UNITED FATIC ITS
AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
DAKAR
CS/2528-9
/f
CONFERENCE ON
THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRENDS AND POLICIES IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
SOUTH AFRICAN SUBIMPERIALI3M
BY
Jane #oles and Robin Cohen
SEPTEMBER 1975
3E Ky co-authorship of this paper is purely nominal. I undertook simply
to present and edit the paper in a form that would he useful for the Lusaka Conference in Ipril 1975. Jane Coles is the true author. A full version of this paper will he presented as a M.A. Thesis at the Centre of West African Studies, University of Birmingham. Academic footnoting
has been eliminated, hut a list of major sources can he found at the end.
cs/2528-9
Page 1.
SOUTH AFRICAN SUBIMFERIALISM
Introduction
The concept of Sub-Imperialism is not well-defined in the aca demie literature. It refers essentially to the industrial develops
of a formerly underdeveloped country, whereby that country manages
gain a certain amount of control over, and economic independence fr
its ties with the industrially developed powers that were responsi"
for its colonisation and incorporation into the world capitalist system.
It refers also to a stage in the underdeveloped country's dee lopmont when that country manages itself to expand and create its
'colonial' satellites that supply it with raw materials and act as markets for its manufactured goods; and therefore analyses the oka . within the political economy of the underdeveloped country, and :.r .
relations to tho imperial
métropole,
that have combined to producethat result*
Sub-imperialism is an extension of the debate about tiio poss'.
t'ios of industrialisation in tho Third World. On the one hand d♦G« Frank argues that the possibilities of autonomous development
(he
calls it "positiveinvolution")
occur "classically" only if and when the satellite's ties with .themétropole
arc weakened during per of war and depression, but that development can be restricted agar once the métropole recovers. On tho other hand, critics of Fran- particular Bill Warren, arguethat
the possibilities of successful capitalist development within a Third World country are greater tkFrank and his followers allow and that obstacles to development c'
as much or more from internal contradications as from an imperiali: ,
World link.
CS/2528-9
Rage 2.
South Africa is not normally discussed, in relation to this delate.
It is generally regarded as an advanced industrialised country much like
those in the west, hut with the added feature of'a racial policy that
denies the majority black population any participation in the running of
the country. There is no doubt that South Africa has achcved a remarkably high level of industrialization for what was once an underdeveloped colony Yet, within this state exist features that arc usually associated with
a colony: stagnant labour reserves struggling for
subsistence,
a mi r atlabour system, the control of the political authority and economic n. :ourc
by a dominant alien minority, and the total absence of democratic ri, ntr.:
for the majority.
The presence of underdeveloped regions within a developed one anu their interrelationship would suggest that a theory of sub-imperialism
has some considerable explanatory potential. When to this is added the
relationship that South Africa has
achieved,
or is trying to cement, withcountries within the Southern African region as a
whole,
the notion tf sub-imperialism booomos even more opposite.The most coherent exposition of a theory of sub-imperialism appears in an article by Ruy Mauro Marini on Brazilian sub-imperialism. After the 1964 coup in Brazil, the military loaders advanced a political and economic strategy that involved a deliberate and extensive relationship with big, almost exclusively foreign capital. Sub-imperialism was both
a conscious strategy and, as Marini argues, "the form which dependent capitalism assumes
(we
think one should say canassume)
upon rea,ching the stage of monopolies and finance capital." Four critical areas are iden¬tified by Marini:
m
cs/2528-9
Page 3«
1)
the problemof tho market
2)
the state as consumer,involving an increase in expenditure
on the military and on
infrastructura.1 development 3)
the alliancewith foreign capital
4)
anintroduction of
anarrowly-based ''consumer society",
built on the superexploitation
of the unskilled segment
of the labour force#
No simple
transposition from Brazil to South ^frioa can be made,
but each aspect that
Marini identifies has
apoint of.reference in
the South African context
that needs exposition. Before this is
done,
however,
wenote some special factors in South Africa's deve¬
lopment.
Situâtionally—Specific
Factors
South Africa's history as a
land of European settlement has been
unlike that of any other
'white settler colony'
-a misleading des-
cription as it
conjures
upimages of the white dominions and pays
scant regard to
the complex political configurations that preceded
the establishment of a single
state. The unit which now constitutes
South Africa has not always
done
so.Namibia was incorporated admi¬
nistratively into
South Africa under
aLeague of Nations Mandate in
1919. The rest
of the present territory of South Africa was first
tenuously brought
together by the Act of Union of 1910. It had
previously
contained two Boer Republics, two English colonies, and
diverse African
societies. Prior to the Union, as Potholm says,
"British and Dutch colonial
authorities, independent African groups,
and large numbers
of European settlers formed and reformed politic-1
communities as they vied
for control of southern Africa."
