Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: Building Practice Note, 1984-09-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20338143
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Field visits to moisture troubled housing in a Maritime climate
Scott, D. L.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=1d714345-2b60-4491-ba05-d5cd5d1c51e8 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=1d714345-2b60-4491-ba05-d5cd5d1c51e8
ISSN
0701 5216BUILDING
PRACTICE
NOTE
FIELD VISITS
TO MOISTURE
TROUBLEDHOUSING IN
A MARITIMECLIMATE
B Y
D.L.
ScotCDivision of Building Research, National &search Council of Canada
O t t a w a , September 1984 r N R C - C16T1
BLDG.
RES.
.-
L I B R A R Y
'.?
01-
U -
4
5
FIELD VISITS
TO
MOISTURR TROUBLEDHOUSING
IN
AMARITIME
CLTMATEby
D.L. Scott*
ABSTRACT
This Mote d e s c r i b e s l a c a l f z e d moisture damage to maritime housing t h a t can b e attributed to a combination ~f inadequate d e t a i l i n g and poor workmanship oz lack of maintenance.
INTRODUCTION
aver t h e p a s t f e w years a number of field v i s i t s have been made t a
investigate the nature and extent a£ moisture-induced damage to wood frame
housing within A t l a n t i c Canada. The number
of
cases investigated does nota l l o w a meaningful s t a t i s t i c a l p r e d i c t i o n concerning moisture problems in the overall b u i l d i n g population. It does appear, however, that a
small
percentage of wood hame housing suffers f r o m localized moisture damage chatcan be
attributed t o poor original detailing and workmanship ora
l a c k of oqgoing maintenance. The four b u i l d i n g s d e s c r i b e d i n this Note are locatedin the.
~alifax,
M.S.
area andSt.
John's, Newfoundland. Each was constructed w i t h i n t h e last ten years and can b e considered r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of l o c a lpractice.
CASE ONE
A factory-built s p l i t entry three bedroom home constructed in the fall
of 1982 near Halifax w a s occupied by two adults and one c h i l d . The owners
camplained a f roof l e a k s id rhe v i c i n i t y
of
t h e
bathroom w f t h each successivewarm
rainy day fallowing cold weather.An inspectian of the r a o f i n March 1984 found all asphalt s h i n g l e s in
place and a p p r o p r i a t e l y tabbed down. Flashings around the roof caps for
bath
and kitchen exhaust fans were w e l l sealed during a prevlous vislt by thecontractor. The a t t i c hatch w a s weatherstripped and the glass f i b r e b a t t s
were
i n s t a l l e d uniformly. The waferboard roaf sheathing had turned blackw i t h mold and was saturated over an area immediately above the bathroom and
common plumbing w a l l w i t h the kitchen ( F i g . 1 ) .
No
w e t n e s so.r
d i s c o l o r a t i o n w a s evident in other areas of t h e attic- During c h i s visit the bathroom fan*
A t l a n t i c Regional S t a t i o n , D i v i s i o n af B u i l d i n g Research, National Research Council Canada, Halifax, Nova S c o t i a .Figure 1. Saturated roof sheathing
g r i l l was removed, exposing gaps of up to 12.5 mm
(%
in.) between t h e f a nhousing and adjacent drywall. Similar g a p s w e r e found between the head
l i n e r
of the cabinet above the kitchen szove and t h e range hood fan duct, As air
leakage appeared to be the main moisture c o n t r i b u t o r , these gaps w e r e
caulked. A hygrothemograph w a s installed to record indoor temperature
and h m i d i t y
-
Weekly v i s i t s w e r e made t o i n s t a l l n e w charts and to monitor the
c o n d i t i s n of the roof sheathing. One week after caulking around t h e exhaust f a n housing, the roof sheathing was found to be e s s e n t i a l l y dry above
the bathroom, with some reductian in moisture above the cornon plumbing
0 w a l l . Tcqeratures throughout t h e study period were maintained at 18 C
(65'~) and t h e relative humidity varied between 50 and 6 4 p e r c e n t . The high humidity readings can be a t t r i b u t e d to the clothes dryer (unvented u n t i l
l a t e in t h e study) and low ventilation rates combined with a reasonably
tight house.
By the second week, t h e w e t roof sheathing condition still p e r s i s t e d
above the plumbing wall and a more d e t a i l e d examination of air leakage
sources was undertaken. The kitchen range hood and cabinet were removed,
exposing a substantial gap between the drop ceiling and range hood d u c t ( F i g . 2 ) . When the duct w a s removed, a d d i t i o n a l lacatfans f o r a i r leakage
were discovered at t h e plumbing stack and through several holes drilled in the t o p p l a t e (Fig. 3). These holes to the attic were interconnected
w i t h an uncovered plumbing access hatch located behznd a false f r o n t o n the
Figure '3.. Air leakage past plumbing and electrical services
Figure 4. Uncovered plumbtng access
allows moisture to enter
A f u r t h e r check
in
the attic revealed untaped ductwork and free water t r a p p e d below the polyethylene vspourbarrier
( F i g .5).
