• Aucun résultat trouvé

CONCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS

The present paper wants to represent an advancement of the scientific trend on company social sustainability and its social roles. Particularly, the paper overcomes Elkington triple-bottom-line model, highlighting that sustainability and responsibility concepts are not sufficient goals to company survival if they are aimed only at the business ends. Therefore, the authors argue that company survival could be lasting if it will be based on its economic aims to reach final social objects.

The comparative analysis presented shows that although they have a predisposition at the level of corporate policy to pay attention to sustainability and to the practices of attitudes of programs to reduce pollution, waste and water resources used, the companies do not fully show social and values commitment.

Therefore, the research insights highlight a prevalent focus on consumer satisfaction, that we could consider as a mere means to reach a better market positioning, and a lacking attention to social ends both in mission claims and in final aims.

Moreover, the paper tries to give a contribution to scientific and practitioner fields showing that companies, both profit and no-profit, are increasingly community members and social actors setting forth this role, reaching the social legitimation, claiming and planning their social ends-commitment.

The present work contributes directly to the body of knowledge on social innovation compared with CSR and circular economy, as possible enabling factors for the development of Agenda 2030 17 goals.

Policy makers and managers in CE development policies and CSR models should transform CE principles in corporate culture values.

This effort should give contribution to create corporates with CE values and, increasingly, social actor committed in Agenda 2030 goals achievement.

The limitations are mainly related to the limited target and sector, for this reason the authors consider the proposed study as a first step to define a comprehensive model.

The future research steps could concern the qualitative analysis to verify the firm social value level in the mission implemented in daily behaviors. Moreover, it could be useful to carry out a SROI (social return on investment) analysis evaluating firm social impacts and noticing future scientific interests.

REFERENCES

Altuna, N., Contri, A.M., Dell'Era, C., Frattini, F. and Maccarrone, P. (2015), "Managing social innovation in for-profit organizations: the case of Intesa Sanpaolo", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp.

258-280.

Arfaoui, N., Hofaidhllaoui, M. and Chawla, G. (2019), "Social performance of the company: An explanation centralized on the social and technological factors", EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 102-126.

Barendsen, L. and Gardner, H. (2004), “Is the social entrepreneur a new type of leader?”, Leader to leader, Vol.

2004 No. 34, pp. 43-56.

Barrena-Martínez, J., López-Fernández, M., Márquez-Moreno, C. and Romero-Fernández, P. M. (2015),

“Corporate Social Responsibility in the Process of Attracting College Graduates”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 408-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1355

Birim, B. (2016), “Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media as Key Source of Strategic Communication”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 235, pp. 70-75.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.026

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), “Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n. 82, pp. 42-51.

Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Amarantou, V. and Aggelidis, V. (2017), "Examining the antecedents and the effects of CSR implementation: an explanatory study", EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 189-206.

Chell, E. (2007), “Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process”, International small business journal, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 5-26.

Czinkota, M., Kaufmann, H. R., Basile, G. and Ferri, M. A. (2018), “For-Benefit company (fBComp): An innovative social-business model. The Italian case”, Journal of Business Research, doi:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.022

Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2010), “Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences”, Journal of social entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 32-53.

Deschenes, O. (2015), “Green Jobs”, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, pp. 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.94025-X

Doherty, B., Haugh, H. and Lyon, F. (2014), “Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda”, International journal of management reviews, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 417-436.

Dro, I. and Therace, A. (2011), Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union, Routledge: New York.

Dufays, F. (2019), "Exploring the drivers of tensions in social innovation management in the context of social entrepreneurial teams", Management Decision, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 1344-1361.

Edgeman, R. L. and Eskildsen, J. K. (2012), “Viral innovation: integration via sustainability & enterprise excellence”, Journal of Innovation and Business Best Practices, Vol. 2012, 1-13.

Elkington, J. (1998), “Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business”, Environmental Quality Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Fiandrino, S., Busso, D. and Vrontis, D. (2019), "Sustainable responsible conduct beyond the boundaries of compliance: Lessons from Italian listed food and beverage companies", British Food Journal, Vol. 121 No. 5, pp.

