Page
37
of the same planned,rate of grov-rtb. beyoYlcl tlle errd of tIle Plan Period can be accepted as reasoTI201e in the a0s~n6e of an alternative proposal.
In certain ,cases9 inc~.ea.~t.~g.._tl'l~§..~~...g~rQJtl..t.,h....~r~J....-!~~~S ~iJhi.cll_..&.r.edee.med ..--to be
• • .••.••• _ _ _ .. _.~__ •.•••.•• _ , • • . • • • • • • •"T".~:.0..;., _ . . .._ _- •..•~~ '" ...
on the·-·lo~v·,side..~..Gt.fte·r ..~l:l.e el~d of the Flan Period, I.:~~_n also be justified.
For exa-nlpl-e-9" ·the:···grovvth· ..·rc. te of the EthioI.ii&JJ...Pl::-an of-4.•·-J7~·-i,s lower than
·the···-target set by···t-b.e"·Unite--d--Na'ti'ons Develb'l~illent'-"necfa'ae"9'-'-~in;ich--'is'51~~~"'''-''
. Consequently after the 611.d of the Plan Period
(1967),
the lil'i11ilnUlTI annual rate of grolfltll of590
has been assuflled for tlJ.e period1967-1975.
A~ reassessrne'·nt.. of the I(enya DGvelol~j1l1erit 1-Ian is already ta,::cing';~place with -- ··cf:--· ..view ;·t-e:···iricTea:s'ing~,·...;-t·:~.e-' assUfi1ed 'grovrth
r a"te
t·(j'· 'soni'e "6%'~'....·.._··..
Th-:ls·:;:r;a·~-.e--·ria's
been assumed fortlie period
1970-1'975.
FirlallY9 for those countries9 which either ITave not ela'borated an ..e.GQnornic ...develol:)lllent plan or vlh:ere gr-owth rates ha-ve" 110t been CJ..uantified? tl'le rnini,.lUln rate of5.6%
set'bythe ,Utlite.d N'ations Develo;IIlent DelJade haf:3beenassUlned.
8~. Acco~ding to the estimation of Table
5.2,
the averabe compo~nded anhUalrate of ~'roliJtll'of tlle ~ast .African Sub-reg'ion as a 1'Jhole would be in ~he r~gioh of~9.2%, or a per capita ratebf
growth of 607%.These rates of' 2;rOvJth lllig}lt aj)pear to be on the hig11 side if cOlIlpared t.o· trends over th.e l:~~t· five years. Tiley are9 h01,v'ever? l011er than the rates of ;rowthnoted in earlier ye&~s within the sub-region, and are·more or less cOillpati~le to those noted for the whole period of
1948-1963
(see Tables4.1
and4.2).
It i~ also interesting to compare the rates of (.'Srovrth of C8luent I,.IonslliIll:tion ootc;.ined for the sub-region to those' corresponding to rapidly developing countries in other regions.Data
on
the total alld IJer cepita consuIllption of" C81118nt for I11dia, Brazil1 Greece9 and the USSR covering the period1950-1960
are sum~marized in Table 5-3 below.
E/
CI~.14/II~R/84 Page38
Table
5.3
Grovrbh of Cement ConsuLlJ;::tion in Selecte,d Co~tri~-;oftheiv-orld'~.. ~- ..,. -,.--'--_._~.-_.__
._---
~_.----Country Consurnption f000 tons AnnLlalRate of Growth
Per Capita Cons~rnp
tion Annual rate
of Growth
"195° 1960
19501960
India
2671 7717 11.2 7 18 9·9
Brazil 1780 4442 9.6 34 63 6·4
Greece -393
1571 14·9 52 191 13.9
10164 16.1
:..-''-~,:.
14.8
USSR 45270 53
211Source·~ "WorldCemerrt I\1arket in Figures
1913-1962"?
Gembureau~~
--87.
'Countries with a per capita COY1sulnption of cenlent withinthe
range of those observ~~c:_ in the c01.lntries of tl'18 su-b-region have .in....
creased\tlleir cons-urJf tion at annual rates of 10 to over 16%. vIith these qualifying remarks9 the estimates of expected demand of cement by,
1975
can be cOLsid.erecl'as t'easona.l)le assessments of tIle possi'ble expansiol1 of ooneum~ptions, wi tllin ti'le fralrle~vorl( of tl18 overall economic development of the su-O-region.'88.
A further valid argument that could justij'iaJJly 08 l:ut forward in this C011text is that there is arnple sccf,e for stimulating increased consumption of cernellt. In this rege rd9 t.b.e expallsiorl of tIle cement based- industries, and sutJstitl:ltion of otl:lCI' mel rials by Ccfil0-nt an.d cemant based pro~usts in oVGrall building a~d construct~onwould raise the relatiVG in-c3Dsi "\TJTI\.:SS of C0Givnt utilization. This aspc~Gt of thecoment r2Ld alliGd indu:3tri :s ;.lill bo tal<:Gn LJ.pag>gip latcr (see Chapter VI) G
89.
_~ comparison of total rrojected deInal1d for the sub-region, which would be of the order of3.5
million tons by1975
(~abla5.
