Onchocerciasis Control Prograntme in West Africa
Programnre de Lutte contre l'Onchocercose en Afrique de I'Ouest.
JOINT PROGRAMME COMMITTEE
Office of the Chairman
JPC .CCP
COMITE Bureau CONJOINT du Pr6sidentDU PROGRATTMEt
J JOINT PROGRAI'IME COMMITTEE
Seventh session
Accra 9-12 Decenber 1986
- to try to
enumerate a conparative and "acceptable" loss reviewof
losses occurringin
broadly sfuoilar progranmes requested by JPC6.JPCT .10
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
September 1986
facEor on the basis of a
or situations outside OCP, as
Provlslonal agenda item 9
MANAGEMENT SURVEY SI'MMARY
STOCK CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF AVIATION FUEL AND INSECTICIDE IN OCP
1 INTRODUCTION
Terus
of
reference1.1
In light of
the repeated concern expressed by both the lnternal and external auditors in the past, regardlng stock control and managementof
aviatlonfuel
and insectlcide, andfollowing
a
dlscusslonof
the matter by theJolnt
Prograrme Conmltteeat its
slxEh sesslon inDecember 1985, Director OCP requested WHO Adninlstrative Managenent (MGT)
ln
May 1986 to conduct a comprehensive surveyof
the situation andto
recommend practical and cost-effectivemeasures whlch could be taken by the Programme
to
overcoEe sorneof its
presentdlfficultles
i.nthls
area.Detailed terms
of
referencefor
the Management Survey lrere subsequently discussed between OCP and MGT and approved by Direct.or OCPot
29 May 1986, followlng thearrival
inOuagadougou
of
the MGT team.1.2.
Oblectlves and approachThree specific objectlves have been addressed:
- to
recommend Lnprovenentsto
the current recordlng systemfor
inventorlesof fuel
and insectlcides, so asto
quantify with eccuracy any given losses whlch tray occur;- to
recommend pragnatic measuresthat
could be taken by the Progranmeto
reduce suchlosses;
i This survey was carried out during the period 26 l4ay - 19 June 1986. Interviews were held wlth all OCP staff involved in the nanagement and control of fuel and lnsecticlde in
Ouagadougou, Bobo-Dioulasso and Bouak6, and all relevant reports, records and correspondence
relating to the subject were reviewed and analysed in detail. In order to gain first-hand experience and knowledge of the practical logistical condltions at field level, the MGT tean accompanied two helicopter pilots on actual treatment cycles ln the western zone. A wide
cross-sectlon of the fuel and lnsecticide caches rrere vislted, and the current nethods of data collection and recordlng were directly observed.
I
tI
JPCT .10 page 2
2. HISTORY AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES ALREADY TAKEN
2.1
Descriptlon of aerial oPerationsDuring 1985 over 6300 helicopter hours and 740 fixed-wing hours were flown. The highest monthly hours were in October (792 helicopter, 203 fixed-wlng), wiEh April being the lowest
(217 helicopter).
Because OCPts aerial operations are carried out over such a vast geographical area, supplies of fuel and insecticides must be stored in a large number of locations throughout
thl programmets operational zones. These locations, ca1led caches, are mostly open-air clearings, selected according to three principal criteria:
- close to the targeted spraying areas to minimize Ehe disEance the aircraft must ferry back and forth to refuel and reload lnsecticide;
- accessible to the trucks whtch replenish the caches;
- safe for both pilots and the local population durlng take-off and landing.
2.2 Losses
Table 1 presencs figures for reported losses of fuel and insecEicides for 1985.
The highly refined jet fuel used by OCP aircraft has an obvious attraction to the 1ocal population, which can use it in kerosene lanps and stoves. Less obvj-ous is the reason for lnsecticide theft. In fact the product most often stolen, B.t.H-14 (also known by the trade
name "Teknar"), an organic lnsecticide, Is taken not for its contenEs, but rather its container - a 50 1ltre plastic drum which can be washed and used for water storage.
IABLE
1.
REPORTED THEFTS AND OPERATIONAL LOSSES'
19851I *"r". also Eo paragraph 3.3 concerning "Thefts versus Losses".
2 US do1l"r figures in this report are calculated at $1 = CFA F 375
I
I
J
Thef t 0perational losses
Li t res
Cost2
(us$ ooo) Lit res
Cos t2 (us$ ooo)
Abate Teknar Chlorphoxim Permethrine Carbosulfan
Aviation fuel
2 343 12 530
100 75 25
52 258
29.0
57 .2
1 7
3
7
25.L
1 010 1 935
|
676L2.5 8.8
8
TOTAL 114.0 22.1
JPCT PaSe
10 3
)
2.3
Preventive measuresDocument JPC6.9 descrlbed several measures taken by OCP in recent years to mininlze pllferage and other losses. Among these were:
- creation of a Logistlcs Co nittee to review operational problems and recomftend lmproved procedures I
- neetings with Government officlals to enllst thelr actlve suPPort;
-
introductlonof
neld forms and an improved stock rePortlng systetr.In
addltlon, OCP has also ellmlnated cachesat
unguarded bushairstrlps to
reducelosses.
