• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 11 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 11 – Report"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 11 – Report

General

Total number of students 23 Number of submitted HW 21 Number of not submitted HW 2 Number of problems 4

Average grade 98.15

Standard deviation of grades 3.57

Individual problem breakdown

Problem P7.7 P7.9 P7.17 P7.25 Average grade 9.88 9.45 10.00 9.93 Standard deviation

of grades 0.35 1.02 0.00 0.18

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comparison with last year

(3)

Comments

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, cf, or 𝛿𝛿

𝑥𝑥.

• Few students made calculation mistakes in computing the number of plates in P7.25.

Références

Documents relatifs

8) He will leave the day after tomorrow.. 2) Which language does he speak?. 3) They study in Oxford University.. 3) I'll ask you when the

In these cases, "when" and "where" introduce clauses that describe a noun the refers to a time or place, making them work as relative pronouns in these

Through improved documentation, improved commu- nication, sharing of information across transitions in care, improved patient safety, and improved quality of care, EMRs

In order for the physics of the problem to be meaningful, the friction loss should be a positive value (zero if the assumption of frictionless flow is applied). • Few students did

• Few students did not report the flow rate in m 3 /hr as required (P6.25). • Some students made mistakes in calculating the friction velocity

• Many students did not calculate the Reynolds number in order to check if the laminar flow assumption

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach

Handling massive (for the time) data bases, quickly leads to the understanding, that while one may in the long run understand, what information is con- veyed by a particular chunk