,. n~'D~
C
~\
ECNSTS/3m/94e
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA
THE INFLUENCE OF ECONOMIC AND
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES ON SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY IN AFRICA
PROCEEDINGS OF A TRAINING SEMINAR ON THE INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT
POLICIES IN AFRICA KAMPALA, MAY 1993
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SECTION NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION February 1994
,J_,~._~,-.,
FOREWORD
Science andtechnology cannotplay its full role in development in an unfavourable economic policy environment.
One of the reasonswAyscience and technology in Africa contribute little to development is that distorted
and
non-competitive economic policies do not provide an enabling climate which could make science and technology a critical factor of development. Economic policies inAfrica
havebeen
improved in recentyears but they still often weaken the capacity of African countries to develop, apply and market or -transfer and assimilate appropriate technologies, particularly agro-industrial technologies.
So far, inmost African countries, S-T policies have narrowly focused on public research and higher education with little regard to improving the general economic policy environment that could facilitate the application and diffusion of appropriate technologies, the commercialization of research results and the creation of jobs for the highly trained manpower. Giventhepresent state of S-T in Africa in general, it is recognizedthat
S-T
development hastorely
to a greater extenton market
mechanisms and on the application of readily available technology which exists on the market place.Bureaucratic trade policies, restrictive foreign investment policies, controlled exchange rate policies, the lack of credit and unfavourable fiscal policies are seriously limiting the initiative of entrepreneurs to develop or acquire the technology they need to improve their situation and become more productive and competitive.
Technology
transferregulations
add further irritating controls which makeit more difficult to apply available technology. Immigration policies, which denytheir freedom to observe technological development abroad and bring back usefulideas andbusiness contacts. Public ownership of landand industry does not provide the necessary incentives to farmers and entrepreneurs to use science and technology to better their own economic situations.
Theseissues and constraints have made the object of a training seminar organized by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa and the Uganda National Science and Technology' Council with the financial support of The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
This document puts together the papers presented at the seminar and it couldbe helpful instrengthening the endogenous capacity of African countries in using S-T and economic policies for development. More specifically, it couldhelp scienceand technology and economic policy..
makers to reinforce the mutuallyself-supporting role and linkages of each set of policies.
The papers cover African and Asian experiences in integrating S & T and economic policies for economic growth and social progress
and
suggest policy reforms to increase the contribu.tion of S & T in development. The report of the seminar is also included.
~-e~'£JJ
Peter N. Mwanza~
Chief
NaturalResources Division
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ..•••..••.•... ., • . • . . • • • . . • . • • • • . . . •• 1
THE LINKAGES BETWEEN ECONOMIC POLICIES
AND SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN
AFRICAN COUNTRIES a . ' a • • • a • • • • • • • • • • • 13 1.Introduction
a • , • • • • • • • • • • • • •13
2. The linkage between science, technology andproduction .
~. . . .. 14
3. The effects of inward looking policies on the contribution of science andtechnology '.. ]6
3.1 Importsubstitution 17 3.2 The impact of other economic policies 18 4. The Impact of
outward
looking economicpolicies and the case of Mauritius ....,... 20
Macro
economic environment . . . .. 21Exchange rates . . . .. 21
Credit
and
interestrate
reforms ...,...21
Tax and tariff reforms . . . .. 22
Simplification ofadministrativeand bureaucratic procedures . . . a • a • • • • • 22 Investment promotion " a 23 The Korean model ,. a • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • • •
25
'The Indian model ... a • • • a • • • • • • , • • • a • , • • 26 The case of Mauritius a • • • 26 Political-economic perspective a • • • 27 The Mauritius Export Processing Zone 28Objectives of the MEPZ '. . . .. 28
The Secret behind
Mauritius success story: ... 295. Conclusion . . . '. . . .. 31
References 34
A NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY:
THE CASE OF UGANDA .. .. .. • .. .. .. .. .. .. 36
Introduction 36
Science and
technology policy39
Integrating science and technolOlY and national
development . . . .. 41 Conclusion .... . . '. . . . .. . . .. 49
INTEGRATING SCIENCE " TECHNOLOGY.
ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT POUCIES IN
AFRICA: AN OVERVIEW •••••••••••••••••••• 53 1-Introduction + • .. • • • • • • • • • • • 53
2- Science and technology
dcve10pmcfttas a multi-
dimensional process 54
3- Integrating g..T into the
I1oba1 econDmies
564- Integrating S·T and
~policies f9r sustainable
development . . . .. 60 5-
Integratingnational
OOOftOftUes tothe S
&T
locomotives . . . • . . . 61 5.1 Integrating S
a:
T policiea, foreip directinvestment, joiM ventM:IWand licensing
policies 62
5.2 Integrating SAT policies with tedmology
~ ~. J~' 63
tranalet l'Cga_aoR polet• • • • • • • • . • • • •
5.3 Integrating S & T policies
and
tradepol
fetes •••••••••••••••••••••••..64 5.4
IntegratingS &. T policies and miJration
p<>11C1e8 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 66 5.5 Integrating S& T
policies
withdevdopnlCDtaid policies 67
6- S & T policies and rePMaJ ecOllOlDie iJDe&tatitln
policies 67
7 Integrating S & T policies with education, training
and manpower policies 67
8- Refocusing S' & T policies on the innovation
system 68
9- Conclusion .. . . .. 69 INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY WITH
DEVELOPMENT: THE JAPANESE & INDIAN
EXPERIENCES . • . . • . . . • • • • . . • . • . . • • • . • • • • •• 71
Introduction 71
Initiation of s & t policies: the context of developing
countries 73
The japanese experience. . . .. 76
References 78
INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,
ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN
THE GAMBIA ..•.•••••..•..•.•.•.•..••.... 81
Background 81
Programmesand projects : .. 83
agriculture: . . . .. 83 housing and building construction 84 small scale industries . . . .. 84
energy 85
cooking stove . . . .. 85 Institutional aspects . . . .. 8S
erp 86
pad policy orientation 88
Science and technology policy 89
Recommendation. . . .. 91
Organization 92
Tnternational cooperation 93
THE INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
AND ECONOMIC POLICIES IN NIGERIA ....•.• 96
1.0 Background to the policy 96
2.0 S&t policy weaknesses in nigeria 99 3.0Strategies for integrating8&tpolicy into the
socio
1-economic development in nigeria 103
/ '
3.1 Engineering infrastructure development
programme 104
3.2 Summary of the policy 105
3.3 Programme content. 108
3.4 Institutional framework . . . .. 110 3.5 Programme objectives. . . .. 113
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND ECONOMIC
POLICIES IN AFRICA 116
1. INTRODUCTION : . . . .. 117
A. Background. . . .. 11 7
B. Outline of the PiWer ". 119
II. LINKAGES BETWEEN S&T POLICIES AND
ECONOMIC POLICIES IN AFRICA 119
A. Historical Backw>und . . . .. 119 B. LinkaiWs between S&T Policies and
Economic Policies in Africa 122 TIT. IMPACT OF ECONOMIC POLICIESON S &
T CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIO- ECONOMIC
DEVELOP~NT 0 • • 126
A. General Overview of Plannin& Practices •
in Africa 126
B. Structural Deficiencies of the African
Economy . . . .. 128 C. Consegyences of Economic Policies for
the Role of S & T in Deve]QPment . . . .. 131
IV. CON C L U S ION S A N D
RECOMMENDATIONS 141
R&D IN AFRICA - WHY BOTHER? . . • . . . • . . . 149 INTRODUCTION . . . .. 149
FUNDING OF R&D 149
Technology and Economic growth 149
Thresholds of expenditure 150
Level of expenditure .. . . .. 152
APPLICATION OF R&D 152
Success and failure rates 152
Stages in production development. . . .. 153
Costs of product development 154
Structure of expenditure 155
Enhancing R&D application. . . .. 155
"IT WAS MY IDEA!" 157
REFERENCES 158
THE STATUS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN
SOCIO-ECONOMIC. DEVELOPMENT IN
KENY'A • • • • • • • .. .. . • • • • • • • • • .. • .. • • • • • • • • • • ... IS9 1. INTRODUCTION. . . .. 159 2. mSTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. . . .. 159
3. CURRENT STATUS OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY IN KENYA .. , . . . .. 163
4. DIFFERENTIAL POLICIES BETWEEN
SECTORS 164
5.
THE
DYNAMICS OF S & T POynCS 165 6. PROBLEMSAND
CHALLENGES OF Sc%
TIN KEIDrA : : 166
Lack of
financialresources 167
Institutional and legal framework ]67
Human Resources 167
Information and Public Awareness 168 Protection ofIndigenous Technology 168
Population Pressure . . . .. 168
Equipment and Raw Materials .-... 169
Natural Disasters. . . .. 169
External Factors . . . .. 169
7. CONCLUSIONS. . . .. 169
REFERENCES ~ .. ~ , . . . .. ]70
ROLE OF NGOtS IN INTEGRATION OF S
&T INTO ECONOMIC
ANDD~VEWPMENT POLICIES ••. 172THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF THE PROTOCOL ON
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYOF THE TREATY
ESTABLISHINGTHE AFRICAN ECONOMIC CO -. • . • . . • . • . • . • • • • . • . • • • . • • . ...
176INTRODUCTION , . . . 176
GLIMPSES FROM THE DRAFT PROTOCOL 178 Modalities for the Establishment of the Community: 180 Science and Technology as an Important Component for Economic Development in Africa , . . . 181
Science & Technology Policies within OAD: .. 182
CONCLUSION '.' . . . .. 183
INTEGRA11NG SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT POUCIES IN AFRICA: THE SIERRA LEONE SITUATION .... 187
1. Preface. . . .. 187
2. Backwound Information of
Sierra
Leone . '.' . .. 1882.1 GeoWaphical Setting . . . .. ]89
2.2
National
Resources . . . .. ]8923 Description ofthe Economy ~ 189 J. Definitional problem of I'Science" and
"Technolo~y't : . . . 191 3.1 Science. . . .. 191 3.2 Technology. . . .. 191 4. Status of Science and Technology in Sierra
Leone 192
4~1 Historical Back~round . . . .. 192 4.2 Current Efforts to Promote Science and
TechnoloKY for Development . . . .. 194
4.3 The R&D Situation 196
Manufacturing Sector Example 198
Problem Type Identified: 199
Policy Recommended: 199
Operational Mechanisms Strategies . . . .. 199
Programs Proposed 200
Projects Listed: 200
Mining Sector Example. . . .. 201
Problem Type 201
Policy 201
Strategies 201
Projects . . . .. 201 Future Polices (improvement): 202 4.4 Science and Technology Policy 202 5. Economic Policies .... ; . . . .. 203 5.1 BudgetinG and fiscal policy . . .. 203 5.2 Interest Rates . . . .. 205 5.3 Monetary and credit policies 206 5.4 Export and Import Policies' 206
6. Development Goal and Objectives 208
7. Institutional and policy linkalle weaknesses 209
8. Recommendations 210
8.1 Policies. . . .. 210
8.2 Coo.peration amOnaS! LDCs 2~1
References 2J2
POLICY ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY:
NAMIBIAN EXPERIENCE •..•••.•••...•..'... 214
INTEGRATING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,
ECONOMIC AND DEVEWPMENT POLICIES'IN
AFRICA mE CASE OF BURKINA'FASO •...•.• 222 1. The burkina faso's experience in interpreting
science and technology for development 223 2. A multi-sectorial coverage policy initially 224 3. Final assessment ofan experience . . . .. 224 4. Difficulties of the policy on integration of
science and technology in development . . . .. 227 5- Future prospects . . . .. 228
INTEGRATING ECONOMIC, DEVELOPMENT AND
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES: THE CASE OF RWANnA •..0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
1. INTRODUCTION .
2. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES .
2.1 General context .
2.2. The case of
Rwanda .
REPORT OF TIlE SEMINAR ..•.••...•...•••..
I. INTRODUCTION' · .
Objectives of the Seminar .
Opening statements .
Attendance . . . .
321
231 233 233 235
261
261 261 261 263
Election of the bureau . . . .. 264 TT.ACCOUNT OF PROCEEDTNGS . . . .. 264
Presentation and consideration of country
experiences
264
III ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 276
AGE N D A . . . • . . . .. . .. . . • . . • . . . . • .. 284 LIST OF PARTICTPANTS • • . • . . . • . • • • • • • • • . • . • . . •• 288
THE LINKAGES BETWEEN ECONOMIC POLICIES AND SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY IN SOCI()..ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN
COUNTRIESERISA O. OCHIENG DirectorofPlaaniog
Ministryof FinanceandEconomic Planning Uganda
1.
IDtrodaetioDMany Sub-Saharan African Countries (SSAC) prospered in the 19608
due to very high commodity prices and inflow of foreign finance. The period beginning mid 19708 wasvery
trying for mostSSAC because the prices of the few export commodities
theydepended on plummeted and concessionary foreign finance dried up.
Most
SSAC reacted by introducing inward looking policies of import..substitution,controls,
regulations, outright bans and public.ownership of productive
enterprises.
These policies produced negative .economic results such as excessive encouragement of consumption and
fallinsaving and investment; ofgrowth
of exports andgrowing
deficit on the currentaccount;
internal inflationary pressures andemerging
parallel markets;and
growingunemployment.
The policies also marginalised the contribution that science and technology could contribute towards socio-economicdevelopment.
Some countries have realized that doctrinaire inward looking
policies are expensive and cannot
besustained. They have turned to
outward looking policiesand introduced changes which have produced
impressive positive growth rates and allowed science and technology to
play
itsrightful
role in the economic development of those countries.This paper investigates how the distorted, non-market oriented and non-competitive policies have negatively affected the contribution that science and technology could make in socio-economic development; and suggests reforms drawing from the experience of Mauritius.
The paper is divided into the following sections : Introduction;
The linkage between science, technology and production; The effects
of inward
looking economic policies onthe
contributionof
scienceand
technology; Thecase
of Mauritius; and Suggested reform package.2. The Unkage Between Science, Tecbnology
aDd-Production
The economic development of any country depend directly on the size of resources available, the extent of their utilization, and their productivity. The ultimate contribution of the resources to economic
development
depends on many factors among which technology plays averyprominentrole.
Whether the need is more food, better education,improved
health care,increased
industrial output, or more efficient transportation and communication, technology plays a decisive role.Technology
is
a system ofknowledge,
skills, experiences and organization that is used toproduce
and utilize goodsand
services. The Technologycould be imported
orindigenous.
The
relationship between
science, technologyand
production canbe
depicted in form of a cybernetic model.(A) Represents potentials of Science, Technology and ProductionSpheres.
,(B) Illustrates processes of transformation taking place in all three spheres. The essence of Science is
the research
activity aimed at discovering new phenomenon and truths. Thetechnology
sphere focuses on transfonningthese theoretical
developmentinto practical applications while
production on converting them into goods andservices satisfying human needs.
(C) Presents results obtained on therespective stages of the whole cycle.
(0) (1) Illustratesthestock
of worldtechnical
knowledgewhich isfreely
available andmay
becalled
non-proprietary.(0) (2) Represents the propriety portion of world technical
knowledge. It is
protectedby proprietary
rightsand/or
kept confidential andis
subject to international transfer on a predominantlycommercial basis.A
science
and technology system has various components such as institutions and production facilities supported by infrastructure comprising fieance,physical
facilities,and human skills. Technology
systems perform several functions startingfromspecification of its finaloutputs, and proceeding to choice of
technologies,engineering-
design,implementation, 'management, marketing, and R and D.
There appears to be differences in science and technology systems in
industrialized
andlessdeveloped countries. In industrialized world evolution of scientific activity bas led directlyto and isclearlylinked
with advances in production techniques. They possess 1ftendogenous science and technology base. In less developed countries knowledge generating
activitiesare often not related
toproductive activities. These possess exogenous science and technology bases see figure 2.
Technology system in most "less developed countries are characterized
bydualism:
theexistence of a modem urban enclave linked
to the internationalmarket
place and a traditionalrural
setting.The modern sector
usually
operatesindependently
of the traditional sector. Thetraditional
sector basbeen
under-valued and under- 4developed while the modern
sectorbaa
beenassociated
withtechnical progress, The modem
sectorgenerally employs
importedtechnologies
that Dringwith
them skillsrequirements,
use of materials, organizational skill,' andtechnical
tradition alien to the localenvironment. science and technology
systemsinAfrican countries are not developed. The existence of individual coDiponents like science and
technology institutions artificiallycreateddoesnot constitute a system.In some countrieS all the components of ftte technological system do no, yetexist and the linkages are
weak -a6d ineffective.
Also decision- making capabilities need to be'strengthened, andpolitical leadership convinced of the
rolethat science and technology
systemcan
play inthe attainment of development goals.
3.. The effects of IDward lookingpoUeiel 011 the coDtrlbadoD of scieDce and
teehno1olY
Whenthe SSAC
beganfacinghostile international environment
in form of declining JUices of their exports and dWindling inflow of foreign
financethey
reactedby
introducing inward looking policies such as importsubstituti~controls, regulations, over expansion of thetariff
substitution industries.
Asthe economic situation got worse, so did the
controls get tighter.3.1
Import
SUbStitutioDBecause of reduced external reserves and dwindling inflow of foreign exchange, the countries took to import-substitution as a way of saving scarce foreign exchange and promoting development. The impetus for import substitution' was generally provided through very high protection which together with overvalued exchange rates biased investment incentives towardsproduction
withlow value-added for the domestic market. The structure of production shifted,from agriculture and exports
withadverse consequences for the growth in demand and
inputsupply
that was neededfor the full
use ofindustrial capacity.
State
ownershipwas
presentto somedegree everywhere, and the strongly interventionist strategies discouraged private industrial development where nationalization was a primary tool of publicindustrial expansion.
Politicalconsideration
and social objectives oftenbecame paramount rather than financial and economic performance
therebyimposing high operating costs on public firms.
Dependence on imports
actuallyincreases because the
import-substitution industries did
not onlyrequire imported machinery
byalso
importedinputsfor the new technologies due toweakness in indigenous sub-contracting facilities. At the firm level, incentives often favored excessively capital intensive techniques rather
thanthe adoption of technology to local resources and conditions.
Among the reasons
for this non..sustainability was failure toincorporate appropriate science and technology
strategies. Somecountries were not even aware of the great importance of technology
for their development, and most are up
tonow unable to exercise real
choice in designing effective strategies for their technical transformation. The intemationil situation has kept them in conditions of technological dependence i.e, most of their technology comes from abroad.
