HAL Id: jpa-00246760
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246760
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
X-ray investigation of the
tetramethyldithiadiselenafulvalene (TMDTDSF)2X series of organic conductors. II. Influence of the orientational disorder on the structural instabilities
Q. Liu, S. Ravy, Jean Pouget, I. Johannsen, K. Bechgaard
To cite this version:
Q. Liu, S. Ravy, Jean Pouget, I. Johannsen, K. Bechgaard. X-ray investigation of the tetram-
ethyldithiadiselenafulvalene (TMDTDSF)2X series of organic conductors. II. Influence of the ori-
entational disorder on the structural instabilities. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (3),
pp.821-837. �10.1051/jp1:1993165�. �jpa-00246760�
Classification Physics Abstracts
74.70K 64.60C 71.45L
X-ray investigation of the tetramethyldithiadiselenafulvalene (TMDTDSF)~X series of organic conductors. II. Influence of the orientational disorder
onthe structural instabilities
Q.
Liu('),
S.Ravy ('),
J. P.Pouget ('),
I. Johannsen(2)
and K.Bechgaard (~)
(')
Laboratoire dePhysique
des Solides (*), Universitd de Paris Sud, B£timent 510, 91405Orsay
Cedex, France(2) H. C. Oersted Institute,
Universitetsparken
5, DK 2100Copenhagen,
Denmark(Received 29 July 1992, accepted in final form 4 November 1992)
Rksumk. Nous
prdsentons
une Etude par diffusion diffuse des rayons X des instabilitds structurales d'une nouvelle sdrie de conducteursorganiques,
de st~echiomdtrie 2: 1, construite sur la mo16cule TMDTDSF qui est unhybride
des mol£cules TMTTF et TMTSF. Les rdsultats sont discutds en relation avec le ddsordre orientationnel de la mol£cule TMDTDSF caractdrisd dans lapartie
I (TMDTDSF~PF6 Prdsente
une instabilitd structurale au vecteur d'onde 2k~possddant
uncaractbre mixte
spin-Peierls
(SP) onde de densitd decharge
(ODC) avec une Evolution en tempdrature interrnddiaire entre celles des instabilitds SP de (TMTTF)~PF~ et ODC de(TMTSF)2PF6.
A basse tempdrature cette instabilitd ne donne pas naissance h un orate tridimensionnel h grande distance de type SP. Probablement h cause du ddsordre, des distortions locales unidimensionnelles de type SP coexistent avec un ordre magndtique. L'influence duddsordre orientationnel de la moldcule TMDTDSF sur les transitions de mise en ordre des anions (OA) est discutde en terrne d'interactions et de champs aldatoires. Le ddsordre a un faible effet dans
(TMDTDSF~Re04 qui
subit une transition de phase stabilisant le vecteur d'onde qj =(1/2, 1/2, 1/2) h une
temp£rature critique
interrnddiaire entre celles de(TMTSF)~ReO~
et(TMTTF)~ReO~.
Les effets dechamps
aldatoires sontimportants
dans(TMDTDSF)~BF~ qui prdsente
unequasi-transition
dephase
au vecteur d'onde qj h unetemp£rature
«critique
»plus
basse que celle de
(TMTTF)~BF4
et (TMTSF )~BF~. L'absence de transition dephase
au vecteur d'onde qj dans(TMDTDSF~CIO~
est attribude aux effetsconjugu£s
deschamps
et interactionsaldatoires.
Abstract. We present an
X-ray
diffusescattering investigation
of the structural instabilities exhibitedby
a new series of 2: organic conductors based on the TMDTDSF molecule which is a hybrid between the TMTTF and TMTSF molecules. The results are discussed inrelationship
with the orientational disorder of the TMDTDSF molecule characterized in part I.(TMDTDSF~PF~
(*) URA 2 CNRS.
shows a 2k~ structural
instability having
a mixedspin-Peierls (SP)-charge density
wave(CDW)
character which exhibits a thermal behavior intermediate between that exhibited by the
~TMTTF)~PF~
SPinstability
and the(TMTSF)~PF~
CDW one. At low temperatures thisinstability
does not condense into a d-dimensional long range order SP ground state.Probably
because of the disorder, one-dimensional local SP distortions coexist with a
magnetic
order. The influence of the orientational disorder of the TMDTDSF molecule on the anion ordering (AO) transitions is discussed in terms of random interactions and random fields. Disorder is found to have a weak effect in (TMDTDSF~ReO~
whichundergoes
along
range qj= (1/2, 1/2, 1/2) AO
phase
transition at a critical temperature intermediate between those of(TMTSF)~ReO~
and(TMTTF)~ReO~.
Random field effects are found to beimportant
in(TMDTDSF~BF~
which exhibits a qjquasi
AOphase
transition at a « critical » temperaturesizeably depressed
with respectto those of (TMTTF
~BF~
and (TMTSF )~BF~. Random fields as well as random interactions are believed to beresponsible
for the absence of a qj AOphase
transition in(TMDTDSF)~CIO~.
1. Introduction.
Over the past ten years the
tetrarnethyltetraselenafulvalenium salts, (TMTSF)~X,
andtetramethyltetrathiafulvalenium
salts,(TMTTF)~X,
where X is a monovalentanion,
have attracted a lot of attention because theirphase diagram
exhibits animpressive
number ofcompeting
instabilities. Table I summarizes some of theground
states observed at ambient pressure in various salts.The
(TMTSF)~X
series based on octahedral anions(X =PF~, ASF~, SbF~)
shows acompetition
between a low pressurespin density
wave(SDW) ground
state[1, 2]
and ahigh
pressure
superconducting
state[3, 4],
while at ambient pressure the(TMTTF)2X
seriesexhibits either a
Spin-Peierls (SP) ground
state(X
=
PF~, ASF~) [5-7]
or anantiferromagnetic (AF)
one(X
=
SbF~) [8].
