• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 8 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 8 – Report"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 8 – Report

General

Total number of students 41 Number of submitted HW 41 Number of not submitted HW 0 Number of problems 5+1 Average grade (w/o bonus) 95.15 Standard deviation of grades 6.167 Undergraduate (w/ bonus)

Average grade 109.6

Standard deviation of grades 11.89 Graduate

Average grade 98.00

Standard deviation of grades 1.728

Individual problem breakdown

Problem 5.46 5.62 5.63 5.80 6.2 C5.3*

Average grade 9.74 9.21 9.34 9.87 9.63 9.75 Standard deviation of grades 0.48 1.52 0.97 0.58 0.94 0.54

*Based on the number of students who attempted to solve the problem

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comments

• Some students did not write the equation in its non-dimensional form (P5.46).

• Few students made calculations mistakes.

• Some students made mistakes in computing the Pi groups.

Références

Documents relatifs

• 50% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C2.2; almost all who attempted could solve the

• Some students did not complete the integration required in P4.7 to find

• Some students attempted to solve P3.61 by using a CV that cuts the two jets (inlet and outlet) instead of using the following:. • Several students wrote wrongly the

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

• 63% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C5.5; almost all who attempted could solve the

• Few students did not simplify correctly the momentum equation; consequently, they got a differential equation difficult to solve. • Few students made mistakes in solving

• Some students did not use the correct frontal area. • Very few students made mistakes in