Butlt
has not been posslbleto
ellminate the useof
suchairstrips
altogetherr e.8.because
of
therefuelllng
requirenentsof
the flxed-wingalrcraft.
As apartial
ueasure,aerial
operatlonsstaff
renove the stocksof fuel
and lnsectlcide wherever possible fron soneof
these locatlons during the dry season, when the Turbo Thrushis
not used.As
far
as lnsectlcidels
concerned,B.t.
H-14 has gone through several changes 1nlts
formulatlon and four variatlonsin
container design slnceits
lntroductionln
1981. Eachtine,
however, the resulting contalner has become Doreattractlve to
potentlal thleves, 1.estronger and wtth better handles. OCP Eanagement has, as a
result,
nold requested the manufacturerof B.t.
H-14to
change the contalnerto
a less reusable form, such as those providedfor
the-other lnsectlcldes(thin netal,
easily dented when the contalnerIs
enPty,rustlng over tLme,
etc.).
To
lnhlbit
pllferage andtheft of
sroa11 quantitiesof fuel,
OCP has also introduced capswhlch require a special wrench
to open.
Local thieves have clrcumventedthis
control, however, by puncturing the druns with axe-type lnplenents, thus also renderlng the drums worthlessfor
future use.3.
CURRENT SITUATION: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS3.1
Cache placenent, and avlatlon loglsticsThe number and placenent
of
caches are, as noted, conEtantly betng reassessed and are determined on the basisof
several conslderat,ions, includlng operationalproxinlty,
safety and easeof
replenlshment.It
appears, however,that
the two nain reasonsfor
conslderlng clos!-ngor
relocatlngcaches have been
(a)
reportedthefts,
a.r?i-(U) an lnadequatefleet of
trucks ano/or drivers to regularly service and replenlsh more caches.In
both cases the trade-offto
closlng or movinga
cache w111 normally be an lncreasedhelLcopter ferrying-tLme
for fuel
andinsectlcide. In
the courseof thls
survey,Lt
was estltratedthat
the anountof tine
spent ferrylngfor fuel
and insectlclde was closeto
302 oftotal flight
hours,lf
the western and southern rout,es from Bobo-Dloulasso wererepresentative
of
the Programme as a who1e.Using a conservative estinate
of
25% of.total flight
tixoe spent ferrylngfor fuel
orlnsectlcide, annual expendltures on
fuel for
suchtrips
would beln
the range of:800 Oo0
x
0.25x
$0.4831 =
$96 OOo.Ferry flights for replenishment of fuel and insectlcide will always be necessary
irrespective of cache numbers and placenent. At the same time, cache numbers must be kept within reasonable limits for slnple logistical reasons. However, trost of the ferrying tine at present is not due to short.age of fuel caches, but rather due to llnitation of caches for insecticlde, where losses in general are smaller t.han for fuel.
I
\
1 Price per
lltre of
fue1, based on CFA F 36 000for
one druuof
200litres.
I
JPC7.10 page 4
As an illustration to the above argument, total reported thefts of B.t.H-1+1 in t98S
amounEed to $5:000 (82 of consumption), but as discussed below in paragraph 3'3, iE is hlghly probable thar at leasr one-third (31[) of this is not theft, but can be atEributed to a
number of other causes. If helicopter ferrying time could be reduced by, say, 3O7. by adding more insecticide caches aE strategic locations, then this wouldr aPart from factors such as
reduced pilot fatigue, etc., also lead to a reduction in expenditures in the order of
$96 000 x 3OZ, o. ippioxinaiely $ZA OOO in reduced fuel bills; to be traded off by a possible, but not certain, increase in losses of insecticide'
The practical lirnitations or placement of caches are, however, also dictated by the availabllity of trucks and drivers to service and regularly replenish the caches, as discussed ln the following paragraph.
3.2 Theft situatlon by cache, country and zone
When considering the thefts and losses presenEly occurrlng in the Programme, it is important to keep in nind Ehe extreme operational and logistical difficulties which OCP has to face. There are 140 fuel^and insecticide caches distributed throughout the oriSinal
programme area of 764 000 kmz, generally located alongside the river banks and ofEen in remote places; the supply 1lnes from ftur principal depots are long and difficult, and the annual consumption figuies are heavy, with approximately 800 000 lltres of aviation fuel and
400 000 lltres of various klnds of insectlcide''
A detailed analysis of thefts by cache, country and zone has shown that there are considerable variatitns in reported ltr"ft" among the caches and over time. Sone 20 caches
have accounted for two-thirds of the report.ed losses fron 1984 to April 1986. Seventeen of these locations are in C6te dtlvoire, the counEry whlch accounts for 757" of total reported thefts.
