• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 8 – Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 8 – Report"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 8 – Report

General

Total number of students 23

Number of submitted HW 23

Number of not submitted HW 0

Number of problems 5+1

Average grade (without bonus for undergrads) 96.35 Standard deviation of grades 9.49 Including bonus for undergraduate students

Average grade 106.7

Standard deviation of grades 15.62

Individual problem breakdown

Problem P5.45 P5.67 P5.78 P5.82 P6.5 C5.5 Average grade 10.00 9.74 9.84 10.00 9.98 9.63 Standard deviation of grades 0.00 1.25 0.32 0.00 0.11 0.90

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comparison with last year

(3)

Comments

• 63% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C5.5;

almost all

who attempted could solve the problem correctly.

Références

Documents relatifs

First, the shortest path, 7r say, may be found by a shortest path algorithm (e.g. Dijkstra's algorithm or, preferably, a label- correcting algorithm [5]) applied to find the

A dense subtree, that DPLL has to go through entirely, forms beyond G till the halt line (Fig. 2C) reached back by DPLL, since nodes above G are located in the sat phase and carry 2

In order to learn more about the different methods proposed to solve the cell formation problem, we refer the reader to the survey proposed in [5], where the authors review briefly

It should be the continuity equation instead since the problem is considering force from the bolt, and the Bernoulli equation won’t be accurate.. - Some students didn’t consider

[r]

• 50% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C2.2; almost all who attempted could solve the

• Some students attempted to solve P3.61 by using a CV that cuts the two jets (inlet and outlet) instead of using the following:. • Several students wrote wrongly the

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the