A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
E MANUELA C ALICETI
Perturbation theory for Schrödinger operators with complex potentials
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 42, n
o3 (1985), p. 235-251
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1985__42_3_235_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1985, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
235
Perturbation theory for Schrödinger operators
with complex potentials
Emanuela CALICETI
Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy
Vol. 42, n° 3, 1985, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. - A
complete analysis
for thespectral
andperturbation theory
of the dilated HamiltonianHg(0) = p2
+~e~B{0},
!
1m9 ~ Bo ~c/2,
isprovided.
Thepotential
V is dilationanalytic
andadmits two different limits a + , a_~ R
as |z| I
~oo, |arg z| 9o
andas I
-~00,
arg z -ao, respectively,
to which it converges suffi-ciently
fast. For a suitable range of the parameters g and0,
aspectral representation
for the resolvent isobtained,
in terms of aspectral family
of
projections,
for whichcompleteness
can beproved. Furthermore,
afunctional calculus is
developed
for a restricted class of functions definedon which
decay sufficiently rapidly
atinfinity.
RESUME. - On donne une
analyse complete
de la theoriespectrale
etde la theorie des
perturbations
pour Ie Hamiltonien dilateHg(e)
=p2
+ E~B{ 0}, ! 1~9! eo n/2.
Le
potentiel
Vestanalytique
pardilatation,
admet deux limites differentesa+,a_~ R quand |z| ~ ~, arg z | 03B80 et quand |z| I
~ ~, | arg z - 03C0| 03B80,respectivement,
et converge suffisamment vite vers ces limites. Pour undomaine convenable des
paramètres g
et0,
on obtient unerepresentation spectrale
de la resolvante en termes d’une famillespectrale
deprojecteurs
pour
lesquels
on peut montrer lacompletude.
En outre, ondeveloppe
uncalcul fonctionnel pour une classe restreinte de fonctions definies sur
qui
decroissent suffisamment vite a l’infini.l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - Vol. 42, 0246-0211 85/03/235/17/$ 3.70 cD Gauthier-Villars
1. INTRODUCTION
We consider the two channel
problem generated by
theSchrodinger operator = p2
+gV
inL2(1R), for g
E[RB {0}, involving
differentspacial asymptotics
as x ±00. Thepotential
V is assumed tosatisfy
the
following.
HYPOTHESIS 1.1. -
i ) V(x)
for each x Eii)
there exists8o E (O, ~/2)
such thatV(x)
is the restriction to ofa function
V(z) holomorphic
at least in theregion
and bounded in a
neighbourhood
of thepoint
z = 0.Moreover,
for each fixed 03B8 ~ Cwith |Im 03B8| 6o,
the function x ~ R ~ V(xe03B8) is of classiii)
there exist real numbers a- and a + , with a- 0 a + ,enjoying
the
following
property :for each
pair
of real numbers(j8i, 03B22) with 03B80, j = 1, 2, /31 03B22,
there exists s =
s(~8i, ~32)
such thatand
iv)
for any fixed 9with Im 8 ~ Bo
and
Remark. - The above
assumption
a-0 a +
isonly
made to fixideas,
but it is notrestrictive,
in the sense that the results obtained in Sec- tions 2 and 3 can be extended to the moregeneral
casea _ ~ a + , a _ , a + E ~,
with similar
arguments.
Example.
- A class ofpotentials satisfying Hypothesis
1.1 was firstanalyzed
in[4 ].
It wasproved
that the Borel sum of theRayleigh-Schro- dinger perturbation expansion
of any odd anharmonic oscillatorp2.+ x2
+/3x2k + 1, k - 1, 2,
..., is the limit of a sequence of resonancesde l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
in the standard sense of dilation
analyticity.