CS/2528-9
Pago 4»
The internal political antagonisms in tho region prevented its efficient and unified colonisation and hence •satellisation' by any
one power» Imperial domination was therefore weaker than in other parts of Africa» The most important contradictions were those which
developed in the late 19th century,
a)
between British Imperialism and the Boer Republics of the Transvaal and Orange Free State; andb)
between British Imperialism and British and other European settlers.
The former was an essentially political contradiction, the latter, an economic one»
The conflict between British imperialism and the two Boer Repub¬
lics crystallized over the control of the gold and diamond deposits
found in the late 19th century, in the Transvaal and the Orange Free
State respectively. British capitalism had to"contend with organised political
institutions,
— actual states — in their attempts to gaincontrol over these mineral deposits» Tho conflict came to a head with tho Boer War, and although Britain seemingly won the war,
it
lost political control of the subsequent Afrikaner-dominated union of South Africa» This can be seen especially in the Afrikaner Nationalist reac¬tion that followed after 1948» The effect of the constant antagonism between British imperial interests and Afrikaner political hegemony was to weaken the structural dependency relations in which South Africa
was tied, first to British, and then later to a more general Western imperialism.
In the case of
b),
the white settler has been typified as essen¬tially antagonistic to imperialism because ho benefitted from colonis- lism and wanted its benefit to accrue within the colony, and not to be exported to the imperial métropole»
Cs/2528—9
Page 5»
European emigration to
South
Africa was aresult of the economic
revolution brought about in the subcontinent by the
discovery of the ;old
and diamond deposits-** Immigrants poured into South
Africa, averaging
'
24,000
a yearbetween 1890 and 1913» Apart from providing skilled labour
for the new mines, those
imndgrants also provided the basis of
a new nr.nufcácturing class» Gold-miningv had stimulated thelocal manufacture
of explosives and other mining requisites.
It "accelerated the
process of urbanization and provided a local market for industrial products,and thus gave rise to
the" local manufacture of
avariety of
consumergoods»
It was in the expanding manufacturing class that
antagonism
toimperial
interests was centred» From the formation of small pressure-groups such
as the South African Manufacturers' Association started in the Capo in the-.
l890s, developed the manufacturers* demands from the state for full
protection of their products. By 1917
the manufacturing class
wasalready
powerful enough to have wonideological support from the majority
orM.P.s in the new union government»
(Legassick).
Bob Sutcliffo points out that economic development is possible
where an industrial bourgeoisie, develops that is supported
by
astate
capable of defending its owninterests. This
wasthe
casein South
Africa. Its long—standing programme of
tariff protection for
new^industry
has been One of the major contributing factors in. its industrial growth
Boosts tó South Africans Development
South African industrialisation made its greatest progress during
the years of
protection afforded by the Boer War, the two World Wars,
and the depression in.Europe that came in
between^thom. This
wasthe
period, of .?positive
involution* for South Africa's
economy.During the
Bóer'War,
localindustries which processed local agri¬
cultural products or
imported
raw or semi—processedmaterials multiplied
in the Cape, an a,rba that whs
less directly effected by the
warthan
other parts of the territory. It was the
First World
War,however, ta
.•»
CS/2528-9
Frigo
6.
provided South
African manufacturers witn a real oppurtunity of exp.-n-
ding into the local
market. A manufacturing infrastructure had already
developed, and
manufacturers
wore, asI.-^yasciok
says,"probahly in a
position tomake
moreof the protootion offered to them than equiva¬
lent classe in other unprotected
colonies; not only
werethey
a growing :ndenterprising class, but they wore ideologically equipped
for expansion." Between
1915/16 and îyj/lôj 1700
newfactories opened.
From
1917/1'.
to1919/20, the
grossvalue of manufacturing output
increaso"• from £35.7
million to £76.8 ra'-llioa- arid the net value,
from £13-9 million to £27*9
million.
