• Aucun résultat trouvé

2019 Fall - CFD LAB 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "2019 Fall - CFD LAB 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

2019 Fall - CFD LAB 1

Number of Students

Total 14

Submitted 12

Not Submitted 2

Average 96.83

Standard deviation 1.52

96.83

0.00 0.00 0.00

1.52 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

CFD LAB1 CFD LAB2 CFD LAB3 CFD LAB4

Score

Grade

Average & STD

Average

Standard deviation

0

1

2

8

1 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

90-92 92-94 94-96 96-98 98-100

Number of Students

Grade

Grade distribution per problem

CFD LAB1

(2)

Comments

 Several students used wrong empirical equation to get the fully developed length, so they can’t compare the CFD result correctly for both laminar and turbulent conditions.

 Some of students were missing some figure/tables.

 Some of student made mistake when they calculate the Error.

96.83

91.82 94.4 92.8 95.74 97.79 97 97.25

1.52

10.36

5.53 8.7

4.17 4.45 4.8 2.95

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

Grade

Year

Comparison with Previous Years

Average Standard Deviation

Références

Documents relatifs

• Several students could not answer correctly for the question about V&V verification regarding comparison of 1st and 2nd order schemes.. • Some of students made mistakes

• Several students did not plot the residual history graph for both 4deg and 10deg cases.. • Some of student calculated wrong friction force at

• Some of students could not derive the frequency of drag coefficient correctly, so calculate

 Several students answered that 1 st order upwind scheme gives out results closer to the asymptotic range.  Some of student indicated validated

 Several students couldn’t indicate separation point or reattaching point correctly.  Some of student did not answered for all questions in

 Several of students indicated wrong sign for drag coefficient of Ahmed Body(Front Part

In CFD grid study, verification is to see if the solution converges as the grid becomes finer.To see if the verification is successful, you need to check if the convergence path

In case you need to answer for pressure coefficients, averaging ‘P’ and ‘Ug’ might be a good idea.. Exercise 9.4 - None