• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 7 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 7 – Report"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 7 – Report

General

Total number of students 24

Number of submitted HW 22

Number of not submitted HW 2

Number of problems 3+1

Average grade (without bonus for undergrads) 95.04 Standard deviation of grades 14.44 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Average grade 108.6

Standard deviation of grades 23.52

Individual problem breakdown

Problem P4.84 P4.88 P5.41 C4.2

Average grade 9.70 9.93 9.88 8.96 Standard deviation of grades 0.50 0.24 0.38 1.88

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comparison with last year

(3)

Comments

• Few students did not consider that M was proportional to Q in P5.41; the information was given in the problem statement.

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3;

many who

attempted could solve the problem correctly.

Références

Documents relatifs

Study of thermal effects while filling an empty tank 49 Figure 8 shows the pressure distribution in the reservoir according to the positions.. This pressure reached its limits in

A dense subtree, that DPLL has to go through entirely, forms beyond G till the halt line (Fig. 2C) reached back by DPLL, since nodes above G are located in the sat phase and carry 2

This paper studies a single-item lot-based supplying and batch production under a bilateral capacity reservation contract based on a partnership structure in which some suppliers,

Some students did not use Bernoulli equation for stagnation point and end of tube when they calculate

- Many students did not show the Q function as the non-dimensional form

• 50% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C2.2; almost all who attempted could solve the

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the

In order to learn more about the different methods proposed to solve the cell formation problem, we refer the reader to the survey proposed in [5], where the authors review briefly