This was achievedby
meansof the
following family
ofapproximating potentials
and the
problem
was reduced to astability
result for theeigenvalues
ofthe dilated operator +
e03B8x2
+03B2e(2k+1)03B8/2x2k+1,
for 1m 0 >0,j8
>0,
with respect to thefamily
+ as a ~ 0. The interest of this class ofpotentials
lies in the fact thatthey
exhibit thetypical shape
of abarrier and the result shows how in some cases the so called
shape
reso-nances
[5 exist
in the standard sense of dilationanalyticity.
It is easy to check that thepotential Va
satisfiesHypothesis
1.1 for k > 2.The purpose of the present paper is to
give
acomplete spectral analysis
of the dilated differential operators ,
in
L 2(~),
on the domainD(H(g, 0))
= the usual Sobolev space.For 0 E
[R, H(g, 0)
isunitarily by equivalent
toH(g, 0),
via the dilation ope- ratorU(8)
definedby (U(8) f )(x)
=Since
V(x, 8)
is bounded andanalytic
in 8 in thestrip
by
standard arguments(see
e. g. Kato[9 ]), H(g, 8)
is aholomorphic family
of type A in
0, for 11m 0 ! 80.
Acomplete description
of0))
is
given
in thefollowing theorem,
whoseproof
is omitted since it is similar.
to the one
provided
in[4 ],
Theorem2 . 3,
for the caseTHEOREM 1. 2. -
Let ! Im 03B8| Bo
and g ERB { 0 }.
Thenny a slight abuse 0 notation we set, 03B80;
Since similar arguments
apply for g
0 and -80
Im 03B80, hereafter g
and 8 will be fixed so
that g
> 0 and 0 Im 880.
Acomplete scattering theory
for this kind ofproblem
in theself-adjoint
case has beendeveloped
in Davies-Simon
[6 ].
Our purpose is to check whether theSchrodinger
operators with
complex potentials Hg(0)
fit in thecategory
ofspectral
operators in the sense of Dunford-Schwartz[7 ].
It turns out that the operator
Hg(e)
is notspectral
and this is due to the fact that the norm of the resolventR(~,) - R(~,; Hg(9)) _ (~,
-it not
uniformly
bounded in ~,as ~, ~ I
~oo, ~,
in theregion R2
betweenthe two branches of
On the other
hand,
at least for aspectral
operator T of scalar type, T is similar to a normal operator, from which one can prove the uniform Vol. 42, n° 3-1985.boundedness
of R(~,) ~ I
in ,1 for dist(~, 6(T))
= const... In fact if T is anyspectral
operator,by
definition it satisfies such an estimate on the normof the resolvent. Nevertheless for the operator
Hg(0)
we can constructa
spectral family E( . )
which is notuniformly bounded,
but allows us todevelop
aspectral theory
which accomodates asuitably
restricted func- tional calculus.In
particular
it ispossible
to prove, first ofall, that,
for a sui-table choice of the parameters g and
(), 6d(Hg(e))
is a finite subset of C.Let
6d(Hg(9)) _ ~ ~.1,
...,~ }.
Then we can definespectral projections E(ð)
for bounded Borel subsets A ofC,
such that the resolventR(/.), ~
Eadmits the
following representation
where
r~
is a closed curveabout ~,~ containing
no otherpoint
ofo-(Hg(0)).
We can also
develop
a functional calculus for a class offunctions
defined on For any
such ~
we can defineso
that,
if weneglect
the contributiongiven by
theeigenvalue
part,Equa-
tion
( 1. 4)
reduces to( 1. 3)
for the function =(z - ~,) -1 (see
Theo-rem 3.3 and the
following remark).
To obtain these results we need tomake
asymptotic
estimates for thesolutions 03C6+ and ø -
of the differentialequation ~.6, which, together
with theirderivatives, decay
expo-nentially
fast at + oo and - oorespectively.
This in turn allows one tocontrol the behavior of their Wronskian
W(,1)
and of the resolventwhen H ~ I
~ oo . Inparticular
it turns outthat W(~,) ~ I
~ 0as H ~ I
~ oo,/). in the
region R2
betweenE +
and E-and,
since theprojections E(ð)
aredefined in terms and of the
functions ~ + ,
this causes the nonuniform boundedness of the
projections E(0).