A significant change had
taken place
:nthe
economy.It was
significant enough toprevent
abacksliding to stronger dependency
ties w"»th Britain after the period of
protection
was over.Within South Afiica, the
evidence provided by the
warof the
ability of industry to grow
under protection, its relative cheapness,
and its employment
potential (a,
newconr'.dcrntion with the urbanisa¬
tion of the previously
rural Afrikaner) all contributed to the now
desira„bilitj of
manufacturing. The positive period of growth during
the war was followed in the twenties ly
-ohc laying of the foundation
of futuro industrial expansion. This v-.m
prpeoially
seenin the for¬
mation of the South African
Electricity Supply Commission (ESCCIi) and
the South African Iron and Steel
Corporation (ISCOR).
t . ..
Hcpghton classifies the period,
1933-45j
asthe "take—off" point
into self—sustained growth of
South Africa's development• South
Africa.. wcariAcrod the depression more
oueiiy than, almost
anyother
country' This was
essentially booaus— of the gold—mining industry,
which had a powerful
"anti-cyclical" ef.cet
onthe
oconorry.The deva¬
luation of chc South African pound-in 1Í13
and its offoct
onthe rice
of gold gov3 gold—rining a now
impetus. This led to
aseries ex econo¬
mic 'VAracles" that .laid the foundation for
profound changes. The
economy raxed ahead. The
National Incerto increased from £226,600,000
cs/2528/9
Page 7.
in 1,932 "to
£585|600,000 in 1949* There
was avastly increased demand
for labour in all sectors of the economy and the employment of both
whites and non-whites in industry increased rapidly. The general
boom of the country attracted foreign
capital,
anddomestic capital
formulation increased markedly.
Similarly, the protection offered by the Second World War
causelocal industry to
expand, diversify, and increase in technical skill
and confidence.
The history of South
Africa's industrial growth centres around
the impetus given to its
developing industry by this long period of
protection? it own
protective policies; and its single greatest
asset - gold. Post-war
import curbs and other fiscal and monetary
controls have strcngthenûd previous
tariff protection policies, and
gold has
continued
tobe the mainstay of the
economy.The value of South Africa's gold has net rested on the
amount produced, since in fact most of the mines
aremarginal producers of
low-grade ore. Its value
has been in the foreign exchange it has
earned; in the fact
that its sales bridge the'wide
gapin South Afric
trade figures,
and in the tactical advantage that -it brings to South
Africa. This last factor is
(Especially
importantin relation to the
present monetary crisis
in the western world. Gold and foreign
cur¬rency reserves in
South Africa
weredeclining at a...rate of R.15
million monthly by May 1971. The now
dual price levels have, however
reversed this trend.
In 1972 the
unofficial price of gold
was38 U.S. dollars
anounce, and
the unofficial price
waswell over 70 U.S. dollars. The
oil crisis of October 1973 has
pushed the price ox"gold
evenhigher.
The unofficial price of gold bullion on
the 6th IJOvember 1974
wasCS/2528-9
Phge
8»
179 U.S.
dollars
an.ounce; the gold price reaching,200 U.S. dollars
an ounce on the London
market at the end of 1974» This is again a
reflection on the
international
currencysituation and the malaise in
the money
market, and shows how gold has become a protective invest¬
ment and thereby an even
greater advantage to South Africa. To anti¬
cipate a
later argument, it should bo said here that any contradictions
induced by the
increasing scarcity of mine labour and its increased
cost,
must be mitigated by the immense price gold can how command.
South African
Sub—imperialism (a) Labour
The factors that have
boosted South Africa's industrialisation
have been discussed above.
However, the character of that industriali¬
sation is also vitally
important. This is whore Marini*s theory of
subimporialism is
relevant to
astudy of South Africa. For South
Africa's development has
from the start exhibited certain subimpcrialist
characteristics. These
characteristics have been closely interconnected
They date
back to the discovery of gold and diamonds in the 19th century
and are connected
with Marini*s, third and fourth aspects of subimpc-
rialism i.e.
(a) the superexploitation of unskilled labour and (b) the
dependence on
foreign capital.
The discovery of rich
mineral deposits in South Africa gave rise
to la.rgo-sca.le
British and American investment. South Africa became
one of the major
investment
areasof the world. Skilled immigrants
which poured in
with this investment had to be attracted by high wages.
From the first a labour
pattern
wasset up on the mines of a few white
skilled highly-paid,
and
manyblack unskilled lowly-paid, workers. As
the
gold-mines
woremarginal producers of low-grade ore they could not
have operated a,t
all if it had not been for the development of a special
extractive tochniquo
which utilised cheap labour.
CS/2528-9
Pago 9*
The pattern of
skilled and unskilled labour that was employed on
the mines was repeated in the
developing manufacturing industries. The
differentials between black and white
workers, the imposition cf the
colour bar,
-and the reservation of skilled jobs for whites only
-South
Africa's infamous restrictive
labour policies.
