• Aucun résultat trouvé

2019 Fall - CFD LAB 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "2019 Fall - CFD LAB 3"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

2019 Fall - CFD LAB 3

Number of Students

Total 12

Submitted 12

Not Submitted 0

Average 98.25

Standard deviation 1.64

96.92 98.92 98.25

1.55 0.98 1.64 0.00 0.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

CFD LAB1 CFD LAB2 CFD LAB3 CFD LAB4

Score

Grade

Average & STD

Average

Standard deviation

0 0

2

4

6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

90-92 92-94 94-96 96-98 98-100

Number of Students

Grade

Grade distribution per problem

CFD LAB 3

(2)

Comments

 Many student couldn’t calculate friction force correctly.

 One student answered that 𝑘 − 𝑒 turbulent model more better than 𝑘 − 𝑤 𝑆𝑆𝑇 turbulent model to capture the flow separation.

 Several students couldn’t indicate separation point or reattaching point correctly.

 Some of student did not answered for all questions in the report.

98.25

92.833 95.600 94.700 94.730 96.720 98.190

1.64

12.037

6.400 6.300 4.300 6.700

3.720 0.00

20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013

Grade

Year

Comparison with Previous Years

Avg STD

Références

Documents relatifs

 Some of students could not answer for the question of section 9.2 correctly and gave the wrong answer for the validated location of the

 A few students could not answer the location of both flow separation and reattachment correctly, and one student missed the answer for the flow separation at top boundary. 

 Also, a few of students extracted inappropriate force value from the experiment figure to compare with

• Few students calculated wrong friction factor, therefore the relative error could not decrease when the convergence limit is decreasing.. This might happen because students did

• Several students could not answer correctly for the question about V&V verification regarding comparison of 1st and 2nd order schemes.. • Some of students made mistakes

• Several students did not plot the residual history graph for both 4deg and 10deg cases.. • Some of student calculated wrong friction force at

• Some of students could not derive the frequency of drag coefficient correctly, so calculate

 Several students used wrong empirical equation to get the fully developed length, so they can’t compare the CFD result correctly for both laminar and turbulent conditions.. 