However we can prove thatI ~1~2W(~) ~ I
-~ 0as ~, ~ I
~ oo, ~, ER2,
and this condition is sufficient toguarantee completeness
for theprojections
in the sense ofEquation (1.3) (see
Theorems 2. 8 and3.2).
The
problem
of thespectral theory
forSchrodinger operators
has also been consideredby
avariety
of authors[7] ] [2] ] [7] ] [8 ].
Thecomplex-
dilated
two-body Schrödinger operator,
whichcorresponds
to a Schro-dinger operator
withcomplex potential
on the half-line[0, 00),
has beentreated
extensively (see [7] and [8 ])
and itgives
rise to aspectral operator.
A similar result is obtained in
[2 ],
where ananalytic scattering theory
isdeveloped
for atwo-body Schrodinger operator -
A +V,
with V a dilationanalytic short-range
interaction. For a more recent discussion of two-Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
particle
systems, in the framework ofspectral
operators, when thepoten-
tial is theboundary
value of ananalytic function,
see also[77].
The situation is more
complicated
in theN-body
case, with N > 2.The
problem
has beenanalyzed
in Balslev[1 ].
He considers thecomplex-
dilated
many-body Schrodinger
operator anddecomposes
it on invariantsubspaces
associated with the «where
is any threshold and z is the dilation parameter, and isolatedspectral points.
In
particular
a uniform bound on the norm of the resolventR(/))
isobtained,
for ,1
varying
in astrip properly
contained in theregion
between two conse-cutive cuts and
E~2.
Such estimate is used to constructspectral
pro-jections
defined in terms of contourintegrals
of the resolventalong
suitablecurves
surrounding
each cutLIl’
but with empty intersection with the spectrum of the operator.A stronger result is obtained in our case :
completeness
for thespectral projections
isproved by
virtue of a uniform estimate on the scalarproducts ( R(~.) f, h ~
of the resolventfor ~, ~ I
~oo, ~,
ER2,
where the bounddepends
on
f and
h inCó(~),
but not on i~. Notice that here i~ can be taken as closeas we wish to any of the
cuts Z+
or L-. Moreover thespectral projections
are defined in terms of contour
integrals
of the resolventalong (and
notaround)
the essential spectrum ofHg(0).
For the
exposition
of the paper weclosely
follow the author’s doctoral thesis[3 ],
in which the casep2
+ V isconsidered,
withVM=(~+~~-")(~~~~+1)-~, a > 0, ~8>0,
Since most of the results can be
proved
with identical arguments,proofs
will be omitted whenever the reader can be referred to the
corresponding
theorems in
[3 ].
In Section 2 we obtain the above mentioned results about the discrete spectrum
ofHg(0)
and the behavior of the WronskianW(,1)
as a function of ,1.In Section 3 we
complete
thespectral analysis
of the dilated Hamilto- nianHg(0), by obtaining
aspectral representation
for the resolvent and thecompleteness
of theprojections E(iB),
in the sense ofEquation (1.3).
Finally
wedevelop
anoperational
calculus for functions defined onwhich
decay sufficiently
fast atinfinity.
2. SPECTRAL THEORY
FOR THE DILATED HAMILTONIANS
Fist of all let us introduce some notation.
For g
> 0 and 0 fixed with 0 Im 03B800,
letHg(0)
denote the operator definedby (1. 2)
with thepotential
Vsatisfying Hypothesis
1.1. SetVol. 42, n° 3-1985.
and
For any function u E
u’(x)
denotes the first derivative withrespect
to x.
Remark. 2014 The relevance of the
assumptions
on thepotential
V willbe stressed
along
the way asthey
are needed in theproofs
of the theorems.In
particular (iv)
isrequired
in Theorem 3.1 to prove the boundedness of thespectral
operatorsE(0) (see
also[7 ],
Theorem XX1.12,
where the sameassumption
is made to prove a similar result for the half-linecase
(0, oo ).).
