HAL Id: jpa-00246300
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246300
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Physical properties and phase transitions in the (tTTF)2X series of organic conductors
P. Vaca, C. Coulon, S. Ravy, Jean Pouget, J. Fabre
To cite this version:
P. Vaca, C. Coulon, S. Ravy, Jean Pouget, J. Fabre. Physical properties and phase transitions in the (tTTF)2X series of organic conductors. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (1), pp.125-140.
�10.1051/jp1:1991119�. �jpa-00246300�
J.
Phys.
I1(1991)
125-140 JANVIER 1991, PAGE 125Classification
Physics
Abstracts64.70K 76.30P 76.50
Physical properties and phase transitions in the (tTTF)~X
series of organic conductors
P. Vaca (~>
*),
C. Coulon(I),
S.Ravy f),
J. P.Pouget f)
and J. M. Fabre (3)(1) Centre de Recherche P. Pascal, Avenue du Dr Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France
f)
Laboratoire dePhysique
des Solides(associk
auCNRS),
Universitb Paris-Sud, 91405Orsay,
France
(3) Laboratoire de Chimie StnJcturale
Organique,
USTL, 34060Montpellier
Cedex, France(Received
20July
1990,accepted
itSeptember1990)
Allstract. The electrical,
magnetic
and structuralproperties
of several(tTTF)2X
salts vith X=
PF~,
AsF6> SbF6> Cl04> Re04, Br have beeninvestigated.
In each case, low temperaturephase
transitions are foundcorresponding
to the stabilization of variousground
states. In the caseof salts with the octahedral anions ~K = ASF~,
SbF~),
theantiferromagnetic ground
state observed below T~ = 25 K and 19 Krespectively
has been characterizedby
resonance measurements. In the case of theCl04
salt a structural distortion,probably relaxing
the Coulombrepulsions
between localized
charges,
is observed at 137 K. An unusualphase
transitionaffecting
both thecharge
andspin degrees
of freedom is observed in thePF~
salt around 50 K. Acomparison
is made with theproperties
of the TMTTF salts and related series in order to rationalize theseresults.
Finally
the role of the interchain coupling in the competition between thespin-Peierls
andantiferromagnetic ground
states is emphasized.Introduction.
It is now well established that many
Organic
salts deserve a unifieddescription
Of their Structural andphysical properties [I]. Among
thesecompounds
there are the TMTSeF salts which are also known asBechgaard
salts » for whichOrganic Superconductivity
was first discovered[2].
A common characteristic Of these salts is theirstoichiometry, namely
twoOrganic
molecules for One counterion and acrystallographic
structure in winchOrganic layers
alternate with
planes
Of anions.Moreover,
thestacking
Of theOrganic
molecules in theplanes
allows a classification Of these salts into two groups
[3]
:. in many
compounds,
the molecules are stacked inweakly
dimerized chains. The TMTTF saltsbelong
to this category which is labelled astype
I in thefollowing
;. other salts like
(DIMET)2SbF6 Present
a muchlarger
dimerisation and theorganic layers
are better described as a 2D lattice of dimers. In this case we talk of salts of type II.
(*)
Presenl address CPMOH, Universit6 de Bordeaux1, 33405 Talence Cedex, France.JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUEI T I, M i, JANVIER (Ml
The
physical properties
are reminiscent of the structuralorganisation.
The electricalresistivity
ofSamples
of type I ranges from astrongly
metallic to asemiconducting
behavior(I.e.
an activatedresistivity).
Intermediate behaviors with a minimum ofresistivity
at atemperature
T~ below roomtemperature
are also found. These differentsituations,
allcorresponding
to the sameparamagnetic phase,
show aweakly
temperaturedependent spin susceptibility.
In otherwords,
there is adecoupling
betweencharge
andspin degrees
of freedom. An activatedresistivity
reveals an electronic localization which is a ID effect and does notcorrespond
to aphase
transition. This localization has beenexplained by
the 4kp charge density
wave response function of theorganic
chain to the anionicpotential [4].
Samples
oftype
II whichpresent
astronger
dimerisation also show a stronger electronic localization. These materials can be described in the strongcoupling
limit(where
Coulomb interactions aredominant)
and theirmagnetic susceptibility
is characteristic of lD(or 2D) spin
lattices in theparamagnetic phase [3, 5].
A few years ago the molecule tTTF
(trimethylenetetrathiafulvalene)
wassynthetized
combining
one half of the TTF molecule with one half of the HMTTF molecule and 2 :1 salts wereprepared.
°(~H~~'
The
physical properties
of these materials werebriefly
described in[6].
This firststudy
waslimited
by
the poorquality
of thesamples
thenprepared. However,
because of the activated behavior of their electricalresistivity,
these salts also offer theopportunity
tostudy
the role ofcharge
localization in thephysics
ofquasi-one
dimensional conductors.We
present
in this paper a morecomplete study
of these effectsby combining structural,
electrical andmagnetic
measurements forsamples
of betterquality
obtained with octahedral(PFj, Asfj, Sbfj),
tetrahedral(Cloi, Reoi)
andspherical (Br~)
anions. Inparticular, special
care has been devoted to thestudy
of low temperaturephase
transitions exhibitedby
these materials.
