging towards the océans via the rivers and the atmosphère, they concentrate in sédiments where they become a permanent threat to organisms living at their contact. PCBs are extremely résistant, bioaccumulated and some congeners are considered as highly toxic. The North Sea is considered as a highly contaminated area ; however little information is available regarding the impact of PCBs on key benthic organisms of this région.
Ubiquist, abundant and generally recognized as a good bioindicator species, the common NE Atlantic sea star Asterias rubens (L.) is an ecosystem-structuring species in the North Sea and was chosen as an experimental model. The présent study focused on the characterization of PCB bioaccumulation in A. rubens exposed through different routes (seawater, food, sédiments) and on subséquent biological responses, at immune and sucellular levels. The considered responses were respectively (i) the production of reactive oxyggen species (ROS) by sea stars amoebocytes, which constitutes the main line of defence of echinoderms against pathogenic challenges and (ii) the induction of a cytochrome P450 immunopositive protein (CYPl A IPP) which, in vertebrates, is involved in PCB détoxification.
Experimental exposures carried out hâve shown that A. rubens efficiently accumulâtes PCBs.
Exposure concentrations were always adjusted to match those encountered in the field. PCB
concentrations reached in sea stars during the experiments matched the values reported in
field studies ; therefore our experimental protocol was found to accurately simulate actual
field situations. Uptake kinetics were related to the planar conformation of the considered
congeners : non-coplanar PCB uptake was described using saturation models, whereas
coplanar PCBs (c-PCBs) were bioaccumulated according to bell-shaped kinetics. Non-
coplanar congeners generally reached saturation concentrations whithin a few days or a few
weeks, which means that sea stars can be used to pinpoint PCB contamination shortly after
occurrence. On the other hand, c-PCB concentrations reached a peak followed by a sudden
drop, indicating the probable occurrence of c-PCB-targeted metabolization processes in sea
stars. Our experimental studies also demonstrated that seawater was by far the most efficient
route for PCB uptake in sea stars and that even if PCB levels in seawater are extremely low
compared to sediment-associated concentrations, seawater constitutes a non-negligible route
for PCB uptake in marine invertebrates. Among the different body compartments, bodywall
SUMMARY
displayed the highest bioaccumulative potency and can therefore be considered as particularly interesting for field biomonitoring applications. Rectal caeca, which play a central rôle in digestion and excrétion processes in sea stars, bave also rised particular interest as results suggest these organs could be involved in the élimination of PCB 77 dégradation products.
The field work carried out during the présent study showed that PCB concentrations measured in A. rubens tissues reflect environmental levels of certain congeners. As it was the case in experimental conditions, A. rubens differentially accumulated PCB congeners according to their planarity. Strong relationships were found between concentrations measured in sédiments and those determined in sea stars body wall for certain non-coplanar congeners (e.g. 118 and 138), thus allowing to consider A. rubens as a suitable bioindicator species for medium-chlorinated PCB congeners. On the other hand, sea stars appeared to be able to regulate -to a certain extent- their content in coplanar PCBs. This implies that (i) A. rubens cannot be strictly considered as an indicator organism for c-PCBs and (ii) c-PCBs probably affect essential aspects of sea star biology, potentially leading to deleterious effects.
The présent study addressed effects of PCB exposure on A. rubens biology, in both experimental and field conditions. In experimental conditions, PCBs were found to significantly alter ROS production by sea stars amoebocytes. This alteration also occurred in a congener-specific way : c-PCBs were found to significantly affect, and probably impair sea stars immune System, whereas non-coplanar congeners had no effect. In the field, the PCB contribution to immunotoxicity could not be determined because none of our studies considered ROS production along with c-PCB concentration measurements. However, the levels of ROS production by sea stars amoebocytes measured in field and experimental conditions were found to potentially lead to altered immunity, and therefore to impair sea stars defence against pathogenic agents.