Figure 5. Ductwark in a t t i c untaped
Several clear air leakage paths had now been confirmed for moisture- laden a i r from the kitchen area i n t o t h e
a t t i c
(Fig. 4). After enteringthe attic the moist air would rise until it hit the cold sheathing, where
frost would form, init-iatlng the cycle leading t o " a t t i c rafn" during
mild
weather. The b u i l d e r sealed off the a i r leakage paths and iastalled a hatchto the plumbing chase. The remaining wet sheathing
then
dried within aweek. The
house ownerwas encouraged
to eliminate indoor clothes drying andto increase the use o f exhaust fans in an effort to reduce relative humidities to levels of about
40
percent.A T T I C M A I N FLOOk B A S E M E N T W I N T E R C O N D E N S A T I O N A N D F R O S T U N T A P E D DUCTWORK N O C A U L K I N G A R O U N D D U C T W O R K O V E R S I Z E D E L E C T R I C A L F E E D HOLE PLUMBING A C C E S S W I T H O U T COVER O V E R S I Z E D H O L E FOR PLUMBING S T A C K
CASE
TWOAluminum s i d i n g installers replacing the s i d i n g on a two storey duplex
discovered water between t h e sheathing paper and 9.5 mm (318 in.) plywood sheathing. The plywood showed water s t a i n s and preliminary signs of rot in
the stud s p a c e s immediately adjacent to the t i l e d bathtub enclosure in the
second f l o o r bathroom, with the darkest p a t t e r n immediately o p p o s i t e the
soap dish ( F i g s .
7 and
8).Figure
7 .
Deteriorated sheathingon bathtub w a l l
Figure 8. Same pattern on
adjacent housing *it
me
moisture content of t h e plywood was approximately 15 percent across m o s t of t h e w a l l , increasing to30
percent in the center of the darkpatches.
me
s h e a t h i n gwas
cut away at t h e location of the soapdish
andf r i c t i o n fit i n s u l a t i o n removed. The polyethylene vapous barrier had been cut to i n s t a l l t h e soap
d i s h
and a substantial amountof mildew
growth andmoisture had accumulated between the polyethylene and the gypsum drywall
Figure 9 . Sheathing cutback behind
soap d i s h
The vapour b a r r i e r stopped at t h e rim of the bathtub, leaviug friction f i t glass fibre insulation exposed t o the area under the tub. Since the house occupants noted the soap d i s h had been loose for some time, it becomes d i f f i c u l t to assess t h e relatllve moisture contribution from direct leakage during showers, a i r leakage at the soap d i s h and d i f f u s i o n and air leakage
through t h e unprotected insulation below the bathtub. These factors did, however, combTne to overcome the natural drying potential of the w a l l in the
area immediately around the bathtub. The remainder of the sheathing in the
These houses were constructed to currenr practice fur the day w i t h respect to insulation and vapour barriers. The plumber r o u t i n e l y roughs i n
the bathtub in advance of the application of insulation,which makes i n s u l a t i n g
below
t h e tub d i f f i c u l t and t h e installation of an air and a vaposrbarrier
i m p o s s i b l e . Consideration
should
be given to i n s t a l l i n g a barrier such asa s i n g l e sheet
of
plywood or waferbsard b e l o w the tubrim
before the tub is i n s t a l l e d . This practice wouldreduce
moisturebuildup
with911 thewall by
limiting a i r
f l a wand
vapaux d i f f u s i o n i n t othe wall
cavity.In
addition, the movement of moisture through deteriorating ceramlc tile gmut and at fixtures such as soap d i s h e s s e t through t h e gypsumd r y w a l l is almost i n e v i t a b l e
ff the
wall isn't ~=ar;efully m a i n t a i n e d .Surface mounted f i x t u r e s wauld
at leasr
avoid cutting the p o l y e t h y l e n e andgypsumboard, which would assist in maintaining air and vapour tightness ( F i g . 10). SURFACE MOUNT
F I X T U R E S
M A I N T A I N C E R A M I CT I L E
G R O U T A P P L Y B A R R I E RS U C H
A S PL,YWQOD OR W A F E R B O A R D B E H I N D B A T H T U BCASE THREE
A s i m i l a r case resulted in m o r e serious damage before the owner w a s alerted to t h e pxoblem. The ,exterior w a l l o f a second storey bathroom was
composed of aluminum s i d i n g , asphalt b u i l d i n g paper, 9.5 mrn (318
in.)
sheathing, 38 x 140 rmn (2 x 6 in-) s t u d s , RSI 3.52 (R20) insulation and a
polyethylene vapour
barrier
extending from t h e c e i l i n g to the tubrim.
