• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW#7 REPORT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW#7 REPORT "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW#7 REPORT

General

Number of students 18

Number of submitted HW 18

Number of not-submitted HW 0

Number of problems 4

Not including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 85.49

Grade standard deviation 14.17 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 100.51

Grade standard deviation 19.09

Grade Breakdown

Problem # P4.84 P4.94 P5.37 C4.1

Grade average 9.19 8.42 9.56 7.03 Grade standard deviation 1.19 1.60 0.60 4.38

(2)

Comments

P4.84

- Some students could not derive the correct momentum equation.

- Some students didn’t integrate along ‘r’ when calculating Q.

P4.94

- Some students could not derive the correct momentum equation.

- Many students skipped the integration part.

P5.37

- Many students did not show the Q function as the non-dimensional form (final answer).

C4.1 - None.

Références

Documents relatifs

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

• 63% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C5.5; almost all who attempted could solve the

In order for the physics of the problem to be meaningful, the friction loss should be a positive value (zero if the assumption of frictionless flow is applied). • Few students did

• 37% of undergraduate students attempted to solve the comprehensive

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, c f , or

• Some students made mistakes in integrating the equation of motion in P7.98 in order to find the distance travelled by the ball. • 75% of undergraduate students who submitted

[r]

• Some students used directly the Navier-stokes equation to find the viscosity instead of a force balance between weight of fluid and shear force (C1.4). • 72% of the