• Aucun résultat trouvé

Combined atomic force microscope and acoustic wave devices: application to electrodeposition.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Combined atomic force microscope and acoustic wave devices: application to electrodeposition."

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Combined atomic force microscope and acoustic wave devices: application to electrodeposition.

J.-M. Friedt, L. Francis, K.-H. Choi, F. Frederix and A. Campitelli [email protected] , [email protected]

October 23, 2002

(2)

Aim

Development of biosensors based on acoustic wave devices: requires to un- derstand the sensing mechanism in liquid medium.

Biological reactions are too slow: use of electrodeposition (fast, reversible and more reproducible).

Look at the nm scale what is happening and relate the observations to the

frequency variations.

(3)

Principle

λ/2

QCM ( =constant) c SAW device ( =constant) λ

k k

QCM: ∆m → ∆λ → ∆f SAW: ∆m → ∆c → ∆Φ → ∆f

)

what about additional viscosity effects ?

Advantages of SAW:

• higher sensitivity (when properly designed)

• open back side for adding more sensing tech- niques

• sensing electrode is not used/polarized

Love mode device:

area (Au) sensing

Quartz (c)

(c’<c)

PDMS flow cell PDMS flow cell

air air

SiO 2

(4)

QCM/AFM combination

- static finite element analysis: out of plane displace- ment A is 0.1 pm

- A dynamic = A static × Q ⇒ out of plane displacement is 0.3 nm (Q ' 3000)

- in plane displacement is at most 3 nm, smaller than AFM pixel size

- standing wave pattern between QCM and can- tilever holder only disturbs the resonance frequency during approach

- fundamental resonance frequency (5 MHz) is un- stable and overtones of the QCM must be used

O

X Y

Z

MODULEF : friedtj 20/11/01

mail coor sol.b 2862 NOEUDS

9684 FACES 2040 PENTAEDRES 1280 HEXAEDRES OBSERVATEUR SPHERIQUE : 30. 30. 0.29E-01 OUVERTURE : 10.

ISOVALEURS : 20 INCONNUE : 4 MNEMO :PHIE 20 4.9750E-04 19 4.7367E-04 18 4.4735E-04 17 4.2102E-04 16 3.9469E-04 15 3.6837E-04 14 3.4204E-04 13 3.1571E-04 12 2.8939E-04 11 2.6306E-04 10 2.3673E-04 9 2.1041E-04 8 1.8408E-04 7 1.5775E-04 6 1.3143E-04 5 1.0510E-04 4 7.8774E-05 3 5.2448E-05 2 2.6121E-05 1 -2.0539E-07 PEAU + ELIMINATION

DC potential (0.5 V)

O

X Y

Z

MODULEF : friedtj 20/11/01

mail coor sol.b 2862 NOEUDS

9684 FACES 2040 PENTAEDRES 1280 HEXAEDRES OBSERVATEUR SPHERIQUE : 30. 30. 0.29E-01 OUVERTURE : 10.

ISOVALEURS : 20 INCONNUE : 1 MNEMO :VN 20 1.0698E-06 19 1.0177E-06 18 9.6006E-07 17 9.0247E-07 16 8.4488E-07 15 7.8728E-07 14 7.2969E-07 13 6.7210E-07 12 6.1451E-07 11 5.5692E-07 10 4.9932E-07 9 4.4173E-07 8 3.8414E-07 7 3.2655E-07 6 2.6896E-07 5 2.1136E-07 4 1.5377E-07 3 9.6180E-08 2 3.8588E-08 1 -1.9003E-08 PEAU + ELIMINATION

In-plane displacement (1 pm)

O

X Y

Z

MODULEF : friedtj 20/11/01

mail coor sol.b 2862 NOEUDS

9684 FACES 2040 PENTAEDRES 1280 HEXAEDRES OBSERVATEUR SPHERIQUE : 30. 30. 0.29E-01 OUVERTURE : 10.

ISOVALEURS : 20 INCONNUE : 2 MNEMO :VN 20 1.2457E-07 19 1.1232E-07 18 9.8787E-08 17 8.5251E-08 16 7.1715E-08 15 5.8179E-08 14 4.4643E-08 13 3.1107E-08 12 1.7571E-08 11 4.0351E-09 10 -9.5009E-09 9 -2.3037E-08 8 -3.6573E-08 7 -5.0109E-08 6 -6.3645E-08 5 -7.7181E-08 4 -9.0717E-08 3 -1.0425E-07 2 -1.1779E-07 1 -1.3133E-07 PEAU + ELIMINATION

In-plane displacement (0.1 pm)

O

X Y

Z

MODULEF : friedtj 20/11/01

mail coor sol.b 2862 NOEUDS

9684 FACES 2040 PENTAEDRES 1280 HEXAEDRES OBSERVATEUR SPHERIQUE : 30. 30. 0.29E-01 OUVERTURE : 10.

ISOVALEURS : 20 INCONNUE : 3 MNEMO :VN 20 1.0083E-07 19 9.1142E-08 18 8.0432E-08 17 6.9721E-08 16 5.9011E-08 15 4.8301E-08 14 3.7590E-08 13 2.6880E-08 12 1.6170E-08 11 5.4592E-09 10 -5.2511E-09 9 -1.5961E-08 8 -2.6672E-08 7 -3.7382E-08 6 -4.8092E-08 5 -5.8803E-08 4 -6.9513E-08 3 -8.0223E-08 2 -9.0934E-08 1 -1.0164E-07 PEAU + ELIMINATION

Out-of-plane displacements (0.1 pm)

Use of commercial instruments:

- Q-Sense (G¨ oteborg, Sweden) for QCM-D

monitoring (overtones 1, 3, 5, 7+Q factor)

