• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW#8 REPORT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW#8 REPORT "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW#8 REPORT

General

Number of students 18

Number of submitted HW 18

Number of not-submitted HW 0

Number of problems 6

Not including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 90.51

Grade standard deviation 11.50 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 100.54

Grade standard deviation 15.30

Grade Breakdown

Problem # P5.46 P5.63 P5.68 P5.82 P6.2 C5.3 Grade average 8.83 8.61 9.69 9.75 9.81 7.61 Grade standard deviation 2.53 2.66 0.82 0.92 0.41 3.68

(2)

Comments

P5.46

- Many students made mistakes when they non-dimensionalize temperature and velocity gradient

P5.63

- Some students did not use PI theorem

P5.68 - None

P5.82 - None

P6.2 - None

C5.3

- Many students didn’t choose ‘g’ as a repeating variable while it’s a better choice than ‘mu’ since it is regarded as constant.

Références

Documents relatifs

• Some students attempted to solve P3.61 by using a CV that cuts the two jets (inlet and outlet) instead of using the following:. • Several students wrote wrongly the

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

• 63% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C5.5; almost all who attempted could solve the

In order for the physics of the problem to be meaningful, the friction loss should be a positive value (zero if the assumption of frictionless flow is applied). • Few students did

• 37% of undergraduate students attempted to solve the comprehensive

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, c f , or

• Some students made mistakes in integrating the equation of motion in P7.98 in order to find the distance travelled by the ball. • 75% of undergraduate students who submitted