In Ehe example of Groumanla, C6te drlvoire, with the highest rePorted losses over time' almost three-quarters of the quantity ldas stolen in two separate months only, and in both cases a large number of druos were plnctured and emptied. The irregular pattern of, reported thefts complicates the survelllance of the caches for OCP and makes addltional preventive
measures difficult Eo determi-ne.
3.3
Thefts versus lossesThe current recording of aviation fuel losses fa1ls into four categories: (a) Ehefts, (b) leakages, (c) contamination, and (d) renainder in drums'
In the western zone, only L3.57. of the losses for 1985 were ascribed to Ehe operational losses (b), (c) and (d) in the above 1ist. The remainlng 86.57. vere attributed to theft'
The following posslble sources of genuine theft would appear to exist for aviation fuel:
- punctured drums (happens rarely' but vrhen it does w111 account for large quantities);
- pilferage of small anounts (nay happen more frequently);
- rheft of entire drums (frequency unknown);
- theft with collusion of OCPrs drivers (unknown, but possible in selected cases; could involve substantial quantities) ;
1 g.t.tt-14 is the only "atEracEive" insecticide due to the nature of the container.
2 A" fro, 1987, the operational area will be extended Eo cover 1 300 000 km2 with an
accompanying substantial increase in (a) rivers Eo be treated, (b) consumption of fuel and insecticide, and (e) number of caches.
a
_t
I
JPCT .10 page 5
t,
Fron MGTts own observations there are, however, also a nunber
of
lnstances where there would be operatlonal losses reported astheft
without actually
belng so, and these include:- pilot
omissionto
record consuoptlon data onFllght
Reports;1-
miscountlngof
reualnlng stock;1-
transcriptlon/arlthnetlcerror ln
recording systen;1-
unrecordedfuel
transfers between depots and cachesl-
drlvers lnadvertently collectingpartlally
fi11ed drunsfor
returnto
depoE;-
nisplacedor lost pilor
Fltght Reports.Using the lnsecticide Abate as a case
ln polnt,
where nelther the drum nor the content has any attractlon whatsoeverto
the outslde population,total
operatlonal lossesfor
1985Irere reported
to
be 37.of
consunptionfor
the western zone.It
would appear reasonableto
assume a broadlysimilar
loss-factorfor
avlatlon fuel (1.e.losses which can be attributedto
thelist of
factors as glven above, but which are today belng reported asthefts) of
around 3Z of. consumptlon.3.4
Replenlshnents and vehlcle fleetPlans are currently being nade
for
augnenting and strengthenlng the systenof
cachereplenishmenE
in
the Idestern operational area, once theaerlal
operations basels
moved froro Bobo-Dioulassoto
Odienn6,in
December 1986. Current planscall for flve
heavy-duty lorrlesand
five
drlversto
operatein
a rotational systemof
well-deflned delivery routes.Consideratlon should also be given
to
acquirlngat
least oneor
two four-wheel drivelorries
rather Ehan the current, conventional type, slncethls
would enable the Progranme to add cachesin
more remote, but operationally better placed locations-
Ehus reduclng further therisk of
losses dueto theft or
pllferage.A separate problen concerns control and accountability of OCPts drlvers, sLnce this is at Present a definite source of potentlal theft. Due to the reoote locatlons of nost caches there are at Present hardly any means of verifying that planned dellverles actually took place ln the prescribed quantitles.
Options which now should be considered in MGTrs vlew include a delivery conflrnation systen at locatlons where thls ls feaslbler e.g. ln caches located at OCPts sub-sector offices, as well as equipping the lorries with radio transmltters. In the latter case, the
driver would report over the radlo to the nearest sector or sub-sector office when dellverles have been made, which would enable at least spot-checks and selective fo1low-up, should a
need for this arise.
3.5
Recordi systemOCP nonitors its cache sit,uation at the Bobo-Dioulasso and l(ara zone offices through a nanual cardex fi1e, wlth one card for each cache, and dlfferent coloured cards for different products. The source for updatlng the consumptLon and stock figures on these cards are the
Pllotsr Dal1y Fllght Reports, which record the quantities of fuel and lnsectlclde taken at each landing, as well as the quantitles observed remaining at the cache at take-off.