Experimental.
The
samples
have beenprepared
asalready
described in[6]. Special
care has been taken for theseparation
of the tTTF molecule from the mixturecontaining
also TTF and HMTTF. This iscertainly
animportant
condition to obtaingood quality samples.
Electrical
conductivity
has been measuredalong
the needle axis(a direction)
of thesamples
with a low
frequency
lock-inequipment.
Contacts were made withplatinum
paste in the standard four-in-lineconfiguration.
ESR measurements were made with a Varian X bandspectrometer operating
at fixedfrequency (9.3 GHz).
The sameequipment
was used forantiferromagnetic
resonance measurements.As in
previous
studies of structural instabilities oforganic conductors,
theX-ray
diffusescattering experiments
have beenperformed
with the so-called fixed film-fixedcrystal
methodusing
a monochromatised CuKaX-ray
source as incident radiation.Temperatures regulated
from 25K to room
temperature
were obtained with a closed circuitcryostat.
Thephotographic study
wascompleted by quantitative
measurementsusing
aposition
sensitive linear detector.N I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)2X
SALTS 127@ ~~~~#)~~ $
200 PF6
Cl04
100~ ~
°0 100 (K)
P
~
.
~
~
.
$ '
. , ..
:
,
, .
, ..
.~
*.
-~
ww
T
128 JOURNAL
below 40 K with a value close to 300 K.
Finally
it should be noted that thesamples
are verybrittle around 230 K
(dashed region
shown inFig. I)
and theincorporation
of thecrystals
into grease was necessary toprevent
theirdegradation
around thistemperature.
This hasprobably
to be correlated with the poor
X-ray quality
of thesamples (most
of them are a collection of rnisorientedcrystals
with a common adirection)
or with apossible freezing
of the solvant included in the structure(see
nextpart).
The poor
crystal quality
of theRe04
salt did not allow any electrical measurements.Preliminary
results were obtained for the Br salt which has aconductivity
similar to that of theSbF~
orASF~ compounds.
However because of theirirregular shape,
the determination of theconductivity along
the stack direction wouldrequire
anX-ray
orientation of thecrystals.
X-ray
measurements.Table I
gives
the lattice symmetry and latticeparameters
of somecrystals
considered in thisstudy. [0, k, I ], II, k, I
and[2, k, I Weisenberg photographs
show that thePF6
saltbelongs
to the P~~~ ~space group. The lattice parameters have been determined both from
rotating crystal, Weissenberg photographs
andby
the measurement of theposition
of25(h, k, I )
reflections on a 4 circle diffractometer.Surprisingly
the cell volume obtained is about200h3 larger
than that for theCIO~
salt(Z
=
2)
or twice that of theASF~
salt(Z= I).
Thissuggests
that two molecules of the solvant(tricmoroethane)
used in theelectrocrystallization (each
of them with a volume of about 100h3)
are
incorlJorated
in the structure. The lattice parameters of theSbF~
salt have been determined fromrotating crystal
and[h,k, ii
with h=
0, 1, 2,
3Weissenberg photographs, according
to theprocedure developed
in reference[8].
Then we have
performed
a lowtemperature X-ray
diffusescattering investigation
of theCl04
andPF~
salts in order to detectpossible
structuralphase
transitions.a)
In theCIO~ salt, X-ray pattems clearly
reveal the occurrence of a structuralphase
transition at about 137 K
T~),
temperature at which ananomaly
ofresistivity
is observed(see Fig. I).
The structural transition belowl~
consists inTable I. Structural paraJneters
of
soJne(tTTF)2X
salts at rooJn teJnperature.X
CIO~ PF~ ASF~ SbF~
a
(h)
14. 7.13 7.376 7.56b
(h)
6. I1.76 6.398 6.56c
(h)
17.08 12.811 13.06a
(deg)
96.0 90 83.52 83.9p (deg)
104.9 90.8 86.36 88.6y
(deg)
81.9 90 85.88 86.5V
(h3)
163 433 643Z 2 2
Space
groupPi
P~~~
Pi Pi
Reference
[22]
~[6]
This workN I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)2X
SALTS 129~
~ 3
§
nib
)
@
(K)
Fig.
2.Temperature dependence
oftheintensity
ofasuperlattice
reflection(a)
and ofa mainBragg
reflection
(b)
of(tTTF)2Cl04.
I)
the onset ofsuperlattice Bragg
reflections at the reduced wave vector(0, 1/2, 1/2)
with respect to the mainBragg
reflections of thehigh temperature lattice,
whose parameters aregiven
in table Iit)
an elastic deformation of the main(high temperature)
Bravais latticeiii)
ahuge change
ofintensity
of some mainBragg
reflections.More
quantitatively figure
2agives
thetemperature dependence
of asuperlattice
reflection.It shows a
rapid
increase ofintensity
from 136.8 K(m T~)
to 134K,
then a smoother rate of increase for lower temperatures. No saturation in its rate of increase is observed down to 25 K the lowest temperature reached. The averageintensity
of thesuperlattice
reflections is aboutone tenth of that of the main reflections.