Many
developing countries suffern double dependence" in that they need not only to acquire the elements of technical knowledge but also to import the capacity to use this knowledge in investment and production.Importedtechnology if well harnessedhassome positive effects such as increasing the physical stock of productive factors, increasing the extent of exploitation of these resources, increasing productivity
&
efficiency, and increasing production capacity. The SSAC were able to exploit these advantages up to a certain point because there was no strategy to internalize the technology.
Because of the weakness in local Research and Development and weak links between R&D and production (depicted in figure 2) imported technology proved detrimental to the domestic innovative activity by replacingindigenous research efforts,divertingthe attention of research and development staff and isolating research and development from production. The activities of local science and technology institutions were devalued. Foreign technology went into
competition withindigenous
technology andreplaced
ordestroyedmost
of it. In addition it destroyed local industryand
imposed import and consumption-led growthpattern,
and internationalized the SSAC economies. It also destroyed traditional system of values, debilitatedtraditional social linksand created the
disarticulationphenomenon [split between modern (rich) and traditional (poor)]. Technological dependence is nowperpetuated and strengthened.3.2 The Impact of other economie policies
Apart from the in-built problem concerning' importation of foreign technology, the economicpolicies pursuedby the SSAC further marginalised the contribution of science and technologyto the socio- economic development of the country.
At independence the SSAC were impatientto catch up with the developed countries and because of the boom of 19605, the governments over-expanded the public sector. The mid-1970s brought in acuteeconomic crisis dueto rapidly deteriorating terms of trade
and
dwindling inflow of concessionary finance. Also many African countries experienced political upheavals culminating into civil wars, coups and mass population movements resultingin large expenditure on defence related items.Faced
with
an expanding expenditure requirements and dwindling revenue base, the Governments were faced with ever increasing deficits whichwas
financed mainly through the banking system. This gave rise to rapid expansion of money supply and galloping inflation.The reaction of governments wasthatof more rigid controlsand regulations i.e. fixed interest rates giving rise to negative real interest rates; price controls giving rise to parallel market activities and smuggling, fixed exchange rates giving rise to overvalued exchange rates; "xed wage rates giving rise to brain drain; and introduction of the allocative system giving rise to distorted resource allocation.
Thehigh inflation rates, negative interest rates, and overvalued exchange rates discouraged local saving andinvestmentandencouraged capital flight. It also discouraged foreign investment. In other words there were no~ economic activity i.e, no invention, no innovation
and
no imitation,but there
was decline.The
contribution of scienceand
technology had come to a stand still.Since Research and Development is a very expensive investment with unclear returns, it is the first to suffer when considering expenditure cuts.
The spate of nationalization scared away foreign investment with
unclear returns, it
isthe
first tosuffer when considering
expenditurecuts.
Becauseof declining economic activity and high inflation there was a crisis in the labor market, i.e, rampant unemployment of education manpower and crisis of paying a living wage. This gave rise to reverse technological transferin form of brain drain to developed' countries. The people who should have spear-headed Research
and
Development in Africa soughtgreenerpastures elsewhere.The imposition of exchange control measures because of the balance of payments crisis discouraged foreign investment, foreign technology and foreign personnel.
4. The Impad ofOutward IooIdDI economicpoIides aDd the easeofMauriU...
Some countries haverealized that the inward looking policies cannot be sustainedandhaveturned
towards
outward looking policies withamazing results.
Countries undertaking policy reforms usually make changes
in'the macro economic environment, exchange
rateregime, .the
traderegime,
tax regime,credit
regime,institutional
framework,and
incentives.
Macro Economle EnvironmeDt
The promotion of economic gR?wth and development requires .
. . enablingenvironment which comprises :
political
stability,
strong private sector
bias,
friendliness to local and foreign investors, large; productive and cheap labor force, good infraStructure geared
toproduction,
tax
incentives,
a viable democracy
etc...Also the .success
inpromoting economic development rests on macro-eeonomic stability i.e, low inflation, low fiscal deficits, stable and adequate exchange rates.
EsehaDge rates
An adequate real exchange
ratehelps to ensure equilibrium in the balance of payments and in domestic markets,
~well as being
compatible with growth in tradable and output over the longer term.Policies
usually
includemarket determined rates.
Credit and Interest
Rate
ReformsBefore the reforms, the public sector
tended
to crowd out the private sector, and interest rates,were
fixed by the CentralBanks irrespective of inflationary rates.
The reforms
inthis sector include :
Limiting government recoursetooverdraft at the Central Bank;
According the Central-Bank greater legal autonomy in monetary policy;
Removing distortions in credit allocation.
Allowing Commercial Banks
todetermine their own
interest rates (deregulating interest rates to bedetermined
by marketforces),
Tax
aDdTariff Reforms
Tax
and tariff
rate are usually very high and there isusually
wide spread usc of quantitate restrictions. The reformsusually
consist of:reductionoftariff, incometax, and comJ)8DY tax rates and reductionintheir dispersion;
restructuring of thetax systems, abolitionofquantitative
restrictions,
redirection of taxesfrom
trade
to inoomeand wealth, establishment of
autonomousTax Collection bodieswith motivated
andwell equipped staff.
SJmpHficatioD of AdBJlnistnttve . . . . aue Procedures
Most Countries are engulfed in a maze of bureaucratic procedures. The tendency has been to increase controls and introduce extra procedures whenever economic conditions worsened.
The reforms in this area are to reduce administrative and bureaucratic procedures for exports and investments to minimum. For
example:
Introduction of a stable and transparent regulatory
environment;
Introduction of a singledocument whichincorporates all
aspects of documentation requirements;Reduction of time to approve the
document;
Reducing documentation requirements for investment;
Setting up special windows to
by-pass
bureaucraticmazes;
Decentralization of licensing offices to all areas of the country;
Liberalization of prices, wages and the
marketing
system.Inyestment Promotion
Investible resources are
DOWscarceworld wide and many LOCs
have devised innovative measures to
competefor these scarce
resources. These -devices include a wide range of incentives,
exemptions,. and the creation of
exportzones.
The measures
Wldertakento attractlocal and foreign investment include :
i)
Exemptions from payment of all forms of taxes;
ii)
Secure capital and
profitrepatriation;
iii)
Independent management of foreign
currency;iv)
Customs
Service at site;v) .Manpower availability and training;
vi)
Provision of utilities;
vii)
Creation of
IndustrialPromotion
organizations to carryout some promotional activities.