Stock replenishnent figures are taken from the radio message instructions glven
e.g.
by Bobo-Dioulassoto
the depotsln
Bouak6 and Banako, plusr{ritten
iostructlonsfor
the drivers working fron Bobo-Dioulasso. As notedin
paragraph 3.4 above, there are no "receiving rePorts" from the sub-sectors or cachesto
confirm independentlythat
the correct shipments reached the correct cache.I
.t
1 Actually observed by MGT.
JPC7. IO
Page 6
i,lhen the remainlng balance aE the cache as reported in the F]ight Reports is less than the anount shown on th; cardex, the staff uember responsible will typically wait for
confirmation until a subsequeni visit to the same cache is made, before adjusting the cardex balance. At the end of Ehe uonth, when preparing the monthly report, however, the tendency has been to repori ".ry n"gatir" di".."p"n"i"" ai theft' excePt for minor differences which may be aEtributed to 1e"t"ge, leading io " g"r,..a1 overstateoent of thefts as dlscussed in paragraph 3.3 above, at least as far as the lilestern zone is concerned.
4. COMPARATIVE LOSSES IN OPERATIONS EXTERNAI TO OCP
In order Eo evaluage OCPrs perfornance in conrrolling its fuel and insecticide stocks, the Jolnt programme Qommittee expressed an int.erest at its slxth session in December 1985, to learn of the loss experience of broadly comparable proSraltrmes.
I I
4.L
Unlque sltuationIt ls difficult, J-f not impossible, to make direct comParisons between OCPrs stock control systen and that of any other Programme or operation' No other programme could be identified by MGT which requires the Lngiing logisrical support provided by the Programme's network of caches.
Several suggested comParisons were found to be inappropriate. For example, nilitary organizations oay use fuel drums during field exerclses, but these are short-terno acElvitles' and during the exercises the supply depots typically have Ehe benefit of armed guards'
AerLal croP sPraying operations do not cover such a wide terrltory and thus do not require the same extensive network of caches'
Chenical industry losses due to evaporatlon or spillage are not comparable because of the uore controlled condiEions of the oanufacturing facilitles'
4.2
Theretail
tradeIn developed economles iE is generally esEimated that an average equivalent of 5% of retail trade turnover is lost due to shopllftlng, employee theft, and accounting errors'
These losses, sonetimes called "shrinkagl", o"",r. in spite of increasingly sophisticated electronic securltY measures.
I{hile this reference to the retail trade may seem inappropriate, there are several logistical similarities to OCP:
- multiple outlets (i.e. caches) with differing "turnovers";
- replenishment of outlets frou a fer'' central depots;
- losses due to a mix of theft and operational losses'
Recognizing that Ehe cost of eliminating all losses is greater than the loss itself,
commercial operations typically incorporat" iti" "fact of life" into rheir budgeEs' Based on their experience, . .""Li.re for "shrinkage" is set up and monitored' and management takes
action only when Ehe losses aPpear to be increasing over the accepted norm' Another
interesting observation from the retailing industry is that 20-30% of reported "losses"-are attributed to various bookkeeping errors, i.e. Uroiaty similar to the experience found in
OCP - see ParagraPh 3.3.
lJhile it should be possible to reduce the risk of errors reported in OCP through irnproving the rnanual recording system, the experience of even modern computerized retall operations suggests thaL a certain margin of record-keeping error will remain'
4.3
Impllcations for OCPJ
Rather than analysing whether OCPts loss experience is above or below some external it would be more prl.ti."f to establish a itandard loss factor based on the Programmers norm,
JPC7.10 Page 7 own experience. Data reported in paragraph 2.2 fot 1985 indlcate that a range of
be adopted as initial norms for losses expressed as a Percentage of consunption.
this range ls in line with commerclal retail trade experience, as noEed above in
paragraph 4.2.
5-7% could Moreover,
,
!
gCP should, however, monitor whether i.t can reduce this norn over time through fuoproved selection of caches or other control techniques.
RECOI,O,TENDATIONS
5.1
Thefts and lossesIlonitoring
of thefts
and losses should be carried out on an ongoing basis andfor
each individual cache wlth trends and aggregates, rather than the current tronthly zone rePorts.Overall "permisslble" losses
for
aviationfuel
and B.t.H-14 insecticide,l.e. thefts
and operatlonal losses comblned, would appearto
MGTto
bein
the rangeof
5-72of
consumPtion, based on comparisonwith "sinilar"
operations externalto
OCP and on observationsof
the Programmets ownoperations. It is
suggestedthat,
as a general ru1e, exceptional, Preventive measures need not be undertakenat
any given cacheIf
the overall losses are within this broad thresholdfor
any given l2-nonth period.The summary monthly stock situation reporting should be nodlfied
to reflect
the above-mentioned operational losses and thresholds, aswell
as Provlde relevant conParatlve data on past exPerience.5.2 Cache placenent and aviation logistics
The nuuber of caches, and especially insecticide caches, should not be reduced in response to theft, if Ehe consequence would be an offsetting increase in aircraft-ferrying time.