The SPground
state of(TMTTF)~PF~
evolves towards an AFground
state under pressure[9].
These salts
crystallize
in thePi
triclinic system[lo, iii
where thezigzag stacking
oforganic
molecules(along a)
delimitscavities,
eachcontaining
one anion X. Due to the 2 :1 commensuratestoichiometry
and to the inversionsymmetry rendering
all the molecularsites
equivalent,
the one~dimensional(lD)
electron gasexperiences
a4k~ (ma*)
bondpotential
from the anion sublattice. Thispotential, together
with the dimerization of theorganic
stack
(partly
associated with the 4k~
response of the chain to the anionicpotential [12]),
contributes to a 4k~ charge
gap A~(m arT~ ).
This gap has apertinent
effect at ambient pressure in the(TMTTF)~X
series[13],
as evidencedby
the observation of aprogressive charge
localization below T~ 230 K
[5, 14].
Well belowT~,
thecoupling
between thespin degrees
of freedomgives
rise either to an AF or to nonmagnetic
SPground
state. In the SPground
state, thespin pairing
is achievedby
an a*/2(m
« 2k~
» lattice tetramerization. 4k~ charge
localization effects are not observed in the
(TMTSF )~X
series[15]. Only
anincipient quasi-
ID 2 k~ CDWinstability
can bedetected,
below about 150 K-200K,
in thePF6
16] andASF~ [4]
salts. This
instability
vanishes below about 30 K when the 2 k~ SDW fluctuationsbegin
todiverge [16].
Additional instabilities occur in salts
containing non-centrosymmetrical anions,
such as the tetrahedra X=
BF4, Cl04, Re04,
which are disordered in theorganic
stack cavities at ambient temperature.They
consist in asuperstructure
formation due to theordering
of anions forentropy
reasons when thetemperature
is lowered[6, 17].
Thesuperlattice periodicity
stabilized
by
the anionordering (AO)
seems todepend
upon a subtle balance between« direct
» interactions
j18],
which favor a uniformordering
of tetrahedra in stackdirection,
Table I. Critical temperatures and critical wave vectors
of
variousground
states observedat ambient pressure in
(TMTSF)2X, (TMDTDSF)2X
and(TMTTF)2X
salts.X TMTSF TMDTDSF TMTTF
PF~ Ts~w
= 12 K
Ts~w
=
7 K
Tsp
m 15 KqsDw =
(0.5, 0.22,
and ID SP short range/)qsp
=
(1/2, 1/2, 1/2)
order
(f~
25h
ASF~ Ts~w
= 12 K SDW ?
Tsp
= II K
SP short range
SbF6 TsDw
" 12 K ? TAF " 6 K
qA~
(o.5, o.05, ?)
Cl04
TAO =24
K,
qAo= q~ qj AO short range TAO " 70 K
state : T~ =
1.2 qAo " qi
state
:TsDw
~6 qsDw(0.5, 0.12,
?BF4
TAO" 36 K qj
quasi
AO transition TAO = 40 KqAo " qi at
T(o
~ 22 K qAo = qjRe04
TAO=
177 K TAO = 165 K TAO = 154 K
qAO ~ qi qAO " qi qAO = qi
NO~
TAO= 41 K AO short range TAO " 50 K
qAO = q3 qAO " q3
TsDw
" 8 Kand mediated interactions
through
the 2 k~ response Of theOrganic
stack(I,e.
« 2k~
» SPresponse in the case Of TMTTF stack Or 2
k~
CDW response in the case Of TMTSFstack),
which favor an altemate
Ordering
in chain direction[19].
At ambient pressure, the mediated interaction dominates in the salts withanions,
such asRe04,
in strong contact with theorganic
stack and in the TMTTF series where the
2k~
SP response shows a low temperaturedivergence.
In this case, the qj =(1/2, 1/2, 1/2)
AO transition involves also a 2k~
CDW or SP distortion of the stacks[20-22]
whichrespectively
opens a gap in thecharge
andspin degrees
of freedom
(case
of TMTSFsalts) [23]
oronly
in thespin degrees
of freedom when thecharges
are
already
localized(case
of TMTTFsalts) [5, 24].
« Direct » interactions are dominant in TMTSF salts when the anions are in weak contact with theOrganic
stacks. In this case no gap isopened
at the AO and the same electronicground
states as those encountered in TMTSF salts with octahedral anions are found. This is well illustrated in the case of(TMTSF )~Cl04 where, depending
upon thecooling
rate at the q~ =(0, 1/2, 0)
AO transition[25],
either asuperconducting
(T~ = 1.2K)
or a SDW(Ts~w
= 6K) ground
state are stabilized. This is also the case of(TMTSF)2N03 126]
which stabilizes a SDWground
state[27]
well below the q~=(1/2, 0, 0)
AO transition. The delicate balance between mediated and «direct»interactions can also be reversed under pressure,
probably
because of thevanishing
Of the 2 k~ CDW response under pressure. This effect isparticularly
well documented in the case Of(TMTSF)~Re04
where the AO wave vectorchanges
from qj to q4 =(0, 1/2, 1/2)
under pressure[28].
