Allen, M.P. and Broyles, P. 1989. Class hegemony and political finance: presidential campaign contributions of wealthy capitalist families. American Sociological Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 275-287.
Ansolabehere, S. and al. 2003. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, No. 1, 105-130.
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. 1962. Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review, Vol.
56, 947-952.
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. 1993. Agenda and instability in American politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. 2002. Positive and negative feedback in politics. In F.R.
Baumgartner and B.D. Jones (Eds.), Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berg, L.L and Holman, C.B. 1989. The Initiative Process and its Declining Agenda-setting Value.
Law & Policy. Vol. 11, 451-469.
Birn, A-E. 2014. Philanthrocapitalism, past and present: The Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, and the setting(s) of the international/global health agenda. Hypothesis, Vol. 12, No.
1.
Blais, A. and al. 2001. Editors’ Note. In: Introducing Direct Democracy in Canada. Choices IRPP.
Vol. 7, No. 5.
Börzel, T.A and Risse, T. 2002. Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of International Governance? Prepared for the Edgar Grande/Louis W. Pauly (eds.), Complex Sovereignty: On the Reconstitution of Political Authority in the 21st Century.
Botterill, L.C. 2013. Are Policy Entrepreneurs Really Decisive in Achieving Policy Change?
Drought Policy in the USA and Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, Vol. 59, No 1.
Boyd, O. 2010. Referenda Around the World. History and Status of Direct Democracy. 6th Annual Southern California Graduate Student Conference, 1-17.
Boyer, P. 1992. Direct Democracy in Canada: The history and future of referendums. Toronto:
Dundurn Press.
Brown, H. 2017. Measuring the drapes in secret: why new approaches to money and politics can
address biased access and influence during presidential transitions. Election law journal, Vol. 16,
No. 1, 21-32.
Bull, B.and al. 2004. Private sector influence in the multilateral system: a changing structure of world governance? Global governance, Vol. 10, 481-498.
Butler, D. & Ranney, A. 1994. Referendums around the world: the growing use of direct democracy.
Washington DC: AEI Press.
Callahan, D. 2017. The Givers: Wealth, Power, and Philanthropy in a New Gilded Age. Alfred A.
Knoff, Publisher, New York.
Clawson, D. 2001. Politics is Money. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, Vol. 3, No 138, 34-46.
Crozier, M. 1963. Le Phénomène bureaucratique: Essai sur les tendances bureaucratiques des systèmes d’organisation modernes. Paris, Seuil.
Dahl, R.A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, 201-215.
Dalton, R.J. and al. 2001. Public opinion and direct democracy. Journal of Democracy, Vol 12, No 4 141-153.
Douzet, F. et Cain, B.E. 2007. Le paradoxe multiculturel de la Californie. Politique Américaine,
Vol. 9, No. 3, 13-31.
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Dür, A. et De Bièvre, D. 2007. The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy.
Vol. 27, No. 1, 1-12.
Finn, C.E., and al. 2000. Renewing public education: Charter schools in action. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Garrett, G. and al. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy. Cornell University Press.
Gilens, M. 2005. Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 69, No.
5, Special Issue, 778-796.
Gilens, M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America…
Gow, J.I. 1998. Les effets pervers d’une bonne idée: la démocratie directe en Californie. Femmes, citoyenneté et représentation, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, 239-271.
Jenkins, W.I. 1978. Policy analysis: A political and organizational perspective. London: M.
Robertson.
Kang, K. 2016. Policy influence and private returns from lobbying in the energy sector. Review of
Economic Studies, Vol. 83, 269-305.
Kaufmann, B., Büchi, R., & Braun, N. 2007. Guidebook to direct democracy: In Switzerland and beyond. Bern: Benteli Hallwag Druck AG.
Kaufmann, B. and Waters, M.D. 2004. Direct Democracy in Europe: a comprehensive reference guide to the initiative and referendum process in Europe. Carolina Academic Press.
Kesselman, D. 2011. Direct Democracy on Election Day: Ballot Measures as Measures of American Democracy. Transatlantica, American Studies Journal, Vol, 1.
Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Klok, P.J. 1995. A classification of instruments for environmental policy. In: Dente B. (eds).
Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Environment, Science and Society, Vol. 3.
Springer, Dordrecht.