A specially designed ELIS A was used to measure CYPIA IPP in experimental and field
conditions. Experimental work has shown that the induction of this protein was related to
PCB exposure in a congener-specific fashion : c-PCBs alone were found to strongly induce
the production of CYPIA IPP according to a dose-dependent relationship. These results hâve
highlighted many similarities between the dioxin-like responsiveness of CYPIA IPP
induction in sea stars and that occurring in vertebrates. This strongly suggests similarities in
the toxicity-triggering mechanism of dioxins and c-PCBs. In the field, CYPIA IPP induction
was found to be significantly related to PCB levels determined in bottom sédiments. It can
thus be considered as a valuable biomarker. Further research is however needed to better
SUMMARY
characterize the influence of physico-chemical and physiological parameters on CYPIA induction to refîne the interprétation of the information gathered via this biomarker.
Results obtained in our study hâve lead to questionning international régulations applying to PCB biomonitoring in the marine environment. For instance, we strongly suggest that the sélection of congeners to be systematically considered should be revised to include c-PCBs.
Indeed, in our experiments PCB toxicity was almost always attributable to the sole c- congeners. Historically, détermination of c-PCB concentrations was extremely difficult due to analytical limitations ; however, nowadays, these problems hâve been overcome and do no more justify their exclusion from monitoring studies.
Although A. rubens appeared to be quite résistant to PCB contamination, levels measured in
sea stars from the Southern North Sea can possibly affect their immune and endocrine Systems
in a subtle way, but with relatively low risk for this species at the short-term. However, this
does not mean that other species in this région undergo similarly low risks, or that sea star-
structured ecosystems may not become affected in the long-term.
G
eneralI
ntroductionI. G eneral I ntroduction
1.1. Polychlorinated biphenyls
1.1.1. General information
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) hâve been in use in the industry since the 1930s, in electrical equipment and in the manufacture of paints, plastics, adhesives, coating compounds and pressure-sensitive copying paper (Clark 1997). Their remarkable physico-chemical properties (very high stability, excellent electric and thermie insulation) led to their prolifération in the industry to which they were marketed under various trade names (Metcalfe 1994) : Aroclor (Monsanto, United States), Clophen (Bayer, Germany), Phenoclor (Caffaro, Italy), Pyralene (Prodelec, France), Kanechlor (Kanegafushi, Japan), Sovol (Russia).
These commercial PCBs vary in texture from clear oils to powders, according to the needs of industrial applications. These mixtures also vary in composition, containing between 20 and 60 % per weight of chlorine, with a varying number of chlorine atome per molécule.
Theoretically, PCBs include 209 possible compounds (congeners) with varying degree and pattern of chlorine substitution (Fig. 1). Ballschmiter & Zell (1980) set up a nomenclature System for PCBs that assigns each congener a number comprised between 1 and 209. This System was adopted by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (lUPAC).
3’ 2' 23
5- 6' 65
nwta orttio
Figure 1. Numbering System for sites of chlorine on a biphenyl molécule (Metcalfe 1994)
PCBs were first reported in environmental samples in the 1960s (Jensen, 1966). Although
there are 209 possible PCB congeners, only around 90 of them hâve been detected in the
G
eneralI
ntroductionenvironment. The relative abundance of the different congeners in environmental samples dépends on factors such as the congener abundance in the initial commercial products, the relative sales and uses of the products, and the relative persistence and transport in the environment of the compounds.
Due to high persistence and relative volatility, on the long term PCBs may be transported over considérable distances, as a conséquence of mass movements of air or water. These movements can also occur by diffusion, which may be very localized, but can take place over large distances, especially in air. PCBs hâve been detected in the most remote régions, such as the Arctic, the North Atlantic and even the Antarctic and deep-sea (e.g. AMAP 1998), where there is no anthropogenic émission sources.
Data on the global production and use of PCBs has been collected for décades, but more work is needed for the interprétation of past, présent and future contamination levels around the World: it is likely that PCB compounds will remain in the environment for a very long time (Cummins 1988, Tanabe 1988, Voldner & Li 1995, Wania & Mackay 1996, Vallack et al.