With the q4 uniformOrdering
in stackdirection, (TMTSF )~Re04
presents eithera SDW Or a
superconducting ground
state[29].
The first motivation Of the
study
Of 2 : salts based On thetetramethyldithiadiselenafulvalene (TMDTDSF) molecule,
ahybrid
between the TMTTF and TMTSFmolecules,
was thepossibility,
with the saltspresenting physical properties
intermediate between those Of the(TMTSF)~X
and(TMTTF )~X
series[30,
3II,
Ofunderstanding
how the instabilities evolve from one series to the other. The second motivation was, after the observation of orientationaldisorder of the TMDTDSF molecule
[32],
tostudy
the influence of a well defined disorder(the
characterization of which is theobject
of paperI)
on the various instabilities exhibitedby
theBechgaard
salts.The format of paper II is as follows.
Experimental
conditions aregiven
in part 2. Structuralinstabilities shown
by
the(TMDTDSF)~X
salts are described in part3,
then ageneral
discussion of the influence of disorder on these instabilities is the
object
ofpart
4.2.
Experimental.
The structural instabilities exhibited
by
the(TMDTDSF)~X
salts with X=
BF4, Cl04, Re04, PF~, ASF~
andSbF~,
the disorder of which has been characterized in paperI,
werestudied in this paper. These salts were
prepared
atOrsay
orCopenhagen according
to theprocedure
described in reference[30].
For each kind ofanion,
severalcrystals,
with a needleshape
and a few mmlong
were used.They
were from the samepreparations
as those used inmagnetic
and transport measurements[30-33].
The structural
investigation
wasperformed
with the CuKa(1.542 h)
radiation Obtained after(002)
reflection Of theX-ray
beam On adoubly
bentgraphite
monochromator. In the case of theSbF6
material the Sb fluorescencebackground
waspartly suppressed
with a thin aluminium foilplaced
before the detection(X-ray film).
The
study
of structural instabilities wasperformed using
the fixed-filmfixed-crystal photographic
method between 300K and9K,
with thesample placed
in athermalysed
container. A
semi-quantitative analysis
of the weak diffusescattering
wasperformed
fromreadings
of thephotographic
filmsusing
aJoyce
Loeble microdensitometer. In the case of theRe04
materialexhibiting
a well defined structuraltransition,
the temperaturedependence
of asuperlattice
reflectionintensity
was measured with a home made linear detector.3.
Experimental
results.3. I SALTS WITH OCTAHEDRAL ANIONS.
Figure
I shows for thePF~ salt,
in addition to theLaue diffuse
scattering
considered in paperI,
diffuse lines(white arrows)
of weakintensity
which are
perpendicular
to the a direction and locatedmidway
between two successiveh
=
integer Bragg layers. They provide
evidence of 2k~
lD structural fluctuations. These lines are detected below about 150 K. Theirintensity
increases when the temperature decreases until about 20 K. Then below this temperature theirintensity suddenly
decreases. The samebehavior was observed in another
sample.
The unusual thermaldependence
of the2 k~
peak intensity
is morequantitatively
shown infigure
3. Note in thisfigure
that thepeak intensity drops by
about 40 iG between 20 K and 16 K and saturates below the lasttemperature.
No sizeable interchain correlations
develop
until loK,
the lowest temperature reached. The half width at half maximum(H.W.H.M.) (') along
a,Aq~,
also shown infigure 2, slightly
(')
In paper II we use the convention Aq=
2 w As, with s defined in paper1.
Fig.
I.X~ray
pattem from (I'MDTDSF~PF~
at 20 Kshowing
in addition to the broad and intense Lauescattering
considered in paper I, very weak 2k~ diffuse lines (arrows). The a direction is horizontal.(TMDTDSF~Pj
=)
j j
Aqafl
~ l
j
i~
0 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70 T(K)
Fig.
2.-Temperature
dependence of thepeak intensity
and of the HWHMalong a(Aq~)
of the 2kF diffuse lines of(TMDTDSF)2PF~,
obtained from microdensitometerreading
of X-ray pattemssimilar to the one shown
figure
1.1
~
Fig.
3.-X-ray
pattem from(TMDTDSF)~ReO~
at 18Kshowing
(arrows)sharp
qjsuperlattice
reflections. The a direction is horizontal.decreases for
decreasing
temperatures. After a Gaussian resolutioncorrection, Aq~
leads to an intrachain correlationlength f~
of 15h
at 80K which increases until about 25h (I,e.
7intermolecular
distances)
at lo K. It isinteresting
to remark that these lines are detected up to150 K which is above the temperature
(T~
looK)
at which(TMDTDSF)~PF~ begins
toexhibit
charge
localization effectsaccording
to the most recentconductivity
measurements[33].
The onset temperature of the2k~
fluctuations iscomparable
to thatpreviously
determined in
(TMTSF )~PF~,
which does not exhibitcharge
localization effects. As far as the low temperature behavior isconcemed,
the2k~
fluctuations of(TMDTDSF~PF~
areintermediate between those of
(TMTSF)~PF~,
which vanish below30K,
and those of(TMTTF)~PF~,
whichdiverge
at the 15 K SP transition[6, 19].
Thedrop
of 2k~
diffuseintensity
below about 20 K in(TMDTDSFbPF~
could be correlated with thedivergence
of 3D SDW fluctuations observedby
NMR[33].