The first part of our
analytic
work consists inmaking sufficiently
fineasymptotic
estimates of the solutions of theequation Hg(e)6 = ~,~,
tobe able to control the resolvent
In this context the
asymptotic relationship h(x)
as x ~ ± oo ismeant in the usual sense :
lim f (x)h(x) -1 - 1!
== 0.The first results in this direction are obtained in the
following lemma,
which extends to the whole real line the half-line case considered in Lemma XX.1.1 of[7].
Itsproof
isanalogous
to that of Corollaries 3.3 and 3 . 6 of[3] ] and
therefore will be omitted.with
0,
that is ~,= ~
+ Then theequation Hg(0)cr
= ~,6has a
solution ~+(~-,~+)
defined for(~~+)e(2014oo, +00)
xP,
with thefollowing properties :
i) ~u+)
is Cooin x, for,u+ eP;
ii) ,u + ) ,u + )
areanalytic
in ~+ for ~+ interior to P and continuous in ,u + for ,u + inP, -
oo x + oo .Moreover, ~+(~~+)
satisfies the
following asymptotic relationships
as x oo,
uniformly
for ,u +E P,
and alsoas ,u + ~ I
~ 00, ,u +E P,
uni-formly Furthermore,
for any a E IR there exists aconstant
Ka
such thatSimilarly
if we~u _ (~,)
=(~.
- withIm ~u _ >- 0,
thenx
P,
Annales de Henri Physique théorique
enjoying properties analogous
to(i )-(ii ),
with the o bvious modmcations,replacing
+ with - . Inparticular
for any a there exists a constantKa
such that
For ,1 e C let
W(,1)
denote the Wronskian of the twosolutions 03C6+ and 03C6-
of
Hg(0)7 = 03BB03C3,
described in Lemma2.1,
i. e.for any x E ( - oo, + oo ).
_Let
E~={z=~+~±~:0jcoo },
Let y denotethe
straight
line segment withendpoints
and Then the curvecan be
parametrized by
a one-to-one functionz(t),
defined for - oo t 00. ~ divides the
complex sphere
into tworegions R1
andR2 surrounding
thepoints
ofR1 (resp. R2)
in thepositive (resp.
negative)
sense ofcomplex
functiontheory.
The first results
concerning
the behaviour ofW(,1)
as a function of ,1are contained in the
following
PROPOSITION 2.2. -
W(/))
isanalytic
in ,1 for ~, in thecomplement
of and
approaches
continuous limitsW~(/)~)
andas ~, ~
~, ± ,
for any~. ±
fromR 1
andR2 respectively.
Moreover
W(/))
satisfies thefollowing asymptotic relationships
where sgn
(:c) =
+ 1, if x 2 0 and sgn(x) _ -
1, if x .Sketch of
theproof.
2014 Thefirst
statementimmediately
follows from Lemma 2.1. Inparticular
for we havewhere
/~+(~)
== lim/~+(~)
>_ 0. Similarexpressions
hold forW 1 (~)
and;
W2-(), for ~ 03A303BB~R1-,
with-()
= lim-(03BB) ~
0.The
proof
of(2.1)
and(2 . 2)
followsby retaining
the terms of0(03BB-1)
in the
asymptotic expansion for ~+(x,~+(/),)) and ~-(x,/~-(/))),
and theVol. 42, n" 3-1985.
terms
of0(~ ~)
in theasymptotic expansion
for their derivatives~c+(~))
and
~’_ (x, ~ _ (~,)).
We first obtain theleading
terms for theseexpansions
and then substitute these
expansions
into theexpression
forW(,1). Finally
we consider
W(,1)
in theregions R1
andR2.