5.3 Replenishnents and vehlcle fleet
Consl-deratlon should be given
to
acquiring oneor
two four-wheel-drivelorrles to
the western zonein
orderto
enable the Programmeto
posltton cachesin
operationally better locations-
closerto river
banks and less susceptlbleto
losses dueto theft ot
pllferage.Ihe Progra q'e should implement a
rotational
systemof drlver delitery
rour-e-s (proposedfor
Odienn6) and take additional Eeasures t.overify
deliveryif
a correlarion aPpears toexist
between a particulardriver
and reported losses.Wherever possible, OCP should arrange
for
independentverification of
deliveries to caches(e.g.
caches positioned near OCP sub-sectorofflces,
or where locaI authorities arewilling to assist).
As a compensating controlfor
caches wherethls ls
not feasible, conslderation should be givento
equipplnglorries
withradios.
Upon deIlvery, the drlver would radio the nearest secEoror
sub-sectoroffice,
thus enabling spot-checks and follow-up where necessary.5.4
Recording systemThe monthly tables prepared by the western zone should be modified to also report beginning sEock balances. Standardized forms, wlth the names of the cache locations already printed, should be used similar to the Practice in Kara.
The measurement for fuel should be to the nearest 10 litres. For insecticldes, drums could alternatively be used as the unit of measuretnent.
The Responsible Officer for Aerial OperaEions should be involved in the development of the stock control system to confirm thaE adequate details are being recorded to suPport
future analyses of che logistics systern.
ri-
\
Tc1
(O
,
t
MANAGEMENT SURVEY REPORT NO. 188
SUMMARY
STOCK CONTROL AND MANAGE},IENT OF AVIATION FUEL AND INSECTICIDE IN OCP
August 1986
,
I
t
I
INTRODUCTIONI
I
Termsof
ReferenceIn light of rhe
repeated concern expressed byboth the internal
andexternal
audiEorsin fhe past
regardingstock control
and management of aviaEionfuel
andinsectici-de,
andfollowing a
discussionof the
matterby fhe Joinf
Programme CornmiEtee aEthelr sixth
sessionin
December1985'
Director
OCP requested I"IGTin
May 1986to
conducta
comprehensi,vesurvey
of the siEuation
andto
recommendpractical
andcost-effective
measures which could be taken
by the
Programmeto
overcome someof its
presentdifficulties in this
area.Detailed
termsof
referencefor the
Management Survey were discussed between OCP and MGT and approved by DirecEor OCP 1986,following the arrival in
Ouagadougouof the
MGT team.subsequently on 29 May
12
Ob.j ectives and ApproachThree
specific
objectives
have been addressed:Eo recommend improvements
to the current
recordlng systemfor inventories of fuel
andinsect.icides,
so asto quantify
with accuracy anygiven
losses which may occur;could be taken by the
to
recommend pragmaEic measures thatProgramme
to
reduce such losses;- to
Ery Eo enumeratea
comparative and t'acceptablettloss factor
onthe basis of a
reviewof
lossesoccurring in
broadlysinilar
prograumes
or situations outside
OCp, as requested by JpCl6.This
survey wascarrled out during the period
26 t{,ayto
19 June 19g6.Interviews
wereheld with all
OCPstaff involved in the
management andcontrol of fuel
andinsecticide in
ouagadougou, Bobo-Diolasso andBouak6, and
all relevant reports,
records and correspondencerelating
tothe subject
were reviewed and analysedin detail. rn order
Eo gainfirst-hand
experience and knowledgeof the practical logistical conditions at fierd level, the
MGT tean accompanied two helicopt.erpilots
onactual
t.reatmentcycles in the
r^restern zoneo
A widecross-section
of the fuel
andinsecticide
t'cachestt werevisited,
and thecurrent
meEhodsof data collection
and recording weredirectly
observed.2
HISTORY AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES ALREADY TAKEN2l
Descriptionof Aerial
Operations,
During 1985 over6
300helicopter flown.
Thehighest
monthly hours 203 fixed drg),
wiEhApril
beinghours and 740
fixed
wing hours werewere
in
October (792 heLicopter,the
lowesr- (217helicopter).
Because OcP-s
aerial
operationsare carried out over
such a vast geographicarea, supplies of fuel
andinsecticides
must bestored in
a large
numberof locations
throughoutthe
programme-s operational2
zones.
Theselocations, called
ttcachestt, are mostly openair
cleari-ngs, selected accordlng Eothree principal criteria:
t
accessible to Ehe t.ruckspl1ots
and22
U*"tu. also
Eo paragraph 33 concerning4us aoffar figures in this report
areclose to
t.he t.arget.ed spraying areas tothe aircraft
mustferry
back andforth insecticide;
which
replenish
thet'Thef t.s versus Lossestt.
calculated at
$l CFA 375.minimize
the
dist.ance t.orefuel
and reloadcaches;
during take-off
Losses
safe for
borhand landing.
the local
populationTable
I
presentsfigures for
reported lossesof fuel
andinsecticides for
I985.The
highly refined jet fuel
used by OCPaircraft
has an obviousaE.traction
to the local population,
which can useit in
kerosene lampsand
stoves.
