• Aucun résultat trouvé

Lab 2 Report 10/25/2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Lab 2 Report 10/25/2018"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1

Lab 2 Report 10/25/2018

1. Summary

0 0 0 0 0 1

0

11

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

0-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10

Number of Students

Grade

Lab 2 Grade Distribution

95.67 97.08 92.8 95.74 97.79 97

6.33 3.32 8.7 4.17 4.45 4.8

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013

Grade

Year

Lab 2 Comparison with Previous Years

Average Standard Deviation Average Over 2013-2018

Total number of students 12

Attended 12

Missed 0

Average grade 95.67

Standard deviation of grades 6.33

(2)

2 2. Comments

• Some of students made mistakes when calculating the lift coefficient

• Some of students missed the sub question, or submit the report without conclusion

• Some of students did not answer the verification question correctly regarding comparison of 1st and 2nd order schemes

• A few students did not probe CFD data at correct locations for validation

91.82 95.67

0.00 0.00

10.36 6.33

0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

1 2 3 4

Grade

Lab #

Lab Grade History

Average Standard Deviation

Références

Documents relatifs

• Some students made mistakes when calculating the pi

[r]

• Few students could not extract the fiction factor correctly therefore the relative error was not decreased with decrease in convergence limit.. This may be caused by student

[r]

.The sign of C k is minus, but most of the student

In CFD grid study, verification is to see if the solution converges as the grid becomes finer.To see if the verification is successful, you need to check if the convergence path

In case you need to answer for pressure coefficients, averaging ‘P’ and ‘Ug’ might be a good idea.. Exercise 9.4 - None

For problem 9.3, many students answered that the grid sets containing grid #8 is more sensitive respect to the refinement ratio.. Grid sets containing grid #4 is more