1998). In the late 1980s, estimations indicated that there were still 374,000 tons of PCBs in the environment, of which 232,400 tons dissolved in seawater, 3,500 tons dissolved in freshwater, and 1580 tons circulating in the atmosphère (Tanabe 1988). According to the same author, 783,000 additional tons of PCBs were remaining in storages or in landfills, of which an undetermined part could be released in the environment.
1.1.2. Analysis
Most analyses of PCB levels in the environment hâve been reported as Aroclor équivalents.
This was once due to necessity because traditional packed-column gas chromatography (GC) were not able to résolve individual PCB congeners. This lack of resolution limited the capacity of analyses to accurately describe environmental PCB levels and patterns. Moreover, these analyses were mostly based on Aroclor peaks from the packed-column chromatogram, assuming that ratios among PCB congeners in the environment were the same as those found in commercial mixtures (Metcalfe 1994).
It is now well-known that, once released in the environment, the composition of a commercial PCB mixture changes over time, since different congeners display very different physico- chemical properties (e.g. water solubility, vapor pressure, tendency to sorb to organic matter).
Individual congener partition behaviour differs among water, air and solid phases (Dickhut et
al. 1986, Lara & Ernst 1989, Brunner et al. 1990). Moreover, some congeners undergo
G
eneralI
ntroductiondechlorination by anaérobie bacterial action when présent in sédiment at threshold concentrations, while others do not (Brown et al. 1987, Quensen et al. 1990, Mohn & Tiedje 1992). Also, “light” congeners can be subject to aérobic dégradation in particular conditions (Furukawa 1982). Consequently, original PCB mixtures become depleted in the most degradable congeners and enriched in métabolites of the latter ones and in “résistant”
congeners. In biota, PCB composition can also be altered, depending on the uptake, metabolization and dépuration rates of individual congeners. PCBs in the environment take on a congener composition that becomes dissimilar to the original Aroclor mixture. Thus, since the early 1990s, congener-specific analysis of PCBs has progressively replaced traditional Aroclor-equivalent based methods (Duinker et al. 1991, Eganhouse & Gossett 1991).
For routine analyses of PCB congeners in marine biota samples, the commonly used methods are high resolution gas chromatography with capillary columns and électron capture détection (HRGC-ECD) or high resolution gas chromatography with low resolution électron impact mass spectrometry in selected ion mode (HRGC-LRMS-SIM) (Metcalfe 1994). Most individual PCB congeners can be resolved using these methods at low parts-per-billion concentrations (Schultz et al. 1989). An advantage of the ECD over LRMS for PCB analysis is that it is halogen sensitive (Cairns et al. 1989): many coextractive compounds (e.g.
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates) are not detected. A disadvantage of the method over HRGC-LRMS is that the response is highly dépendent on the degree and pattern of chlorination, reducing sensitivity and accuracy of the method for lesser chlorinated congeners.
Another approach used to address the toxic potential of PCBs is the use of toxic equivalency (TEQ). In this approach, the biological or toxic potencies of individual congeners are expressed related to a benchmark contaminants, usually 2,3,7,8 tetrachloro-dibenzo-/i-dioxin (TCDD), an extremely potent toxicant (Fig. 2). Using a variety of endpoints or responses, a relative biological potency or toxic equivalency factor (TEF) can be determined for each congener. The TEQ approach is an attempt to provide integrated assessment of the toxic potential of environmental mixtures. It relies on a number of assumption, including the absence of non-additive interactions (i.e. possible synergism or antagonism is not taken into account) among the components of the mixture (Safe 1990, Ahlborg et al. 1992, 1994).
TCDD équivalents are being used increasingly in risk assessments as a replacement for
exposure measures based only on TCDD or total PCBs (Barron et al. 1994, Van den Berg et
al. 1998).
G
eneralI
ntroductionFigure 2. Molecular configuration of 2,3,7,8 TCDD and PCB 169 (Metcalfe 1994)
1.1.3. International recommendations
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) is the common name refering to a group of organic contaminants that comprises PCBs. POPs are semi-volatile, bioaccumulative, persistent and toxic (Vallack et al. 1998). Although the occurrence of POPs at elevated levels is of great concern in “hot spots”, the POPs issue has received increasing attention at régional and global scales in the last décades (Wania & Mackay 1996, UNECE 1998, UNEP 2001).
