UNITED NATIONS
ECONOMIC
AND
SOCIAL COUNCIL
Distr.
LIWLITZ .141IY-
1965
Original; ~PGLI3H
Conference on the Earmon~zationof Industrial Develc:p:merlt Pro{sranldes in East .hfric2.
Lusaka9
27
September -5
Octo'oer1965
'I'R.:..; ii-lTD .B.LLI...~~D
, r
t 1mr1'M.ENTS OFFJCE
"Jtf~ (jOP'·~
)to ·I·~() Ii
e: T
1\KEN Otrr
';r'a-ole "of*"'Contents
Explanatory Notes 0 • • • & • • 0 • " I) ti • • • • • • • ' I . • • • Page 1
CHAPTBR I
CHAPTER II CHAPTER IJI CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI
Introduction •• e • • • • • • GI • • • •• • • • •0 • • Q • • • • • •
Trends in the Building and Construction Industry ..• " .•..• 0 T118 Grow-~hof the Cement Industry •• It• • •~• • Trends in the Trade of Cement ••.•••..••••
Trends in Cement ConSUlIlptio'u ••.•· 0 0 0 (t 0 fJ 0 • • • I roj ?ction 0£' Deilland ••••••••• 0 • CI • • 0 • • • • • •
Bas~c Considerations in the Ex:pansion of the Cement Industry in the Sub-region
1 ...
5
6 -
2223 -
47
48 •
60 61 75
;. 76 - 89
Future Development Requiremonts ••••••••••
(a) llaw IVIaterial and Oth;3r Input reso'urces (b) Cost of Production and Price Trends ••
(0)
ilant Size 8nd Fixed Investment CostsConclUS~lons
CHAPTER· VII CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER IX
T118 ( a) ( b) (0) ( d)
oI--l.llied Industries •• 0 • • •" • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Introduction 0 • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •
Concrete Froducts ..••..•...• 0 • • • • • • • •
FrOSlJ8cts of Develop111ent
90 - 109
110 120
121 - 129130 - 131
132 -
134 135 - 139
140 - 149 150 -
157 158 - 176
Table I - - East .i.l.frican I)rocluction of Cement Table II - East .;,..,lrican Ii~iports of Gerrlent
Table III - Value of Iil1ports of CeIl1ent - East oI-.l.frican Sub-rogion
Table IV
Table V
Table VI- Bxports
or
.East ..,..,fricEi11 Produced Cernent - East ...~f·rical1. Consull1·}~ tioll of Gelnent - TotalPer Capita Cerl1ent C011SUinption -
East ~~frican Sub--region
Explanatory NQ.tes
The
countries covere~ by' th~ re~ort areBurundi,
Ethiopia~ICen;ra.9 ~1adag'ascar? rIalalfli9 Ivlauritius9 illlode~3ia, Rwandaj Somalia? Tarlzania9 Ugarida,' Zalnbia ·as '''~lTell as COllIore9 French Somaliland, Reunion and Seychelles.
( ' .
T11e following' ,sym'ools have been use in the tables~-
, indicates that data is not available
.... \. ..
.. ,indica-ces that Hamount': is nil or Tlegl·igi·ble.
Re'feie11C"e'S ·to .t~tons'~ .indic.a.te limetric tons i and "'dollarsif
to nUS clollarsH unless other'V'Tise speclfied.
'(.u)
L
E/Gl~.14/IrI.R/84
1.
light on the broad characteristics of the Duilding materials industry in Africa. Ttii th fe1'J indi 'vidual 'excer'tians t11ese could be summarized as followsg-
a serleral inadequacy of local prod.l.lction wi th a rapidly expanding total de~and;
an im0alance in
the
sub-re~ional ~attern of production and c011swnption of ke;y-'building mat?rials such as cenlellt and wood proq1;lcts;an allnost total absence of industries prod..ueing elect:ri- cal and sanitary equi~pment9 sheet glass, and in e.;'enera;l iron and st'eel products 9
a COYilpBratively' higb. cost of local i rocluction due to lilditations iinposed by factors suc11 as tb.e u.neconomic scale of 0l;erations9 t118 laclc of technical and manager- ial s~~ills arld tIle use of ine.l.ficient or outdated
~~roductionplantsj
a hea-v;y dependence on in1ports fralTl o-utside tIle con'tinent 9 a lilI1i tecl 8C01J8 of inter-.Africa11 trade even for com- modi ties for which individual sub-regions showed a balance of export~
a lack of long-terrIl probramlnes for the development of' the local production of building materials and
components.
2. The anl1.u,al consurlllJtion of b'uilding materials and components for the continent (excluding South Africa) in the early sixties was estimated by the secretariat to be of the order of over one billion
11
The Building Materials Industry in Africa; Present Structure and Future Growth.EeA,
Addis Ababa1964
E/CI\f.14!INFt/84 Page 2
dollars of which the imports component was about 600 million dollars.
In addi tion7 the price of iLl.orted buildiiig'-'rnaterials and COlil})Onents delivered to Africa is cOllsidera blyhigher th-an
tb.e
price at the country of origin. 11hen i t is realiz;ed tllatan investlnentequi valent to a fraction of the amount s~ent annually O~ imports of building materials and cornponents on the expansion of the Qomestic building material industries WQv..ld lead to cOrJ.siderable savirv~s in foreign currency - badly needed for other lJroducti v·e investmen~s - and tc reduction of price~ ofbu~lding materials9 then the problem of the develoI.. ine.nt of the industry in Africa fOT 1rJhic11 the resources are available will be placed in its prop~r perspective.3~ The priorities set for im~ort substitution in the field of the building materials industry' revolve aroG~nd t:he tliree L[lost essential building materials~ viz., iron and steel products, wo6dproducts, and cement. The share of cement of the total value of imports of building and constructiorl Inateri&l i11 Africa fluctuated at about lo%,-in the
ear~y sixties. There is 21il1Jle scope to redu::=;e this s11are to a relatively insignificant level ~"fit11in tb.e r.l.ext decade.
4~ Attempts at practical solutions to the o~erall continental imJ:ort substitution requirelllent could best be approache-d through a closer exarl1inatio:n of specific materic.ls in. specific sub-regions.
5.
The followirib chapters deal with the proble~~ and prospects of the cement and allied industrie:::; in the East African Sub-region in the recent past9 present and the decade ending in1975.
E/ CI\f.14,/II~R/84
~
Ta,bl'e
1;;1
PI"o-v~des c~ata of the gro~'ltbtrend:
of irnlJorts oftrend is dominated the v&riaLions 'in the imports of a feWc9u~t~ies9
notably those of Kenya,9 Rl'l8(le sia and III t118se COl..}..nt rie s] tl16 value of imports increased steadily until
1958,
Table 1.1 Value of ImpJrts of COGILlodities fOl'-' ConstrlJ.ction Purposes East African Sub·-reg~i.on IV3~1963
Val~e in Million dollars
Country
1953 1954 1955 1956 19:37 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962
L96_~Ethiopia I{enya
lViaur'i t i us
Somalia])
Tanzania Uganda Burundi 'iRwanda
J
2.1
14.8 806 3.6 0.7
7,:2
207
18 .. 7
806
5~6
0·7
7..1
3·0 19·4
1004509
1.1
1.03c4
21,,0
lO\~ ~
12.8
7ttO
1 ..