-gradually became insti¬
tutionalised and formalised. This
took plane mostly in tho 1920s.
Rural Afrikaners were moving to
the towns .in increasing numbers in
of jobs, and
there
was agrowing problem of 'poor whites'. Continuous
industrial unrest among those newly
urbanized white workers, and espe¬
cially the famous
strike
onthe mines in .1922 increasingly pressurized
the government of
the day to introduce policies that would prevent the
white workers from being undercut
by cheap skilled black labour* Tons
obviously was a
further obstacle to imperialist interests in South.
Africa. Britain's loss of
political control
overthe Union bocc.ee ere
• complote.
The South African government
intervened increasingly
onboh- If of
the white worker. This trend was
reflected in the policies of the
Afrikaner Nationalist Party,
which
cameto
powerin. 1948 and introduced
most of thé legislation
that protects white workers
tLegislation that
has been an important
basis of apartheid. Tho ideology behind it was
enunciated by Vorster in
1956: "we. know
oneperson only to whom wc owe
an explanation, and
that is the white worker in South Africa who has
brought the
Nationalist Party to the position it occupies today out will
keep it in that
position
îin the future."
-bï \ . ii. j. ' rx..South Africa's industrialisation
has relied heavily
on asystem
of migratory
Labour. It is
afurther aspect of its labour policies and
has Served tò restrictthe
development of
asettled, increasing!.;
skilled,
andorganized, African proletariat, and to reinforce the rrbrac -
tural underdevelopment of the areas from
which the migrants
comees/2528—9
Rvgc 10.
In the early days of
mining and industry, the Africans coming
from their rural homes to work in the new
urban and mining centrer;
wore naturally migrants. The
first diamond mines provided closed
compounds for
African workers
as asecurity measure. Tho gold mines
followed suit. Tho mine compounds, now
notorious for their atro.cious
conditions and prison-like security,«
have helped to perpetuado the
migratory system.
Nevertheless an increasingly large and
settled urban African
proletariat has
developed. There is hardly
a.town of any considorabl
size-in South Africa that does not have a
greater African then white
population. By
designating all urban
areas as"white" the government
hopes to avoid
security problems in the control of the African ponulr
tion. African workers in the towns have
the status of temporary
sojourners and are
supposed to return to their 'homelands' when unem¬
ployed or unemployable, even
if they have
never seenthose 'homelands
Similarly, wives
and children
areconsidered 'unnecessary appendages'
who must ideally remain in the
'homelands'. In this
waythe
govornm.- falsoly maintains the statusof tho urban African worker
asthat ai?
a migrant labourer. It
a,lso avoids
expensesthat might otherwise be
incurred in the provision of social and
medical welfare, adequate
housing, or
education for the Africans.
The incorporation of foreign
African labour into this enforced
migratory pattern is
centred round the labour requirements of t a
African mines. In 1972 there were 300,000
Labourers in the gol.; ai;;.
and tho Transvaal coal mines. Of this .number,
21%
werefrom Moranteq 19$
from Lesotho,22.5% from African countries to the North. Thai i.
37.5%
only were fromwithin South Africa. The majority of the :
Africans from the north are from Malawi. In 1971 there were
100,000
t ■
Malawians working in South Africa,
mostly
onthe raines.
CS/2528-9
Page 11»
The significance of this input of foreign labour into South Africa. is in tho two—way dependency it entails, linking South Africa
to countries to the north. As South Africa's .Manufacturing industrie:-
have developed, so its African
workers
hove i-ncronsingly moved intothis sector of employment. Even in the
Witwatorsrand,
traditionallythe mining centre of South.Africa, the primary"sector employed loss
than
15$
of a regional work force of738,250- Africans,
in 1970, as against35$
in the secondary,and 50$ in tho tertiary,
sectors. Manu—facturing, commerce and transport together created
nearly 47$
of allSouth African work opportunities in the arca»
As the manufacturing sector has increased in
importance, South
Africa's dependence on foreign labour for the mines has also increased.
This has meant that the countrios immediately to the north òf South Africa have been exploited as labour reserve to create white South
Africa's development. This has added to their own underdevelopment.
Lesotho has
50$
of allits adult males
awayat
any onetime, mostly in
South Africa. Migrant workers are the single largest source of the country's income.
Malawi has also rolied to a large extent on the export
:of
labour toSouth Africa as its main source of income. The government reaps tho
benefits in the form of foreign exchange revenues and taxes on
the mine-
workers.