2 ), and present(1965)
installed capacity within the sub-region, which is ofthe order
of1.8 million tons (Table 2.1), shows that
therewould be
a short fall of1.7
Inilliol"l tons by1975,
Tllis cOinput<_tion obviously asswnes tllSt t118 rresent installed capacity of tIle sub-region viill be fully utilized in1975.
This 1nib'ht 11.0t in practice be realized dueE/
C'N'.14!I111t/84 Page 39to one or another or a combinatfbn'~f reasons such as~ for example, uneconomic hau.?-at:?e ~ist~,nces ?etr'een.A,prod1},yi,pg, and n0l}Tproducing coun-tries. The e~~~mate
the minimwn Q~der the
shQr,t fallSl1ould~ tp.e+.efore, b.econsidered as
. .'..".~. '.. ~:~.. '..' .... ~.."~':. ". .~-~:'.::=-..,.._-.~~~;-~~:..~ . '.
cirCDclllstal1Ces. '~lithin the next decade present day installed C2i-iacit~I 'vJould have, to ,'be doubli~:a according'to ,t,he
projected estimate of demand in
1975.
Towards the realization of this$,oall) however, tl18 salie11t fa<Jtores governing' tl'le develo:IHnent of
the
industry lllUSt be exaJ:Lined.
E/CN.14/INR/84
Page
40 '.
CHAPTER VI J
Basic Con~~i~~!~~.~9ns__~E_,.the ,.8x~3,nsion of
the
Cement Ind~~trl in the Ea~i~A.f~.?:.b·an·Sub-region (a) Raw ~1ate.~~ial and Other Input Resources90. The
process in the manufacture of PortlandCement
involves burning a finely ground mixture containing calculated qu'an'tities of lime, silica, alumina and iron oxide at high temperature. The lime, which usuallyaccounts for approximately
80
per cent of t,he rnixture,may be obtained from limestone, chalk, coral, etc_, and the main source of the required silica, alumina and iron and oxide is shale or clay.91.
Limestone and clay are usually quarrried, ground and blende~j eitherby the wet process? which involves mixing in a
slurry
or by thedry
process, wherein the dry powders are blended. HoweverJ other variations in thedetails of processing occur, and semi-dry methods are occasionally used.
In these cases slurries of raw-mixture may be nedulized at about 11 to
15
per cent water content and ei tb.er fed in this state or dried and partly
calcined
on a moving grate through which the gases ofcombustion
are expelled.92.
The factor determining by and large between the wet and dry processes is the water content of the primary raw material. If the water content is high, the wet process is usually chosen. If the water content is very low, the dry process is preferred. Between these two extremities, there is nohard and fast
rule to decide between one processor the
other.In
thepast
the wet process was preferred because it produced more uniform cement than the dry process. This is no longer the case. Dry process equipment can be designed to produce cement which is homogeneous. The following major points enter in the final decision~ the wet process consumes 20 to25
per cent more fuel per ton than the dry process and very cheap fuel may favour the adoption of the wet processJ. conswnption of power is less(4-8
per cent) in the wet process~ initial fixed investment costs are about 10 per cent more in the dry process than in the wet process? and less dust is generallyreleased in the wet process. lI
11
Studies in ~conomics of IndustrY9 United Nations1963.
•
•
E/CN~14/INR/84 Page
41
93.
The sequence inthe
luanufactlITebf I'ortland" cement can be. summarized as follows. In ~he wet proce~s, the' wet ·mixtur~ is fed into a slightly sloping rotary kiln, fired at the' lower· and by pulverized coal (charcoal can also be used) or by oil or by gas. The· slurry passes .;throug'h three diff.erentstagE3s a.s it travels by g'ravity f:rom one end of the kiln to the o;ther1 ' first <the I.TI..qistur.e i·s~ d,riven. off.9 second the clay is dehydrated and thelimes.tone decomposes into c.ar"Q.on dioxi~o an~ StuicklimG; a.rt.d ~hird, the var·ious·cbi.emicals combine at white heat to form clinker. After c,ooling, the, clinker i-s .fine.Iy g'roU;Ild ,in mills, with the addition .,of some3-5
per c:e;nt. "of gy~p.s~~:;.to,cQn1;;:rol< .s,E(tting·, and thus become :~h~ or.dinary Portland cement..of·eo.m;merc~,,·whicp-. if? g;enerally .~xpedit~d in p.ap~r bags, but alsoin:bulkers'direc~ly,to
con&truotion
sites •. 94.
,cGeneraily"1.6
tons :ofl·iIIle'ston·e and0.3
tons':of cl.ay ':are requir,ed per ·t"011~of the'-"finishedproduct'.
'The transport'~problem.andcost .involved in . the''movement 6:r
suctl','bulk materialsis
'serious and considerable,' which iswhy' cement
is essentially 'a resource..Ltied commodity. Thedevelopment
of··the'·'~·iildusiry therefor·e "demands the·availability of these·:basic ,direct~;'11iatefials"i{l':adequate'quantities and of the a.opropriate quality. "By and