2 k~ diffuse lines are also observed below about135K in
(TMDTDSF)~ASF~.
Howeverthey
are of weakerintensity
than those of(TMDTDSF )~PF~
and theirintensity
does notdrop
until 9K,
the lowesttemperature
reached.Finally
no 2k~
diffuse lines could be detected in(TMDTDSF)~SbF~.
3.2 SALTS WITH TETRAHEDRAL ANIONS. It is found that all the
Re04, BF4
andCl04
saltsexhibit a qj Ao structural
instability. However,
these salts differby
thespatial
extent of the qj order : theRe04
saltundergoes
a well definedphase transition,
theBF4
salt has aquasi- phase
transition and theCl04
salt does not show anysign
ofphase
transition down to lo K.Sharp
qjsuperlattice
reflections are observed below 165 K in(TMDTDSF )~ReO~ (Fig. 3).
This critical temperature
(TAO),
is the average between those at which(TMTSF)~ReO~
and(TMTTF~Re04 undergo
the qj AO transition(see
Tab.I).
At this temperature(TMDTDSF )~ReO~ undergoes
a metal to insulatorphase
transitioninvolving
both thecharge
and
spin degrees
of freedom as evidencedby conductivity [31]
andmagnetic [33]
measurements
respectively. Figure
4gives
the temperaturedependence
of asuperlattice
reflection. It shows a
sharp
increase ofintensity
below TAO,nearly
identical to that found in(TMTSF)~Re04 134],
butsharper
than thatpreviously reported
in(TMTTF)~Re04 [35].
Pretransitional fluctuations
consisting
of broadquasi-isotropic
diffusescatterings
are observed until about 200 K. Similarisotropic
fluctuations are observed above TAO in(TMTSF)~ReO~
and
(TMTTF)~ReO~ [6, 17].
(TMDSDTF)2AeQ4
mi ~~
£§ ~jz
(~~
~%
7° 1°° TlKll5°
'Fig.
4. -Temperature dependence of the peakintensity
of a qj superlattice reflection of(TMDTDSF)~ReO~
measured with aposition
sensitive linear detector.Intense but broad qj
superlattice spots
are observed at lowtemperatures
in(TMDTDSF)~BF~ (Fig. 5a).
These broad reflections have asymmetric profile
for wavevectors
nearly parallel
to the chain direction and anasymmetric
onealong perpendicular
wavevector directions.
Figure
6gives
the temperaturedependence
of the qjpeak intensity
and of theHWHM of the diffuse
scattering
in chain direction(Aq~
and in aperpendicular
direction close~
a) b)
Fig.
5.X~rays
pattems from(TMDTDSF)~BF~ showing
(arrows) intense and broad qisuperlattice
spots at 9.5 K in (a) and theirbroadening
at 41K in (b). The a direction is horizontal.(TMDT0Sfi2BF4
a_×~=~ ~
MW
I
I d
~ ~
~" $
x
, lo 20 3l T(KJ 4°
Fig.
6.-Temperature dependence
of the peakintensity
and of the HWHM alonga(Aq~)
and b*(Aqi
of qi superlattice spots of (TMDTDSF )~BF4 obtained from microdensitometerreading
ofX-ray
pattems similar to those shown
figure
5.to
b*(Aqf).
Thisfigure clearly
showsby
the saturation of the rate of decrease ofAq~
andAqt
andby
therapid
increase of the qjpeak intensity,
that(TMDTDSFbBF~
undergoes
aquasi-phase
transition aroundT(o
21-23 K. This behavior isanalogous
to that observed in the solid solution(TMTSF )~(Cl04)o_~~(Re04
)o_o~(compare Fig.
6 withFig,
I of Ref.[36]).
Below about 22Konly
a qj AO short range order is established in(TMDTDSF)~BF~.
The inverse of the HWHM shown infigure
6gives,
after a Gaussian resolution correction, thefollowing
« correlationlengths
» :f~
30h
andf~~
23h
belowT(o.
However thephysical meaning
of theselengths requires
a detailled determination of thespacial dependence
of the correlation function of the order parameter. This can be achievedonly through
an accurateanalysis
of thesuperlattice
spotprofile,
which can be well fittedby
aLorentzian square function in the
symmetric
case.By
these structural features(TMDTDSF)2BF4
contrasts with(TMTSF[BF4
and(TMTTF)~BF4
which exhibit a well defined 3Dlong
range qj AO athigher
critical temperatures(36
K and 40 Krespectively
seeTab.
I).
Thecharge degrees
of freedombeing
frozen below T~ ~l lo K
[44],
the 22 Kquasi-
transition of
(TMDTDSF )~BF4
has beendetected,
in thespin degrees
offreedom, by
a faster rate of decrease of themagnetic susceptibility [45],
qjpretransitional
fluctuations are observed until about 70 K in(TMDTDSF bBF4.
As shown infigure
5b, the broad diffuse spots broadensizeably
aboveT(o.
At 40 K their inverse HWHMgives f~
18I
andit
~
l I
I, leading
tothe same
anisotropy
ratio as belowT(o.
Ananisotropic broadening
of thepretransitional
fluctuations is also observed above the 3D AO transition of
(TMTSF )~BF4
and(TMTTF )~BF4.
It means that the mediated interactions between anions
(I,e, through
the 2k~
response of theorganic stack) play
animportant
role in the qj AO mechanism of theBF4
salts.Figure
7 shows anX~ray
pattem from(TMDTDSF )~CIO~
at 12 K. There is no evidence of the q~ AOpreviously
observed in(TMTSF)~Cl04
and its solid solutions[(TMTSF )j _~(TMTTF )~]~Cl04 [37]
and(TMTSF )~(Cl04)j _~(Re04)~ [36]
for x small.Only
a weak and broad qj diffuse
scattering
can be detected below 150 K.Figure
8 shows that the qjpeak intensity gradually
increases uponcooling.
Thereis, however,
until lo K norapid change
in its rate ofincrease,
which could recall the One Observed around 22K in(TMDTDSF)~BF4,
and which is taken as thesignature
Of aquasi-phase
transition. TheHWHM Of the broad diffuse
scattering slightly sharpens
uponcooling (Fig. 8).
At lowFig.
7.X-ray
pattem from (TMDTDSF)~Cl04
at 12 Kshowing (arrows)
the weak qj short range order. The a direction is horizontal.f'M©TDSn2Ci04
~
$. OCk"
(
g
I
~+
m * £
o
o o
AESOLLMON o
o
ioo «K~
Fig. 8.-
Temperature dependence
of thepeak
intensity and of the HWHM alonga(Ai)
and b*(Aqi)
of the qj short range order of (TMDTDSF~CIO~
obtained from microdensitometerreading
of X~ray pattems similar to the one shown figure 7.temperatures the correlation
length
of the qj short rangeorder,
estimated from the inverse HWHM is of about loI
in thea and b * directions. These correlation
lengths
are shorter thanthose measured in
(TMDTDSF)~BF4. They
are howevercomparable
to those of the weakqj
scattering
Observed in the(TMTSF
~o,~~~(TMTTF
)o_oo~]~Cl04 [3 7]
and(TMTSF
)~(Cl04)o~~(ReO~)oo~ [36]
solid solutions.4. Discussion.
The structural instabilities shown
by
the(TMDTDSF )~X
salts(Tab. I)
must be discussed inrelationship
with theanalysis
of the disorderperformed
in paper I. Let us here recall the main results of thisstudy
:in all the salts
investigated
the two orientations of the TMDTDSF molecule haveequal probability
and there is a statistical absence of orientation correlationsassociated to the orientational disorder and
depending
upon the relative molecularorientation,
there is also adisplacement
of the molecules from their averageposition.
Themagnitude
of the size effect isrespectively
of 0. II
and 0.03I
for the Ist and 2ndneighbors
in chain direction in the case of thePF~
salt. The lstneighbor
size effects amounts to the dimerizationamplitude
of theorganic
stacks in the(TMTTF )~X
series II].
It islarger
than the weak dimerization found in the(TMTSF)~X
series[10].
lst and 2ndneighbor
size effectdisplacements
are alsocomparable
to theamplitude
of distortion of theorganic
stacksoccurring during
the qj AO transition[20-22].
In the
following
we shall discuss the influence of the disorder. first on the intrastack structural instabilities then on the AO transitions.4.I MIXED SP-CDW INSTABILITY.
Quasi-ID
structural fluctuations at the «la(w
2k~)
critical wave vector are observed in the
PF6
andASF~
salts.They
are weaker in theASF~
saltthan in the
PF6
one. These fluctuations are not observed in theSbF~
salts. The(TMTTF)~X
series exhibits the same behavior with the same anions[14].
However in(TMDTDSF )~PF~
andASF~
the fluctuations occur on atemperature
rangecomparable
to that of theincipient
2k~
CDWinstability
of the TMTSFanalogues [4, 6].
In(TMDTDSF )~PF~
andASF~
these fluctuations are detected above T~ loo K[33]
and 80K[44] respectively,
temperatures at which the localization of
charge degrees
of freedom manifests itself inconductivity
measurements. In(TMDTDSF )~PF~, they appreciably
grow below T~(Fig. 2)
as in(TMTTF )~PF~ [6]. They
have thus a mixed CDW and SP character. In this respect it can beshown
[38]
that the2k~ (bond) instability remains,
whatever thestrength
of Coulombrepulsions
between electrons. For small Coulomb interactions(with
respect to the bandwidth)
the 2 k~ CDW affects both the
charge
andspin degrees
of freedom. When the Coulombinteractions
increase,
a new4k~
CDWinstability develops.
Thisinstability
localizes thecharge degrees
of freedom(below T~).
Inparallel
the 2k~ instability
becomes more and moreassociated with the
spin degrees
of freedom and thusgradually
evolves towards a SPinstability.
As the2k~ instability
is detected on atemperature
rangeexceeding
T~ in(TMDTDSF)~PF~
andASF~,
we are neither in a pure CDW nor in a pure SPregime.
Thus(TMDTDSF)~X
has a behavior intermediate between those of the(TMTSF)~X
and(TMTTF LX
series. In addition the 2k~
SP~CDW structural fluctuations of(TMDTDSF )~PF~
show an
interesting competition
with the 2k~
SDW(or AF) instability. Below,
we shallonly
discuss the
PF~
salt because themagnetic properties
of theASF~
andSbF6
salts are not known.Compared
to(TMTSF)~PF~,
the2k~
structural fluctuations are enhanced in(TMDTDSF )~PF~
thepeak intensity
increases morestrongly
uponcooling
and the intrachaincorrelation
length
increasesby
a factor of 2 from(TMTSF)~PF~ (f~~10h)
to(TMDTDSF )~PF~ (f~
20h).