- Molecular Imaging (AZ, USA) AFM

(5)

Measurements

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −0.1 0 0.1 0.2 E (V)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −5 0 5 10

∆D5

(× 10

−6

)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −2000 −1000 0

∆f5

(Hz)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −5 0 5

∆D3

(× 10

−6

)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −1500 −1000 −500 0 500

∆f3

(Hz)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −200 0 200 d/dt(∆f

3

), i

i*2.5.10

4

−100 d/dt(<

f

3

>

10

)

Ag

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −40 −20 0 20 d/dt(∆f

3

), i

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 E (V)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −10 0 10 20

∆D5

(× 10

−6

)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −2000 −1000 0

∆f5

(Hz)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −20 0 20 40 60

∆D3

(× 10

−6

)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 −2000 −1000 0

∆f3

(Hz)

i*10

4

−20 d/dt(<

f

3

>

20

)

Cu

Rigid layer ⇒ ∆f n /n ∝ ∆m layer (low damping) with n: overtone number Viscous layer ⇒ ∆f n / √

n ∝ { ∆m liquid , ∆m layer } (large damping)

(15 MHz)

Z =9420 Ω

viton O−ring teflon liquid cell

QCM AFM cantilever

glass prism laser beam photodetector

measurement setup

Gamry potentiostat (WE) Q−Sense QCM parameters

L=100 H µ

(25 MHz)

(15 MHz)

Z =6

Ω Z =15708 Pt (CE)

(RE)

1 nF

(15 MHz)

Z =11 Ω

(6)

Experimental setup

Φ G Network

analyzer

∆Φ , IL

−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

x 10 5

−45

−44

−43

−42

−41

−40

−39

−38

−37

I.L. (dB)

∆ f (f 0 −124.4 MHz)

−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

x 10 5

−150

−100

−50 0 50 100 150

Φ ( o )

∆ f (f 0 −124.4 MHz)

slope: 360 o /601.38 kHz

⇔ 1670 Hz/ o

Closed loop monitoring

frequency Open loop monitoring

Open/closed loop operation:

requires a 4-port network analyzer

PLL setup: compensate for energy losses (and phase shift)

Problem: liquid must not

reach the IDTs

(7)

Measurements

2 4 6 8 10 12

x 10 4

−1 0 1

E(V)

device 11 (1.38 µm SiO 2 ), 10 −2 CuSO 4 , 10 −2 H 2 SO 4

2 4 6 8 10 12

x 10 4 123.62

123.64 123.66 123.68 123.7

f (MHz)

2 4 6 8 10 12

x 10 4

−1 0 1

I (mA)

−→ time (a.u.)

m Cu =

P I × δt

N × e × M n Cu e

N × e = 96440 C: 1 Faraday M Cu = 63.5 g/mol, n e = 2

1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35

x 10 5

−1 0 1

E(V)

device 11 (1.38 µm SiO 2 ), 10 −2 CuSO 4 , 10 −2 H 2 SO 4

1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35

x 10 5 123.62

123.64 123.66 123.68 123.7

f (MHz)

1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 1.35

x 10 5

−1 0 1

I (mA)

(8)

Sensitivity estimates

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

mass (ng, estimated from electrochemistry)

sensitivity (cm 2 /g): S=(A ×∆ f)/(f 0 ∆ m) Love mode: 1.38 µm SiO 2

Love mode: 2.96 µm SiO 2

QCM (Sauerbrey, 5 MHz): S ∼11 QCM (Sauerbrey, 10 MHz): S ∼23 S→102

S→58

S = f

f 0 × A m cm 2 /g

A: sensing area (3.2 × 3.5 mm 2 ) f 0 : center frequency (123.7 MHz)

∆m: deposited mass (electro- chemistry)

∆f : frequency variation

S assumed to be constant, ∀ ∆m. Good fit when including offset in the

current measurement by the potentiostat ⇒ rigid mass.

(9)

AFM combination

Monitoring simultaneously ∆Φ ⇒ ∆f , ∆m and topography at the nm scale

⇒ S ' 70..80 for ∆m = 4.5..7.5 µg (S QCM ' 20 cm 2 /g).

(10)

Conclusion and perspectives

• ability to independently measure deposited mass and frequency shift

• estimation of the sensitivity: constant over the mass range analyzed

• high sensitivity of Love mode device ( ∼ 10 times more sensitive than QCM)

- fluidics setup (IDTs protection)

- application to biology: replace electrochemical cell by biochemical reactions - combination with other detection methods (SPR)

Copies of the slides at http://mmyotte.free.fr/chua

Références

Documents relatifs

calculated. The calculated frequency variations versus the applied magnetic field are illustrated in Fig. 14 compared with experimental results adapted from Ref.

Finally, different first-order temperature coefficient sets are tested for GaN and AlN by comparing calculated and experimental temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF)

To meet the requirements of high-voltage output under a specific range of driving frequency, we used electroplating and bulk micromachining to fabricate the planar coil and

We have designed and fabricated a dedicated temperature sensor for use with a 100 MHz ground penetrating RADAR (GPR) unit and demonstrated the ability to record echo signals when

shows that the amplitude is low in the three mountainous regions and in the tundra as expected, because of the small amount of vegetation, and also possibly because of the long

In this study, we have investigated a surface acoustic wave (SAW) biosensor to quantify the TNF- α /SPD-304 affinity and to estimate the binding kinetic of SPD-304 to TNF-α,

• Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): recording backscattered &amp; secondary electrons of the target illuminated by electrons (charged particle path bent by electric field

We have designed and fabricated a dedicated temperature sensor for use with a 100 MHz ground penetrating RADAR (GPR) unit and demonstrated the ability to record echo signals when