Knoepfel, P. and al. 2011. Public Policy Analysis. The Policy Press.
Knoepfel, P. and al. 2015. Analyse et Pilotage des Politiques Publiques: France, Suisse, Canada.
Presses de l’Université de Québec.
Kobach, K.W. 1993. The referendum: Direct democracy in Switzerland. England: Dartmouth.
Kriesi, H. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lexington Books.
Lafourcade, O. 2014. L’aide au développement: un état des lieux, des interrogations. Techniques Financières et Développement, Vol. 4, No. 117, 11-19.
Lambelet, S. et Pflieger, G. 2016. Les ressources du pouvoir urbain. Métropoles.Vol. 18.
Lemieux, V. 2002. L’Etude des Politiques Publiques: les Acteurs et leur Pouvoir. Les Presses de l’Université de Laval. Deuxième Edition.
Lijphart, A. 1989. Democratic Political Systems: Types, Cases, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Theoretical Politics. Vol. 1, No 1, 33-48.
Lowery, D. 2013. Lobbying influence: Meaning, measurement and missing. In: Interest groups and advocacy. Vol. 2, No 1, 1-26.
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
Mansbridge, J. 1999. Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent
« yes. » Journal of Politics, Vol. 61, 628-657.
Marxer, W. 2007. Direct Democracy in Liechtenstein. Liechtenstein Institute.
Matsusaka, John G. 2005. Direct Democracy Works. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 19, No.
2, 185-206.
McNeal and al. 2007. Legislative Activities on Charter Schools: The Beginning of Policy Change?
Mendelsohn, M. and Parkin, A. 2001. Introducing Direct Democracy in Canada. Choices IRPP. Vol, 7, No. 5.
Michelot, V. 2010. Le processus référendaire en Californie: un travestissement démocratique.
Pouvoirs, Vol. 133, No 2, 57-68.
Mills, C.W. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mintrom, M. 2000. Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Georgetown University Press.
Overton, S. 2004. The Donor Class: Campaign Finance, Democracy, and Participation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 153, No. 73, 73-118.
Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Popkin, S.L. 1995. Chapter 1: Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter. In: Grofman, B.
1995. Information, Participation, and Choice. An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective.
The University of Michigan Press.
Powell, L.W. 2012. The Influence of Campaign Contributions in State Legislatives: The Effects of Institutions and Politics. The University of Michigan Press.
Powell, L.W. 2014. The influence of campaign contributions on the legislative process. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy. Vol. 9, No. 1, 75-101.
Princeton Survey Research Associates. 1997. Money and politics survey: summary and overview.
Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books, 200.
Rittel, H.W.J. et Webber, M.M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, 155-169.
Rogers, R. 2011. Why philanthro-policymaking matters. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Vol. 48, 376-381.
Rogers, R. 2015. Why the Social Sciences Should Take Philanthropy Seriously. Springer Science +Business Media, LLC. Vol. 52, 533-540.
Schneider, A., and Ingram, H. 1993. Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for
Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, 334-347.
Schneider, M., and Teske, P. 1992. Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No 3, 737-747.
Sidorsky, D. 1987. Moral Pluralism and Philanthropy. Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2, 93-94.
Sievers, B.R. 2010. Philanthropy’s Role in Liberal Democracy. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, New Series, Vol. 24, No. 4, 380-398.
Skocpol, T. 2016. Politics Symposium: Why political scientists should study organized philanthropy? American Political Science Association, 433-436.
Skocpol, T. et Hertel-Fernandez, A. 2016. The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism.
Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 681-695.
Stone, D.A. 1989. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly.
Vol. 104, No. 2, 281-300.
Tallberg, J. 2003. The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 10, No 1, 1–19.
Wagschal, U. 1997. Direct Democracy and Public Policymaking. Cambridge University Press, Vol.
17, No 3, 223-245.
Weissert, C.S. and Knott, J.H. 1995. Foundations’ Impact on Policy Making: Results from a Pilot Study. Health Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 4.
En ligne:
Alex Padilla California Secretary of State. Statewide Election Results. http://www.sos.ca.gov/
elections/prior-elections/statewide-election-results/
Ballotpedia. 2010. California 2010 ballot propositions. https://ballotpedia.org/
California_2010_ballot_propositions.
