• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW#3 REPORT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW#3 REPORT "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW#3 REPORT

General

Number of students 18

Number of submitted HW 18

Number of not-submitted HW 0

Number of problems 7+1

Not including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 91.28

Grade standard deviation 8.27 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 98.62

Grade standard deviation 11.86

Grade Breakdown

Problem # P2.120 P2.130 P2.141 P2.155 P3.127 P1.82 P4.71 C2.2 Grade average 9.64 9.19 9.33 9.94 9.22 9.78 7.25 8.67 Grade standard deviation 0.91 1.60 1.13 0.16 1.39 0.58 2.83 3.11

(2)

Comments

P2.120

- Moment equilibrium was not used for a few students.

P2.130

- Submerged height of the cylinder was not calculated for a few students.

P2.141

- Coordinate transformation was not considered for some students.

P2.155

- RPM wasn’t calculated correctly for some students.

P3.127

- Some students did not assume the open jet (p=patm). Some students did not use Bernoulli equation for stagnation point and end of tube when they calculate H.

P1.82

- Some students made mistakes while they integrate the equation.

P4.71

- Some students did not understand the concept of velocity potential and stream function.

C2.2 - None.

Références

Documents relatifs

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

• 63% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C5.5; almost all who attempted could solve the

In order for the physics of the problem to be meaningful, the friction loss should be a positive value (zero if the assumption of frictionless flow is applied). • Few students did

• 37% of undergraduate students attempted to solve the comprehensive

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, c f , or

• Some students made mistakes in integrating the equation of motion in P7.98 in order to find the distance travelled by the ball. • 75% of undergraduate students who submitted

[r]

• Some students used directly the Navier-stokes equation to find the viscosity instead of a force balance between weight of fluid and shear force (C1.4). • 72% of the