Mozambiquan mine—workers have been the basis
f
anagroement between
South Africa and Mozambique since 1903. South Africa
has been regularly
supplied with migrant labour in
return for increased
useof the port of
Lourenco- Marques, and gold
payments for the labour. Those gold payments
took the form of diroct payments to the
Lisbon representatives in
Mozambique of half the value of
the migrants'
wages.The migrants
wore paid half their wages inSouth Africa, and half in Mozambique. Tho
gold went straight into
Lisbon's coffers. The degree to which the
CS/2528~9
Page 12»
provisional government, headed by
Frelimo,
can, or chooses to, reducethe flow of labour to the mines, will be a crucial index of its own
revolutionary capacity and or the degree of success which the South African strategy of sub-imperialism continues to command*
South African Sub-Imperialism
(b)
Alliance with Foreign Capital As South Africa1s industrial development has expanded, South Africa..has achieved greater control over its economy, andhence,
more autonomy from the West. W.R. Duggan suggests that within the next five years South Africa will be virtually self-sufficient in its heavy chemicalneeds,
itsfertilisers,
synthetic rubber, plastics and phar¬maceuticals. Such developments• . obviously question how dependentï , South Africa still is on the West*
South Africa's trade with the West still exhibits characteristics of an underdeveloped economy* Of its total exports to industrialised countries in
1967, 65%
were raw materials and fresh produce,28*6%
were products of primary and extractive
industries,
and only5.8fo
were products of the manufacturing industry. South Africa still imports machinery, textiles, electrical and transportequipment,
etcetera*These trade patterns in
themselves, however,
do not signify much.Australia and Now Zealand export mostly agricultural goods and import manufactured goods, yet they can hardly be described as structurally dependent on the industrialised countries in the way that Third World
countries are. -■
Nor does the heavy reliance of South /.frica, on foreign investment necessarily signify structural dependencies of this sort. Throughout
its histoiy South Africa, has relied on foreign
investment,
the greatestCS/2528-9
Page 13»
amounts coming from
Britain,
the U.S., and WestGermany,
in that .■rdor.However,
with the increasing control over the economy, local capital accumulation has been possible and that capital hasincreasingly
allied itself with foreign capital in the country.The alliance between South African and foreign capital has partly
been enhanced by the historical and cultural links between South Africa and the West. With the increasing immigration that accompanied early British mining investments in South Africa, the distinction between
i
foreign and local English mining interests was rapidly blurred. The interconnections between these two groups of interests became the basis
* of a future continued alliance. By 1970, of the seven major mining
houses in South
Africa,
the General Mining and Finance Corporation and the Rand Mines both had three British directors out ofthirteen,
Conso¬lidated
Goldficlds,
three out ofeight,
and Anglo-American had a sopa-v'
rate board of London directors.
United States and West German oapital in particular has been
vitally important in creating South Africa's economic boom of the sixties.
The events at Sharpeville in I960 led to a rapid outflow of capital from South Africa. The U.S. and West Germany helped significantly to balé South Africa out of the poagihle ensuing economic crisis. U.S.
direct investments in South Africa in 1956 totalled 288 million dollars.
By 1968 they had 'risen to 700 million. If account were taken of indirect
investment,
they would have totalled about 1,000 million dollars. From1963-1969 U.S. holdings in South Africa increased by
80%.
The sumactually loaned to South Africa after Sharpeville was 150 million dollars,
of which IMF gave 38 million, and the World Bank,
28
million.Similarly,
West German investments rose from a value of Rll million in 1956 to R115 million in 1968. About 300 West German firms had established subsidiaries theia?by mid-1968.
-
CS/2528-9
Page 14»
Most
U.S.,
muchGerman, and muçh
recentBritish,
investment lice been in themanufacturing
sector - through the establishment of branches and subsidiaries of the foreign companies in South Africa. As foreign firms have set up subsidiaries in SouthAfrica,
the government has insisted on a gradual increase in the percentage of the local contentor components of products made by these firms. It has thereby been
able to increase its control of foreign
investment,
and become less simply dependent on it.Since the second World War,
South
Africa has seen the rise ofAfrikaner economic- power. Nationalist power
today
has an economicbased in the bulk of the farming
capital,
an expanding sector »f* private industrial and commercial capital, and a complete monopoly of statecapital. By I960 the amount of foreign capital invested in South- Africa was about the same as the total of state capital. The cntrv - Afrikaner capital into importar# sectors of the economy was nado oc -
t
sible by effective use of the Afrikaner political
machine,
which includedcontrol on foreign capital.