Isotropic pretransitional
fluctuations can be observed up to about 200 K.Figure
2bgives
the temperaturedependence
of a mainBragg
reflectionstrongly
affectedby
the
phase
transition. It shows astrong
decrease ofintensity
in the first fivedegrees
below T~, then a moregentle
decrease ofintensity
down to 80K,
where about 85 9b of theintensity
islost. The
dip
ofintensity
shown at T~ infigure
2b isprobably
an artifactproduced by
aslight misalignment
of thecrystal undergoing
strong elastic deformations at T~.All the structural data are consistent with a continuous
(2nd order) phase
transition at T~. Moreover the transition involves considerable structural modifications asemphasized by
the strong
intensity
of thesuperlattice reflections,
theimportant change
ofintensity
of some mainBragg
reflections and the elastic deformation of the Bravais lattice. A structuralrefinement of the low
temperature
structure is necessary in order to describe these modifications moreprecisely.
b)
We haveperformed
a lowtemperature investigation
of thePF~
salt with the fixed film- fixedcrystal
method down to 30 K(in
order to detect apossible
structural transition around50
K),
temperature at which anomalies are observedby
ESR measurements(see
nextpart).
Our
investigation
does not reveal anysuperstructure
formation at low temperatures but wehave observed below 50 K an increase of the
intensity
of someBragg
reflections of thehigh
temperature lattice. This last feature could be associated with a structuralphase
transition atconstant unit cell volume
breaking
some symmetry elements of thehigh temperature
P~~~ ~
space group.
ESR measurements.
For all the
samples,
Lorentzian lines are observed. Theeigendirections
of the g tensor were obtained aftermeasuring
the ESRsignal
for six different directions of themagnetic
field. Theeigenvalues
arerespectively
:g~~~ =
2.0022(5)
g,~~=
2.0070
(5)
g~~~=
2.0100(5).
These
eigendirections
of the g tensor are related to the molecular axes :respectively
theperpendicular
to the molecularplane,
the short molecular and thelong
molecular directions[9]. They
do notcorrespond
tosimple crystallographic
directions. For this reason we have nottried to compare in details the ESR data between the different
(tTTF)2X
salts.The ESR data for
(tTTF)2Cl04
aregiven
infigure
3. The g factorbeing
almostindependent
of temperature is not shown. These datacorrespond
to a direction of themagnetic
field close to g~~~. Themagnetic susceptibility always
decreases whencooling (note
thesemi,log
scale inFig. 3a).
As shown in theinset,
there isclearly
achange
ofslope
around 140 K(a semi-log plot
ofXT
versus IIT
reveals amagnetic
gapassuming
X=
~
e-~/
~~).T
AH
j
,/
~
~
/
M
~
~ ~
5 lK-'I
(K) (K)
h)
Fig. 3. ESR data for the Cl04 salt
(a)
nonnalisedsusceptibility
(a log-logplot
is given in theinset),
(b) linewidth.From these data we
get
thefollowing magnetic
activation energy:A~m700K
forTm140K, A~
ml 000K for Tw140K. These tworegimes
are also visible from the temperaturedependence
of the linewidth which first decreases uponcooling
and then increases below 140 K. Thesemagnetic
anomaliessupport
the occurrence of a structuralphase
transition at 137 K.Finally,
these data are very similar to thosealready published
in reference[6]
for(tTTF)~BF~
since the results are very close above 100K(below
this temperature thesusceptibility
is very small and extrinsic effects are mostlikely
to beobserved).
This is a strongargument
to suggest that the tetrahedral geometry of the anion is relevant and that one mayexpect
to observe relatedproperties
for theRe04
salt.bf I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)~X
SALTS 131(Gauu)
xn
o
o
I
2.OM
~
2.
T(K)I
T(K) ° TlK)
h)
Fig.
4. ESR data for theRe04
salt(a)
normalisedsusceptibility,
~b) linewidth. The low T variation of the g factor isgiven
in the inset.The ESR data for this
compound
shown infigure
4 areclearly
different. Thesemagnetic
features aretypical
ofweakly
dimerized salts such as those of the(TMTTF)2X
seriesill-
At low temperatures thevanishing susceptibility
and thedivergence
of the linewidth atTN
m 20 K are characteristic of the condensation of anantiferromagnetic ground
state[10].
The ESR data for the
SbF~
salt aregiven
infigure
5. The results forASF~
are very similar.The
AsF6
results resemble that shown infigure
4 for theRe04
salt. Most of thecrystals
aretwinned
ill
and the ESR spectrum iscomposed
of several lines.Special
care should be taken toseparate
thesesignals
for a properstudy
of one of them. For this reason the data shown infigure
5 are not takenalong
asimple magnetic
direction. Thisdifficulty
alsoexplains
the poor accuracy of the resultsgiven
in reference[6]
for theASF~
salt(the
decrease ofsusceptibility
at 60 K is an artifact due to the deformation of thecomposite
ESRsignal).
The linewidth first decreases with T while the g factor is almostindependent
oftemperature.
At the same time themagnetic susceptibility
decreasessmootmy.
Below 35 Kantiferromagnetic
fluctuationsI
)~~4~°
~___-____-
AH
i .
z I
(K) (K)
b)
Fig. 5. ESR data for the
SbF~
salt :(a)
g factor and linewidth,(b)
normalisedsusceptibility.