Inparticular (2.1) corresponds
to
Equation (3 . 20)
in[3] ]
and can beproved following
the same steps.As for 2 we obtain
for
)~E R2, 1,1 sufficiently large. Using Cauchy’s
theorem andHypothesis
1.1the chanse of variables x ~
e03B8/2x
yieldsand
Now
(2.2) immediately
follows from(2.4)
and theidentity
We now start the
study
of thediscrete spectrum
ofHg(0).
As remarkedin the
Introduction, o~(Hg(0)) = E- uE+.
Ourgoal
is to show thatconsists of a finite number of
eigenvalues;
inparticular
we shallprove
that,
for suitable values of the parameters g and0, eigenvalues
canneither accumulate at oo nor at any
point
THEOREM 2.3. - With the
possible exception
of one valueof g
>0, independent
of0,
is a bounded subset of thecomplex plane,
i. e.there is no
sequence {03BBn}n~N
c withlim UJ =
oo.Proof
2014 As in[3 ],
Theorem3.12,
one canprove that
if03BB0 ~
then
~,o
E if andonly
ifW(,1o)
=0,
in which case~,o
Eand is a pole of the
resolventof Hg(03B8). Moreover if 03BB ~ 03A3- ~ 03A3+ and W(,1) i= 0,
the resolvent
R(~,; Hg(o)) _ (~, -
is anintegral operator
inL2(1R)
with
integral
kernelR(x,
y ;/))
definedby
More precisely
Annales de Physique théorique
Thus,
since6d( H~ ( () )) c ~ B ( ~ _ ~ ~ + ), W(/L)==0
for any/Le~(Hg(0)).
Therefore it suffices to prove that there exists go>
0, independent
of0,
such that for
all g ~
go, g >0,
and all () with 0 Im 000,
the ope- ratorHg(0)
satisfies the condition :W(~,) ~
0 for all ~,with 1,1 sufficiently large.
This follows
immediately
fromProposition 2.2,
sincewhere
c(g)
does notdepend
on 0 and vanishes for at most one valueof g
> 0.Remark. - From
2 . 2 W(03BB) - 3 ige03B8
sgn(1m 03BB)03BB-1/2c(g)
+- 1)
asH! I
~ wherec(g)
vanishes for at most one valueof g
> 0.As remarked
above,
in theproof
of Theorem2. 3,
for any g > 0 such that 0 we haveW(~,) ~
0 for all ,1with ~ ~, ~ sufficiently large.
Also notice thatW(,1)
~ 0as ~, ~ I
~oo, ~,
ER2,
and this prevents the operator frombeing spectral
in the sense of Dunford-Schwartz[7].
Inparticular
theresolvent
R(~,) - R(~, ; Hg(0))
is notuniformly
boundedas ~, ~ I
~oo, ~,
ER2,
for dist
(~,, o-(Hg(0))
= const. ; in factR(~,) ~
= oo.ÂeR2
This result is rather
surprising, since,
if operators are definedby
the same
potentials V:!:(x, 0)
restricted to(0, oo)
and( -
oo,0) respectively
with essential spectrum +
[0, (0),
their resolvents are bounded innorm on lines
parallel
to these half-lines. This situation isanalogous
tothe limit case with a- = a + on
(201400, oo),
when theregion R2 did appears.
However as
long
as a- ~ a +(non-limit case),
the two separate branches E-and 03A3+
of cause a sort ofpinching
ofeigenvalues,
which becomesmore and more
appreciable
aseither g or a + - a _ ~ I
gets smaller and smaller :R2
becomes more and more narrow, while is « com-pressed »
in it. So the number of zeros ofW(,1),
i. e. the number of discreteeigenvalues,
staysfinite,
butthey
alter the behaviour(in comparison
with its behaviour in
R1,
which is similar to theself-adjoint case), causing
its
decay
at oo.Nevertheless we shall be able to construct
spectral projections (not uniformly bounded)
and to provecompleteness,
in a sense that will be made moreprecise
below(see
Theorem3.2).