6 11·9
6·,·31~0,/
11.1
4·1
10·4
2·9
11.2
5-9 2.1
..., f"', 1 , / · 1 - - · - ' - <.>. ./
--: Ir-~ 1
_L :::..;,.L
7~d
~~a1awi )
~hOd~sia
....•..•.LJarnbla " .
or,\...,.1
Others~ Reurlion eomore) Fr. Somali-
land9 Seychelles 5~2
S6rif6~: N~~i6hal Statistics
II' l 1Iti• •
3
.:../r::.6.7
i/
Until 1960~ d.ata r-~'fer to fOTHler Italia.TI SOlnalilanci. 0111y'Q In19
9 'val'ue of imports of building materials of ,former British SOlnalilarHl amOu11tecl to :1P558)OOO;of 1ihich ceme11t accounted or $1089000,.
y
Cornbined val'lle of the inl~>orts of Rllodesia 8rJ.d LJalll'o1a 0E/lcrr.14!INR/84
Page
4
after which a change appears to have taken place that characterized the next period (1958-1963) as one of continuous declil'1es i l l the value of irnports. Altho·':u€,'h·'not tc tr18 t"al~le e}:t·er.t9 tlle saHle trend is also noticeable in. tlle cases of ') Iranzania9 B'urundl9 RVJ8.11da9 and.
}:Iadagasc8.r. On t11e other hand.9 the trend in tile 'values of im~ports of Ethiol)ia, I<[auri tius and SOIlla1ia ha·s been orJ,e of steady i:1.crea-se.
7 ·
The precise reasons uYld.erlying the diilerL,811t trends olJserved abo've 'HOl-1Id pr.Jbably differ c~nsid8rably fLOil1 0118 sr:8cific case to the other but on the whole thB two fundame a1 and dominating fa~tors shap- ing the su:;ply struc·tuTe· of b1.J.ilding' lna-cerials are the tTencls irl t:he level of the D"J..ilcling 5.Yld construction indlj.str~y orl tlle one hal"ld and thegrowth of the domestic b~ilding m~terials industries on the other.
8.
T118 availa-ble ·statistic"al data or~· the output an·d elllpl.oY~le11t.of the building and constructiob industrie§ of thG couhtries of the su_b-resiol""l cOl1~-"irll1 tl1C1t rerl1arl::2.o1e and consiste11t gro~~Jths vIer8 observed for almost all countries u~ to
1958.
Subse ntlY9 hOWBver9 two di- vergent trends too~ place. ~rhile tl18 out;JL.t of the buildin6 and con- struction irldustries of SOGl2 cO:J.ntries fell 9 ·:~llose of t118 relnain,ing countries showed in r1Gral •9·
l~otaule EL"long the cOLultries fs.l1ing i l l tb.e first g'roup are Kenya, r1ala~vi9 11rlolGsia, TJ.~3ncia and Zani-oia. li'rOll11958,
tb.e -buildi11G and C011struction inuustry ~o.T(:!S not as pros::'erous as i t was in previous years. In fact a serie$ of sllarp drops 110\/8 Gharo.cterised the industryi l l each successive year. In Kenya t118 contribution of' the industry· to
gross capital formation fell from a peak of
£15
millionin1957
to £l~m.in 1960, ;~9m. in 1961) b::7m. in 1962 and ;f:5ril. in 1963. ErJ.1p1oyment irl the ·ini.lustr~l a.l~:;·ofel1-..frorl1 20,931 in
1958
to 12,624
in 1962"The SatHe tre.nd,
b.a·s."
also bee11 follc)1ved in U~;a11da··~ althougl1 not at thesame level or rate. The contribution of the
inaustry
to gro~s~cRpital formation fell fran1 a lJealc of£9.9m.
in 19~)8 to S~6.6iH. i·n··1962. In the.three countries of r.Calawi, ·Rho(lesia and iJanlbia? tllere has· been a sub- stantial fall in the value of output of the buildinG an~ construction
industr~y in eV;:;I'J' successive :)Tear siY1Ce 19)8? v'Jhich vIas a peak: year
I ...
.1 lllillio:q,_ In t :L~eriocl1.9.5:i~--~962.~ el~J~,loynlent PlJ.~t....
1.P
.1llQ.l).e.y.:te.+~c~ls .sto.Qcl.,at tl;te?2lT18 -~Tallle: of i;~~56nl~11io11in both the... , '- ..:M..- ,--- ··- •• 1 "~, :t.•.~.'"'.., e..-~•.. '__ "" .:,~.,,"'•.~~.,":" ~~. ·r~:."" '..•. """ .." "~of ' __ _ _- . ..."",,~.,."",'" _". • __ ~.:'._ . • •
refere~t:.ce Jrears0 '~Fhe
19
o:Ylllent 1e'7el(170
,_~Oo)- "las 257~' and62%
a~)ove that of
1)54
ar.Ld1962
respectively. The trend. of declil18 con--~butthe influs-try re·g'is·tere0. reco~ver:y.-i..:n. i<ilHi~ui.a in. 19b3 ..f.ox.. the...ii.rs.t tilile since
19
Irl'tl1is ;lear~ t'l1e contribution of thei11dustr;y to GDP10Q Examples of .countries falling in the second group are Ethioria9 I·Iauriti·us9 Sornalia 'ranza11ia. 111 tl'l8se cases, _~istinc~ deviations
or sharp ch2n~es are not discernable? as in the case of the first grou~.
The general trend has usen one of steady growth or
minor
fluctuations in the activity of tIle 1Juil industry. In Ethiopia9 data on new -buildiniS'S COInlJleted'irl Addis -,~lJa"ua indicc~-Ce all increase of a'bout 700;~in building' acti'vity irL
1963
over that of19)<:3.
Eruplo,)TLlent in the-building' and const:euctiOD,inclust ry illra~"lza:Gia shovJe d l.liD.Or flUC:tuations in the late fifties, but a cODbideraule incrs2se is noted in the early
sixties. Ral>id and iYltensi v-e c
contruction sector in icu1ar. In
1961
gross out Gut of the private sector was£4.5
mi~llon and th2~ of the 1ublic sector was£7.6
million:72') 0 i 11
19 63 •
Tl"le i 1'1cLUSt ry also, ertjoyed.. renlar~ta.L)legrOi;qthin.IVJ.c,.uI·it~us • Its s}lare in gross capital formation increasein
1962.
11.
placed on the Qui1 8.lla constructiori. S :,ctor of the eCOY10iny at a g'i yen tiLle 1'J01.11cl also increase the sllare of illlports of buildi e-
rials
unless accompanied arl expansion of t11e dornestic bl:Lildil1g materials industryo This appears to have been the case in severalcountries referre~ to in the last paragraph whose buildlng and construc- tion incil.lstr,.j.8s n~ained trends of growth without significant changes in the 8trlJ~ctLlre of tl1eir -bl~i1cllllG' lneterials ir:dustries.
