• Aucun résultat trouvé

Lab 4 Report 12/4/2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Lab 4 Report 12/4/2018"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Lab 4 Report 12/4/2018

1. Summary

0 0 0 0 0

2

5 5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10

Number of Students

Grade

Lab 4 Grade Distribution

88.08 95.60 97.70 95.44 98.90 99.80

6.67 6.40 2.80 5.65 5.00 0.84

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013

Grade

Year

Lab 4 Comparison with Previous Years

Average Standard Deviation Average Over 2013-2017

Total number of students 12

Attended 12

Missed 0

Average grade 92.83

Standard deviation of grades 12.04

(2)

2 2. Comments

• Most of the students did not extract EFD data correctly for the Ck CB CS.

• Most of the student did not extract the CFD(k-e) data of Ck. .The sign of Ck is minus, but most of the student ignore it.

• Some of the student did not calculate the period correctly for the St number calculation

• A few of student got wrong answer for the separating location of Ahmed body

91.82 95.67 92.83

88.08

10.36 6.33 12.04

6.67 0.00

20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

1 2 3 4

Grade

Lab #

Lab Grade History

Average Standard Deviation

Références

Documents relatifs

If you cannot filter packets using an IP access-list, consider using the following interface configuration command: “ip verify unicast reverse-path”. This allows you to log

Student need to calculate drag coefficient in each part as below and need to answer

• One student confused the unit between ‘mm’ and ‘cm’ when he tried to find the drag coefficient, so used wrong drag coefficient. • Some of student made mistake when

• Some students selected inlet and outlet to apply the Bernoulli equation. Selecting reservoir surface and outlet

[r]

[r]

• Few students could not extract the fiction factor correctly therefore the relative error was not decreased with decrease in convergence limit.. This may be caused by student

The first Science Commissioning Targets (young solar-type star kappa 1 Ceti and beta Cephei pulsator delta Ceti) resulted in major scientific findings (Rucinski et al. 2006) and kappa