Thevanishing
of the 2 k~ CDW fluctuations of(TMTSF )~PF~
below 30K takes
place
when the2k~
SDW fluctuationsbegin
todiverge [19].
In(TMDTDSF )~PF~
therapid drop
of theintensity
of the SP fluctuations below 20 K also occurs when 3D SDW fluctuations become critical[33].
Howevercontrary
to(TMTSF)~PF~,
theintensity
of the 2 k~ diffuse lines does not vanish at low temperatures, but saturates to a constant value(Fig. 2).
This means thatalthough
a 3Dmagnetic
order is established below 7 K in(TMDTDSF )~PF~ [30],
asignificant proportion
of chains eitherundergo
a SP distortion or is stillsubject
to SP fluctuations(we
use here the SPdesignation
because in the low temperaturerange at ambient pressure the
charge degrees
of freedom arefrozen).
The in-chain SPcorrelation
length slightly
decreases uponcooling.
However at lo K the average correlationlength
of the SP distortion is 25h
in chain direction and there isno sizeable interchain correlations. With such a local SP
order,
the continuous decrease ofspin susceptibility [33], especially
in thetemperature
range where the 2k~
SPintensity drops
and where 3D critical SDW fluctuations areobserved,
is difficult to rationalize. Our measurements mean that(at
least above loK) (TMDTDSF)~PF~
does notundergo
a SPphase
transition. The absence of a SPOrdering
either can result from thecompetition
between low temperature SP and SDWfluctuations or
(and)
can be due to structural disorder. The firsthypothesis
hasalready
been discussed above. Let us now examine the case of the disorder. It waspreviously
shown[6]
that in(TMTTF)~PF~,
where irradiation defects suppress the interchaincoupling
veryrapidly,
the 3D SPOrdering
is very sensitive to disorder. Here, the absence of a SP transverseshort-range
Order could be ascribed either to the sizeable orientational and
displacive
disorder of theorganic
molecules or to thelarge
averageseparation
between the small number of chains whicheffectively experience
the SPinstability.
In the latter case the SPinstability
could concemonly
a limited number of molecules whose
positions
are not too much disturbedby
the size effects and whose intermolecularspacing
is close to that of(TMTTF)~PF~.
In conclusion the net increase of 2 k~
intensity
oncooling
down to 20 K shows that the structural disorder does not inhibit thedevelopment
of the SPinstability.
This could beexplained by
the fact that in a truespin-Peierls
mechanism themagnetic
interactions which are little affectedby
the disorder drive the latticeinstability.
But in TMDTDSF salts thespin pairing
in an S=
0 state is
probably badly
transmitted to the latticedegrees
of freedom becauseof the structural disorder. The structural disorder has
apparently
a verymarginal
effect on themagnetic coupling
asproved by
the observation of a 3Dmagnetic
order in thePF~
salt[30].
It hasprobably
animportant
influence on thesuperconductivity
because thePF~
salt does notundergo
asuperconducting
transition(down
to 0.56K)
when the metallic state is restored underhigh
pressure[30].
4.2 AO INSTABILITY. Let us first consider
(TMTTF)~X [(TMTSF)~X]
salts where X is anon-centrosymmetrical
anion. In eachcavity
the anion canpoint
towards theS[Se]
of one of the two inversionsymmetry
related nearneighboring
molecules. The orientation of the anion is thusspecified by
anIsing
variable ~ whose value is + I or I if the anionpoints
towards theright
or left molecule. The AO transition can thus be describedby
aphenomenological Ising
Hamiltonian
[19, 39]
:Ho
~
j £J;j
~, ~j,
(I)
i,i
where
J;j
is the interaction between anions located at sites I andj.
Let us now consider(TMDTDSF)~X
salts with disorderedorganic
molecules. The anions will thusexperience
three kinds of environment
corresponding
to theS-S,
Se-S and Se-Sepairs
of atoms towards whichthey
canpoint (Fig. 9). Among
them the Se-S environment breakslocally
the inversionsymmetry
of thecavity.
On site I this effect can be accounted forby
the presence of anT~~~*W
~b)
+ f
-wj~~@~
~~s ~
_ q
~l ol
Fig.
9. Schematic illustration of the latticepotential experienced by
an anion in Se-Se (a), S-S (b) and S-Se (c) environments.additional field h~
coupled
to the order parameter ~,. The Hamiltonian(I)
will thus become :H
=
Ho
+£ f
~~(2)
The field
h~ has a random distribution because the TMDTDSF disorder has no
spatial
correlations. In addition because of the TMDTDSF disorder and of the S or Se nature of the
species
in close contact with theanion,
the mediated contribution to J,~ will alsopresent
somedistribution. Randomness of both natures are also present in the
(TMTSF )j _~(TMTTF )~]~X
solid solution. However
only
a distribution ofJ~~ interactions is
expected
in the(TMTSF )~X
j ~Y~ or
(TMTTF )~X
j ~
Y~
solid solutions.Both random fields and random interactions are invoked to
explain
the absence of along
range order in orientationalglasses [40, 41]. Following
these earlier works we shall discuss in thefollowing
theirrespective
influence on the AO of theBechgaard
saltsby comparing
threerelevant
quantities
obtained at a crude level ofapproximation (formula (A31', (A7)
and(A9)
of theannex)
:the mean interaction between anions
J(x>
=
(i
x)Jo
+vi (3)
the variance of the J distribution
Var
(J)
=
~ Jo Jj (4)
the variance of the h distribution
Var
(h
=
fi~ /
h.(5)
In the case of solid solutions,
Jo
andJj
are interactionsappropriate
for pure salts(x
=
0 and x
= I
respectively
; J~ 0 or
< 0 for
staggered
or uniformcoupling).