Due to their beyond-boundaries transport, political problems bave also arisen. International
agreements hâve thus corne into effect, such as the 1998 Aarhus Protocol on POPs (UNECE,
1998). The overall and long-term objective of the Aarhus Protocol on POPs is to eliminate
any discharge, émission and loss of POPs to the environment. The international community
has called for action to reduce and eliminate production, use and releases of these substances
through: (i) the Protocol to the régional UNECE Convention on Long-Transboundary Air
Pollution (CLRTAP) on POPs, opened for signatures in June 1998 and (ii) the global
Stockholm Convention on POPs, opened for signatures in 2001. These instruments establish
strict international régimes for initial lists of POPs (16 in the UNECE Protocol and 12 in the
Stockholm Convention). Both instruments also contain provisions for including additional
Chemicals into their list. They lay down the following control measures: prohibition or severe
restriction of the intentional production of POPs and their use, restrictions on export and
import of the intentionally produced POPs (Stockholm Convention) , provisions on the safe
handling of stockpiles (Stockholm Convention), provisions on the environmentally sound
G
eneralI
ntroductiondisposai of POPs wastes and provisions on the réduction of émissions of unintentionally produced POPs (e.g. dioxins and furans).
Regarding PCBs, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has recommended that congeners 28, 52, 101, 153, 138 and 180 should be selected for routine analysis (Duinker et al. 1988). Several European Union (EU) countries hâve adopted these congeners, with the addition of congener 118, for defining maximal levels of PCBs in edible marine resources. These environmental quality standards and other international commitments also arise from the 1984 International Conférence on the Protection of the North Sea, the 1995 Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Seas against Pollution, the Baltic States HELCOM, etc.
One of the most frequent objectives of monitoring is to assess seafood quality using estuarine and marine water and sédiments as a check for sources of possible pollution. The recent emphasis on the monitoring of non-ortho and mono-ortho PCB congeners has necessitated an expansion of the list of congeners to be considered in routine analysis. Because of their high toxic potential (Safe 1990), it is most probable that ail non-ortho substituted congeners should be included in analysis programmes (Metcalfe 1994).
1.2. PCBs in the marine environment
The ultimate sink for many contaminants is the marine environment, following either direct
discharges or hydrologie and atmospheric processes (Stegeman & Hahn 1994). Since the late
1960s, PCBs are known to be présent in substantial quantities in marine sédiments, as well as
in marine biota (Jensen et al. 1969). PCBs accumulate in the organic phase, such as biota and
the organic fraction of sédiments, transfering between these compartments according to the
model presented in Fig. 3. PCBs persist in the marine environment for several décades: most
PCBs only exist in trace concentrations, but ail hâve extensive half-lives (dégradation half-
lives ranging up to 200 years) in the environment (Howard et al. 1991, Haynes et al. 2000, Oh
2000, Moore et al. 2002, Wania & Daly 2002).
G
eneralI
ntroductionBioaccumuîatloni Ç Transfer
How?
Where?r.; M Spatial .distribution
^When?^"’ ^ Temporal distribution
Figure 3. Contaminants transfers between compartments in a Coastal model (Moore et al. 2002)
1.2.1. Caracterization of PCB contamination
a. Seawater
PCBs are hydrophobie compounds, i.e. they hâve extremely low water solubilities.
Concentrations in océan water are generally very low, making reliable quantification technically difficult. PCB concentrations in filtered océan water are usually reported to be in the low pg 1' range. In contrast, PCBs are highly lipophilie and adsorb readily onto particles.
Their distribution in sea is thus far from being uniform.