I 2,00%
2.0030
*
I la
~ it
T
N I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)2X
SALTS 133eigendirections
aresimply
deduced from the room temperature tensorby
a rotation of about±10° around g;~~. Since these rotations are related to the molecular axes directions
[9]
the results suggest that below 50 K the molecules rotateby
about 10° around their short molecular axis. The occurrence of two lines then indicates two different molecular orientations in thestructure, Since no
superstructure
has been observed below 50 Kby X-ray studies,
it ispossible
tointerpret
the ESR databy
astaggered
rotation of the two dimerscomposing
the unit cell. A lowtemperature
refinement of the structure is necessary toclarify
thispoint.
In addition to the ESR linesplitting,
a suddendrop
of the linewidth AH and of thespin susceptibility
x~ is observed(Fig. 6).
However our datasuggest
that thesusceptibility
remains finite andgapless
below thisanomaly.
Results for the Br salt are
given
infigure
7. This behavior is alsotypical
of salts oftype
I.The condensation of the AF order is observed with the
highest
NEeltemperature
everreported: TN
m33K. Asexpected
the linewidthdiverges
whenapproaching
TN. Theparticularly
cleardivergence
of the linewidth intemperature
allows a rather accurate determination of thecorresponding
criticalexponent.
This determination isperformed by
thelog-log plot
in the inset offigure
7a. The deduced value of the exponent agreesquite
well with the mean field theoreticalprediction (p
=
1.5)
of reference[12].
Antiferromagnefic
resonance.The ESR data suggest that the
ReO~, Br, ASF~
andSbF~
salts have a lowtemperature antiferromagnetic ground
state. Because of thesample quality, antiferromagnetic
resonance(AFMR)
hasonly
been detected for the last two salts below the N6eltemperature
TN. Theexperimental temperature (4.5 K)
was lowenough compared
withTN
to consider thatthe zero temperature limit is reached.
The results are
given
infigure
8.Simple crystal
directions(shown
ininset)
were chosen as rotation axes. In both cases theexperiment
was limitedby
themorphology
of thecrystals
:good quality crystals
wereusually
too small for aquantitative study
of AFMR.Moreover,
most of the
samples
are twinned as shownby
the occurrence of two ESRsignals.
In the case of the
SbF~ salt,
a ratherbig crystal
was foundgiving only
one ESR line. The X- ray characterisation has shown that it was a collection of severalcrystals
oriented in very close directions. Since no othercrystal
of reasonable size wasavailable,
we have used thissample
for the AFMRstudy.
Its AFMRspectrum
consists of two linesfollowing
very similar rotationpatterns.
Figure
8(a, b)
shows thepatterns
for the narrowest line. The continuous lines in thisfigure give
the fitusing
theNagamiya theory [13].
This allows the determination of theTable II. AFMR paraJneters deduced
froJn
thefit using
theNagamiya theory.
For theSbF~ salt, (a)
and(b) refer
to the two observedsignals.
r= I xi
IX
i is taken
equal
to I(zero
teJnperatureliJnit),
£l_ and£l~
are thezero-field frequencies.
0 and q~ are thepolar angles of
the rotation axes
(see
insetof Fig. 8)
in theJnagnetic fraJne.
r
fl~ (kG)
0° 1°( )
SbF~
12.8 7.4 0a) (1) (12.3) (7.I) (o)
b)
12.8 7.4 85 85(1) (12.3) (7.1) (85) (85)
AsF6
13.3 7.6 10 25~ l
U/~~y
zv
~
i~
Q
af
I~
,
~ °
o
I /
I ° " ~
cD . o m
m
°
~ ~
~ X °
X
~ ~
o
l~ p
~,
~~ ° 4(°) ~~ ~'° 4(°
~
l
~
Q ~
~ #
g oo o
cD '
O~~
~ X
.i
~-~
C)
-i° v (°) d
Fig.
8.(a)
and(b)
AFMR rotation patterns for(tTTF)2SbF6.
The orientation of the crystal and the rotation axes aregiven
in the inset. The continuous linesgive
the fit using theNagamiya theory.
The theoretical parameters aregiven
in table II. (c) Deduced orientation of themagnetic
axes relative to thecrystal.
Note that the easy axis is either atm
80° or m 100° from a.
(d) Corresponding
data for the AsF6 salt. The theoretical parameters are also given in table II.eigenvalues
andeigendirections
of themagnetic anisotropy
which arereported
infigure
8c.The fit of the broadest
signal gives
the sameposition
of themagnetic
axes within theexperimental
accuracy. The zero fieldfrequencies
are about 4 fb smaller than those of thenarrow line. We have
presently
no clearexplanation
for this result which may besimply
theconsequence of the
imperfection
of thesample
used. Thecorresponding parameters
aregiven
in table II. The zero fieldfrequencies £l±
are similar to those observed for the otherorganic compounds [10].