These promotional activities are
used
for different purposes :IQ1De are used to build a particularimage of the country, others are
used
:togenerateinvestment
directly, andstill
others are investmentservice techniques.
viii)
(\ . ix)
Creation of Free Zones where most of
theincentives, utilities and exemptions arc provided;
Promulgation. of the Investment law or code which
outlines many of the incentives
an~otherlaws intended
toatttaet,'
protectand encourage foreign investment.
Countries which have taken these steps have witnessed phenomenal revival of their economies and high growth rarest the
most
outstanding example in SSA being Mauritius..An outline of the case is given at the end of this section.When there is economic revival, it follows that more goals and services are being produced and more scienceandtechnologymust
be
applied. This technology could be imported or indigenousdepending on thetechnology
policy being pursued in the country, evenimported technology
could becomeendogenous
i.e. making atransplant
to grow its own roots.The success achieved by some developing countries in the development of their
technological capacities is difficult
togeneralize.
It is interesting to compare, take the examples of Korea and India which have developed some technological capacity.
TIle
Koran
Dlodel taD bedepleted a. follow. :
PHASEONEExport
Promotion
Foreign InvestmentForeign Technology and Management know-how transfer.
Outward - Oriented Dependence (ForeignInvestment and Control) PHASE TWO
On the basis of
the
expertise gained during the firstphase,
the.modelbecomes more international and delinking takes place
Endogenous Science &. Technological Base
(A transplant that grew its own roots)
... bMtiuModel iaas foUom :
Blockforeign ownership of productive activities
and foreign control and domination of the economy
Emphasize internationalization of skills and institutional structures Acquire self confidence required
tomeetthe nation's needs Entry into the world
marketthroughnationally owned companies
Thereis no simple method for defining the
bestcourse of action for the development of indigenous technological capacities. But
manyAfrican countries are
toosmall
tofollow the Indian model because one
needs a captivelocal
market as a springboard to the international market. Mauritius which is the most advancedinSSA took the Korean model and it is at the endof
Phase I. It will be very interesting toobserve Mauritius cross over technology
tophase Il.
The ease of Mauritius
Mauritius lies to the east
of Madagascar,
just off the coast of northernAfrica. Mauritius has a populationof about
1.1 million people,and has an average annual
growthrate of 9010;
itsper
capitaincome bas just shop
upto US
$1.800.
Mauritius has an area of 1.865 Sq.
Kms(a mere size of a
county inUganda) of
which agriculture occupies 1.062sq.
Kms ;(57%) forest, grass and scrub occupy 65 sq.
KIDs (3S%);developed
areuoccupy a mere
118sq.Kms
(6%)and the remaining 40 Sq.Kms are unclassified.
At the
timeof political independence (12 March 1968), the Mawitian export
sectorwas dominated
bycane cultivation and sugar
production; the island used
to importmost of her needs.
The infrastructureand services
sectors comprisedthe auxiliary industries and activities connected or dependent upon the
sugarindustry. In other words, the sugar industry was the island's engitte of growth
in thata cane sugar mono-culture
shaped theisland's economic and social environment. If the sugar industry prospered, the maUritius economy also
prosperedfrom
thecolonial hangover comprising of a highly
specialized,extroverted and dependent economic
systembasedon sugar cane production.
Polidcal-EcoDomle Penpeetive
The loomingdominance of
thesugar industry in Mauritius is on the decline being challenged
bythe newcomer on the economic scene,
viz : the Mauritius ExportProcessing
Zone (MEPZ).The attainment of political independence acted as an
important positive catalyst in theisland's economic diversification, advancementand independence. It brought the island out of its secular isolation as
a British colonial outpost acting as a peripheral sugar producer for the
British
market.Political independence opened
theMauritius economic
doors with new alluringprospects as a prospering exportmanufacturing
base. Economic issues became. predominant among the preoccupations
of the island's leaders and the business community in their task of
constructing aviable post-independence economy, Thus the political
leaders and.the business community conceived the splendid idea of
establishing an Export Processing Zone (EPZ).
TIle
MamitlaIEsport ProaI_.ZoDe
Prior
to1,970, Mauritius
export processingsector
hadproblems Such u inflation unemployment, lack of foreign exchange.
etc...which ultimately
affected thewhole economy. The MEPZ scheme introduced in 1971 (the first phase)
bas beenthe majorcontributing factor towards
theisland·s
spectaculargrowth. Itbas successfully attracted investors the world over-e.g,
ftomFrance, the
UK,Germany, Holland, Indi,
Hong Kong, Taiwan,A~ia, USA and other countries.The industrial revolution
which hastaken
placein Mauritius with
the setting upof
theBPZ bas
changedMamitiua
t image froma cane sugar producer BDd a tomist paradise
toa shoppers paradise.
Buyers from the world over are flocking
tothe island,
afterrealizing
thereliability as a supplier of
manufactured products.TheMawitiua
EPZ
,is also quiteUDiqucin thatit considers the whole island as an BPZ.There is thusDO geograpbicallimitationandan En enterprise can
beset upanywhere on the island. Molt of the EPZare,located on
theindustrial estates of
theMamitian Development Bank
atPlaine Lauzon, Coromondel
andPhoenix.
The
maiDobjective of Mauritius'
industr;iaIdevelopment policy is
theimprovement of the
COlDltry'Sforeign exchange outlook and
the creationof
gainfullemployment
Onthis scoretherefore,
M~tiUlbaa made remarkable progress with the setting
upof the EPZ.
The EPZ currently
producesan amazing
varietyof
qualityand
exotic products f6r-tbe international markets. The biggest firms are
specializing
intextiles for which Mauritius
DOWranks third among the world
exporters.The zone also makes
toys,sunglaues
and
spectacle
frames,plastic products, leather goods
(bags,wateJt
straps,
garments. foot wear),assembled watches, TV
seta,telephonCl, etc...
The'present
policy is
toprepare the EPZ
toenter the second phase whereby Mauritius will diversify into
hightechnology and high precision goods with high added value - 8UCh as
computers,varioua electronic
gadgets, etc..: Itis moving
awayfrom
labor tocapital - intensive technology.
The s.et
heIabIdMaulti..
lUeaIIstory :
Mauritius offen. uDique blend of incentives and advantages
to export-oricntedCIltcrpriaes.. TbeIe.
inabort, include,:
1. A
stablepolitical and social
enviromDeat;2. Duty-freeIDd
quota-free access
tothe
BEemarket according .
tothe Lome Convention.