A field v i s i tin October
revealed large areas of deteriorated plywood sheathing adjacent to the bathtub enclosure and extending down p a s t the second storey headerl i n e
in one location. Theplywood
subflooring a t thefiller end of the bathtub had deteriorated below the v i n y l
floor
covering to t h e extent that it was structurally unsound. Water s t a i n s w e r e evident on t h e c e i l i n g of the kitchen b e l o w t h e bathroom. The occupants i n d i c a t e dthat water spillage during childrens' baths and showers was common
and
chatm o s t water would d i s a p p e a r at the open joint between the v i n y l flooring
and bathtub. Considerable damage w a s caused by
t h i s
continued wetting( F i g . 11). At the time af inspection t h e w a l l sheathing had a l m a s t n o
structural c a p a b i l i t y and the fibreboard backerboard installed w i t h the aluminum siding w a s saturated (Fig. 12).
Figure 11. S u b f l o o r damage Figure 12. Deteriorated wall
sheathing
In t h i s example, a i r in the Eloorlceiling cavity picked up moisture
spilled i n t o t h e cavity. T h i s moist a i r was able to migrate up through the subfloor, where a l a r g e hole w a s cut for the trap on the bathtub and out
into the
outer
wall across the full length o f the bathtub.Damage to the exterior w a l l
and
f l o o r c o u l d have been reduced ore l i m i n a t e d by controlling water s p i l l a g e , Although most houses up until
r e c e n t l y have been constructed without an air or a vapour barrier b e l o w
the bathtub rim, this problem w o u l d have been greatly reduced if both had
CASE FOUR
A two-storey duplex l o c a t e d in
the
St. John's, Newfoundland, area w a sinvestigazed in March. The exterior
wall system consisted
of gypsum drywall,polyethylene, paper clad
E I
2.1 ( R f 2 ) b a t t s between 38 x 89 mm (2 x 4 in.) studs 400 mm (16 in.) on center and an exterior f i n i s h of 9 . 5 mm (318 in.)plywood with vertical and
horizontal
battens. Little is known of the insidetemperature and moisture conditions maintained in this u n i t .
The plywood cladding on the SE comer w a s removed, revealing a w e t
stain b n
the panel
s t a r t i n g at t h e h e i g h t of an electrical box and extending down to t h e p l a t e (Figs.13 and
14).Figure
13.
Wet sheathing causedby a i r leakage at
electrical box
Figure 14. Insulation details
adjacent to e l e c t r i c a l b ox
Moisture-laden air had apparently leaked o u t p a s t h o l e s around and
through
the electrical boxes and condensed on the back of the siding.Water
forming
at t h i s location ran down in a fan-shaped pattern to saturatet h e
sill plate and header. The moisture content of the sheathing and studsvaried considerably in relation to the proximity of the electrical outlet ( F i g . 15)
.
PLYWOOD CLADDING
Figure 15.
FRAMING ON SE CORNER
VALUES
WITH
ARROWS WERETAKEN
75
mm (3 in.) FROMOUTSIDE FACE
Percent moisture c o n t e n t in
w a l l
componentsSubstantial rot w a s found in the
sill p l a t e s
and h e a d e r s behind t h elower r i g h t and upper l e f t hand corners af the panel. Both locations are below an electrical outlet ( s u b j e c t
to
air leakage) and an unflashedhorizontal j o i n t
in the c l a d d i n g ( s u b j e c t
to rain leakage). The glassf i b r e i n s u l a t i o n w a s dry, except where it was wadded
in
around t h eelectrical
box.
CONCLUSIONS
Hoisture damage in the houses studied w a s l o c a l i z e d and appeared to
result from one of three factors:
1. Information
on
working drawlngs for many houses is inadequate to convey critical details regarding air and vapour c o n t r o l . In general,residential warking drawings contain only dimensions and material
napes, leaving much of the detailing to standard trade procedures. T h i s p r a c t i c e , while economical in expediting a b u i l d i n g p r a j e c t , has
been shown to produce long term problems.
mre
d e t a i l should beconveyed to
the
a p p r o p r i a t e trades.2.
The q u a l i t y of workmanship determines whether a construction detail is f i n a l l y s u i t a b l e for its intended use. Withnut adequareand rtmely
i n s p e c t i o n , t h e construction process soon conceals the evidence, making
future discovery and correction d i f f i c u l t and costly. A small amount
of
additional care on the part of the trades, encouraged by adequate supervision, will lead t o a salu~ion that is more economical and satisfactory ~o the Contractor and b u i l d i n g owner,3. B u i l d i n g s m s t
be
maintained to remain serviceable. Homeowners could b e n e f i t from reading and following manuals d i s t r i b u t e d by many homewarranty p l a n s .
To
avoid the type of problems d e s c r i b e d in thdsNote, the b u i l d i n g owner should identify and a t t e n d to minor
maintenance problems before s e r i o u s deterioration begins.