The sea surface microlayer (SSM) is a film varying from a few pim to 1 mm in thickness. It is extremely difficult to study, but is known to contain high levels of particulate organic carbon and lipids compared to bulk water, thus allowing PCBs to accumulate (Daumas et al. 1976, Hardy et al. 1988, Xhoffer et al. 1992, Garabetian et al. 1993). Elevated levels of dissolved organic contaminants in the SSM hâve been reported with enrichment factors reaching one to three orders of magnitude for PCBs (Duce et al. 1972, Bidleman 1973, Napolitano 1995).
While the total quantity may not be great, the PCB enrichment of the SSM may be of
considérable importance to surface-living organisms. Where water masses with variable
physico-chemical characteristics meet, they form a front where floating material gets
accumulated including surface oil. Fronts hâve a high productivity and attract a wide range of
animais, which thus receive a PCB-enriched diet. Since the upper millimétré of the sea is also
enriched in microorganisms and zooneuston (including larvae), great concern has been
G
eneralI
ntroductionexpressed on the toxic effects of the high contaminant levels in the SSM (Hardy et al. 1990, Hardy & Cleary 1992, Stebbing et al. 1992). The PCB enrichment in SSM microorganisms also poses analytical difficulties in distinguishing the portion that is incorporated and the one that is adsorbed onto it. The former may affect them, but the latter is bioavailable to animais feeding on the contaminated organisms. PCBs adsorbed onto inorganic particles may ultimately be carried to the seabed, which acts as a sink for these compounds. Moreover, suspended or re-suspended particles are commonly ingested by filter-feeding animais, entering food chains by this route.
b. Sédiments
Sédiments are repositories for physical and biological débris and are considered as sinks for a wide variety of Chemicals (Clark 1997). The concern associated with PCBs sorption to sédiments is that many organisms spend a considérable portion of their life-cycle on or in marine sédiments. This provides a path for PCBs to reach higher trophic levels. Direct transfer of contaminants from sédiments or interstitial water to organisms is considered to be a major route of exposure (Walker & Peterson 1994). PCBs are présent in much higher concentrations in sédiments than in overlying water. Sorption to sédiments is the prédominant removing mechanism for PCBs from the water column. The analysis of PCBs in sédiments has the advantage of integrating time variations. Once contaminated, sédiments can act themselves as a slowly releasing source of PCBs, which causes chronic exposure of biota long after the primary source of contamination has discontinued (Moore et al. 2002).
c. Organisms
As a conséquence of their hydrophobie and persistent characteristics PCBs are bioaccumulated and high concentrations are found in biota (Stebbing et al. 1992, Clark 1997, OSPAR 2000). PCBs are efficiently accumulated by marine organisms by absorption across outer surfaces (e.g. gills, skin), or by ingestion of contaminated food, seawater or sédiments.
Once they hâve entered the organism, PCBs are stored within the fatty tissues, or in other
lipophilie sites, such as cell membranes or lipoproteins. In the long term, release from storage
may occur (e.g. in times of low food availability) during which organisms mobilize and use
their fat reserves, so increasing the concentration of PCBs in their body up to possibly
harmful levels (Walker et al. 1996). Delayed toxicity may therefore be observed some time
after initial exposure to the contaminant. Organisms hâve the capacity to bioaccumulate and
to biomagnify PCBs, which results in body concentrations several orders of magnitude higher
G
eneralI
ntroductionthan in seawater or in the food (OSPAR 2000). In marine animais, contaminants tend to concentrate in spécifie organs (Walker et al. 1996).
The fact that PCB s accumulate preferentially in fatty tissues implies that caution must be taken in comparing levels of contamination in different organisms. Different amounts of PCBs can be accumulate in the varions organs, having quite different implication for a fat animal than for an emaciated one. Accumulation rates vary among species, but also within a species according to factors such as âge, sex, stage in the breeding cycle, as well as exposure concentrations or feeding habits (Van der Oost et al. 2003). Bioaccumulation is a precursor to ail Chemical toxicity: without some degree of accumulation, even if slight, toxic action in organism target site(s) cannot take place.