Thisconvention provides for close economic cooperation
betweenthe
BEemember countries and
theACP States.
Mauritius,as a member, can export
itsmanufactured
productstoBeCountries
duty-freeand quota-free if
these projects satisfy the relevant rules 'andorigin.
Membership of this convention is probably the most
importantfactor behind
thesuccess of the Mauritius EPZ and explains why the bulk of her exports
goto the BEe.
3. A well-balanced package of fiscal incentives. These include:
Complete exemption from payment of import duty on
machinery,
equipment, spare parts. raw materials and semi-finished goods.Payment
of nominal rare of 15%corporate tax during
the
whole life of the company;Exemptionfrom
payment
of incometaxon dividend for the first 10years;Free repatriation of invested capital and dividends.
4. A highly literate,adaptable, productive and inexpensive labor force speaking English and French and other languages.
Mauritiushasa pool of young, educated and inexpensive
labor
(about one tenth of average European and one-sixth of Hong- Kong rates). The workers are reliable, hardworking and easily trained. Thehigh qualityof the labor force, coupled with the responsible trade unions, bas enabled the EPZ sector to achieve theremarkable growth rate of over25%.5. A well-developed
infrastructure,
including excellent communications with all parts of the world.Infrastructural
facilities (internal and external communications, internal road network, water and electricity supplies as well as port airport facilities are well developedin Mauritius.FactoryBuildings
with
all amenities are availableat low rentals,especially
inareas where labor isplentiful.
A developed service" sector, including bankin!,
insurance,
management consultancy,witlt
world-wide connectionsfacilitates the establishment and smooth running of enterPrises
inMEPZ.
6. Availability offaetorybuildings and fully-servicedlandatcheap
rates.
7. A well-developed and diversified industrial base.
8. An exceptionallysophisticated
entrepreneurial
class prepared tocollaborate
withoverseas partners;
9. A keen (and proven) awareness of the need to maintain the highest quality standard of the goods produced.
10. Residence and work permits granted to foreign technicians at short notice;
11. Guarantee against
nationalization; and12.
An
extremely efficient and dedicated administrative service.The effects of these reforms
showsthat
GDPincreased
byfour
told between 1982 and 1992, agriculture by three fold, and manufacturing by six fold.5. CODdusloD
Science and technology developed can
only
flourish in agrowing economy because in a
stagnantordeclining economy there are
no new economic activities, no inventions,
no innovations 'and no imitations. The preconditions for scientific andtechnological
development, whether through imports orindigenous
is a growingeconomy.
For economies
togrow,
ithas been demonstrated that they neea an open and outwardpolicies and therefore, for countries that have not yet
adoptedthese policies the need
toseriously wnsider the following changes
intheireconomic policies :
(i)
Creation of an enabling macro-economic envirtmIDe11t;
(ii)
Creation of macro-economic stability i.e, low inflation, low fiscal deficits and stable and adequate exchange rates;
(iii)
Removing distortions of
moneymarket,
labormarket and goods market;
(iv) Restructuring the
taxsystem and
reducerates;
(v). Simplification of
administrative
and bureaucraticprocedures;
(vi)
Investment
and exportpromotion;
(vii)
Promotion of private initiative and entrepreneurship;
(viii)
Provision of incentives for Science " Technology
innovation .
(ix)
(x) (xi)
Provision of a fixed percentage of GDP for Research and Development;
Protection of proprietary
rights;I
Provi'sion of Subsidy
for·Private R&D
(xii)
Evolution of an educational
systemwhich will enable African Societies
tocritically develop and' record their thought, culture and indigenous technology and also
to criticallyassimilate,
adaptand endogenise the
vitaland energizing foreign facets of culture, science and technology.
Once the economy begins
torevive, the role of science
andtechnology is activated and there is need
topromulgate a science and technology policy
to guide,itsdevelopment.
An endogenous science and technology
policycan only be fol'lDlllated on the basis of clearly defined development goals and objectives, and in
termsof decisions concerning
typesand volumes of goods and services-
to be produced. Inother words, science and technology should be demand driven, derived
fromthe need
tosolve the couutry's production problems given
itsrequirements.
Once the country's production requirements havebeen identified then science goo technology
strategyshould
beput in place which should have a two prongs attack.
(i)
Selection, acquisition and management
offoreign inputs
and adaptation of theimported technology and its
productstoensure
thattheycan
beabsorbed
byand can
operate
effectively in the new environment.
(ii)
Stinmlation of indigenous supplies of technology
andinitiative of an autonomous process of technological
innovation and development.
The government should then put in
place
a science andtechnology policy to create a framework in which
decision~concerning S
&,T choice can
bemade and implemented.
References
1.
Kazi,
M. New Challenges face Indian Ocean Tiger,African Business, April, 1993.
2. Nyiira, Z.M. Capacity Building and Technological change in
Sub-Saharan Africa : Experiences from selected countriesand suggested Agenda for Action BCO
1992 PublicForum
Cairo 9 - 10My
1991.3. Nyiira, Z.M. Science and Technology "in the context of Uganda's Economic Reform. (Unpublished)
4.
s.
6.
7.
Ochieng, B.O.
UNIDO.
UNIDO.
UNlDO.
Export Policies, A
paper
delivered to,East African Central Banking Course, -, Nairobi 1992.
Guide
to Guaranteeand
WarrantyProvisions
inTransfer of Technology Transactions. Vienna
(1989).Manual on Technology Transfer Negotiations.
Technological Self-reliance of the Developing countries : Towards operational strategies.
Development .and Transfer of Technologies
8. World Bank Mauritius
ManagingSuccess, Washington
(1989).
A NADONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY' POLICY:
THE CASE OP UGANDA
INTRODUCIlQN
The rote and
impactof science and teclmology
inthe social
ecoDoqUC
development process of a country hardly need any
Ielucidation. Yet,
inoItdeveloping C01D1tries have Dot
benefitted from :this technological transformation process.