"' 'jI&-, _ I t t _ "
r-
1953-1963
I ,...
•
COuiltry Et11iopia I{enya
Ivlauriti us Somalia Tanzania
Ug'anda
Burundi Rwanda
1953 1955
19~)71959 1961 1963
--.
__
. .--.-..__
...:_-.._--~.--..:-._...--.-...3.8 4·4 4·7 3-7 5·0 6·5
10.2
12.2 10·5 8.3
6-97-7
6.7 8·5 7·3 8.3
10.1 10_46.8
11.1 11·5 10.2'10·9 9·4
7·0 7.7 9·,5 9·7 9·5 9·9
9·1 11.7 11.,6 11.6 10·9
6.8
9·9 12.7
U t I )Q ;-8.8 6.8 7.7
8.·4 7·0
11alali'Ji Rhodesia
~ambia Others~
Reunion, French SOTIlaliland;
Se~yc~l.e11e s
7·9
9-47·5
7·1
7-9
7-7
.6 8.0
7·3 7·3
Source~ Based OD tional Statistic:::; 2LYld -cf1J Yec:rbool( of Inter- national Trade St5tistics.
It is possi-ble to ,~'xt8nQ tIle saLle sLrgurnel1.t to the case of the OPI_'osite trend, i.e. 1'1hen t'he )ace of -bullding 'ancl constructio11 activit:{ slaclzel1.s, tl1erl it should be 1~)ossio18 to visu'alize a decl'ining share of illlports i11 total- national iiT1I:ort;3. '1'his lJOLlld be
l'leral, v-vhen the trend in total national iin~.ort2 is ',lo'~'JnWarCls as ~1ell. "Tri'is case is very likely to be similar to the case of
imports of buildi rnaterials ir: total [LJ.tional i
1 jl 11'1\''''' /(14
• 4/ l\1i./ 0 I
Pa,ge
7
s at a I)eriod and national itrr, arts 8.1-->e all i11creasirlg, 'Itll1.ich lL11Jll8s a s}lift i l l
SOl,lrCe s .
is from In}J~arts to' dOI1)estic
Tacle 1CI2 SlJpports the arg'UJ11ents r.'lXt fOI';'Jard in tIle last"
few ~aragraph~. It indica~es the sig~ificant es 'C1'lC1t
place in the S-Url)ly struct'ure of b',lildiYlg 111c,tarials in the Sll0-re 011
as a whole and in in~ividual' countri~s withi~ the dec 1
53-1963.
In Etiliopia, uritillS9 ;~[1arlzaDia ciY.l" ••'_ -, .. "
a..LSO l ascar and
t ri s re ste 1"ed ' ei the'r trerJ.ds of or stayed at CC)I:;C-Cal1t levels9 tilere vJereno
sharp changes in the period 1953-19630 'The occasional sharp changes that have tL~~;.ce11 plaoe9 e. g'. irl l\,J.21.uriti us9 Tanza11ia and Ugenda bet-.Jeen
1953
and1955
can only be attributea to s in priorit~r or relative emphasis placed on the buildi and construction sector in the economy.By and lal~g'e9 ho~Ve\ler~ tb.e a ~)sel1ce of noticea'ole declines in tIle share of building' fl1atsrials in total Ds·tional iur,orts i a tioD of an incr,3asi treTICl of the latter ·hC':LS i1l8 nt t t in ,a-bsolute vc~,ll.les, these cDuntries have baen relyin~ at an increas
needs of b~ilding materials.
rE.1 te OYl rts for tllsir
On the other hand 9 a distinct c~2nge in t S~1.a.r8 of building materials in total iilll·or-cs took: Ila,~~e ill ~(erlya,
and Zambi~ subse uent to
1958.
True the activit~y of tl1e blJ.ild- ing and conscru.-:;tion irldustr;)T also cornmenc<:d a dO-'d11"C'lard t'rend durins this I\eriod but so also did tlle value of total rl'a~tional idports. Never- tl'1s1ess') t118 decline in tb.e share of ii~l})Orts of b'Clilding Elaterial>.J can-construction activities alone. Adoitte' a relative slackening in the building' and COllstruGtion s·,;,;ctor could [laVe 'IJeen. a contri'Qutoi'\/ factor.
There could be little clOllOt9 hO':Je\:er9 tl1at tb.e trellcl o'bser-ved [l'/Vove reflects a chan~e in the supply structure of building materials9 that a shift itt 8111phasis frol'!l ilTII,orts to domestic s'upply took place iYl the period under consideration.
E/IC1J
.14/
IN11/84
Page
8
16(>
Th~s ch&ngs, so rronounced in t rase of tha above group of countries, 11as also in::Clu~:ncEd the sl:L:ppl~y struc'cu.re of Glle sl.lb- region as a who~e. ~fuerGas the regional average of the share of..
at this stag'e to CO{JCl-clde tey~tati-\rel,I that consicl.2 ble E.tCi_""'\TarlCe alJpears to have been Ii1ELJe in. the lE.te fifties in 8xpallding t118 dorndstic 'bll:~~Ld~
irlg Inaterials indu.stry in ttHJ sL~'b~regioll. af.,:; a 'WI10Ie but Hiore aptly in' t118 above me11tioned cO'c.lntries 1~articu13.rIy.
Ta'~Jle 1.3 rreserrts3,
clOluestic pr6duction~ irnj~)orts and. consl:un'\:,tior~ of tb.e rnain DuildiIlg materials cina COllllJonetlts irl t11e earl:ysi~xti ;~; (1 ;160-1963)tjand 11elps to sup~ort the abbve conclusion. It should9 however, ~G' appreci ted til.at t:he data i11 the tcible s:lould only ue cO::lsi,lered as sin1ple in- dicators9 in vie~v of the'fact tb.':-,.t irldllstJ~'i2.1 ~,I'odu8tion cia';~a are llot
~vailable for all 8ountri~s -L ..1e 8u1)- r e oJ:J.• of error
inevitale in this k:in,d of i mind in study-
of the f 110vli gBrteral ~bservations.
18.
It is noted tl1at the of -che -\;'2.1'...18 of iLL ,orts of the total value of dOluestic consdurtiol1 'das 49~o C3.round 1961-62. 1111i8 con- trasts strilzi~I,gly TtJit'h t::'lose of the ':lest D11c1 orial rlfrican sub-corres~ondinishare of
Africa was
estimated at 58~The c;J.veras8 for .4J..frica e~xGl".'d.irlc- 30uth in the early Si.xl;i
s.Y
Clearly, the0.1.-e'
was in tl1e orts
IJeriod.
regioTIs 1 where the
L ' ,
oO-7O'f() ii1 theS&111G
building materials irld~llstr~{ in the East .tifr'iean s'ub-reg"ion has reaclled a relc2ti vely significant level of developi~len1~.
y
lI'he B'uilding~ T~aterials Industry in Africa1 lIOU/~-lP!4
9 EGA, Addis Ababa)1964.
11ablc;
1.!3
.~:::~v~._g
.i.·~t~·o~~s _c1~__
J~;.~:.j2i"~"" ".-.:.l._~;~j.ll.~. c~·nd ~~:.()[i;Jt --l~LC -·S.::~... .__ ..._~_~?.!~j_:.-J:.S _~X~.~ CC~~=J-i:On811ts !'i11 tIle ·_j.~Qt ~~:fr,ica.n ~h;b-.T~(~:~·l-Qp.:ill th~ ~.]arl~- lIin,:)tUGll.Sixtie s "
---,--_._---~._---~---_._..-..
