• Aucun résultat trouvé

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

efficiency

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

FGD1 FGD2

signal in FGD1

fractional reconstructed

Figure 5.5: Efficiency as a function of the true muon direction, in terms of theθ angle respect to the neutrino direction, for both selections, in FGD1 (red) and in FGD2 (blue).

Statistical error bars are shown, but small. The fractional distribution of the reconstructed events in FGD1 is shown as well.

Fig. 5.6 shows the true muon (pµ,cosθ) phase space predicted by NEUT forνµ-CC

1809

interactions in FGD1 and in FGD2 fiducial volumes. High energy muons are more

1810

likely to be in the forward direction, where the detector efficiency is high. On the

1811

contrary, muons scattered at high and negative angles, where the detector efficiency

1812

is low, always have a relatively low momentum. This explain why the efficiency as

1813

a function of the true muon momentum decreases below 1 GeV, as it can be seen in

1814

Fig. 5.7. Considerations on the phase space are discussed in Section 7.3.

1815

The purity is defined as:

1816

purity = Nselected−Nbackground

(5.6)

true muon cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

true muon momentum [GeV/c]

0

Integral 4.052e+04 Integral 4.052e+04

0

Integral 4.052e+04

FGD1

true muon cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

true muon momentum [GeV/c]

0

Integral 3.868e+04

0

Integral 3.868e+04

FGD2

Figure 5.6: (pµ,cosθ) phase space of the true muons from νµ-CC interactions predicted by NEUT in FGD1 (left) and FGD2 (right)fiducial volumes.

true muon momentum [GeV/c]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Figure 5.7: Efficiency as a function of the true muon momentum, for both selections, in FGD1 (red) and FGD2 (blue). Statistical error bars are shown, but small. The fractional

whereNselected−Nbackground is the number of signal events among the selected ones.

1817

The purity predicted by NEUT after the last cut is 90.31 % for the selection in FGD1

1818

and 88.65 % for the selection in FGD2. The reconstructed momentum and direction

1819

distributions of the muon candidates are shown in Fig. 5.8 for both the FGD1 and

1820

the FGD2 selections, broken down by the predicted NEUT reactions. The sources of

1821

background are:

1822

1. out offiducial volume (main background): νµ-CC interactions happening outside

1823

thefiducial volume of FGD1 or FGD2 respectively;

1824

2. non νµ-CC interactions: these are neutral-current (NC), ¯νµ and νe interactions,

1825

where a π (in most cases) is mis-identified as theµ candidate (cf. Fig. 5.9).

1826

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 349475

CC 88.11 %

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 344814

CC 85.98 %

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Figure 5.8: Reconstructed momentum (top) and direction (bottom) distributions of the muon candidates for both the FGD1 (left) and the FGD2 (right) selections, broken down by the predicted NEUT reactions. “out FV” are the events occurred out of the fiducial volume. The percentages on the legend are the fractions of each component in the whole plotted distribution.

Fig. 5.9 shows again the reconstructed momentum and direction distributions but

1827

broken down by the true particles associated to track chosen as muon candidate. In a

1828

non-negligible fraction of events the chosen track is not associated to the true muons,

1829

but most of them are background events: this can be seen in Fig. 5.10 where it is shown

1830

the same distributions after removing the background events. The remaining∼2% of

1831

non-true muons in CC signal events is not considered background, nor in the T2K

1832

oscillation analyses neither in this analysis, hence it is considered as a reconstruction

1833

inefficiency (which might cause events being reconstructed in a wrong bin). Note that

1834

events where a pion is selected as muon candidate affect the secondary interaction pion

1835

systematics (cf. Section 6.2.3.1).

1836

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 349475

88.22 %

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 344814

87.93 % candidate muon reconstructed cos

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 candidate muon reconstructed cos

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Figure 5.9: Reconstructed momentum (top) and direction (bottom) distributions of the muon candidates for both the FGD1 (left) and the FGD2 (right) selections, broken down by the true particles associated to the muon candidate (as predicted by NEUT). The percent-ages on the legend are the fractions of each component in the whole plotted distribution.

Fig. 5.11 shows again the reconstructed momentum and direction distributions but

1837

broken down by the target nucleus elements where the true neutrino interaction

oc-1838

Integral 307933

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Integral 307933 Integral 307933 97.42 %

Integral 296455

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Integral 296455 Integral 296455 97.43 %

Integral 478646

θ candidate muon reconstructed cos

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Integral 478646 Integral 478646 97.19 %

Integral 454059

θ candidate muon reconstructed cos

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Integral 454059 Integral 454059 97.13 %

Figure 5.10: Reconstructed momentum (top) and direction (bottom) distributions of the muon candidates for both the FGD1 (left) and the FGD2 (right) selections, without the background events, broken down by the true particles associated to the muon candidate (as predicted by NEUT). The percentages on the legend are the fractions of each component in the whole plotted distribution.

curred. There are non-negligible contributions from heavy targets, but they are

actu-1839

ally background events occurred out of the fiducial volume (“out FV”), as it can be

1840

seen in Fig. 5.12, where it is shown the same distributions after removing the “out FV”

1841

background events. This allows assuming that any interaction model uncertainties on

1842

heavy targets is covered by the out offiducial volume systematics (Section 6.2.4.1).

1843

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 349475

Carbon 85.91 %

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

16000 Integral 344814

Carbon 46.93 %

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Figure 5.11: Reconstructed momentum (top) and direction (bottom) distributions of the muon candidates for both the FGD1 (left) and the FGD2 (right) selections, broken down by the target nucleus elements where the true neutrino interaction occurred (as predicted by NEUT). The percentages on the legend are the fractions of each component in the whole plotted distribution.

Integral 307933

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Integral 307933 Integral 307933 Carbon 89.58 % Oxygen 4.63 % Hydrogen 2.74 % other 3.05 % FGD1

Integral 296455

candidate muon reconstructed momentum [GeV]

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Integral 296455 Integral 296455 Carbon 48.18 % Oxygen 47.04 % Hydrogen 3.45 % other 1.34 % FGD2

Integral 478646

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Integral 478646 Integral 478646 Carbon 89.24 %

Oxygen 4.61 % Hydrogen 3.19 % other 2.96 %

FGD1

Integral 454059

candidate muon reconstructed cosθ

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Integral 454059 Integral 454059 Carbon 47.98 %

Oxygen 46.73 % Hydrogen 3.99 % other 1.30 %

FGD2

Figure 5.12: Reconstructed momentum (top) and direction (bottom) distributions of the muon candidates for both the FGD1 (left) and the FGD2 (right) selections without the

“out FV” background events, broken down by the target nucleus elements where the true neutrino interaction occurred (as predicted by NEUT). The percentages on the legend are the fractions of each component in the whole plotted distribution.