Inprinciple
J(x)
and Var(J)
must be defined on all the directions of interaction between the anions. If puresalts
adopt
the same wave vector ofordering (qj
in most of thecases),
the Var(JYJ
ratio canbe estimated
by replacing (Jo
and(Jj
in(3)
and(4) by
thecorresponding
AO criticaltemperatures. This ratio is more
inaccurately
estimated if pure saltsadopt
different wavevectors of
ordering
such as qj and q~ forexample.
If it is assumed in thisexample
that theinteraction
along
a(staggered
for qj, uniform forq~)
dominates the AO andmainly
determines TAO, this ratio can be estimatedby replacing
J in(3)
and(4) by
thecorresponding
values ofTAO with
opposite signs.
It isinteresting
to remark that this crudeassumption predicts (Eq. (3))
for(TMTSF)2(Cl04)o.35(Re04)o.65,
a qjAo, at a temperature, TAO =lo?
K,
very close to thatexperimentally
observed : 109 K[34, 36].
In thefollowing
we shall also assume thatequations (3)
and(4)
with x ~0.5 can beapplied
to the(TMDTDSF)~X
series ofhybrid
molecules.
Equation (5) gives
Var(h)
for the solid solution[(TMTSF )j _~(TMTTF)~]~X.
The sameexpression
is obtained in the case of(TMDTDSF)2X
with c~(defined
in paperI)
instead of x.2 h is the asymmetry of the anion site energy for an Se-S environment
(Fig. 9c).
If h is in firstapproximation independent
of theanion,
Var(h)
isproportional
to the square root of theintensity
of the Lauescattering.
With thishypothesis
Var(h
has about the same value in theRe04, BF4
andCl04
salts.An orientational
glassy
behavior is obtained when the interactions arestrongly disordered,
I-e- when Var(J )
~ J
[40,
4II.
This is the case of random or frustratedinteractions,
a situation encountered inspin glasses.
In theopposite limit,
Var(J
<f,
the disorder is notlarge enough
to suppress the
divergence
of critical fluctuations and thus thephase
transition.Random fields also compete with order
[42].
When Var(h)
~f,
the system hasno
long
range order. However it has been shown
[43] that,
for 3Dinteractions,
a low temperaturelong
range order is established in the case of small random fields.
As the critical temperatures of the qi AO are very close in
(TMTTF)~X
and(TMTSF)~X
for X=
Re04
andBF4 (Tab. I)
a weak disorder of interaction isexpected
in thecorresponding
TMDTDSF salts.By replacing
Jby
thecorresponding
TAO thefollowing
ratios ofequation (4)
over
equation (3)
are obtained :~~~~~
= 0.07 for X
=
Re04,
J
~~~~~
=
0.05 for X
=
BF4.
J
As these ratios are
comparably small,
the observation of a well defined AOphase
transition in theRe04
salts and ofonly
aquasi-phase
transition in theBF4
saltpoints
out thekey
role of the random fields in the latter case. As similar values of Var(h
) areexpected
for both salts, the differences observed could be ascribed tolarge
variations of the Var(h)/f
ratio whenf
decreasesby
a factor 4 fromBF4
toRe04.
The observation of a well definedqj AO transition in
(TMDTDSF)2Re04
at a critical temperature which is the average betweenthose of
(TMTTF)2Re04
and(TMTSF)~Re04
means that Var(h)<f.
In contrast, theobservation in
(TMDTDSF)2BF4
of a qjquasi
AO transition at 22K,
a value much lower than38K,
the average criticaltemperature
of(TMTTF)~BF~
and(TMTSF)~BF~,
means thatVar
(h)
~ J.In
(TMDTDSF)~CIO~ by replacing
the «J»by
thecorresponding ±TAO,
the ratio ofequation (4)
overequation (3) gives
Var
(J)
~ J
The
large
disorder of interactions and also the increase of Var(h)/J
from theBF4
to theCl04
salt
(due
to the decrease ofJ),
can be taken asresponsible
for the absence of anysign
of AO transition in(TMDTDSF)~Cl04.
When the disorder of interactiondominates,
thesuppression
of the AO transition is due to the formation of domains of
competing
qj and q~fluctuations,
asobserved for
example
in the(TMTSF)~(CIO~)j _~(ReO~)~
solid solution[34].
However in(TMDTDSF)2Cl04
we haveonly
succeeded to detect short range qj structural fluctuations.This
again points
out thekey
role of random fields to which the random interactions add their effects for acomplete suppression
of the AO transition.A
glass
state is characterizedby
the Edwards-Anderson order parameter q~A, which for an orientational(Ising) glass
is definedby [46, 47]
~2 j j
2(~)
~EA p/
l~ ~~' l~ ~q
q
X-ray scattering experiments
measure the instantaneous correlation function of ~~, the Fourier transform of ~~.s(q,
t~o)
~
((~q(~)
~
(~q)
(~ ~((8~q(~) (?)
If
~~
isseparated
into a frozen part~~) )
and afluctuating
part(8 ~~ ),
q~A is thus obtainedby
the qintegration
of the frozen contribution toS(q,
t =0).
Thisseparation
isgenerally
difficult to
perform.