__
..~..~.~_•...---~"'-_...,..'_'~---- ....-.1t.,---...,.;o-_ _. _ _'. . "~,-",_ _~ " ,_ _~ = , , - , ,~•.,..., __
Total ]orn8stic Co:r18umption Im.ports
a r;
27
3""\ ,/jee.. j •c)
{~.0 12 1600
6·,5 51"
l2.e
5301 75 ....
~._. -'-70·9
1000
39 25·4
3.8 41
9033.4 IOO
3,,4C OY1SllL1P-
tioll
24.
Lt-73::
14.0
88
6.3 49
17.8 25
15·4- 61
5·5
59(million doilars) Dor;18stic
J\'Iatorial
~18ctric,:..j.l a:nd ;]Elrlita,ry' I~litt and }i'ixtures BuiJ
COIllellt
COITlerlt PrOGJ.1c ~
Iron E~1. I3ui ldi:nt., COLl .. orlents
I
ood PTodu.cts:.SY
Bricks5Tilo , other
Clay
Products)Glass---".---_
..._--.-~.--.- - -:uarry -Ls'
8.6
92
(r)
100
51 88 (r) 49
e.6
leO (r)
;:;OLLrcc,; f)0cret Com.: titE.ti 011
1· .
E/ C1J.14/IIITR/84 F'ag'e 10
arilple score fo...::' Tc=:;CLuciYlc, furthsr the slla~ce of i~~l_)01"'tS irl total con- s wnpti 0~~.l.. Tl.18 value of iLl.,orts v!~1ich f:3tood a\; a";Oli-t El-il~Lion dollars i the early sixties i~ still· significantly large~ However, it is encoursging to no
e
+ 0"ve r o~Oc;: 0+.... t ""l"c' ~."a u·y~..1..' 1'8-....---y>"u 1.J - 11. ...> Q,L.l •.1.":'V...lJ ...c;; ntecl the sll.are
..
steel lJuilding compon- clevelopmerlt.
Ylext stage of
It is, l~lOljleVGr~ tIle Gonsidera!,'le d8V31o~.ll1e:r.i.t that took place in the 'non-1Tletallic nlineral bl~t.ilding' rnaterial inctustries tb.at brought about the notable ch2nge in ~he supply structure 01 ~uilding materials
iY1 the sub-re wiLh~n the last decade~ The
eloll1e s t i c co nSUffilJti6r:-~ of non-rne-c8~11ic i[lille Tal lyui 1 di ng nia te rials ShQvlS
that the sllare of ~i'llrorts "V'JBS of tIle ordE;r of 3O'J~' at -the Inost. Th~s
is the lowest perc~nt
region of any buildi
sllare th2.t l1as BO ar "been reali:68cl in the
ponent illaterials within,the
0-r
itself ..21. and dOl!.~in.a11t role in
this developmellt. l TIle! Ta~L~i(l expansio-n tl1at toolc 1~,li::t,'J8 in tlli$ sector neels o~ cesent. tncl~di irJ.ter-T~er>ritorial t~Eillsfers, t.~.Le share of.
()8 in tr16 C1..01118Stic 'productioYl o f cement
27%.
While this r~pi~tion and rising costs.~
., 4-
eCL vO vvitIl a f311rln~cing'
220 Tt18 fo}_lovJij~~l'.~ c11Clpters preserlt tile proolems and. prospects of tb.e cement irldustry
irl
the "Cast~ifrican
Sut;-regiofl. Broad suggestions as to )ossi1Jle sho~T't-ter-m and long-term solutions are given for furthercon8ider,",~tibnand pl..:LrSl.lance. TIle GOllCl"usiol1s i~dicEte t11at tilere are tangible ~d~sibil ies to ensure the reco ry o~ the cement industry in the first for its :-further 81Cra.nsion ill the second st&g8.
" "
The
2 ')..)e Before dorIa Jar II~, 11.hoclasia \rIas 1:>:e only CerneJlt prOdl..l.cer within the sub~region. Eased on tl~le Coleen i3E(\~D st.one resources, to,ns t,ras set IIp in tl18 eal-.ly l',iYleteeIl tl/ven~ies.
a small kiln no~ exceeding an annual caraci of on, of 20,000 nning' of World War II, installed capaci in SlEt ~ias inci.e seLL to a0QUt 60,000 tons l-er anrlUlll. Irl additioD to t~he ciornesGic TodJ~lCtiOY1of
Rho~esia within th~s period9 a clinker gr~ ant Ha~3 also in operation at I'Tairobi 9 :Ke.nya... Ill,his V'Jas a small factor:{.~ vrhOS8 output went only a small way towards satisfying its potential markets. In addition to thes8 9 two s~all cement plan'cs were UT at Massawa and Dire Da~a in Ethiopia in the later part of the~0~rti~s. ,I11ile
one at jYlasf3a~'Ja vvas d,ismarltled soon after the end of the ,~ar1 the 0118
at Dire Da~~a has con,tirlued operations up to t ~~~'1'8 Se11t
24.
The main develol.~r~~~~nt of c;:;Jnen,t inclustry ') hO~Jeve,r,to awaittl18 end of ~J"orl(i~rar II and~ i t8rma~h. There were at the GXI)a.nsion of the in- q.Uf?try. lI'he st urgent of -chese -rdas the shortage e}cpc~rienc2din the supply of,C,;lT1SYlt illlIort\2d fran1 broacL. J~)=tensi""v8 reconstruction pro-
gralnrIles 1;J81"'e b':5 Her cernent
noma market let alone export to Africa. Another reason was the prevailing hi IJri s of iU.L ortecl cernent. 'Ehe se vve re no do ubt tL~e cOin_: e IIIJ!C; an(~L
re
rsuasi ve arg"urnent s"t'fhich prornpted actions frorll .Airical~ Governlnents9 t'lhich Eelsa at- tracted the atteniian of industrialists to t
of the situation.
"'rofi ta;Jle l"ossibilities
The ±-'irs-c rou~nd of \.levelo~lnents in the flost-VJar .period took~
plac~ i Rhode~ia ~i11d :~jthior)ia. Furt11er expansion of the existing',<?e- ,TIlent indu,stry was undertak:en. An annual prodrtccive G:::~paci oJ': 1 OC)? 000
tons 1\'as attained. i11 R11odesia9 w11ile in Ethiopia
the Pire
DaUB plantwas re\lived arld IJut into opera~ional order. 'J:he rota~y k~iln has an annual capacity of 309000 tons7 which could possibly be geared to pro- duce as rnuch as 40,000 tOY1S anrrually.