For bothlines,
r= I is a reasonable value since theexperimental
temperature
is small with respect to TN.For the
ASF~ salt, only
smallcrystals
were available andprobably
because ofpolarisation
effects, only
the bubble-likepattern
has been detected(Fig. 8d). Moreover, only
one line was found. The parameters deduced from the fit are alsogiven
in table II. As in theprevious
case,N I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)2X
SALTS 135r = I is obtained and a very similar
position
of the easy axis issuggested although
the determination of themagnetic anisotropy
isincomplete. Compared
with the narrow line ofSbF~,
the zero fieldfrequencies
areapproximately
4 fblarger,
in agreement with theslightly larger
TN found for theASF~
salt.Discussion.
A
striking
feature of the(tTTF)2X
series is the widevariety
of behaviors found when the anion ischanged.
WithX,
at least three differentcrystallographic
structures are found at room temperature in this series(Tab. I).
Each structuraltype
has a differenttemperature
behavior of the electricalconductivity (Fig. I)
and stabilizes aground
state of differentnature. ESR results
suggest
amagnetic phase
transition for theASF~, SbF6, Re04
and Brsalts. The
antiferromagnetic ground
state has beenfirmly
confirmed in the former two saltsby
AFMR measurements. A structural
phase
transition with a superstructure formation isobserved in the
CIO~
salt at 137 K. Thisphase
transitionchanges
the activation energy of thespin degrees
of freedom(deduced
fromspin susceptibility
measurements,Fig. 3)
but not thecharge degrees
of freedom(deduced
fromconductivity
measurements,Fig. I).
ESR measurementssuggest
that thePF~
salt couldundergo
a structuralphase
transition at about 50K. At thistemperature
adrop
ofspin susceptibility (Fig. 6)
and an increase of theactivation energy of the electrical
conductivity (Fig. I)
are observed. Let us now discuss these different behaviors moreprecisely.
I.
(tTTF)~CIO~.
The roomtemperature
latticeparameters
of theCIO~
salt aregiven
in table I.They
are very close to those of theBF~
salt for which a structure refinement shows atroom temperature
[6]
:an altemate
ordering
of the tetrahedral anion and a tetramerisation of theorganic
stackalong
the a directiona uniform
ordering
of the anions in the other two directions.With respect to the a x b x c prototype unit cell of the
Bechgaard
salts(or
that of theASF~
salt),
the roomtemperature
structure of theBF~
andCIO~
salts can be describedby
a2 a x b x c
supercell corresponding
to theordering
of the tetrahedral anions with the wave vector(1/2, 0, 0). Although
thea*/2
component amounts to the 2k~
wave vector of the ID electron gas in the 2 : series oforganic conductors,
the tetramerisation of theorganic
stack may not be at theorigin
of the electronic localization since a similar activation energy isobserved in the non-tetramerized
ASF~
salt. One alternative is that the activated behavior isdue,
as in many other salts oftype I,
to the 4k~ charge
localization effects of onecharge
perdimer of molecules. Moreover the
2k~
tetramerisation of theorganic
stacks could beresponsible
for the activated behavior of thespin susceptibility (Fig. 3)
as the formation of tetramers leads to apairing
of twospins
in asinglet
state. Thispairing
creates a gap in themagnetic
excitation spectrum(I.e. singlet-triplet splitting
in the extreme case of welldecoupled tertramers).
This last limit iscertainly
not encountered in theCIO~
salt above T~ since the observedmagnetic
gap is of the order of a fewkB 7~. Moreover,
in agreementwith this
interpretation,
an activatedspin susceptibility
is not observed in theASF~
saltcontaining only
dimerized stacks.The
Cl04
saltundergoes
a structuralphase
transition at T~ = 137 K(a
similar transition at aslightly
lower temperature isexpected
for theBF~
salt whose ESR behavior above 100 K isnearly
identical to that of theCIO~
salt[6]).
Thisphase
transition exhibitsquasi-isotropic pretransitional fluctuations,
which seems to indicate that it is drivenby
the interstackcoupling (an
intrastackdriving
force leads toquasi
lDpretransitional
fluctuations as in a pure Peierlsor
spin-Peierls instability).
At this transition adoubling
of the lattice parameters in the b and cdirections,
transverse to thestacking axis,
is observed. This newperiodicity
can beexplained by
a sequence of intradimer or interdimer distortions out ofphase
in all directions. As a tetramer is made of two dimers theperiodicity
in thestacking
direction a iskept.
This and the considerable structural modifications observed atl~
on the main lattice could beeasily
understood if the
instability
relaxes Coulombrepulsions
betweencharges
localized onneighboring
tetramers and between tetramers and anions.Usually
the minimization of Coulomb interactions leads to anout-of-phase ordering
ofcharge
extremaconsistently
with the informationgiven
above.The main effect of the distortion on
magnetic properties
is an increase of themagnetic
gap.We believe that such a feature is more
likely
the consequence of the distortion than itsdriving
force. When it is the case, as for the
spin-Peierls instability
of relatedcompounds
like(TMTTF)~PF~
or(BCPTTF)~PF~,
thephase
transition occurs at a much lowertemperature (15-30 K) [7, 14]
than in(tTTF)~CIO~.
2.
(tTTF)~PF~.
