• Aucun résultat trouvé

Cosmic signatures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Cosmic signatures"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Skygazing: Astronomy through the seasons, 2019-01-08

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/23004886

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Cosmic signatures

Tapping, Ken

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=e84e6892-4c8d-473e-bc76-b664f747c862 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=e84e6892-4c8d-473e-bc76-b664f747c862

(2)

COSMIC SIGNATURES

Cosmic signatures

Ken Tapping, January 8, 2019

Thirty-some years ago, one of my radio astronomy colleagues at the NRC pronounced that “One way or another, he was going to detect water on Mars”. This was years before there would be any

prospect of landing a spacecraft on the Red Planet and look around for water. He was using a large radio telescope – the 46-metre dish at the Algonquin Radio Observatory, in Ontario. That instrument, equipped with what were at the time state-of-the-art receiving systems, had played a part in a number of world radio astronomy ”firsts”, and was well suited to the job.

The idea was to look for a characteristic radio emission produced by water molecules. This radio signature is at a wavelength of about 1.35 cm. The idea was basically simple, to point the dish at Mars for long periods, hoping to collect enough signal to add up to a detectable “spike” at that wavelength. Unfortunately, despite intense efforts, he was not successful. Although we now know there is a lot of water on Mars, there is not much of it in the atmosphere, where it would be producing that radio signature. Despite problems like this, studying the radio signatures of water and other molecules has become an extremely important branch of astrophysics. It shows us what is going on in those dark, cold cosmic clouds and gives us important insights into the processes that made the foundation for the appearance of living things. The most important radio signature of the lot is that of cold, neutral hydrogen gas in space. Since hydrogen is the most common element in the universe, and is involved in the formation of stars, galaxies and other things, it is a powerful

stethoscope on cosmic processes. The radio signature has a wavelength of 21.1 cm. Since there is a lot of hydrogen out there, the signal is a strong one and relatively easy to pick up.

From the number of icy objects we can see in space, we can conclude there is a lot of water out there, and despite that lack of success with Mars, we are detecting its presence in most cosmic clouds. There are lots more radio signatures that have been detected, such as ammonia, at about 1.3 cm wavelength, formaldehyde (6.2 cm

wavelength), carbon monoxide (2.6 mm), methanol (4.5 cm) and many others. Most of these

molecules radiate their radio signatures at very short (millimetre) wavelengths. Since their relative concentrations and reactions tell us much about star and planet formation, and about life, cosmic molecules have become a very important branch of astrophysics, and special radio telescopes have been built to observe them. Two such instruments in which Canada has participated are the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, on Mauna Kea in

Hawaii, and the Atacama Large Millimetre Array, in Chile. The problem now is that, although a very large number of molecular signatures have been detected, we have as yet only identified a fraction of them. In the cold, dark, cosmic dust and gas clouds, the elements produced by stars will react very slowly, but billions of years have been enough time for a lot to have happened.

Laboratory experiments have shown us that, under the right conditions, in the atmospheres of young planets, they can react to form aminoacids, the building blocks of proteins and life as we know it. This may give us the impression cosmic processes favour the formation of carbon-based life, like us. However, that conclusion is a bit premature. We are of course biased toward searching for life processes with which we are familiar, like ours. What are those unidentified molecules up to? Can there be life that is not based on molecules at all? In our huge, old universe, almost anything is possible. We need to keep our telescopes going and our minds as open as possible.

Mars, fading as it recedes, lies in the south after dark. Venus and Jupiter shine low in the dawn glow. The Moon reaches First Quarter on the 13th.

(3)

Ken Tapping is an astronomer with the National Research Council's Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, Penticton, BC, V2A 6J9.

Tel (250) 497-2300, Fax (250) 497-2355 E-mail: [email protected]

Références

Documents relatifs

Our results, in accordance with Field et al.’s (1999), suggest that evaluative learning effects - if they are observed - may be explained as the result of

The holistic hypothesis predicts no stem frequency effect but that surface frequency strongly deter- mines masked morphological priming effects because lexical access takes place on

In this paper, I have tried to show that, although temporal pluractional operators of the sort proposed by Van Geenhoven (2004, 2005) can adequately capture the temporal structure of

Analysis of Murchison, the most studied carbonaceous chondrite, shows the extensive variety of organics (up of tens of thousands of different molecular species) in meteorites

Given that a previous study on oral production data collected from a similar population in France (Gudmestad et al., 2014) documented the importance of three linguistic factors –

Burkert (2000) carried out numerical simulations to describe the evolution of haloes consisting of weakly self-interacting dark matter particles as suggested by Spergel &

In the Peruvian climate change policy network, there were more connections between actors in the mitigation layer (higher density), as compared with the adaptation one, which

Eine typische, wenngleich schwierige Ent- scheidung zum Behandlungsabbruch ist bei- spielsweise dann zu fallen, wenn es darum geht, bei einem schwer dementen, polymor- biden