• Aucun résultat trouvé

2020 Fall - CFD LAB 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "2020 Fall - CFD LAB 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

2020 Fall - CFD LAB 1

Number of Students

Total 10

Submitted 10

Not Submitted 0

Average 88.70

Standard deviation 8.20

(2)

Comments

• Some of students missed required figures and tables.

• Few students calculated wrong friction factor, therefore the relative error could not decrease when the convergence limit is decreasing. This might happen because students did not extract the shear stress data at fully developed region.

• Some of student could not complete each section, and missed to answer for 9.4, 9.5, 9.6 etc.

• Some students used wrong empirical equation to get the entrance length of pipe

Références

Documents relatifs

 Some of students could not answer for the question of section 9.2 correctly and gave the wrong answer for the validated location of the

 A few students could not answer the location of both flow separation and reattachment correctly, and one student missed the answer for the flow separation at top boundary. 

 Also, a few of students extracted inappropriate force value from the experiment figure to compare with

• Several students could not answer correctly for the question about V&V verification regarding comparison of 1st and 2nd order schemes.. • Some of students made mistakes

• Several students did not plot the residual history graph for both 4deg and 10deg cases.. • Some of student calculated wrong friction force at

• Some of students could not derive the frequency of drag coefficient correctly, so calculate

 Several students used wrong empirical equation to get the fully developed length, so they can’t compare the CFD result correctly for both laminar and turbulent conditions.. 

 Several students answered that 1 st order upwind scheme gives out results closer to the asymptotic range.  Some of student indicated validated