At first it issurprising,
with respect to theTMTT(Se)F
prototypeseries,
that salts with octahedral anions couldadopt
different structures. Table I shows that this is thecase in the
(tTTF)~X
series for the~PF~, AsF6, SbF~)
anions. ThePF~
salt is monoclinic with Z = 2 while theASF~
andSbF6
salts are triclinic with Z=
I. In addition the
PF6
saltprobably incorporates
two solvant molecules per unit cell. Thiscertainly implies
a differentpacking
of the tTTF molecules. A more detailedcomparison
between these saltsrequires
a full structuredetermination. Nevertheless it is clear that the difference in
packing
arrangement has aconsiderable influence on their
physical properties, especially
on the electricalconductivity
and low
temperature ground
state.Figure
I shows that thecharges
are much less localized inthe
PF~
salt than in theASF~
andSbF~
ones. Aprogressive
localization occurs in the formercase at low temperatures
(I.e.
below about200K)
a behavior which resemble that of(TMTTF)~PF~
with however a much smaller activation energy(A
~
100 K
compared
to 600 K[7]).
This last feature coulde,l~l;iin
,ih,ItTTF),P[,
,hnws an unusualphase
transition at about 50 K where thecharge
activation energy A exhibits a further increaseby
a factor of 2(Fig. I)
and where thespin susceptibility
decreasesby
a factor of 4(Fig. 6a).
This means that both thecharge
andspin degrees
of freedom are involved in the transition. These features arepartially
reminiscent of those observed in Peierls transitionswith, however,
animportant
difference since thespin susceptibility
remains flat(I.e. gapless)
below the transition. Such a situation could be achievedby
apartial pairing
below 50 K of two dimers per unit cell. Thepairing
could arise from astaggered
rotation of the dimerspreviously
invoked toexplain
thesplitting
of theeigendirections
of the g tensor. Moreover thesample
could remainparamagnetic
if thepairing
does not occur on everyorganic
chain. This situationimplies
theoccurrence of
non-equivalent
chains in the lowtemperature
structure. This can be obtainedby breaking
at least one symmetry element of the P~high temperature
space group. As theII n
structural arrangement of the tTTF molecules is not known the mechanism of this transition cannot be further discussed.
Last but not
least,
it isstriking
thatby
thedrop
of thespin susceptibility
and of the ESR linewidth the transition found in(tTTF)~PF~
recalls thatpreviously reported
at 269 K and 273 K in the(BEDTTTF)~X
salts ofASF~
andSbF~ respectively [15].
The results areslightly
different in these materials since a
doubling
of the unit cell is observedalong
the b direction of bestconductivity
at the transition. However it should be noted that twonon-equivalent
stacksare found in the low temperature structure of these BEDTTTF salts
[16].
3.
(tTTF)2AsF6
andSbF6.
TheAsF6
andSbF6
salts show a substantial 4k~
localization of theircharge degrees
of freedom at roomtemperature
and below. Moreover an antifer-romagnetic ordering
in found in both cases at lowtemperature.
N I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)2X
SALTS 137Up
to now,only
the room temperature structure of theASF~
salt is known[6].
However theASF~
andSbF~
salts have very similar lattice parameters(see
Tab.I)
which indicates that bothcompounds certainly adopt
the same structure.(tTTF)2AsF~
isisomorlJhous
to theBechgaard
salts(TMTTF
or TMTSeFsalts)
with at least two noticeable differences :. the molecules are not
perpendicular
to thestacking
axis. This can be checkedby
the determination of the g tensoreigendirections.
Inparticular
the onecorresponding
to g~;~ makes anangle
with the needle direction a. This seems to be ageneral
characteristic ofthe
(tTTF)~X
series. the
angle
y(m
86° see Tab.I)
islarger
than that found in the TMTTF or TMTSeF series(m
70°).
These structure differences have some consequences on the
magnetic anisotropy
that we shall discuss in thefollowing.
From the structure of
Bechgaard salts,
the characteristics of themagnetic anisotropy
have been calculated as a function of themagnetic
superstructure. For sulfurcompounds, dipolar
interactions were shown to be dominant and the results areessentially
a function of the b component q~ of themagnetic ordering [17].
This wave vector can be related to a parameter#
as follows
[18]
:qb =
(i
+~/ (i)
The
anisotropy
energy and theposition
of themagnetic
axes are therefore function of#
which is a function of the transferintegrals
in the(a,
b) plane.
Inparticular #
isdrastically dependent
of the balance between the different components of the transverse interactions which are Tdependent.
Thus low temperaturecrystallographic
data are necessary to estimate thisparameter.
On the otherhand,
when#
isdetermined,
the other details of the structureare less relevant to estimate the
magnetic anisotropy
and aprototype
structure has been used to discuss the role of#
within the TMTTF and TMTSeF series[18].
To illustrate this argument, we have calculated the
magnetic anisotropy
for a verysimplified
model of the structure of salts oftype
I. Since the correction due to thecoupling
in the c direction is small[18],
we have used a 2D model. Each molecule is reduced to apoint
site and the lattice mimics the
organization
of theorganic
molecules. Diads are introduced in the a direction(by
the introduction ofdj),
y # 90° and am b. This lattice is shown in the inset of
figure
9a. The results fordj
=
a/2,
b= a, and y
= 70° are
given
infigures
9a and 9b.As shown in
figure 9,
two domains labelled I and II are found whose limits are identifiedby
a
divergence
of R=
Wm /W~i
wherelI§~
and W~~ are the differences between theeigenvalues
of the
anisotropy
energy in the intermediate-hard andeasy-intermediate planes respectively.