Ballotpedia. 2012. California Proposition 39, Income Tax Increase for Multistate Businesses. https://
ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_39,_Income_Tax_Increase_for_Multistate_Businesses_(2012)
Ballotpedia. 2012. California 2012 ballot propositions. https://ballotpedia.org/
California_2012_ballot_propositions
Ballotpedia. 2014. California 2014 ballot propositions. https://ballotpedia.org/
California_2014_ballot_propositions
Ballotpedia. 2016. California 2016 ballot propositions. https://ballotpedia.org/
California_2016_ballot_propositions
California Fair Political Practices (1). What is a California Ballot Measure Committee? Lecture online le 24.06.18: http://www.fppc.ca.gov/content/dam/fppc/NS-Documents/TAD/Campaign
%20Manuals/Manual_3/Manual_3_Ch_1_What_is_a_Ballot_Measure_Committee.pdf
California Fair Political Practices (2). Top 10 Contributors List. Lecture online le 24.06.18: http://
www.fppc.ca.gov/transparency/top-contributors.html
City and County of San Francisco. Department of Elections. Past Elections Results. Lecture online le 13.07.18: https://sfelections.sfgov.org/past-election-results
National Institute on Money in Politics. FollowTheMoney.org
National Institute on Money in Politics. Independent Spending in California, 2005-2010. https://
www.followthemoney.org/research/institute-reports/independent-spending-in-california-2005-2010.
Henderson, P. 2012 (Oct. 29). California ballot measures draw free-spending billionaires. In:
Reuters. Lecture online le 30.05.18: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uscaliforniapoliticsp ro https://uk.reuters.com/article/uscaliforniapoliticsp o s i t i o n s https://uk.reuters.com/article/uscaliforniapoliticsp e n d / c a l i f o r n i a b a l l o t m e a s u re s d r a w f re e s https://uk.reuters.com/article/uscaliforniapoliticsp e n d i n g b i l l i o n a i re s -idUKBRE89S16P20121029
Heußner, H. K. 1999. Ein Jahrhundert Volksgesetzgebung in den USA. Heußner, Hermann K./Jung,
Otmar (Hg.): Mehr direkte Demokratie wagen. Volksbegehren und Volksentscheid: Geschichte.
Madroñal, J.C. 2005. Direct democracy in Latin America. Fron Democracy International and Mas Democracia website: http://www.democracy-international.org/fileadmin/di/pdf/papers/dd-latin-america.pdf
Meyerson, H. 2012. Will the Munger Kids Kill California's Schools? The American Prospect. http://
prospect.org/article/will-munger-kids-kill-californias-schools
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2015. Campaign Finance and the Supreme Court. http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/campaign-finance-and-the-supreme-court.aspx
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2017. Independent expenditures. http://
www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/independent-expenditures635425050.aspx
Praxis–Vorschläge, 101-122. Traduit de l’allemand par Blot, Y. http://www.democratiedirecte.fr/
2009/07/plus-dun-siecle-de-democratie-directe-aux-etats-unis/comment-page-1/
The Cook Political Report. Passwaiter, S. 2017. 2018 Campaign Ad Spend Will be in the Billions.
https://www.cookpolitical.com/analysis/national/political-advertising/2018-campaign-ad-spend-will-be-billions
The New York Times. Lovett, I. 2014. Tribes Clash as Casinos Move Away From Home. https://
www.nytimes.com/2014/03/04/us/tribes-clash-as-casinos-move-away-from-home.html
The Pew Charitable Trusts. 2016. Dollars in State Referendums. http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/
research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/09/23/big-money-pours-into-state-ballot-issue-campaigns
The Washington Post. July 2014. Michelle Obama: ‘Write a big, fat check’ . By Zezima, K. https://
www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/07/25/michelle-obama-write-a-big-fat-check/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a2d67a55242c
Figures:
Photo page de garde: Vox. 2014. 40 charts that explain money in politics: https://www.vox.com/
2014/7/30/5949581/money-in-politics-charts-explain
Carte 1: Ballotpedia. States with Initiative or Referendum. https://ballotpedia.org/
States_with_initiative_or_referendum
Dans le document
L'influence des donateurs privés sur les politiques publiques: une analyse des initiatives populaires en Californie
(Page 53-65)