In order to obtain these results it is crucial thatW(~,) decays sufficiently slowly,
i. e.(see [3] Theorem 3.19,
and Theorem 2 . 7below).
On the other handif g
Vol. 42, n° 3-1985.
is a critical
value,
in the sense thatc(g)
=0,
then it is stillpossible
thatW(~,) ~
0for 1,1 I sufficiently large.
It suffices to find apositive integer n
such
that lim 03BBnW(03BB)| ~
0. However in this case we would obtain a.
weaker version of
completeness
for thespectral projections.
The worst case, of course, occurs
if,
for some valueof g > 0, W(,1)
vanishesto all orders. Then not
only
doescompleteness fail,
but alsoeigenvalues
accumulate at
infinity.
THEOREM 2 . 4. - There exists a
sequence {
gn + with lim gn = ~such that for
all g ~ gn, n ~ N, 6d(Hg(o))
is a finite subset of C for all 8 with 0 Im 03B80o.
Proof 2014 By
a standard dilationanalyticity
argument(see
e. g. Reed-Simon
[10 ]),
Im 8arg(z-ga_) 0 } u [R
andits
only possible
limitpoints
are and ga + . The assertion is obtainedfollowing
the steps of theproof
of Theorem 3.14 in[3 ].
Inparticular
wecan find a sequence gn
~
oo such that forall g ~
gn, n EN,
and all 8 with 0 Im 03B880,
for the operatorHg(0)
there is no accumulation ofeigenvalues
at the thresholds and Theproof
is thencomplete
if we combine this result with Theorem 2. 3.
In order to construct
spectral projections
forHg(0)
we need tostudy
the behaviour of the Wronskian
W(,1)
as ,1 -~ Inparticular
we shall prove
that,
for a suitable choice of theparameters g
and0, W(~,) approaches
non-zero limits as ,1 ~ fromR 1 qnd R2.
THEOREM 2 . 5. - The
sequence {gn}n~N ~ R+ obtained
in Theorem 2 . 4can be chosen so as to
satisfy
also thefollowing
condition :for every ~ 5~ gn, there exists
80)
such that for all 8 with 0 Im 03B8 there isr(o )
> 0enjoying
thefollowing property :
W ± (~,) ~
0 andW ± (~.) ~
0 for- ~ x
+ >0}
for all 8’ with Im 8 Im 0’ Im 0 +
r(o).
Proof
2014 See[3 ],
Theorem 3 .15.Remark. - In view of the above results we can select a sequence
{
gn withlim gn
= oo,satisfying
thefollowing
condition:for every g ~ gn,
N,
there exists03B8(g) ~ (0, 80)
such that for every fixed0i
with 0 Im81
there isr(0i)
> 0enjoying
thefollowing properties :
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
for all 8 with Im
61
Im 8 Im0i
+r(61).
In what follows we shall work with the operator
Hg(0)
where the para- meters g and 0 are chosen so that conditions(a)-(d )
hold., We shall now
study
the behaviour of the resolventR(~, ; Hg(0))
as ,1approaches
apoint
fromR 1
and We shall prove thatR(~, ; Hg(0))
admits continuous limits in the weak sense, in terms of which it will bepossible
to definespectral projections
and toprovide
aspectral representation
for the resolvent.Similar results hold for
W~(,1_)
andW2 (~, _ ),
~, _ Moreoveriii)
for eachpair
offunctions f, hE C( -
oo,(0)
which vanish outside abounded set, the limits
exist for and are
expressible by
the formulaswhere /~+ =
Hm(~-~+~)~>0
and,u _ _ (~, --- ga _ ee) 1 ~2,
> 0.Similarly,
for the limitsexist and are
expressible by
formulasanalogous
to(2. 7), (2. 8) replacing
+with 2014.
Vol.42,1~3-1985.
Proof
2014 Statement(i )
follows from Lemma 2 .1 andEquation (2 . 3).