The
divergence
of R comes from the cancellation of W~~ at the borderline between thedomains.
Figure
9a also shows the sum S=ll§~+ W~i
inarbitrary
units(an
absolutedetermination would
require
a choice of theamplitude
of thespin density
wave condensed on thechains).
The calculated information on
eigendirections
isgiven
infigure
9b. Due to the 2D nature of thecalculation,
one of theeigendirections
of themagnetic anisotropy
is c*= a x b and the
other two are in the
(a,
b) plane. Following
the notationgiven
in theinset,
this means that thepolar angle
q~ of anyeigendirection
is either 0 or 901 In the latter case thecorresponding polar angle
0 is 90°(the corresponding
direction isc*).
Thusonly
theknowledge
of 0 for twoeigendirections
is necessary to characterize themagnetic
frame in thissimple
model. These results aregiven
infigure
9b for the easy and intermediate axes. Continuous functions are obtained in each domain(considering
that 0 and 180° areequivalent
values of theangle 0).
Inparticular,
in domain II where01is
90°(I.e.
the intermediate axis isalong c*)
there is anDE
PHYSIQUE
I Nfi
o o ao
~ o
o 6
o
I I
Q~'
C'Q
a~
~~
@
(5)
,,'',, II
,j
', ,',
, ,' ,'~~
,' / ,' (/
-E0 -120 40 j
~~ 4
(20) (60)
i b
@
A J'
, '
, '
, '
,'J ,
J i
,', ,
' ,,
' ,
J J
' i~70
,'
i , I~90
J'
' ,
$'
(+901 4
Lj
Fig.
9.(a)
and(b)
theoretical determination of theanisotropy using
thesimple
model described in the text (the notation for the lattice and polarangles
is given in the inset). (a) R is the ratio between H§~ and W~i difference between theanisotropy energies
in the intermediate-hard andeasy-intermediate
planesrespectively
(continuous line). S (dotted line) is the sum H§u + WET in arbitrary units. Domains I and II are defined in the text.(b)
Polarangle
9E(continuous line)
and 91(dotted line)
for the easy andintermediate axes as a function of ~§. For these two
figures
we follow thepresentation
of reference [17].(c)
Effect on 9~ of achange
of the triclinicangle
y.almost linear
correspondence
between0~
and#.
Asalready
mentioned the crossover observed around 0° and 60° is the consequence of theinterchange
between the two lowesteigenvalues.
Similar results are found after a reasonable
change
of the different parameters. Forexample,
achange
ofdi simply
induces a smallchange
of theslope 0~(~§)
in domain IIwithout modification of the crossover I
++ II. The same conclusion
applies
when the ratio bla
isslightly
modified. The influence of y is illustrated infigure
9c. The main effect is a shiftof the
position
of domains I and II. Theslope 0~(#
remains almost the same.M I PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
(tTTF)~X
SALTS 139It is
striking
that we canreproduce
sonicely
thefigures
obtained with thecomplete
calculation of reference[17].
Theonly
difference is that c* is notexactly
aneigendirection
because of the tridinic
symmetry.
Thus we use the conclusions of our model to discuss the tTTF salts. Since low T structural data are not available we use our results to deduce#.
Inparticular
we takeprofit
of the linear relation0~(#)
to estimate#
from the AFMR determination of0~.
In our case y is close to 86° at 300 K(see
Tab.I)
and we alsoexpect
y to be close to 90° at lowtemperatures.
Thus we can use the continuous line infigure
9c. Within theexperimental
accuracy,0~
is close to either 80° or 100°(the
rotation axis inFig.
8a can beeither + a or
a).
In both casesfigure
9cgives
an estimate of ~b clo~e to 90[This result is
important
to discuss the nature of the low temperatureground
state.Many
results in the TMTTF series have been discussed
using
apurely
lDtheory [4b].
In thisdescription
one should observe anantiferromagnetic ordering
when the electronic localization isweak,
aspin-Peierls ground
statebeing
favored in morestrongly
localized systems. Thislocalization is
experimentally
revealedby
theexponential
increase of the electricalresistivity
below the characteristic
temperature T~.
Thistheory explains why
in the TMTTF series theweakly
localized Br salt presents an AF low Tground
state while the more localizedPF~
andAsF6
salts present aspin-Peierls
distortion[3]. However,
even in the TMTTFseries,
some results seem to contradict thisanalysis.
The SCN saltpresents
astrong
electronic localization below 160 K where a 4k~
structural transition occurs[19]
but has an AFground
state. In thesame manner,
although
the localization gap is similar in thePF~, ASF~
andSbF~
TMTTF saltsonly
the lastcompound presents
an AFground
state below 6 K[10].
Similarproblems
occurin other series of
salts,
the conclusionbeing
that an AFground
state is also observed when alarge
electronic localization is present[20].
The present work supports thisanalysis.