Less obviousis the
reasonfor insecticide theft. In fact the
product mostoften stolen, B.t.
(a1so knownby the
t,rade namet'Teknartt), an organic
insecticiE, i"
takennot for its contents,
butrather its conEainer; - a 5O-litre plastic
drum which can be washed andused
for
water storage.Table
l:
REPORTED THEFTS AND OPERATIONAL LOSSES le8s!/
Product Theft Operational Losses
Litres
Cost 2/(us $
000)Litres
Cost 2/(us $
000)Abate Teknar
Chlorphoxime Permethrine Carbosulfan
Aviation fuel
2
343r2
530 100 75 2552 258
29.0
57 .2 .7
r.3
.7 25.1
1010
I
935t 676
t2.5 8.8
.8
TOTAL 1 r4.0 22.1
t.
I
3
23
Preventive MeasuresDocument JCP
6.9
described several measures taken by OCPin recent
yearsto
minirnizepilferage
andother losses.
Among Ehese were:Creation
of a Logistics
Committeeto
reviewoperational
problems and recommend improved procedures IMeetings
with
Governmentofficials to enList their active
support;Introduct.ion
of
new forms and an improvedstock reporting
syst.em.In
addiEion, OCP hasalso eliminated
cachesat
unguarded bushairstri-ps to
reducelosses. But it
has not. beenpossible to elininate the
use of suchairsErips altogether, e.g.
becauseof the refueling
requireuents ofthe fixed
wingaircraft.
Asa partial
measure,Aerial
Operationsstaff
remove
the
stocksof fuel
and insecEicide whereverpossible
from some of theselocations during the dry
season, whenthe
Turbo Thrushis
not used.As
far
asinsecticide is
coucerned,B.t.
has gone through severalchanges
in its formulation
andfour variations in
contai-ner design sinceits introduction in 1981.
Eachtime,
however,the resulting
container has become moreatEractive to potential thievesl i.e. stronger
and with betEerhandles.
OcP management has asa result
now requested themanufacturer
of B.t. to
changethe container to a less
reusable form, such as Ehose providedfor the other insecticides (thin
meta1,easily
dented when Ehecontainer is
empty, rusti_ng over ti-me,etc.).
To
iuhibit pilferage
andtheft of small quantities of fuel,
OCP has also introduced caps whichrequire a special
wrenchto open. Local
thieves have circumventedthis contror
however by puncturingthe
drums with ax-type implements,thus also
rendering Ehe drums worEhlessfor future
use.
3
CURRENT SITUATION: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSand
Aviation Logistics 3I
Cache PlacementThe number and placement
of
cachesare,
as noEed,constantly
being reassessed andare
determined onthe basis of several
considerations,including operational proxirnity, safety
and easeof
reprenishmeut.It
appears, however,that the
two main reasonsfor
considering closingor relocating
caches have been(a)Ep'orted thefts,
and(b)
aninadequate
fleet of trucks
and/ordrivers to regularly service
andreplenish
more caches.In
both casesthe trade-off to closing or
movinga
cachewill
normally be an increasedhelicopter ferrying-time for fuel
andinsecticide.
Inthe
courseof this survey, it
was estimatedthat the
amounLof
timet.
a
spent
ferrying for fuel
and i.hours, if the
western and souof the
progranme as a whole.nsecticide
wasclose to
30i(of total fl ight
thern routes
from Bobo were representative-4-
I
Using
a
conservative estimaEe of. 25%of total flight time
spentferrying for fuel or insecticide,
annual expendi-tures onfuel for
suchtrips
would bein the
rangeof
:800 000
x
0.25x
$0.48! = $
96,000.Ferry flights for
replenishmentof fuel
andinsecticide will
always benecessary
irrespective of
cache numbers andplacement. At the
sametime,
cache numbers must bekept within
reasonablelimiEs for
simplelogistical reasons.
However, mostof the ferrying time at
presentis not
due Eo shortageof fuel
caches,but rather
due Eolinitation
of cachesfor insecticide,
where lossesin
generalare smaller
thanfor fuel.
As an
illustration to the
above argument,total
reportedchefts
of8.t.2/ in
1985 amounted$
53 000 (82of
consumption),but
as discussed belowin
paragraph33, it is highly
probablerhat ar least
one-third(3'l)
of.this is not theft, but
can beaEtributed to a
numberof
othercauses. If helicopter ferrying time
could be reducedby, sayr
30% byadding more
insecticide
cachesat strategic locations,
thenthis
wou1d,apart. from
factors
such as reducedpilot fatigue, etc., also lead to
areduct.ion
in
expendlturesin the order of $
96 000x
302, orapproxiroately
$
28 000in
reducedfuel bills; - to
be tradedoff
by apossible, but
noEcertain,
i.ncreasein
lossesof insecticide.