However, the links between Afrikaner capital and its West Gcr: an
ally have been crucial. West German monopoly capital has establishA.
some of its closest licks with South African state trusts. With fcv,f
help of the Deutsche and Dresdner banks, ESCOM obtained advances
amounting to £348 million by the end of 1964. SASCL's first lique¬
fying plant received
85$
of the machinery and technical equipment necessary from West Germany*South African capital has tended to ally itself with manufactu¬
ring enterprises that, entered the. country at a later stage in its development and were therefor^ subject to greater controls.
However,
the tendency in the mining sector has been for'South Africans to pu- more money into mining stocks and thus reduce the proportion of forei r- to local capital involved. As far as banking and insurance go, Brit-:.n:s
role has been of some political significance. In
1968,
well over ?0 of South Africa's domestic bank accounts were held in British owned : Jce,CS/2528-9
Page 15»
and most loading British insurance companies and building societies had
a share in.-South Africa's-£400 million
insurance,
and£680
millionbuilding society, strength. At the end of 1970 two—-thirds of the commer¬
cial banks' assets in South Africa, which totalled
£1,962 million,
werecontrolled by two British banks. These were -Barclays National Bank Ltd.,
a subsidiary of Barclays Bank
International,
and the Standard Bank ofSouth Africa
Ltd.,
asubsidiary of the
Standard Bank in London. Thesebanks ha.ve been expanding their interests. In 1961 Barclays had 340 branches in South Africa and Namibia. By 1969 it had 9^3. Over the
same period the Standard Bank increased its number of branches from 350
to 822. However, Afrikaner banks have also expanded and increasingly competed with the British ones. By 1970 the Volkskas,, set up in 1941»
and the Trust Bank, set up in 1955» were the third and fourth largest
banks in South Africa. Afrikaner businesses have always been encouraged
to use these banks.
The South African economy has since moved further in the direction
of strengthening
(a)
the alliance between local and foreigncapital,
and(b)
the homogeneity of South Africancapital
itself.(b)
has resulted in a decrease in the conflict between the twowhite communities in South Africa and to a convergence between the two
sectors of economic power. This has in turn provided part of the "back¬
ground to South Africa's increasing economic expansion into
black Africa.
(a)
This alliance isoutsido*South Africo,
aswell
asinside, for
Xr
instance in projects such as the Cabora Bassa dam.
* The contract for the dam was awarded to ZAMC0 international consortium.
The executive direction and co-ordination is Anglo-American. Anglo- American, Shaft Sinkers Ltd.,
V.P.C. Ltd., Powerlines Ltd.,
areall
South African companies involved in the consortium; with Fronoh, and
German based capital. The South African Industrial Development Corpo¬
ration has granted £10 million to the scheme;
ESC0M,
£22million; and
a government loan,
£16 million.
es/2528-9
P^e
16.
South African Sub-Imperialism
(c)
The Consumer Ulite and the MarketBefore turning to this critical phase in the development of
South African sub-imperialism, it is also necessary to comment, though briefly, on the other issues raised in the model of sub- imperialism presented at the beginning of this paper.
In protecting white workers from being undercut by cheap
black labour, South Africa's labour policies have given
the
whitesa standard of living comparable to that in American and the West.
The whites have become rich both through their exploitation of
black labour at home and through their tactical control of foreign capital. They have been able to wrench some of the profits of foreign investment in South Africa from the foreign investors them¬
selves. Foreign capital has remained in South Africa, and has increased, in spite of strict controls on it. This is because of
the amazingly high rate of return on investments there. The net earnings on U.K. investments in South Africa have been reported as
running at above
12$.
This is50$
higher than on other U.K. in¬vestments abroad.' Mining investment returns have been averaging
25$
or more, and manufacturing returns about
10$.
Similarly it isestimated by the U.S. Department of Commerce that the net profit
on U.S. investments in South Africa have been ranging from
12-13$
after taxes. In 1972 the U.'S. Department of State Sources said
that they were averaging
17$.
.These high rates of return in spite of fiscal and tax controls
have in turn been possible because of the superexploitation of the
black workers in South Africa.
CS/2528-9
Page f?