(tTTF)~SbF6
orAsF6
exhibit an AFordering although they
are more localized than(TMTTF)~PF6
whichpresents
aspin-Peierls
transition.It has been
recently suggested
that aquasi-
lDtheory considering
the interchain interaction in the b direction is necessary to discuss theproblem
of thecompetition
between low Tground
states in more details
[21].
In the case of thespin-Peierls instability
the dominant interchaincoupling
which is kinetic favors the transverse wave vector q~already given by (I)
for the AFordering.
It wouldgenerally
lead to an incommensurate superstructure. However the condensation of thespin-Peierls (SP) ground
stateimplies
astrong coupling
with theunderlying
lattice and therefore a commensuratesuperstructure (this
is an alternative way ofthinking
to the influence of the electroniclocalization).
When this lock-in term is dominantonly
commensurate values of qb are allowed for the SP distortion(I.e. #
= 0 or
90]. Finally,
Coulomb interchain
couplings
which favor distortions out ofphase
onneighboring
chains can discriminate between these two values. Thus thespin-Peierls ground
state will beonly
stabilised when
4
m 0 in
(I).
The observation of an AFground
state in tTTF salts withSbF~
or
AsF6
where#
is close to 90°supports
thisanalysis.
Conclusion.
We have described the structural and electronic
properties
of the(tTTF)~X
salts. In this series thecharge
carriers have a localized character. In the salts withASF~, SbF~, Re04
or Br thespin degrees
of freedomcouple antiferromagnetically
at low temperatures. Inparticular
the Br salt orders at 33K,
thehighest
Nkeltemperature
everreported
in the 2: series oforganic
salts. The
analysis
of the AFground
state of theASF~
andSbF~
salts supports the argument that thecompetition
between AF andspin-Peierls
low Tground
states is in partgovemed by
the interchain
coupling.
New kinds of structuralphase
transitions have been found in theCl04
andPF6
salts. Such transitions could be the result of a delicate balance between Coulomb interactions between localizedcharges
in these 2 :1 salts.Acknowledglnents.
We thank T. Granter and A. Penicaud for unit cell determinations.
References
[Ii
For a recent review see theProceedings
of the Intemational Conference on Science andTechnology
ofSynthetic
Metals, Synth. Met. 27 and 28(1988).
[2] JtROME D., MAzAUD
A.,
RIBAULT M., BECHGAARD K., J.Phys.
Lett. France 41(1980)
L95.[3] CouLoN C., NATO ASI Series B, Eds. P. Delhads and M. Drillon
~Plenum
Press, NewYork)
168(1987)
201.[4] (a) EMERY V. J., BRUINSMA R., BARISIC S.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 48(1982)
1039 ;(b) BOURBONNAIS C., NATO ASI series B, Eds. D. Jkrbme and L. G. Caron ~Plenum Press, New
York)
155(1987)
155.[5] LAVERSANNE R., Ph. D. Thesis
(Bordeaux)
1987.[6] CHASSEAU D., GAULTIER J., MIANE J.
L.,
CouLoN C., DELHALS P., FLANDROIS S., FABRE J. M., GIRAL L., J.Phys.
Colloq. France 44(1983)
C3-1223.[7] CouLoN C., DELHALS P., FLANDROIS S., LAGNIER R., BONJOUR E., FABRE J.-M., J.
Phys.
France 43 (1982) 1059.
[8] HEBERT H., Acta Cryst. A 34
(1978)
946.[9] KINOSCHITA N., ToKumoTo M., ANzAi H., SAiTO G., J.
Phys.
Sac. Jpn 54(1985)
4498.[10] CouLoN C., Scow J. L., LAVERSANNE R.,
Phys.
Rev. 833(1986)
6235.[I Ii
As inBechgaard
salts, the two elements of the twin share the a axis andcorrespond through
a 180°rotation around it.
[12] BAILLARGEON P., BOURBONNAIS C., TOMIC S., VACA P., COULON C.,
Synth.
Met. 27(1988)
883.[13] NAGAMIYA T., Prog. Theor. Phys. ll
(1954)
309.[14]
DUCASSE L., COULONC.,
CHASSEAU D., YAGBASAN R., FABRE J. M., GOUASMIA A. K.,Synth.
Met. 27
(1988)
543.[15] LAVERSANNE R., AMIELL J., DELHALS P., CHASSEAU D., HAuw C., Solid State Commun. 52
(1984)
177.[16] BECHTEL F., GAULTIER J.
(unpublished).
[17l
ROGER M., DELRIEU J. M., WOPE MBOUGUE E.,Phys.
Rev. 834(1986)
4952.[18] YAMAJI Y., J.
Phys.
Sac. Jpn 55(1986)
860.[19] COULON C., MAAROUFI A., AMIELL J., DUPART E., FLANDROIS S., DELHA~S P., MORET R.,
POUGET J. P., MORAND J. P.,
Phys.
Rev. 826(1982)
6322.[20] COULON C., VACA P., GRANTER T., GALLOIS B.,
Synth.
Met. 27(1988)
8449.[21] VACA P., COULON C., Phase transition (to be
published)
VACA P., Ph. D. Thesis, Grenoble (1988).
[22] GRANTER T., Private communication.