DespitetheawamlCSS
«eatedalmost two decades
ago inVienna of
therole
ofsciCllCCand technology
indevelopment, and despite
thepersistentefforts by S & T policy makers in.developing countries
tobuild
upinfrastructures and
set
up promotional schemes, science and technology have failed
totake
tootand bearfruitsinmost of the developing world. Overthe last three
decadesseveral United Nations Agencies have been engaged in the
elaboration of practical measuresneeded
to integrate sciettceand technology
in thedevelopment process, particularly
indeveloping
countries. The major S " T plana which havebeen elaborated
forreview, or are applicable
inthe Afri'*l region are :
i) The
Africa Regional Planof Action for the Application of Science and Technology to Development (1970)
ii)First
CoDfereaceof MiDisterl respollJible for the
AppI~eatiODof
Science
aDd TecImoIogytoDcvelopmeat
inAfrica CASTAFRICA (1974)
iii) The ViennaProgram of~ction(1979) iv) Lagos Plan of action
(198()"2000)
v) Program of Action .for the Industrial Development Decade of Africa (1980)
vi)
Africa's Priority Prolram for
'BeonomicRecovery APPER (1986-1990)
vii) The United Nations Program of Action for African Economic Recovery and Development (1986-1990)
(UNPAAERD)viii) Second. Conference of
MinistersResponsible for the Application of Science and Technology
toDevelopment
in Africa(CASTAFRICA). Kilimanjaro Declaration (l987)
x)
PriorityAfrica-
UNESCOProgramme of Action (1990- 1995)
The main
objectives of the above efforts
havebeen :a) To
sttalgthcnthe scientific and technological
capacityofthe developing countries
toeDable themapply science and technology
to theirown development.
b) To
adopteffective
mcat1Sfor utilization of Scientific and
Technological potentials
tosolve the development
problemsof natiOllal, regional and global significance,
especially for the benefit of developing countries.
c) To provide instruments of
cooperation
between developed and developing countries in utilizing scienceand technology to solve socio-eccnomic problems that cannot
besolved
byindividual action
inaccordance with national priorities.
Over these
years,
one of the mostimportant
lessons that baa beenlearnt is that science and technology in developing countries
has so far been treated as an isolated process in the dynamics ofdevelopment and not as an
integral part.inseparable
fromthe social, economic
process.Furthennore,
decisionsregarding technologies have
often been taken in isolation without due consideration of the total developmentpicture.
Thus ingeneral whatever has been done
inthis manner has failed
toproduce the full intended results.
Thereis, therefore, a need
torespond
tothis
situation.This requires fostering a total environment for science and tedmology
toprosper in support of
developmentand, promotingautonomous decision making
capacity -a
need to build and strengthen Endogenous Capacity in science and technology, EndogenousCapacity
in this sense beingunderstood to mean the
extentof
local capability toexercise
independent,informed
judgement and actions regarding the generation, acquisition anddeployment of technologies for sustainable economic and
social development, including the fulfillment of basicneeds, within
asociety.
Itis this capacity, that determines or deters the
pace of
development ofa country through the application of science and technology.
Fostering a total environment for science and technology
to prosper in support of development calls for the formulation and implementation of effective science and technology policies whoee intended objectives areto enhance the application of science and
technologyto the development process. Concurrent and in support
of this exercise, there is a need to identify and examinetheoptions opento usto improve the management of science and technology policy at the national level.
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
The widelyfelt need for a science and technology policysprings
from an explicit commitment to a national goal and the acceptance ofscience and
technology as important strategic variables in the development process. science andtechnology
policy formulation oughtto naturally follow the establishment of a development vision or perspective
plan
characterized amongothers, by a desired mix of the goodsto be produced andthe services to
be providedinthe medium
to longterm future. The policyframework:must bebroad
and flexible enough andmust
take into account the dynamics of change. In Uganda for example, current government effort isbeingdirected to creating an independent, integrated and self-sustaining economy. This being the vision of the country, wewill
have to formulate and implement a scienceand technologypolicygearedtowards
achieving this. This calls for resources, both human, material and commitment.Our
intention in Uganda is to have a policythat
will be a comprehensive statement by the highest policy-making body of government to guide;promote and regulate science and technology activities for national development purposes. It will contain statements ofailDland objectives, of principles and purposes andof commitments
of Government for scienceandtechnology. The role of the policy will be to provide the overall direction for the use of resources. It will provide guidance for formulating policy instruments and plans. While setting thenational
technology goals and objectivesand
inducingtheformulation of
relevant policy instruments, it will embody anticipatorydecisions on specific investment programsin varioussectors. The main
purpose of the policy will be :To commit governmeat fimd.I and
to setpriorities for research and development;
To encourage technology innovation
to meetnational objectives;
-To attract enough dedicated science and technology workers;
To induce
andenhance the provision of science
andTechnology services;
To utilize selected technologies
81tools for national development
tolegitimize the
policy;To ensure
thatpolicy is
integratedinto the national development policy.
We are aware however. that the succcssfu1 implementation of
thepolicy will demandcommitment.
Thesecommitments
willtranslate
the policyinto
action. They will need to be specific andmust
be present atall levels of
the systemsIDd will have
to bearappropri.
sttength. We will try
to ensure
that thehierarchy
ofcommitment
corresponds to the stl1lcturcof government i.e., natioual, aectoral aDd specific technology commitment
atthe enterprise level. These commitment$,
raDkedin
theorder of increasing relative
sblmgthare
thepublic
statement, publicofficial
statement,statement
in planningdocuments, law and
articlesin
theCODBtitution.
We are fully aware of
thefact
thattechnological evolutiOD
twhich
isaffectingevery facet
ofhumanactivity,
isvery dynamic. We
1berefore believe that science and teebnology development initiative
must
be.undertaken without delay.
Inthis
respect,we acknowledge the
fact~l'Otiey
declarations and
commitmentsare time-bound. The
timedimeaJion
and itsimplieatiODI
willtherefore
be appropriatelyconsidered during
the policyformulation process
and we will try toensurethat the validityof
commitmentsmatchesthe time
frameof plm implementation.
In the science and technology policy
thatis currently under formulation by the Uganda National Council for Science and
Tcc1mology~
we will take into
8CCOlDltthe
factthatimprovement of om capability
toassimilate and
adapt importedtechnologies will
benecessary. In addition, we believe that integration of technology considerations
intothe development plan should include provision for formulating policies andguidelines
togenerateand
promotedemand
forindigenous technologies and
tostrengthen technology
capability.This will call for the creation of a technology culture i.e,
theexistence of a general
baseof trained manpower, a mass of middle technical managerial staff, down
toand including skilled worlanen. The mass
media.technology expositions, societies and clubs at
everylevel, scientific
andtechnical
literature can all help create atechnology culture
andan innovative climate.
INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
It
is
beingsuggested that while
integrating thescience
aDdtechnology plan
intothe national development plan,
itwin
benecessaryto build a vision or scenario
tobe arrived at by using tools of economic analysis
toanalyze growth, investment, resources, employment and
,otheridentifiable variables. Webelieve
that essentialcomponents of the
technology plan will include :
Institutionalization of Technology Assessment(TA)and Technology Forecasting (TF) at different organization levels of Government;
Human
resource development planning;Institutionalization of research plansfor various sectors
to supportthe national development plan;
Development of engineering design capability;
Hardware and material development to meet needs of the
national
developmentplan.
Development of the information services sector.
Based on the technology plan, programs at
the
sectoraland
enterprise levels will then be derived, specifictime frames set, and institutional mechanisms for extensive market surveys developed. In view of the above, we are now suggesting that for us to be able to achieve our intended objectivesof building an independent, integrated and self-sustaining economy, an objective whose achievementwin
definitely depend on our local capability to exercise independence, informed judgement and actions regarding the generation, acquisition and deployment of technologies for sustainable economic and
social
development, the basic framework for technology development given belowcouldbe adopted and the considerations shown in the figurethat
follows mustbe taken into account.From the two figures, the following observations can bemade:
1. There has to be -political, administrative and financial commitment at all levels of government - the science and technology
policy mentioned above, integrated with the National Development Plan. The policy will induce the establishment of laws and policy guidelines and facilitate the creation, building and strengthening of technological infrastructures.
As noted above, a science and technology policy is not yet in place. It is under formulation. As a result, the few technological infrastructures that have
been
built, laws established andpolicy
guidelines issued have not been organically linked, This can sometimes lead to duplication of effort, waste of time and resources with a danger of conflict and non performance. there is therefore, need for us to come up, as soon as possible, with a science and technology policy, integrated withtheoverall national development plan, to guide, promote and regulate science and technology activities for national developmentpurposes.
2. The laws established andpolicy guidelinesissued must facilitate
the creation
ofa
technologyculture. The mass media,
clubs,societies,
professional association etc can all help create the necessity technology climate. In this respect, efforts of the Uganda Manufacturers Association in mounting expositions from time to time must be commended. To help strengthen the technological climate in the country, there is need from timeto time to hold trade fairs, science and technology expositions. in schools, colleges and universities and to facilitate free flow of information through the mass-media, technical publications etc...3. The established laws and
policy
guidelinesissued must also take into account our need for technological innovation and competition.Institutionalized national annual prizes could help. In additional financial support through the universities, colleges etc...must be extended to innovators to help them with their research and development work. To ensure that we attain our objective of self-
reliance, thei~licensing authorities couldact in such a way that local production is encouraged, while taking into account the needto
maintain
acceptable standards, fair prices,and
adequate quantities on themarket.
4. There is need to build and strengthen our technological infrastructures. 'These
win
help us to develop the necessary humanresources.
Ithas been observed
thatwe are
veryweak on
technologicalinfras1ructures. A
population of16.8
mpeople growing
ata
rate of2.8%
perannum
has :1 Polytechnic producing about 300 people at· ordinary and higher diploma levels
perannum.
24 technical schools and 29
technical
institutes all producing about4 000 technicians
and craftsmeneveryyear.
4 technical colleges baving an annual output of about 200 technicians.
1 Faculty of Technology with an annual output of about 50 graduate engineers.
These numbers are
depressinglylow. Considering
thefact that
the few institutions we have areill-equipped
in terms oftraining materials, trainers and course content, there is need
to urgentlyaddress the issueofbuilding and strengthening our technological infrastructures.
In doing this, we
must
ensure that properlinkages exist betweentheinstitutions and those
theyare
toservee.g. industry. The curriculamust
bedesigned such as
thosewho go through the education and training
programs will
befound useful
byindustry. There is therefore need for
training
institutions,professional
associations and industry to
gettogether and come up with a suitable curriculum. The task of producing a national curriculum should not
beleft to one section of
society,e.g. The
NationalCurriculum Development Center or the University.
While building and strengthening our technological infrastructure cognizance must
betaken of the need to strike the
rightbalance between brain and skill. We need creators and innovators as much as we need skilled people.
Another factor which will have
tobe born in mind is the need
tobuild and strengthen our information services. This will be necessary
inorder for us to avoid wastage of time and resources. A national
systemof information generation, acquisition, processing, storage, retrieval and dissemination
mustbedeveloped. It should
bepossible
toknow what research bas been or is being done where?
Whatthe results
wereand where and how the results of
theresearch are being applied.
At present, there are a number of information and documentation centers as well as a number of teaching and documentation centers as well as a number of teaching and research institutions. A systemis called for whereby all these institutions will be' able to share experiences and research results witb the objectives of saving time and costs.
S. We must generate a capability to forecast world technology trends
and
toassess
emergingtechnologies.
Itis
tosome extent
truethat
thelimiting factor
torenewing our economy is not raw materials
rather technological information andknowledge
totum the raw
materials into process and products. The technologies (especially
ininformation, biotechnology and material sciences) have reshaped the
world economy and have marginalized those countries such as Uganda
which depend on the
exportof raw materials -for foreign exchange
earnings. These shifts have affected us much more than any other region of the world because of our excessive dependence on raw materials (coffee, tea, cotton, tobacco) and our inability to move to higher levels of industrial processing (e.g, making instant coffee and other products from the grown coffee beans, finished garments from the cotton, fruit concentrates from the oranges, pineapples, mangoes, etc for export). Our strategic importance as a source of raw materials has diminished as the industrialized world continues to identify alternatives to our exports.
A national science and technology policy, organically integrated with the national development plan, will lead us to an identification of our technological needs and specifications. Therefore if we had the capacity to forecast the world technological trends and were able to assess emerging technologies, we would then be in a positionto carry out a national technological needs assessment on one hand and a national capabilities assessment on the other. Having identified and assessed our technological needs and capabilities, these, together with technological considerationsintegrated into national plans, would help us in the process of national social-economic development planning which would have to be done on the basis of three domains :
i) Digestion, adaptation and improvement of imported technologies;
ii)
Improvement of
indigenous and traditional technologies;iii) Production of new and future-oriented technologies;
6. After identifying our technological needs and specifications, decisions on which technologies to buy and which ones to develop locally will have to be made. Should the decisions regarding a
be