E/Cl~• 14/IIJ1~/84 Page 12
Tl18 11LOst. i Y~.Ge.nsi i l1Ct.LISt rj~ i Y1 +1- vile
factoT'y was set at :Eule. lTI
1951.
Subse uently~ the Rhodes cement industry expand~d 83 until it ~ceached its peale in1957
9'Has created some 20J:<:ln. frolTl So.lisbury. 'l'oday the .HllodesiancuilJ.ent
indlJ.stry has reached a tot;::;.l anrlu21 lJrOdUC1~iV'C~ capacitJr of 678,.000 ton,s], and ~scapa-ble of producinG a COl£li,Tenel:L8lv.e ranC)G of C81nent cY};.es. Its employment .figure arOUl1d
1960
W"a.s about 1,300.27·
The first C8lTl8Lt faotor;/ in iJanluia caIn·e i:ntooperation in1951.
This is tie Chi1anga Cement factory located at Shilanga a~ some 20 krn. souttl of Lusa}:<:2. The factor;y is -;~)a~3ed on t'~l::~ 8xtensi \/8 linle- stone deposits ofShimajal at 10 km from Chilan~a. It started produc-ity of
55,080
tons.In
1956
a second K~~ln J,j8S into operation, and increased.the tive cepacity of t factory oy 110,000 tons per annwn. Tod~y?Chilanga can be made to ~roauce 2009000 tOGS of ordinary portland ce- ment as \ilTell as C2 lJc...l':Ltlties of other es of C8ment9 e.g.
cenlen'C DC,. rllaSOncjr~l c,ell1ent. It :2ives
28.
Ef'forts ~LeveI rig tb.13 CCL~ent industry of l\lalavli started in1951,
llherl aelir.ll~er gTindiYl€~ l-1ar.Lt -~vas erected. at Blallt:yr·re. Theclinker WBS imporced from Rhod~sia. The-ent rprise too advantabB of the
25%
discount bn·trans~ort tariffs on the 1l . l e -"ev·er) sl:tita:.Jle.res8rve of liU18fJ ~Jere located at Cllalu6EL118 SOlT18 tile lJ~iasaland sa re8er'~\i"es. However9 tlle grinaing of the eli r corltin"ues to be clone at Blantyre. Irhe en11Jlo;/- rnent of tIle factor~y" is of ~'l1e orclsr of 3609 of lJ'1hicll a considera'ble
~iuarry si 'ce.
E/ 01\T .14/Il\TR/84 Page
13
29~ Cement productio'n in ascar 'Vias first started long before the war; however, the ind.ustry d.id~ not ha:ve 3. successf~ul history. The Ambeanie factory' near l'J~as'uga 1vas comrleted in
1932
9 and cement I)roduc- tion was started tn1934,
trle G<3ident ente~P!'ise known as "Ciments Vicant"; but alreCj.,q.y -by 19359 the cO;llpan~y 'rdD.S i.n. difficulty. It was' forced to close down due to difficl11 ties of mar~eting' and competi tion from importedcsment. It changed~pr~prietorsin1936
and for a few years after this it was a~le to operate somewhat continuously. Its peak production came about in1940,
after which? thecompaY)y
a.gain face"Ct new difficul ties., in partic~ularin so far as the supply of spare part..s were concerned. Up to1958
p:roduction vIas e.ithervery small or intermi tt·ent. However, at about this tirne~ poverllffient intervention'and'new
managelnenthelpecL
to rationalize the situation,and
:production has, been incre·asingin recent.. years. Under its present set-up and facilities, tIle factor:y~.canproduce .up to 50,000 tons per annum. Its employment figure a:r;-().und;1960
was360.
30. In
the threecountries
ofKenya,
Tanzani~ and Uganda, the first cement ·factory·to
emerge after the ~larwas that of the UgandaCement Industry·Ltd.
at~Terere.This took place in 1953, some twenty
years' after the -erectio'!1 of the clinl-cer grinding plant .at Nai:robi, whichfirs't
I)ro(luced cement in" the area. Considerable difficulties wereencountered in starting off the
factory.The available limestone re-
sources re'quired spec~al attention and careful tecllnical solutions.Th€ capacity of the fi.rst rotary:~iln 1~as of. the order of
50,000
tonsper annum·. In
1957
a second rotary lciln of the Lepel type was insta·l- led. Its rate.cl capa.~ity was of tIle order of 80, 000 tons per annWTl.:However, shoulcl tl18 need arise? the irerere :plant could ];,roduce up to 200,000 tons'Q.f C8Inent annuallyo
31. Over"' tb.e years reseatch and stucly have ·b~en pursued. 'I'he conversion of tl18 k:ilns to chc.rdoal firing was the result of such efforts at irilprovement. Beside·s a,rdinary
portland
'Jament, three types of special cement are also produced~ rapid hardeningcelnent,
low heat cement and sulphate resist.ing cernent. The Cluality of the limestoneE/ elJ
.14/
INRI8L~Page
14
deposit is particulDr1y suitable for the production of
low
heat cement, which is in particular dernand i l l darn 'building. The fact.ory employs some 620 workers and personnel.32. Me&nwhile in Kenya9 the British Standard Cement CQmpany was formed in
1951
fOl~ cne p-u.rJ,,-!ose of setting- up a cement factory. After a thoroug'l1 searc11 for raw mateT'ial resources of tb.8 ap~i;ropriate qua- Ii ty and ~.luerltit~y·9 t11~; final decision was macle to build a factory at Barnburi, some9
lern. noth of ~jIom0asa. The area has extensive deposi ts of coralstone and the neighbouring' hllls pro,ride good quality' shale.The first phase of t118 construction of the Bcunburi works was cornpleted in
1953
~vith the erc3ctioY1of
two vertical lz:ilns, designed for an annual output of over 10G,000 tons annually. A third Kiln'was added in1955,
and soon afterwards tTIO n10re.:ill1S were added. At the completion of these extensions irl
1958,
the total annual capacity 'Tflasoroug-llt up to 350,000 tons. In 19619 a sixth vertical l\:iln was added, and so today the total annual prod.uctfon c8pacityof the Bamburiworks stands at 400,000 tons. The considerlule success story of this enterprise is basedon
a far-siChte'u export d.ri ve. The company has set up an ex- tensi ve distribution netvJorlc. -Jith t1rlO sea vessels , and distribution ".and packaging plants in Mauritius, 'Reunion and Tanzani~, the c~mpany
'\ATas able to recLuc8 C0StS, a11d tn·~~s capture i.lnI-,ortE.in~ export markets.
The work:s proper offers 8Hlployment for sorne 420 workers and. personnel.
33.