The
practical lirnitat.ions or
placementof
cachesare,
however, alsodictated by the availability of trucks
anddrivers to service
andregularly replenish
Ehe caches, as discussedin the following
paragraph.32 Theft Situatlon
by Cache,qqmlfy
and Zonewhen considering
the thefts
and lossespresently occurring in
the Programmg,it ls important
t.o keepin
mindthe
extremeoperational
andlogistical difficulties
which OCP hasto face.
Thereare
I4Ofuel
andinsecticide
cachesdistribuced
throughoutthe
present programme area of 750 000 kms2,generally
locat.ed alongsidethe river
banks andoften in
remoteplaces; the
supprylines
fromfour principal
depotsare long
anddifficult,
andthe
annual consumptionfigures
are heavy, withapproximately 800 000
litres of
aviaElonfuer
and 400 000litres
ofvarious kinds of insecticide.3/
A
detailed analysis of thefts
by cache, country and zone has shown thatthere are
considerable variaEionsin
reportedthefts
amongthe
cachesand
over-liue.4/
Sone 20 caches have accountedfor two-thirds of
the reported losses from 1984to April i986.
Seventeenof
these locationsare in c6te d-rvoire, the
country which accountsfor
752of total
reportedthefts.
Price per litre of fuel,
based on CFA 36 000for
one drumof
200litres.
B.t. is the onlyrlattracEivettinsecticide
dueto the
naEureof the
container.As
from Ig87, the operational
areawill
be extendedto
coverI
300 000 kms2with
an accompanyingsubstantial
increasein a) rivers to
betreated, b)
consumptionof fuel
andinsecticide,
andc)
numberof
"caches".The conplete Management Survey Report
includes illustrative
annexes.!/ u
1l Ll
,-
a
5
In the
exampleof
Groumania, C6ted-Ivoire,
wit.hthe
highesE reported losses overtime,
almost3/4
of.the quantity
was sEolenin
two separate months on1y, andin
bot.h casesa large
numberof
drums were punctured andemptied.
Theirregular
paEternof
reportedthefts
complicates thesurveillance of the
cachesfor
OCP and makeadditional
preventive measuresdifficult
Eo determine.33 Thefts
versus Losses6
The
current
recordingof
aviatj-onfuel
lossesfour categories : a) thefts, b)
leakages, c)d)
remainderin
drums.fall into
contaminaEion, and
In
Ehe western zorle,only
13 .57" of. t.he losses f orthe operational
lossesb), c)
andd) in the
above 86.57" wereattributed to theft.
1985 were ascribed to
1ist.
The remaining Thefollowing
possiblefor aviation fuel:
sourcesof
genuine Eheft would appearto exist
Punctured drums (happensrarely, but
wheniE
doeswill
accountfor large quantities);
Pilferage of small
amounts (may happen morefrequently);
Theft of entire
drums (frequency unknown)1Theft with collusion of
0CP-sdrivers
(unknown,but possible in
selectedcases;
couldinvolve substantial quantities).
From I'1GT-s own observaEions t.here
are,
however,also a
number ins t anceswithout
acwhere
there
would be operational lossesreported
astually
beingso,
and Ehese include:of
theft Pilot
omissionto
recordl'liscounting
of
remaining Transcripti on/ ari thnetic
Unrecordedfuel
transfersconsumption data on stock ; I
/
error in
recording between depots andFlight Reports;!/
system;l/
caches;
where
neither the
drumthe outside
population,to
be 3% of. consumptionDrivers
inadverEentlycollecting partially filled
drumsfor
reE.urnto
depot;Misplaced
or losr pilor Flight
Reporrs.,
Using t,he
insecticide
AbaEe asa
casein point, nor the
content has anyattraction
whatsoever tototal operational
lossesfor
1985 were reportedfor the
West Zone.It
would appear reasonableto
assumea
broadlysinilar loss-factor for
aviaEionfuel (i.e.
losses which can beatt.ributed to the rist
offactors
asgiven
above, buE whichare
today being reported asthefts)
of around 37"of
consumption.a
rl Actually
observed by MGT.6
34
Replenishments andVehlcle
FleetPlans
are currently
being nadefor
augmenting and sErengthening thesysEem
of
cache replenishmentin the
westernoperational area,
once theaerial
operations basels
moved from Boboto
Odienn6,in
December 1986.Current
plans call for five
heavy-dutylorries
andfive drivers
Eooperate
in a rotational
systemof well-defined delivery
routes.ConsideraEion should
also
begiven to acquiring at least
oneor
twofour-wheel
drive lorries rather
thanthe current,
conventional type,since
Ehis would enablethe
Programmeto
add cachesin
more remote, but operat.ionallybetter
placedlocations; - thus
reducingfurther the risk of
losses dueto theft or pilferage.
