• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 11 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 11 – Report"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 11 – Report

General

Total number of students 23 Number of submitted HW 21 Number of not submitted HW 2 Number of problems 4

Average grade 98.15

Standard deviation of grades 3.57

Individual problem breakdown

Problem P7.7 P7.9 P7.17 P7.25 Average grade 9.88 9.45 10.00 9.93 Standard deviation

of grades 0.35 1.02 0.00 0.18

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comparison with last year

(3)

Comments

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, cf, or 𝛿𝛿

𝑥𝑥.

• Few students made calculation mistakes in computing the number of plates in P7.25.

Références

Documents relatifs

• Few students did not calculate correctly horizontal and vertical forces acting on the surface and did not apply correctly the balance of moments around the hinge. • 60%

In order for the physics of the problem to be meaningful, the friction loss should be a positive value (zero if the assumption of frictionless flow is applied). • Few students did

• Some students did not simplify correctly the energy equation therefore they could not find easily a relation between f

• Some students did not use the correct frontal area. • Very few students made mistakes in

• 13% of students recognized the flow as inviscid but did not recognize that it was a uniform stream past a

• Few students used the absolute pressure instead on the gage pressure in computing the net force (P3.77). • Some students did not tell if the momentum equations were

• Few students made mistakes in integrating the velocity in order to find the volume flow rate (P4.84). • Several students did not provide a sketch of the buoy even if

 Students did not find the center of mass of the gate properly Problem 2.119 – Buoyancy.  Students had trouble finding the center of buoyancy of the displace water since the