• Aucun résultat trouvé

Lab 3 Report 11/29/2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Lab 3 Report 11/29/2018"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Lab 3 Report 11/29/2018

1. Summary

0 0 0 1

0 0

2

9

0 2 4 6 8 10

0-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10

Number of Students

Grade

Lab 3 Grade Distribution

92.83 95.6 94.7 94.73 96.72 98.19

12.04

6.4 6.3 4.3 6.7 3.72

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013

Grade

Year

Lab 3 Comparison with Previous Years

Average Standard Deviation Average Over 2013-2018

Total number of students 12

Attended 12

Missed 0

Average grade 92.83

Standard deviation of grades 12.04

(2)

2 2. Comments

• Some of students did not report the separation and/or reattachment points

• Some students made mistakes when calculating separation and/or reattachment points

• Some students made mistakes when calculating friction facto

91.82 95.67 92.83

0.00

10.36 6.33 12.04

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

1 2 3 4

Grade

Lab #

Lab Grade History

Average Standard Deviation

Références

Documents relatifs

• Concurrent provisioning of key high-level network services for a busy branch office, including Firewall/NAT, IPS, transparent content caching, VoIP and analog telephony

Si les émissions parasites sont à éliminer, on devra remplacer ce type d'antenne par un modèle unidirectionnel pouvant être orienté à volonté par un

• Part (a) had a typo where the A1 and A2 relationship was asked to be found using momentum and continuity equations. It should have asked to use continuity and

[r]

[r]

• Few students could not extract the fiction factor correctly therefore the relative error was not decreased with decrease in convergence limit.. This may be caused by student

[r]

.The sign of C k is minus, but most of the student