J
A separate problem concerns
control
and accountabiliEyof
OCP-ssince thls is
aE presenta definite
sourceof potential theft.
Ehe remote
locations of
most cachesthere are at
present hardly ueansof verifying that
planneddeliveries actually
took place prescribedquantities.
drivers,
Due to
in
anythe,-
a
Options which now should be considered
in
MGT-s viewinclude a delivery confirmatlon
systemat
locati.ons wherethis is feasible, €.g.
i.n cacheslocated at
OCP-s sub-sectoroffices,
aswell
as equippingthe lorries wlth radio transmitters. In the latter
case,the driver
would report over t.heradio to the
nearest secEoror
sub-sectoroffice
whendeliveries
have been made, which would enableat least
spot-checks andselective follow-up,
shoulda
needfor this arise.
35
Recording SystemocP
nonitors iEs
cachesituation at the
Bobo and Kara zoneoffices
through a manual cardexfile, with
one cardfor
each cache, anddifferent
colored cardsfor different products.
The sourcefor
updatingthe
consumption andstock figures
on these cardsare the pilots-
DailyFlight
Reports, whi-ch record Ehequantities of fuel
andinsecticide
takenat
eachlanding,
aswell
asthe quant.ities
observed remaining atthe
cacheat take-off.
Stock replenishment.
figures are
taken from t,heradio
messageinstruct.ions given e.g.
by Boboto
t.he depotsin
Bouak6 and Bamako, pluswritten inst.ructions for the drivers
workingfron Bobo.
As notedin
paragraph 34 above,there are
not'receiving reports'r
from thesub-sect.ors
or
cachesto
confirm independentlythat the
correctshiprnenEs reached
the correct
cache.when
the
remaining baranceat the
cache as reportedin the Flight
RePortsis less
than t.he amount shown onthe cardex, the staff
member responsiblewill typically wait for confirmation unti-l a
subsequentvisit
Eothe
same cacheis
made,before adjusting
Ehe cardex balance.At the
endof
t.he month, when preparingthe
monthly report,
however, t.he tendency has beento report
any negative discrepancies astheft,
exceptfor
minordifferences
which may beattributed to
leakage,leading to
ageneral overstaEement
of thefts
as discussedin
paragraph 33 above, atleast
asfar
asthe
wesEern zoneis
concerned.7
4
COMPARATIVE LOSSES IN OPERATIONS EXTERNAL TO OCPIn order to
evaluate OCP-s performancein controlling its fuel
andinsecticide stocks, the Joint
Programme Conmittee expressed aninterest
atits sixth
sessionin
December 1985,to learn of the loss
experience ofbroadly
comparable prograunes.4L
UniqueSituation
It is difficult, if
noEimpossible, to
makedirect
comparisons between OCP-sstock control
system and Ehatof
anyother
progranrme oroPeration.
Noother
progranme could beidentified
by MGT which requiresthe
ongoinglogistical
support providedby
che Programme-s network of caches.Several suggested comparisons were found
to
beinappropriate.
For example,military
organizaEions may usefuel
drumsduring field
exerci-ses,
but
theseare short
Eermactivities,
andduring
t.he exercisesthe
supply depotstyplcally
have Ehebenefit of
armed guards.I
I
Aerial
cropthus
do not spraying operations donot
cover such a wideterritory
andrequire the
same extensive networkof
caches.I
I
Chemical
industry
losses dueto
evaporationor spillage are
not comparable becauseof the
morecontrolled conditions of
themanuf
acturing
facilities
.42
TheRetail
TradeIn
developed economiesit is generally
estimated than an average equivalent-of
57"of retail trade turn-over is lost
dueto shoplifting,
employee
theff,
and accounc.ingerrors.
Theselosses,
sometimes cal1ed"shrinkage",
occurin
spiEeof increasingly sophisticated electronic
securit.y measures.I.Ihile this
referenceto the reEall trade
may seeminappropriate,
thereare several logistical siuilariti,es to
OCp:-- nultiple outlets (i.e.
caches)with differing "turn-overs";
--
replenishmentof outlets
froma
fewcentral
depots;losses.
losses due
to
a mixof rheft
and operationalRecognizing
that the cost of eliminating all
lossesis greater
than theloss itself,
commercial operationstypically incorporate this rfacE
ofli-fett
inEotheir
budgets. Based ontheir
experience,a
reservefor
"shrinkagett
is set
up and monitored, and management takesaction
only whenthe
losses appearto
beincreasing
overthe
acceptednorm.
Anotherinteresting
observationfron the ret,airing industry is that
20-30 percentof
reported trlossesttare attribuEed to various
bookkeepi-ngerrors, i.€. broadly similar to the
experience foundin ocp; -
see paragraph 33.While
it
should bepossible to
reducethe risk of errors
reportedin
OCpthrough improving