})arallel vvit11 this ~LevelOplnent, the"E'ast' African Portland Cement Co. whicll v'lere tb.8 OWYlerS of the N2i=~bl)i-,clinker g-rinding plant, too1: decisions to atandon this enterprise and build a cement factory.And so in
1950
9 the l~t11i river 'factory \'J&8 CUic~2jlet'ecLat30
km. from Nairobi. This consis~Gedot-. an up-to-date rotary- l.':iln, but is based on the limestone de.~'osiuS of Sultan Haiinid, loce:te:a at 130 km. from the At11i River. Tllis invol"'"J"8S transport of 'th'e bulk of the raw material requirements. Ifhile the laeatioD of t.hefactory ap~>ears to have been justified by its' proxirl1ity to the, ilLOSt irrlj)Ortant market in Kenya, nevertheiess ·the recess,ji,en of t.l18 building' and Gonstruction industryE/eN o14/INR/84 ...
Page
15
since
1958
has' hit hard this enter:r:~rise0 Today? i t operates at a fraction of its capacity. It has an ernployment fig'ure of 200.34-
Basedop theqement factory at Albertville inCongo
(L~?)~a clinker grinding plant has been in operatiO!l at. Bujumbura in Burundi
sinc~ the turn of the fifties. This enterprise9 which has a capacity of prqduction of
ur
to 2°9°00 to!1S annually~ has9 however, operated intermittently since1960
1 ll1ainly due to interrupti9ns in clinker sup-ply
from Albertville, but also due to fall in demand for cement in Burundi.35·
.":..-'".
. Finally~ th.e Inost recent develof,fnents in the expansioIl of the industry are those that are tal(ing' place in ~thiopia and Tanzania.
In- ,8'0 .far' as· t11e' forme·r··is c·e·nce-rned·~·a···n·ew····cefiieJ:'lt···..·~:at3-to·ry was completed
:l'ii····Addi·sAbaba ':i.'Yi 1964;--"and
product'ion 'was siarted i.r1·~arlyi·965.;
The kiln .is. a rotary l~iln B-11d has a11 annual l?roducti "rv-e capaci -by of 60,000 tons. It employs 320 people. The liruestone deposits? however? are situated 200 km. from the fac~.?ry and po~.e transl)or~ and exp10itat,ion problems. Another factory of70
9000 tons ann'ual capacity is under construction at Massawafj the main Red Sea port of Ethioi.=ia. At the completion of this factory sometime in1966
the total annual productive eapaoity····of·"·Etlliol}ia would re"ach"170','OOO tons.···.. ··36.
In Tanzania9construction of a cement factory of a rated capacity of 1609000 tons per annum is scheduled to be completed towards tb.efi·rs·t
part of1966.
Thefactory
is loea-ted at Wazzo hills at30
krn.from' Dar...·es-Salaan1, and '.iill exploit the extensive coral limestone of the area. The exploi tation of the limestone ll1ight " 11olflever, prove some- what costly in thatt118 blasting and subsequent sorting of the needle- like coralstone formation would appear to irlvo1 ve considerable expendi- ture. The existing storage and pacJ:\:ing plant at Dar-es-'Salaam jetty is not
likely
'to be incorporated into the project.37-
Table 2.1 SUlTUllarises the evolution i11 tl1e s'u'b-region ofannual
capacities of installedcelnent plants. In. the decade1950-1960".
installed
capacity increased by about six times from 300,000 tons perE/eN .14/INR/84
Page 16 _
annum. By the 81'1d of
196 5,..
total installed capa.city v.louldh.av~ r€)ached nearly 2million
'tons 1;eran111Jffi.(""". " This is a far cry from tIle sit.l;i~tion.- ....of the sub-region in
th~ ";'~'ars
before the~Jar9
vJhen tlottal installed qa:pacid~\y.. vIas·only sli'g;ritl'y'more than 100,000 tons per annum. The1960
'r
installed ,.cap'aci'ty. of ·thesl1b.... reg'ion constituted just ~2'bro
of
thein.stalled capacityi'of Afri':c29 8xcluding S'outhAfrica, in tl'l8 same year.
This contrast.ed strik:iTlgly with the corrosl.Jondi11g' s11are of 'v'fest and Bq.1;J.atori-al AfriCa around 1960, Wllich l,'fere
7
a'nd. 14% respectively.Tab1~__
f_!_L,rrll.
e _fJYQ.l.~Y-."t_±-',<2-!}_. 0f ,~h?_~~..§.g~13nj~ ..I n!~US -~~.J]._ _t~ Eas~
AfricanSUb-re~oJl
Country
In~talled Capaciiy (tons)' ing-
1950 1955 '1960 1965
100,000 520,000
5
0 ,00090,O~O
678,000 200.,,000 200,000 55,000
528~OOO
5
0 ,0004°9°00 40,000 40,000
15
0,000470,000 5
0 ,dOO 50,000 90 ,000678
9000 200,000 200,000 228,00060,000
Ethiopia
I{enya Madaga-scar Malawi Rhodesia Uganda Zambia·
Total
110,000 318,000 873,0001,838,000
Source: SecTet-ari'at
38.
A noia~le ch2racteristic of indust~y- in the sub-region{._.'.;;-" °l,
ha-s been that' i t 11as to a very laTtse exterlt relied on slilall l)rodl.lctive units for' its" gro1Jtll. In the majority of cases? a cerne11t factory was laurlched wi
tIl.
a 1":il11 of ];;roducti.V8 capacit;)r cO'nsidera;Jly less than 100,000. This prefel.'e11Ce 111[aS especially L1arksd in t:tt$ -"...ioneer ·cement·industriesfJ e. • those of Ethiopia9 IVlada:_~ascar9 and Rhodesia. _.Tren9-s since
1955,
a~p~ar~ however, to incline towards units of at least 100,000 tons per annum. E\j-en iYl recent years~ small l..-lnits achieved11
Does not incl:l-1de l):roduction from rure'ly clinker D1il1irig' i-nstallations.y
Expected to be con1lJleted before the clOSE: of1965.
~~~i/ '~:1'.T.1/1
/Tl\T"R./..
·8·." ..I:.JI V.J_'. L.t .l..l..\,.L... Lt
Pag'8
17
notable SUCC8f3ses. This -~T2S t118 cc}_se ·vJitb. the successive "\Tertical r.cilns (prod'ucci'.Ie capacit~y of 50-5)~OOO tons per arlD.lL.s) i!.1stalled at the BaIIlDuri 'worl(s of he J3_,_itisll l?ortlaD.d. Cenlerlt COLl1pany.
390
Moreover9 what on the surface appe&r to be l&rge factori~Bare also') in fact 9 COIll!Jinations of slllall 1.11Jits. Conse(~~uent12t9 at tiDes' of falling sales, units could be closed down without too
incOn'Jetlience or finc:,J:'"lcial loss. The vertical >.:iln rroc,ess in arti'"'"
c~ular lends itself to this lcind of adapta'bilit~y. TvlO of the j,OL
...cement factories in the region (one in Rhodesia one in Kenya) use this typ~ of kiln.
