• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 2 REPORT Number of Students Total 39 Submitted 34 Not Submitted 5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 2 REPORT Number of Students Total 39 Submitted 34 Not Submitted 5"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 2 REPORT

Number of Students

Total 39

Submitted 34

Not Submitted 5

GRADE DISTRIBUTION

SUBMISSION HISTORY

(2)

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM BREAKDOWN

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4 YEARS

COMPARISON OF HW 2014

Problem 2.48 2.79 2.83 2.119 2.127 2.141 2.154 1.83 3.117 4.74 c2.2 Average w/o zeros 9.15 9.68 8.56 8.82 8.13 8.63 7.60 8.35 8.47 5.91 5.51 Std Dev 1.33 1.01 2.63 3.03 3.46 2.79 3.67 2.84 3.59 3.90 4.99

(3)

SPECIAL COMMENTS

Problem 2.48 - Manometer

 Students traversed the fluid correctly but did forgot to subtract from the pressure when moving up through the fluid and add when moving down

Problem 2.79 – Force Plane Surface

 Students did not realize the hydrostatic force acts at the center of pressure (Ycp) and not the center of mass

Problem 2.83 – Force Curved Surface

 Students did not realize the vertical force acting on gate was due to buoyancy and equals the weight of the displaced water from the gate

 Students did not find the center of mass of the gate properly Problem 2.119 – Buoyancy

 Students had trouble finding the center of buoyancy of the displace water since the geometry was not simple

Problem 2.127 – Stability

 Students did not solve for both solutions of SG Problem 2.141 – Uniform Acceleration

 Students used wrong equation for the pressure at the bottom of the tank Problem 2.154 – Rigid Body Rotation

 Students did not solve for the differential volume and integrate over radius Problem 1.83 – Streamlines

 Many students solved correctly but plots were lacking, no effort put into plots Problem 3.117 – Uniform Acceleration

 Most students did excellent on Bernoulli problem Problem 4.74 – Velocity Potential and Stream Function

 Some students did not attempt

 Issues with solving stream function correctly

(4)

Comprehensive 2.2 - Manometer

 Many undergrad students are not doing comprehensive problems

 Student who attempted, almost all got correct solution All Problems

 Follow formatting laid out in information on website

 Make sure to use units and check for unit homogeneity

 Some students are using the solution manuals too copiously

o Errors exist in solution manuals, and when found, very easy to spot copiers

Références

Documents relatifs

However, since we are projecting the force vector into (1,0,0) vector to get the drag for other parts too, we shouldn’t change the sign of force for that specific part.. Some

Analysis and Discussion, can fix the mistakes and resubmit for full credit by (10/7). This is only allowed of CFD Lab 1, no future leniency will be granted. o Many students did

 All students understood the CFD process and were successful running the simulations.  Many students were satisfied with the lab and felt they benefitted from the lab. Negative.

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4

Comparison of

 5 students used the incorrect Reynolds number and other did not remember at all.  5 students did not

 The only recurring error was students not understanding which terms simplify

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach