Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
FS-World.com Fire & Safety Magazine, Summer, pp. 37-38, 2001-10-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Halon alternative: water mist
Liu, Z. G.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site
LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=13e440b0-a3c6-4a93-844a-3fcb25773cab https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=13e440b0-a3c6-4a93-844a-3fcb25773cab
Halon alternative: water mist
Liu, Z.G.
A version of this paper is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans :
FS-World.com Fire & Safety Magazine, Summer 2001, pp. 37-38
www.nrc.ca/irc/ircpubs
NRCC-45144
FS-World
.com
8
F
ire & Safety Magazinewww.fs-business.com (Official site of Fire & Safety Group.com) www.fs-world.com 37
Recent research at Canada's Institute for Research in Construction (IRC) will have implications for the use of water-mist systems as a replacement for halon in certain circumstances. Following the ban on halon production by the Montreal Protocol,
HALON ALTERNATIVE:
WATER MIST
Fire Protection: Canadian Research Boosts
Water Mist as Halon Alternative
IRC's Fire Risk Management Program, in partnership with the Department of National Defence (DND), has been looking for alternative fire-suppression systems to use as replacements for existing equipment and in future
designs. It is of primary importance that the use of such systems does not c o m p r o m i s e t h e f i r e f i g h t i n g effectiveness currently provided by halon, have negative implications for t h e e n v i r o n m e n t n o r c r e a t e unacceptable safety risks.
Water-mist fire-suppression systems have good potential to satisfy all of the above criteria. Recently, IRC carried out full-scale tests to study the feasibility of using water mist as an alternative to halon in DND Halifax Class Frigates, and to compare the fire-extinguishing performance of water-mist systems to that of gaseous agents evaluated previously.
As part of the tests, a mock-up of a diesel engine casing was installed in the test compartment. The researchers chose fire scenarios including different sizes, types and locations of fires that presented the greatest challenge for water mist to extinguish. Ventilation conditions varied from closed door to open door (natural ventilation system) to open door combined with an operating exhaust fan (forced ventilation system). Two types of water-mist systems were used in the tests:
1) A single-fluid/high-pressure system and 2) a twin-fluid/low-pressure system. In addition, the effects of two w a t e r- m i s t d i s c h a rg e m o d e s , continuous and cycling discharges, were examined.
The test results showed that the time required for extinguishing fires when water-mist systems were used was
T E C H N I C A L A R T I C L E
Dr. Zhigang Liu is a research associate at the Canadian
National Research Council's (NRC) Institute for Research in
Construction. Dr. Zhigang Liu is specializing in research on halon
alternatives and water-mist fire suppression. He received his Ph.D.
in mechanical engineering from the University of Calgary.
FS-World
.com
8
F
ire & Safety Magazinelonger than when gaseous agents were used. However, water mist q u i c k l y c o n t r o l l e d f i r e s a n d s i g n i f i c a n t l y c o o l e d t h e t e s t compartment, hence keeping combustion products (CO and CO2) in the compartment at a low level. The thermal conditions and gas concentrations in the compartment, after the water-mist application, were safe enough for firefighters to enter the compartment immediately.
Safe and Effective Suppression Agent
The measurements from the tests showed that water mist did not produce thermal decomposition products as a result of the breakdown of halocarbon agents during fire suppression. In all tests, the CO and CO2 concentrations in the test compartment were not high enough to pose an immediate danger to life and health.
The results also showed that water-mist systems were able to extinguish a wide variety of fires under ventilated conditions, while the gaseous agents were not effective in extinguishing
fires under these conditions. Ventilation in the compartment reduced the CO and CO2 con-centrations in the room, but prolonged the time required to extinguish the fire because of the additional oxygen supply.
One of the significant findings from the tests was that the performance of the water-mist system, in terms of extinguishing the fire, could be substantially improved by using the cycling discharge mode rather than the continuous discharge mode. When the type of fire was one where water mist could easily extinguish it, the improvement achieved by using the cycling discharge was not significant. However, even for these conditions, it was possible to reduce the amount of water required to extinguish the fire by using the cycling discharge.
For fires that are more difficult to extinguish with water mist for example, small fires, shielded fires and fires in ventilated conditions, both the time required to extinguish the
fire and the amount of water required were substantially reduced when the cycling discharge was used. The test results showed that the water requirement was one-third, and the time to extinguish the fire was one-half that of the continuous discharge. The cycling water-mist discharge also extinguished fires that the continuous discharge could not.
The test results also showed that unlike other fire-suppression agents, the water-mist discharge created s t r o n g d y n a m i c s t h a t m i x e d combustion products with steam in the compartment, which played an important role in putting out the fire and reducing the impact of air convection on extinguishing fires. The full-scale tests and corresponding analysis carried out by IRC provided new insights into water-mist systems as an alternative to Halon 1301. In addition, some possible approaches for further improvement of water-mist fire-suppression performance were identified.
www.flame-detection.com
Tel: +1 (973) 239-8398, +1 (800) 452-2107 | Fax: +1 (973) 239-7614