The Lepel ty~e of rotary kiln, which used to be fabrica~ed
in South Afr~ca ~nder license., is tne other e of kiln widel used in the sU0-region. One reason for its choice i~ many C2ses i~ that sinall CalJaci units could be made to special sr8cificat on9 (j..eli- vered at relatively cheaper rices from South Africao These kilns do
not9 11oTvi8v'sT9 'have as largo B. delnandto as used to have in the
very recent ._
are based on IIp-to-date rotal"'yl\:ilns9 ~v:licb_ aI' e r to lL,ve the advan- ta0 8 of fuel econoil~. 30th the wet 2nd
41.
Ann,"llal l=TO Gio e r e Oli i'ronione country to the other with~n the region
in
early six~ies. The.~vva s bet11e e n 1,500-29500 tOllS i YJ t11e sahle had
proQ1.1Cti.vi r the lOI,JesT~. In .2Jarnbi Rhodesia and U6anda
production was in the range of 400-800 tons. The ave fO.T the region 1I.~S of the order of 5009 ldhich was
.1/3
of tb.e lOlJ8st ~'~UrOlJean prod."llC·-I:;i vitJT~4
1"")c:... In addition to low productivity the cement industry of
the
which accounts for a significant proportion o~ roll and or·erat- l.ng costs. 'The expatric:;.te re llirelnerlt of the ind'l.lstry is oftel1 not lilUited to 1~;rofessio1.1al ca.dres OYll,~T but also iDcll.ldes·awicle ·ra:Ylge ofr skilled labour and Sl{f·ervisory role. In general D.G ef' art b.as been
industriali·sta ('[1 T,h;~~ir ()1;j Lr~~itiativc3 or g'o'ver11lildl1ts
to ,..Jera'in local' staff. OYlly in (3.' f81"7 C2ses }lEL3 a s t a r t 'iJeen rnade i:n recerit ~years.
430 Tb.e of the C8l"l1ent ind.ustr~fJ nd l:articular13T tlle rate o.L· grolvth is -iJest measured
uy,.i·o~ion
trene_s. Tabler-J:/
providesthe da.ta on tIle tioD of cement in the period
1948-1963-
Domes- in the period1948-19
which ~n annual r2t~ of 6rowth of27.8%
was noted. Subs~~ue , however, the' t~e took the op~osite direc~
tiOTI9 aYld the st decli'l1,e in I)rocll,lction. Ijersis''Cedu11til
1963.
rhe annual rate of gl'o1t'Jth for the lEL3'0 clec&de(1953-1963)vJas
8_17~ vvhi~11 is th.u~ considerably lOvJer'44~ rrlle net regional ,t':icture is '0~lat tv ~here is excessive
11nused capaci In 196~ unused capaci o
'contrast9 in
1958
~ excess capaci was no more tha 1 Follo"Vling'ti6n has been falling in
1965
9 whilst in45·
The £ub-rs anal treD~ Doted a ted tl18tion of I{e n.hodesis. Z-l8.S en a6counting for a declining share 1 st i teen years9 while in the past this' s11are 'had' s·{ci\od 1rJiell.in the dOfninELtiD£, ]>"n,~~e of 70-90"169 in 1963 i t
fell
to68%.
The tase history of Rhodesian c~ment roduction reflects what was noted earliei for the ~egion as a whole. ~roductlon increased at a consi rabIe' pac89 and -cairled a 'cen-·fold increase in the perivd~lineo
In Kenya,
production inc:ceas8a. fo!;,rfold in the short4
year eriod~f 1954-19SB,
si~,' the trend' subse~uent to
1958
not domipated bya
sharp
decline. This tern is also reflected the relati ve c.~,cute-ness of unused capacity
in the
!
7 Se e . llnne x· .ft...countries. .Ihile that of K~enya irl
~/Cl-T •.14/IIJRj/84
19
1963 was 34~~-; of installed caIJacity-, tha.t of Rhodesia ~"1as o:f the order of
73%.
Yet only five yecrs earlier in19
, t h e unused capaci in the latter country had not xcee d l~ •Production trends in nUE!, 010 ~r reflected. se of Rh.oclesia. In t11e £'iVi:': ~yeE_rs
1933-19
,prOcl.'vlct:i,.011 i11creased sixfold2;n~reached,,~:t~..peak: in, 19583 su-bsec:tlelltl~Y9 unused CEtlJ&ci, rellto
-~ .
less tllan 5V}b of inf3'Ga11ed caJ:-aci {rile ste& decline tl1a.t came a'Uollt further incre8secL ti18 pr01JOrtion of unu_sed capacity to 72~:.;. ;3uch acute decline,s in I~,I'odu~ctions llave not occ-t-lred in. the rell1aining' pro- QllCer countries of tIle suo-re~:;iOli to
sharply. In Ethiopia9 produc~ionhas been steadily increasing ~t an ann"Llal rate of 101~:;9 particularl={ sinCea-001.1t 195,2. In 19 6;39 i t ;vJas operating at full capacityo Re ent trends in the production of the
daGasca~ Cement Plant indicte marked improv8@erits as well.
47 •
'1'0 s'wl1marize, the CGElen.t ill(iustr~/in th.8cGast African Sub- regiop has had dynamic ,~")~;ro"';,;, -t11 •-, By and 1 ? far-si~~htedriess9 con- fidence i:n ~,lre'Jfore s nd the success story of t i try. In most of" t~ne
C01.1ntries, Cie"vel
tSro"'voJth ::pe.ttern. It i;'"as 1l,8oilJ.ly the private sector 1-.rl1ich aCGounted i or the ole effort in this field in the majori of the countries of the su'-u-region. Besi __Les norni11al en\Joura~)erfle11t of the pri-vate sector9 the role of g0·verl1men.ts in this develoIIllent 118.8 11.ot 'been sig'nificant.
To~ay, however, in the situation of falling productions cLnCt- i~l Sl Y1g. .
to tlie situation on its own as w'ell'. l\je~'l markets
'costs that l1as evolved;) t118 i11clustry is looh:ing towards 6o-vernlnent for
m,arkets are sought9 nd there have 'ueen notalJle sucee ses ill some CE~ses
as will becorneevident froIlltb.e trade anal;ysis v:hich is dealt,J'i th in the next ch~pter~
.,- -r--r- ..L.J..l.
