• Aucun résultat trouvé

HW 11 – Report

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "HW 11 – Report"

Copied!
2
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

HW 11 – Report

General

Total number of students 41 Number of submitted HW 37 Number of not submitted HW 4 Number of problems 4

Average grade 94.61

Standard deviation of grades 6.72

Individual problem breakdown

Problem 7.9 7.11 7.19 7.23

Average grade 9.55 9.91 8.99 9.39 Standard deviation of grades 1.65 0.26 0.74 1.91

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade history

Submission history

Comments

• Some students made calculation mistakes.

• Many students did not calculate the Reynolds number in order to check if the

laminar flow assumption holds (P7.19).

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( PDF - 2 Page - 53.21 KB )

Documents relatifs

HW#3 REPORT

Some students did not use Bernoulli equation for stagnation point and end of tube when they calculate

HW 3 – Report

• 50% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C2.2; almost all who attempted could solve the

HW 4 – Report

• Some students did not complete the integration required in P4.7 to find

HW 5 – Report

• Some students attempted to solve P3.61 by using a CV that cuts the two jets (inlet and outlet) instead of using the following:. • Several students wrote wrongly the

HW 6 – Report

• 82% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; almost all who attempted could solve the

HW 7 – Report

• 56% of undergraduate students solved the comprehensive problem C3.3; many who attempted could solve the

HW 11 – Report

• Few students did not carry out the complete procedure asked in P7.9; they did not compute either H, c f , or

QUIZ 10 – Report (Laminar pipe flow)

• Some students did not consider that, since the flow rate was constant, when halving the diameter the velocity would change. • Some students did not re-calculate the