1035-1049.

Friedman, M. (2007), “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits”, Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, pp. 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14

Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M. and Evans, S. (2018), “Business models and supply chains for the circular economy”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 190, pp. 712-721.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.04.159

Granovetter, M. (2018), “The impact of social structure on economic outcomes”, in The Sociology of Economic Life, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338

Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, American journal of sociology, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 481-510.

Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M. (2010), Social Innovation: concepts, research fields and international trends, Studies for Innovation in a Modern Working Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36540-9

Idowu, S.O. and Filho, W. L. (2009), Global practices of corporate social responsibility. Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0

Javed, A., Yasir, M. and Majid, A. (2019), “Is social entrepreneurship a panacea for sustainable enterprise development?”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-29.

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. and Hekkert, M. (2017), “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 127, pp. 221-232.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Manasakis, C. (2018), “Business ethics and corporate social responsibility”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 486-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2921

Meyskens, M., Robb–Post, C., Stamp, J. A., Carsrud, A. L. and Reynolds, P. D. (2010), “Social ventures from a resource–based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows”, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 661-680.

Merli, R., Preziosi, M. and Acampora, A. (2018), “How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 178, pp. 703-722.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112

Michelini, G., Moraes, R. N., Cunha, R. N., Costa, J. M. H. and Ometto, A. R. (2017), "From Linear to Circular Economy: PSS Conducting the Transition", Procedia CIRP, Vol. 64, pp. 2-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.012

Mumford, M. D. (2002), “Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin”, Creativity research journal, Vol.

14 No. 2, pp. 253-266.

Popa, R.A. (2015), “The Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in The Context of Sustainable Development. The Case of Romania”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 23, pp. 1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00395-0

Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011), “Creating Shared Value”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 4-10. https://doi.org/4-10.1108/09600039410055963

Reiter, S.L. (2016), “Corporate Profit, Social Welfare, and the Logic of Capitalism”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 121, No. 3, 331-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12090

Ruiz Malbarez, M.C. and Romero Gonzales, Z. (2011), “La responsabilidad social empresarial y la obsolescencia programada”, Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 127-135. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2011v6n1.1767

Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., & Vrontis, D. (2018). Open social innovation: towards a refined definition looking to actors and processes. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 36(Jan-Apr), pp. 25-42.

Sila, I. and Cek, K. (2017), “The impact of environmental, social and governance dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Australian evidence”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 120, pp. 797-804.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.310

Skene, K. and Murray, A. (2017), Sustainable Economics: Context, challenges and opportunities for the 21st-century practitioner, Sustainable Economics: Context, Challenges and Opportunities for the 21st-Century Practitioner. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351286206

Tarde, G. (2009), Die sozialen Gesetze. Skizze einer Soziologie (1899), Marburg: Metropolis.

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012), Towards a Circular Economy - Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Greener Management International. https://doi.org/2012-04-03

van Marrewijk, M. (2003), “Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247 Velenturf, A.P.M., Jensen, P. D., Purnell, P., Jopson, J. and Ebner, N. (2019), “A Call to Integrate Economic, Social and Environmental Motives into Guidance for Business Support for the Transition to a Circular Economy”, Administrative Sciences, Vol 9, No. 4, p. 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040092

Vrontis, D., Basile, G., Andreano, M. S., Mazzitelli, A. and Papasolomou, I. (2020), “The profile of innovation driven Italian SMEs and the relationship between the firms’ networking abilities and dynamic capabilities”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 114, pp. 313-324.

Weerawardena, J. and Mort, G. S. (2006), “Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model”, Journal of world business, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 21-35.

Wu, J. and Si, S. (2018), “Poverty reduction through entrepreneurship: incentives, social networks, and sustainability”, Asian Business & Management, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 243-259.

Yunus, M. (2007), Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty, PublicAffairs: New York.

Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2010), “Business model design: An activity system perspective”, Long Range Planning, Vol.

43, No. 2-3, pp. 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004

THE INTERRELATION BETWEEN HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND