Texte intégral
Number of Students
Total 10
Submitted 9
Not Submitted 1
Average 97.61
Standard deviation 2.42
Comments
• Some of students could not report the pressure difference between inlet and outlet correctly.
• Several students did not plot the residual history graph for both 4deg and 10deg cases.
• Some of student calculated wrong friction force at upper wall.
• A few of students could not show the separation region clearly with k-w SST of 10 deg case.
Documents relatifs
• Several students could not answer correctly for the question about V&V verification regarding comparison of 1st and 2nd order schemes.. • Some of students made mistakes
• Some of students could not derive the frequency of drag coefficient correctly, so calculate
Several students used wrong empirical equation to get the fully developed length, so they can’t compare the CFD result correctly for both laminar and turbulent conditions..
Several students answered that 1 st order upwind scheme gives out results closer to the asymptotic range. Some of student indicated validated
Several students couldn’t indicate separation point or reattaching point correctly. Some of student did not answered for all questions in
Several of students indicated wrong sign for drag coefficient of Ahmed Body(Front Part
For problem 9.3, many students answered that the grid sets containing grid #8 is more sensitive respect to the refinement ratio.. Grid sets containing grid #4 is more
Learned how to model the airfoil and analyze the lift and drag while changing the angle of attack.. Required materials are notified at the end of the manual