The whites in South Africa therefore form a highly consumor- oriented elite that compares•with the consuming elite that Marini identifies- in Brazil. Unlike in Brazil, however, this South African
elite is not only differentiated on class grounds. It includes
the owners of South African capital;, hut South Africa's racialist policies have created a
race/class
pyramid that has meant that thiselite also includes a white labour aristocracy:
■i Ó.sCl L•'
A: whites - including a white labour aristocracy.
B: coloured and Asians.
C: an increasingly stable Black urban group - a labour _ -
aristocracy in1
comparison to other black workers.D: rural African in the Bantustans - the dispossessed.
E: migrant workers, and foreign migrants.
Broadly speaking ;the consumer elite Marini deems characteristic
: of a sub-imperialist power would exist only above the horizontal
line indicated in the diagram. To extend the consumer elite
"downwards", below the line, would contradict the other characteris—
• . tic ofa subimperialigjbe- power, viz suporexplpitaiiont-at -that level.
Tfy as many capitalists in.-South- Africa argue-,-the traditional in¬
ternal market has been sated,., the only, way, to -resolve this cc-nrr-: -
diction is to abandon &upBrejsplod4$bt-i,on-
(an
-option that- has boon accepted only fer a minute-.fraction of the«UaJxLiie-edfiaok^-gpo
1 _ta-riat)
or to exp-and-heyend. interwufirontiers: in short adoptingan 'outward-looking' strategy.
C3/252S-S
Page 18
Components of South Africa's
New-Strategy- of Sub-imperialism (a)
MilitaryOne important result of South
Africa's historical connections
has "been a military alliance between South
Africa and the West.
Unlike Brazil, South Africa has not
been refused military aid. It
has been able to develop a munitions industry,
utilising both
local and foreign capital, that now includes a
nuclear reactor at
Palundaba.
It has been in the West's strategic interests to
largely ig¬
nore the U.N. embargo on sales to South Africa. France
and
West Germany have given consistent military aid.
France has
supplied it with numerous"weapdnsjdozens-of Frenchrtechnicians
participate permanently in the
development of various
armsand
military-industrial projects in South
Africa: South African
officers 'train1in France. The West German Hõechst works stated
in June 1969 that they had started a new firm
outside Johannesburg
that was developing poisonous gases
original-ly manufactured in
Nazi Germany towards the end of World War II.
South Africa is of strategic importance to the West partly be¬
cause of its geographic placement at the base of the African continent.
It stands beside the sea lanes that connect the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Its ports provide fuel, provisions, and the possibilities
of shore-leave, for NATO naval enterprises in the area. This is the basis of naval agreements with South Africa, such as the
Simonstown one. The British governments public renunciation of this agreement will coincide with the opening of the Suez Canal and the conclusion of a secret agreement
(or
so reliable rumour hasit)
along the same lines as Simonstown.CS/2528-9
Page 19
Internally, militarism, a further defining element of a
sub-imperialist power
("witness
Iran andBrazil),
grows apace. In 1967 South Africa was spending more on military and paramilitaryforces than at the height of the second World War. Of the white population #f 3
1/2
million there were21,700
men in the armedforces, 55>000 reservists, 43,600 armed police, and further commando
•"and citizen forces. The growth of militarism is signified by the spectacular growth in size of the armed forces in South Africa.
This trend continues. There is now compulsory military training
for all adult white males. South Africa can muster a force of several hundreds of thousands of men and officers. Moreover, puppet forces, composed of units drawn from the oppressed peoples
themselves have also been built up, and have already seen action
in Namibia. In the 1973-74 budget,
Defence
was the biggest singleitem. There were large increases in the amounts allocated for both external and internal defence, the latter including a
63^
incrèase for the Bureau of State Security
(BOSS).
0*)--
-PoliticalThe formal inauguration of the new 'outward' phase in foreign policy was marked by the visit of Chief Leabua Jonathan of Lesotho to Bretoria in September, 1966. South Africa reciprocatéd by sending representatives to the independence celebrations of the three former High Commission territories - Lesotho, Swaziland, and Botswana.
The economic integration of these states with South Africa
has been a brutal, inescapable fact of life since the creation of it® Union in 1910. Their admission to formal independent status could not significantly affect their critical dependence on
South Africa. Given Britain's traditional indifference to their
underdevelopment and poverty, their leaders have had little alterna¬
tive but to bargain for the best terms of co-existence with
South Africa that were available.
CS/2528-9
Page 20
As "black enclaves in a white-dominated, southern Africa, these
countries have served as useful testing grounds for South
Africa's
"Outward" policy, in
which."dialogue"
andincreasing trade with
V
independent countries is sought. The
benefits^ accruing to South Afric
from this policy have, so far largely been
ideological
orpolitical,
rather than economic. Chief Jonathan's enthusiasmfor
-closer links
with Pretoria was hailed as tangible proof of South
Africa's willing¬
ness to live in peace with its black neighbours.