However, in the case of theBF4 salt,
the saturation of the HWHM of the qjsuperlattice peak (Fig. 6)
means that the AO is frozen belowT(o.
Therapid growth
of the qjpeak intensity
observed below this temperature thus indicates a net increase of the Edwards-Anderson order parameter q~A. The elastic
peak
observed in neutronscattering experiments,
whose
intensity
isproportional
to q~A, behavessimilarly
at thefreezing
temperature of collective variables in certain orientationalglasses [48].
Further studies are necessary in order to describe the nature of the qj AO short range order in
(TMDTDSF)2BF4.
Here let us remark that the observed Lorentzian squareprofile
of thesymmetric
part of the broadsuperlattice
reflections is thatexpected [42, 49]
when the order isdestroyed by
random fields.Altematively
the sameprofile
can also beexplained by
a random distribution of domain sizes[50]. Superlattice
spots with a Lorentzian squareprofile
are also observed in the case of qj and q~ AO short range orders in the(TMTSF )~(Re04)1-x(Cl04
)xand
[(TMTSF)j_~(TMTTF)~]~Cl04
solid solutions. Theasymmetric profile
observed for certain wave vector directions is more subtle to understand.By analogy
with similarfindings
in orientationalglasses [46,
5II
this asymmetry could be causedby
a linearcoupling
between the anion orientational order parameter and a deformation field inducedby
the disorder.Let us now discuss the
relationship
between the qj AO and the nature of the electronicground
state. In(TMDTDSF)2Re04
at ambient pressure thelong
range qj AO opens a well defined gap both in thecharge [3 II
andspin [33] degrees
of freedom at TAO. This is due to the factthat,
because TAO and T~ 210 K[44]
are veryclose,
the electrons are notcompletely
localized at TAO. The electrons are localized below T~ II0 K and 135 K in the
BF4
andCl04
salts
respectively [44].
Thusonly
thecoupling
between thespin degrees
of freedom isimportant
nearT(o
in theBF4
salt. The faster rate of decrease ofspin susceptibility
observed belowT(o [45]
can be viewed as due to theopening
of apseudo
gap in thespin excitations,
such a gapcorresponding
to a local SP distortion of theorganic
stack associated with the qj AO. No lowtemperature magnetic
measurements have beenperformed
in(TMDTDSF)~CIO~.
However as the correlationlength
f of the qj AO remainscomparable
to the interdimerseparation,
the SP distortion of theorganic
stack will not beimportant enough
toproduce
anomalies in the thermaldependence
of thespin susceptibility.
Above 10kbars,
when T~ issuppressed,
a clear metal-insulator transition is observed in theBF4
andCl04
salts[3 II.
This electronic transition is
probably
not drivenby
a well defined qj AO transition because itseems
unlikely
that pressure couldimprove
the short range nature of the qj AO due to thefrozen nature of the TMDTDSF disorder. From the small value of the electrical gap measured in
pressurized samples,
such a transition could be ofmagnetic origin [3 Il.
But in thishigh
pressure range, it is not known if a SDW
ground
state can coexist with a localqj AO or if the stabilization of a
magnetic ground
staterequires
achange
of the AO wave vector, as is the case in non-disordered salts such as(TMTSF)~Re04 [28, 29].
However theambient pressure
study
of the(TMDTDSF)~PF~
salt shows that a SDW order can coexist witha local SP distortion. This means that the SDW order could be stabilized
inhomogeneously
in(TMDTDSF)2BF4
andCl04
salts under pressure, forexample
in domains where there is no 2 k~ structural distortion of theorganic
stack associated with a local qj AO.5. Conclusion.
Two main results have been obtained from the
study
of structural instabilities exhibitedby
the(TMDTDSF)~X
series oforganic
conductors. First, from the observation of aquasi
lD« 2
k~»
structuralinstability
in thePF6
andASF~ salts,
we have shown that there is acontinuity
between the SP and CDW instabilities observed in the TMTTF and TMTSFanalogues respectively.
Thisstudy
also shows that the lD SPinstability,
which is drivenby
lDmagnetic interactions,
ismoderately
sensitive to structural disorder.However,
disorder seems to prevent the 3Dcoupling required
to achieve acomplete
SPphase
transition.Second,
wehave shown that both random fields and random interactions due to the structural disorder could have a
pertinent
effect on the AOphase
transitions. Thestudy
of theRe04, BF~
andCl04
salts has shown thekey
influence of random fields on the AO transition of the(TMDTDSF)~X
salts. In thelight
of these newresults,
aninvestigation
of therelationships
between disorder effects and structural instabilities exhibited
by
the(TMTSF )j
~
(TMTTF
)~~X, (TMTTF )~X
j ~Y~ and
(TMTTF )~X
j ~Y~ solid solutions is
underway [34].
Acknowledgments.
S.
Senhaji
is thanked for hisparticipation
in theearly development
of thisinvestigation.
Useful discussions with P.Auban~senzier,
D.Jdrome,
R. Moret and V. Ilakovac are also acknow-ledged.
This work has beenpartly supported by
the ESPRIT-Basic Research ActionMOLCOM 3121.
Annex.
Let us consider a random solid solution where a
given
site can beoccupied by
thespecies X(Y
with theprobabilities
x and I x. Each site has anIsing
variable which interacts with itsneighbors according
to the Hamiltonian(I).
The average interactionJ~~ between a
couple (I, j
ofIsing
variables is :f;~
=x~ J(~
+(l
x)~J(~
+ 2 x I x) J(~ (A1)
where