1.2.2. Biological effects of PCBs
Experimental studies hâve shown that PCBs are capable of producing a wide variety of toxic effects in exposed organisms, some of the most common include neurotoxicity, immune dysfunction, reproductive and developmental effects, and cancer (Harding & Addison 1986, Zabel et al. 1995, Chapman 1996, Krogenaes 1998, Coteur et al. 2001). PCBs are of concem primarily because of their potential for causing chronic effects following long-term, low-level exposure (Walker et al. 1996, OSPAR 2000). The effects of substances on biota are dépendent on a number of factors and processes including bioavailability, bioaccumulation, toxic potency and the capacity of the organism to metabolize the substance (Fig. 4). Marine contamination by PCBs poses a relatively well-documented risk to the health of marine organisms, which can occur at levels ranging from subcellular effects to ecosystem effects (Tanabe & Tatsukawa 1992, Elkus et al. 1992, Norstrom & Muir 1994, Bello et al. 2001).
Figure 4. Model describing the fate of lipophilie xenobiotics in organisms (Hodgson & Levi 1993)
G
eneralI
ntroductiona. Subcellular and cellular effects
To gain a full understanding of the toxic effects of a Chemical, it is necessary to link initial molecular interactions to conséquent effects at higher levels of organization. The extent to which such a molecular interaction occurs is, in general, related to the dose received, although the relationship is rarely a simple one (Walker et al. 1996). Molecular interactions between the xenobiotic and sites of action, which lead to toxic manifestations, may be highly spécifie for certain types of xenobiotics and organisms or non-specific, because of the variety of sites of action, which can occur in one species and not in other ones (Fig. 5).
Détoxication
n
Monooxygenase System
Initial Chemical
Repair ofDNA
Original State
Figure 5. Pathways for activation and détoxification of organic Chemicals (Walker et al. 1996)
Activation
w'jthlsNA'--- ^ Mutation--- Carcinogenicity
Subcellular effects of pollutants can be out of two types: those which serve to protect the organism against the harmfui effects of the Chemical (viz. détoxification via e.g. induction of monooxygenases or induction of metallothioneins), and those which do not (e.g. inhibition of AchE, formation of DNA adducts) (Table 1). Protective mechanisms fonction by reducing the contaminant concentration in the cell (e.g. some PCB congeners induce enzymes that metabolize them) or by reducing the bioreactive fraction of the contaminant concentration.
One of these mechanisms is achieved through the monooxygenase System, whose fonction is
to increase the rate of production of water-soluble métabolites and conjugates of low toxicity,
which can be excreted. However, in some cases, metabolism leads to the production of highly
reactive métabolites, that can cause more damage than the parent compound.
G
eneralI
ntroductionTable 1. Protective and non-protective responses to Chemicals (Walker et al. 1996).
Type of effects Example Conséquences
Protective Induction of monooxygenases Induction of metallothionein
Increase in rate of metabolism of pollutant to more water- soluble métabolite and thus increase in rate of excrétion Increase the rate of binding sites with metals to decrease bioavailability
Non-protective Inhibition of AChE Formation of DNA adducts
Toxic effects seen above 50% inhibition May cause harmful effects if leading to mutation
These Chemical surveillance Systems hâve evolved as mechanisms for recognizing a broad range of Chemical structures and initiating appropriate responses, such as the biotransformation and élimination of toxic compounds (Brattsen 1979, Nebert & Gonzalez 1987, Gonzalez & Nebert 1990). The enzymatic components of this inducible biotransformation System are now well-known and include monooxygenases in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily as well as conjugating enzymes such as the glutathionetransferases and glucuronosyltransferases. The sensory component of this System consists of soluble receptors that regulate the expression of the biotransformation and transporter genes in response to environmental Chemicals. These receptors include several members of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily (Kliewer et al. 1999a,b, Savas et al.
1999, Waxman 1999, Honkakoski & Negishi 2000) as well as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR, Fig.6).
BTCDCa BtcddB
AhR --- > AhR --- > AhR
■arÎ^
cvtoplasma
;. ; ccl] nucieus' ;
^---
>1
CYPlAmRNAl CYPIA protcin