]Jurin~:) -che 1 af~t 2 n yea~s9 there have. been some sig'nificant rl,~8s i 11 t118 rt tr0de o~ Ghe suo-reglon.
clisCLlssed iLl the l=,revio1J.s C er9 is ref'leGte the struct"lLral charles that to ace in im art pattern;:;. Table
~l/
domonstratesl 'Cat \T81~/• >Jhilst the iJIL arts of the sut-reg-ion vIere rising' steadil,/ UT: to 1;
51
9 sese nd became either one of fluctuations or a or~du21 decline. The sU0-region's sha~e of im.vorts of total il.frican in1l=,oris9. e:x:clucliTlg SO~Lth 1~frica9 11as been falling' frorn Ci00'ut 20-25?~ i l l the eDrly fifties to some15-177
0 in the e 2rlJT sixties. trend in itself. i.s also t.:'"LLC'.r-,+V l~Otal Africa!'l iUlports have elso been declining vlitl1in the l-Jeriod.49·
l~otab1ecie,:;lines in iIIlIJorts TIithi.n. the riodoccured in~hode3ia, Malawi, ~am0ia9 Kenya and :nda. T11is took place ma:i.,rily irl the late fifties. Toda~l9 im:orts to tl'lese countries are lil-~lited in g'?tlerctl to special t:y~.es of C8L1811t s"u.ch as al'w:linous9 nd colo'ured
CelTIellt s • corrtrast, Tanzania continued. to iEr:'ort considera~~le and
increasing uantitie of cement. 1'118 showed substantial tos of
car and 2thiopia n~7e not shown COD3istencY9 but their imports are in relative TIllS at considerably levels.
of ~e~errt to the suo-region have co~tinu~d to be the U.K. and France.
9. "but 011.8 ceme.nt
nlarl:~eus of IJlada,SE>scE:T? Reulllon 11CL French SOTIlalilEtnd. are allilost 8X- clu.sivelyorielTted to France. Though srnall,.other ,)oll11trios 3'J_C1:: as
Belgium, Congo (Leo.), UiiR, Ital;y, -Yugoslavia, have at one time or another accounted orcoYltinue to account for signific-;arlt eX.i:,orts. to
Eviclently, c-url-;ency ali2J11ITlents, bilateral trade acreedents'end otb.er siuilar fEi.c-cors are trIG "L1l1Clerlyillg COU.l"'ses ~'or t118 specific trade alisn- fflents 110ted a"bo\re0
17
See Annex IE/C1J
.14/IITR/84
Page 21Table:tl~proVides
data on the value of imports of·· cement to·the· 'sub-region by country for the p·eriod1953,'-196,3,
-whic~h further help to stress the significance and impact of the declining'trend inimpoi·ts·:·"'·al''I'e-adY·~''''·110ted,parti'c'ularly' insofa'r"'as-'"S-2ving'S' 'o·n"'··f·o"re·i·g.n _ _ _._-.- . currency exch~nge is concerned.
52
~,
The's'harpes t::":f'B:l'l ···±n···t·h·e· 'value" of' ilnl)Ortstoo'k':~'p'lace'in, ' . : i
....__....--_.... --. ICenya'.··"· '·The"·c"onsidera.le 'e-ipe-mii ttiTe"'-oT' 'over 3'lnillion"-dol-laT's' o-n ....im-·..-·..__ ··_·_··_·.._·, po~ts 01 cemerit in 1~53 f~ll to ~elow 5°°9°00 dollars iri
1958 and
toless tha'n 50,0'00 dol'lars i'n the e"arly sixties'. Silnilarly alsain Rhodesia' and .~ambia, vii th 'the difference that' i11 these countries, the fa-II in 'the va*lue of' impurts calne a-bout 111uch'":earli:er on t11an it did in
. .. ~
Ke'nya. 'In Uga'n'da alIso 9 the decline iri the va'l ue of iIIlporte was'
co'nsiderable •.
]'rom
"rierly2
million dutl rs in1953
i t fell to a mere 20,000 dollars' il1.19"63. By
const"rast in the other countries of t'he s·u-b-regi·on, the Gene'Tal t.rend in, -the vE:lue of imports "'01a-8 an. up,ward one. Nevertheless, tIle sub-ree..sional a·vel'c:. e has not "been infl'uenced by the latter irene.. to t118 Scdne extent that i t has -been by the former.The net decli~~:1 l10-wever9~'has not' been as
sharp
alihouttl 'it is' still impressive. In tb.8 ten ye ,rs u_nder consideration, the fall in the value of the s'ub-reg~ional ill11JOrt \Jas of the oT'der of4
Dlillion .dollars.53.
At the turn of the sixti s? the value of imports 0f foreign ce,ment and inter-teI~ritorial transfers repressnted only 10% of total African''i"ll1}5orts"~'-"'-'Yet-'-o-nly"c"'fe'w"yec:rr's ..'bc.ci:~9 thiS' s"hal-e-'~Ja-s""'c'on's'i'derably hitgher. The ~~ecline,in ~h,e share of the value of cement :import;sJf the.., "value
o"f' inlj;;o:tt..s·..
·o·f···b'ui·lding· arld 'const'ruction material's fO'I~ the··sub-..region as a whole is noticeable from Table3.l. ,Moreover, a m6reac- centuated decline has taken place in the share of the value of imports of· total national imports. 1J:11is share SL; nds at just :)VeT ~ t~oday r . for the· ·s'u:o-.regi'onas a v'Jhole. When considering t11e individ~ual,· cou~
tries, it is evident that a number .of them show corresponding percent-
~Ges higherihan :1%- But these are countries where either there is no domesticproduct:'ion (e.g .. Tanzania? Mauritius, Sorl1alia,e.tc·.)or else
doun~ries where the existing facilities for domestic production cannot cope with domestic demand adequa~ely
or efficiently (e.g. Madagascar).
17
See Annex I_E/C~T.14/IN1i./:84 Page 22
Country
.§1 :t-'ercenta~e
Share of the Value ofCement of the Value of Imports ---9..f Building' ~laterials
YPercenta~e
Share of the Value ofIm~or~s of Cement of Total National Imports
Ethiopia Kenya
~Jladaga$Qar.
JVlauri tius Somali, ; Tanzania Uganda Burundi RliJanda
I~alawi
Rhodesia
OtheTS6 Reunion .:>eyche~les, COf110re '}
Fre'nch Sornaliland Regional.
Average
1953 16
22 30
23 18 37 27
..
17,
17
1955
12
9 29 23
29.26 17
19
14
1957
~o
7 32
21 11
29
8
16
21
11
1959
20
0.7
22
24
10 226
2038
11
10
0.3
20
24
'817
31
10
11
0.4 13
22 12 22
31
10
1953 1955 0.6 0.5
2.21.4
2.0
2.5
1.6- '2.5 1.3 2.1
3. 33·1.
~~.6 2. 2
1957 0·5
0,7 ,2.4
2.4 1.1
3.• 3'0.7 1·3
2.0
1.0
19)9 0.7
0.1 1.8 2.4 0.]
2·5 0·5 1.4
1961
Q·5
1.8 2.8
9·7
2.1
2.7
0.8
0.6 1.4
2.2 1.2
1·5
Source: Based on
TableIII
(~nnex)54.
It would appear that the share of the value of cement.±n relation to total national inlports for t'ne 110n-produ_cing countY'l8S of the suu-reg'ion,ilt.any s~ecified tirne did. not exceed 35;~; in general, and as a rule varied betvl.~erl 2-37~. ~'lhile this represents one distinct pattern of :the. CSIU$n:t S11pply structure'} on the 0Ijrosite seale, the cor-respo-n;ding· ·perc.e,nta,:jt3 in effect falls to rti.l in th'ose countries: vJhere dornestic 'l~,rodu2tiorl has been au.equately de\Teloj;;ed.