• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 3 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 3 – Report"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 3 – Report

General

Total number of students 24

Number of submitted HW 22

Number of not submitted HW 2

Number of problems 7+1

Average grade (without bonus for undergrads) 86.38 Standard deviation of grades 20.25 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Average grade 94.08

Standard deviation of grades 24.32

Individual problem breakdown

Problem P2.119 P2.127 P2.141 P2.154 P1.82 P3.117 P4.74 C2.2 Average grade 9.09 9.19 9.50 9.30 9.66 9.88 8.43 9.69 Standard deviation of

grades 1.83 0.37 1.26 2.04 0.93 0.35 1.99 0.68

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comparison with last year

(3)

Comments

• Few students made mistakes in solving the system of equations in P2.119.

• Many students, when solving the second order algebraic inequality at the end of P2.127, either determined only one solution or did not explicitly express the stability bounds using:

0≤ S≤0.235 and 0.765≤ S≤ 1

• Some students did not calculate the stream function in P4.74.

• 50% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C2.2; almost all who attempted could solve the problem correctly.

Références

Documents relatifs

The main novelties of our approach are the modeling of a spatially inhomogeneous mean-field optimal control problem with periodic boundary conditions leading to anisotropic

This paper studies a single-item lot-based supplying and batch production under a bilateral capacity reservation contract based on a partnership structure in which some suppliers,

More recently, a new class of BSDE, called backward stochastic differential equation with time delay gen- erators (delayed BSDEs for short), were investigated for the first time in

Some students did not use Bernoulli equation for stagnation point and end of tube when they calculate

• Few students did not calculate correctly horizontal and vertical forces acting on the surface and did not apply correctly the balance of moments around the hinge. • 60%

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

A dense subtree, that DPLL has to go through entirely, forms beyond G till the halt line (Fig. 2C) reached back by DPLL, since nodes above G are located in the sat phase and carry 2