Other African
leaders followed suit and accepted the principle and idea
of dia¬
logue. In
1967
three Malawian cabinet ministersvisited Pretoria and
signed a trade pact. President
Banda, who
wasto follow Chief
Jonathan as an avid supporter of closer links with
South Africa,
stated: "being a good African does not mean
cutting
youreconomic
throat..."I have to be realistic. Colonial geography and history are against us. We cannot boycott South Africa,
Rhodesia
orPortuguese
Mozambique- that would mean the breakdown ofMalawi's economy". By
197O Malagasy, Niger, Upper Volta, Ghana, Ivory Coast,
Gabon, Dahomey,
Togo, C.A.R. and Mauritius had also accepted theprincipie of dia¬
logue with South Africa.
The more recent, and ongoing, exchanges with African countries cannot, however, be simply represented as further evidence of the
success of South African policy, and no explicit analysis of these
event is presented here.
(c)
EconomieThe economic aspect of South Africa's new sub-imperialist
strategy is conditioned by the contradictions presently
visible with¬
in South Africa between, economic growth and the maintainance of apartheid. A substantial digression is necessary to explain the
character of these contradictions.
CS/2528-9
Page 2i>
As South Africans economy has expanded its manufacturing sector-
has became increasingly'impotant. The following table
of
theSector
Distribution of the National Income shows this change in the
economy: •
Sector 1930 1940 1950
1960
Agriculture .
13.9$ 11.8$ 13.1$ 11.7$
Mining
17.3$ 22.8$ 13.6$ 13.3$
Private manufacture 15.4
$ 17.5$ 22.1$ 24.6$
The importance of the agriculture sector has
remained relatively
constant. The mining sertoc, however, has decreased
in significance
from its high paint
«fu22.£8$:
of'theenation?ú.ôincome in1940
to18.35-
in 196O. The manufacturing sector has assumed
24.6$
of thenational
income by i960 and is of greater importance than the mining sector.
In thé Witwatersrand the number of people employed in mining dropped
from 300,210, or
30.9$
of "the work force in 1951? "to93?f>90?
or7*73$
of the work force in 1970. Thenumber of people employed in
the •manufacturing-. elector rose fr«m 235
>620,
or24.23$
ofthe work force in 1951? 452,890, or
37-39$
of the work force in 1970, and became the largest sector of the regional economyin terms
of employment. As Houghton argues; "The impertance of
manufacturing
in the future economic development of South Africa cannot be toe greatly
stressed
because all the indications arethat it must be the
cornerstone of future expansion."
The further expansion of this sector is, however,
restricted by
the policies of apartheid. These restrictions can be
roughly classi¬
fied as follows:
(a)
the problem ofthe migratory labour system,
(b)
the Shortage of skilledlabour, and (c) the need for wider markets.
CS/2528-9
Page 22
(a)
The artificially maintained, system of migrant labour re¬duces the efficiency of the manufacturing industry. Migrant workers
do not form a stable labour force. The discontinuity does not en¬
sure an efficient learning and application of new skills required
in the expanding industries. The conditions under which migrant
workers., live in. the. -urban areas do not aid productivity. The trans¬
ference of a part of the migrant's wages to his family in the 'homeland' does not aid the development of a black proletariat as
a potential market for manufactured goods.
(b)
More significant, however, is the actual shortage ofskilled labour that is artificially created by the policies of job
reservation. There is a chronic
shortage of skilled labour in the
manufacturing industries, and this obviously inhibits their further- growth. A long-term prediction by the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council revealed that if the economy continues to grow
at an annual rate of
5«8$ (the
rate achieved between 1965 and1969),
by198O
South Africa will be short of half a million skilled workers.While skilled jobs have traditionally been reserved for whites, there has been an increase in the number of Africans in skilled
employment. The proportion of economically active Africans in un¬
skilled jobs has fallen from
84$
in196Õ
to68$
in 1970 - an increaseof
16$
in skilled employment. Job reservation is also being avoided by what First, Steele and Gurney term a 'floating colour bar'. Thismechanism breaks down skilled jobs previously reserved for whites into component parts which are then re-classified. A white worker is retained at one of the new levels, while African workers are employed
at the other levels, doing skilled work for unskilled wages. This practice has spread quite widely.