(ii)
is a consequence ofProposition 2 . 2,
whereas(iii)
followsimmediately
from
(2. 5)
and(2. 6).
In the next theorem we obtain a
spectral representation
for the resolventin terms of
integrals
Let6d(Hg(o)) _ ~ ~,1,
...,~,n ~,
whereeach ~,~
is aneigenvalue
of finitemultiplicity
and apole
of the resolvent:let
rj
be a small circle centered at~.~,
which containes no othereigenvalue
of
Hg(0)
and such thatrj
n =1,
..., n.THEOREM 2 . 7. - Let
/LeCB7(Hg(0))
=p(Hg(o))
and let the circlesr~.
j =
1,
..., n, be chosen so thatthey
do not contain thepoint
~,. Then forthe resolvent
R(~, ; Hg(0))
we have thefollowing representation
for
all.f;
g ECo(~)~
whereRemark. 2014 Note that in the case
that ~,~
is asimple eigenvalue,
where
P~
is theprojection corresponding
to If~,~
is notsimple,
thenmay in
principle
contain anilpotent
part.The
integrals along E +
and E-appearing
in(2 . 9)
are in the directionof
increasing
and theintegral along 0393j defining
is taken in the counterclockwise
direction, j =1,
... , n.Proof
2014 See[3 ],
Theorem 3 .17.3. THE SPECTRAL PROJECTIONS AND THEIR COMPLETENESS
The next
goal
is to definespectral projections E(0)
on the bounded Borel subsets A in such a way thatAnnales de , l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique .
THEOREM 3.1. - and A- be bounded Borel subsets
of E+
and E-
respectively.
Then there exist bounded operatorsE(A+)
andE(A-)
onuniquely
determinedby
the formulasand
for
any f E Co(),
Moreover theoperator-valued
function
E( . )
defined on the bounded Borel subsets A of thecomplex plane by
defines a
spectral
measure in thefollowing
sense :for bounded Borel subsets
1B1
and1B2
ofC,
withAi
nd2
=~.
Furthermore the operator
E(1B)
satisfies thefollowing
conditions :iii)
for any two bounded Borel subsets ofC, O 1
andd2,
we haveE(d1 nA2)
=E(d1)E(d2).
Inparticular E(d)
is aprojection,
Proof
2014 See[3 ] :
the arguments of Theorems3 .18,
3 .19 and 3 . 20 canbe
applied by making
use ofHypothesis
1.1 to obtain similar results.In
particular
the boundedness of the operatorE(d)
can be shownfollowing
the
steps
of theproof
of Theorem 3 .18 of[3 ] ;
it is based on the fact that for some constant D > 000
where "
(03A6+~)( )
=Jo
o
> O. This in turn is achieved 0by comparing
£0+
with1>0
, defined 0by
Vol. 42, n° 3-1985.
00
By
Plancharel’s theoremI |2d )
::;(2n)1/21
h12
andby
Lemma 2 .1 0
Now
(3. 5) immediately
follows fromHypothesis
1.1(iv),
sinceWe can now prove the main result of this
section,
i. e. thecompleteness
for the
projections E(~),
in the sense of(3.1).
THEOREM 3.2. - The operator
Hg(0)
satisfies thefollowing equation
n
for all where
E(z) = E(~ga + eH, z~),
and
= {jc
+ga + ee : 0 _ ~- ~ -~+~}. Similarly
ford E(z)
is defined moreprecisely
below.Sketch
of the proof Proceeding
as in theproof
of Theorem 3 . 21 in[3]
we obtain
Let be an
increasing
sequence of compact subsetsofE+
such thatand o Since the function
nwN
Annales de Henri Poincare - Physique ’ theorique
is
absolutely
continuous on0 + ,
it defines a Borel measurey +
on eachsuch that
which does not
depend
00.Hence,
where the last
equality simply
defines theintegral (~ 2014 ~) -1 d ~ E(z) f, h ~ .
