• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW#4 REPORT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW#4 REPORT "

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW#4 REPORT

General

Number of students 18

Number of submitted HW 18

Number of not-submitted HW 0

Number of problems 4

Not including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 97.01

Grade standard deviation 3.36 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Grade average 97.01

Grade standard deviation 3.36

Grade Breakdown

Problem # P3.17 P3.32 P4.8 P4.25 Grade average 9.92 10.00 9.42 9.47 Grade standard deviation 0.34 0.00 0.87 0.81

(2)

Comments

P3.17 - None.

P3.32 - None.

P4.8

- Some students made mistakes when they differentiate du/dx.

- Some students could not find the a=0 condition

P4.25

- Some students did not complete the differentiation.

- Some students didn’t find correct

v

r=0 condition or found partially.

Références

Documents relatifs

• Some students did not complete the integration required in P4.7 to find

However, since we are projecting the force vector into (1,0,0) vector to get the drag for other parts too, we shouldn’t change the sign of force for that specific part.. Some

• Some students did not use the correct frontal area. • Very few students made mistakes in

• 13% of students recognized the flow as inviscid but did not recognize that it was a uniform stream past a

• Few students did not report the flow rate in m 3 /hr as required (P6.25). • Some students made mistakes in calculating the friction velocity

 All students understood the CFD process and were successful running the simulations.  Many students were satisfied with the lab and felt they benefitted from the lab. Negative.

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach

 Students did not find the center of mass of the gate properly Problem 2.119 – Buoyancy.  Students had trouble finding the center of buoyancy of the displace water since the