• Aucun résultat trouvé

A super-resolution approach for receptive fields estimation of neuronal ensembles

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A super-resolution approach for receptive fields estimation of neuronal ensembles"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01215541

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01215541

Submitted on 19 Oct 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

A super-resolution approach for receptive fields

estimation of neuronal ensembles

Daniela Pamplona, Gerrit Hilgen, Sahar Pirmoradian, Matthias Hennig,

Bruno Cessac, E Sernagor, Pierre Kornprobst

To cite this version:

Daniela Pamplona, Gerrit Hilgen, Sahar Pirmoradian, Matthias Hennig, Bruno Cessac, et al.. A

super-resolution approach for receptive fields estimation of neuronal ensembles. Computational Neuroscience

(CNS), Jul 2015, Prague, Czech Republic. �hal-01215541�

(2)

+

Spatial resolution of the estimation

It is defined by the size of the blocks of the checkerboard stimulus. How to set block size? A matter of compromise…

A super-resolution approach for receptive

fields estimation of neuronal ensembles

D. Pamplona, G. Hilgen, S. Pirmoradian, M.H. Hennig, B. Cessac, E. Sernagor, P. Kornprobst

(1) Inria Sophia Antipolis, France (2) Newcastle University, United Kingdom (3) University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

This work was partially supported by the EC IP

project FP7-ICT-2011-9 no. 600847 (RENVISION)

Spike Triggered Average (STA) with white noise (WN)

Naive solution: decrease block size

If the block size is considerably smaller than the RF, then the spike count will be low, resulting in very slow convergence speed, an impractical solution for experimentalists.

Proposed solution: Introducing shifted white noise (SWN)

Using SWNP,S increases the STA resolution by a factor S without decreasing the block size, thus it is suitable for a large ensemble of neurons.

The STA obtained can still be theoretically related to RF in the context of LN models similarly to the classical white noise scenario.

Remark Analogy with super-resolution (SR) techniques in image processing

We define SWN as a WN stimulus where blocks are randomly moved by discrete spatial shifts at each time stamp.

Spatial RFs: DOG Temporal RFs: DOE 5 trials, 20000 images per trial Display rate 30Hz

Results

For a fixed block size, the STA spatial resolution is improved as a function of the number of possible shifts, leading to smaller estimation error.

Targeting a given STA spatial resolution, shifting the stimulus increases the convergence speed.

STA error as a function of the cell RF position and size:

Experimental protocol

Comparison between RF estimations

Statistical analysis over the population

This study presents for the first time a simple approach allowing quick and simultaneous extraction of receptive field profiles with great accuracy

from hundreds to thousands of retinal ganglion cells. The method not only ensures strong responses because these stimuli are big (e.g. 160 μm),

but it also provides receptive field measurements at super resolution thanks to the small shifts (40 μm) applied to the basic checkerboard stimuli.

Convergence:

Error tends to zero as the spike count tends to infinity.

A classical technique to find receptive fields (RF)

(1) (2) (3) (3) (1) (2) (1)

How to increase the resolution of RF over the population?

(see COSYNE 2015 poster for more results)

Experimental study

Gaussian distribution Variance of the stimulus

E(ST A, RF ) =X x,y,t (ST A(x, y, t) RF (x, y, t))2 ⇡ N (0, 1)2 2 n(T ) Spike count

SWN

P,4

t

WTA

P/4

(P/2, 0) (P/4, 0) (P/2, 0) (P/4, P/4)

SR

Population of LNP neurons

Pan-retinal RGC responses from WT mice were recorded using the high-density large-scale CMOS-based APS MEA (Biocam, 3Brain GmbH, CH) featuring 4096 electrodes (42 μm spacing) arranged in a 64x64 configuration, covering an active area of 7.12 mm2.

r

d

+

WN

8

WN

2

SWN

8,4 r r d

A: WN

160

B: WN

40

C: SWN

160,40

WN and SWN give similar RF estimation. SWN allow to map more large RF. White Noise images (block size of 160μm, 40μm and

160μm with arbitrary shifts of 40μm) were presented for 15 min at 30Hz (P79) and 15 Hz (P76) using a custom built system based on a DLP video projector.

P76

P79

Berdondini et al., Lab On Chip (2009)

Solutions exist for single cells but not for a whole population

Chichilnisky, Network (2001)

Foldiak, Neurocomputing (2001) Machens, Phys Rev Lett (2002) MacKay, Neural Comput (1992)

WN

P/4

t

WTA

P/4

+

Stimulus Spikes STA RF

t

/

P

t

WTA

WN

P

Averaging gray low activity slow convergence Always “in between” low activity slow convergence Always full field strong activity… but no way to recover RF

)

)

)

)

)

Example with 4 shifts:

r

RF center

Most of RF are mapped by both stimuli (with highest resolution from SWN). Differences are possibly coming from RF properties (e.g., size and position)

A

B

C

A

B

C

P76 Shifted WN Basic WN 221 cells 252 cells P79 Shifted WN Basic WN 287 cells 165 cells OD V N T D OD V N T D

C

d d cell 1 cell 2

A vs.C

P79 Shifted WN Basic WN 287 cells 165 cells C A P76 Shifted WN Basic WN 221 cells 252 cells C A

Distribution of RF sizes

P76 P79 shifted basic

A

252 cells P76 P79 shifted basic 165 cells P76 P79 shifted basic

C

221 cells P76 P79 shifted basic 287 cells C:34% A:19% A&C:47% 0 25 50 75 100 A C 66% 81% B (650 mapped neurons) RF surround

Simulation study

Références

Documents relatifs

Une correction de biais est alors nécessaire : elle est obtenue, pour chaque secteur d'activité (en NES16 et NES36), par un étalonnage de l'indicateur sur les estimations

Another classical tool often used in geostatistics is the variogram. But for spatial processes with Fr´ echet marginal laws, the variogram does not exist. Spatial extreme models.

The pixel-wise strain differences between the normal heart model and the models with the smallest (left) and the largest (right) dysfunctional regions for both the ground truth (GT)

Dans une étude de cohorte rétrospective, Rappo et ses collaborateurs[152] ont comparé les résultats obtenus chez des patients adultes ayant subi des tests positifs

The objective here is to set the minimum number of ESUs at the optimal location both to (i) establish robust relationships between the measured biophysical variables and

The main contribution of this paper is to propose an ABC MCMC algorithm for the joint estimation of the label vector z, the granularity coefficient β and the other unknown parameters

Como soporte al modelo de pruebas, el cat´ alogo de modelos de caracter´ısticas extendido servir´ a como una gu´ıa para seleccionar correctamente los atributos en diferentes casos

Between 2005 and 2008, West Baltimore residents collaborated with the Maryland Department of Transportation, the Maryland Transit Administration, the Baltimore