Similarly
we have ~+Now e assertion follows 1 we combine (2. 9) with (J.
We conclude this section
by introducing
a class of functions~ ,
definedon for which we can
develop
a functional calculus relative to the operatorHg(0).
The functional calculus for functions defined on the discrete part of the spectrum forHg(0)
reduces to that for a finite dimen- sionalmatrix,
since each discreteeigenvalue corresponds
to a finite dimen- sionalprojection (see
Kato[9 ]).
Therefore we shall not consider this part further. In order togeneralize
thespectral
theorem forself-adjoint
ope- rators, we shall show that witheach ~
E $’ we can associate a boundedoperator
~r(Hg(8))
on defined in terms of thespectral projections E(0).
In
particular
will beuniquely
determinedby
the formular
with
E(z)
theprojection-valued spectral family
of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2.Notice that this
representation
for the operator is of scalar type, in the sense of Dunford-Schwartz[7 ].
The class ~ will consist of functions for which the
right
hand side of(3 . 9)
defines a bounded bilinear form. Moreprecisely
Vol. 42, n° 3-1985.
THEOREM
3 . 3. - Foreach 03C8 ~ F
there exists a boundedoperator
inL2(1R), uniquely
determinedby
theEquation (3.9)
forall fl,
Moreover, ~ 0,
then
n~
in norm.Here ~ ~ ~ ~ !~
= sup! I for 03C8
E F.Proof.
2014 See[3 ],
Theorem 3 . 22.Remark. 2014 For fixed the function
~(z) = (z-i)-1
1belongs
to g- and the
corresponding
operator satisfies therelationship
where
R/~)= -(27cf)~(D
as in Theorem 2.1.rj
Moreover, by linearity, by differentiating
with respect to /) andby
theresolvent
equation,
we havethat, ifP(x 1,
...,xp)
is apolynomial
in x 1, ... , xpequal
to zero at ~1=~-2= .’ - thenP(R( ~31; Hg(8)), ... ,
+eigenvalue
part.Furthermore, if 03C8
is the F-norm limit of asequence {Pn}n~N
of suchpolynomials
thenn~
in norm. Hence it is natural todefine
by
thespectral integral.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This paper is based on the author’s doctoral thesis written at the Uni-
versity
ofVirginia.
The author wishes to express hergratitude
to Pro-fessor L. E. Thomas for his
guidance
and encouragement. It is apleasure
to thank Prof. E. Balslev for critical remarks and fruitful discussions.
[1] E. BALSLEV, Comm. Math. Phys., t. 52, 1977, p. 127-146.
[2] E. BALSLEV, J. Funct. Anal., t. 29, 1978, p. 375-396.
[3] E. CALICETI, Perturbation Theory for Schrödinger Operators with Complex Potentials.
Doctoral dissertation presented at the University of Virginia, Department of
Mathematics. August 1983.
[4] E. CALICETI, M. MAIOLI, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Section A (Physique Théorique),
t. XXXVIII, no. 2, 1983, p. 175-186.
[5] S. COLEMAN, The Uses of Instantons. Lectures delivered at the 1977 International School of Subnuclear Physics Ettore Majorana.
Annales,de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theonque "
[6] E. B. DAVIES, B. SIMON, Comm. Math. Phys., t. 63, 1978, p. 277-301.
[7] N. DUNFORD, J. T. SCHWARTZ, Linear Operators Part III. New York, Wiley-Inter- science, 1971.
[8] T. KATO, Math. Annal., t. 162, 1966, p. 258-279.
[9] T. KATO, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer 1966.
[10] M. REED, B. SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. IV, New York, Academic Press, 1978.
[11] C. VAN WINTER, J. Math. Anal. Appl., t. 94, 1983, p. 406-434.
( M anuscrit reçu Ie 15 février 1984)
revisee reçue ’ Ie 1er octobre 1984)
Vol. 42, n° 3-1985.