• Aucun résultat trouvé

Inverse problem in electrocardiography via factorization method of boundary problems : how reconstruct epicardial potential maps from measurements of the torso ?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Inverse problem in electrocardiography via factorization method of boundary problems : how reconstruct epicardial potential maps from measurements of the torso ?"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00926344

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00926344

Submitted on 10 Jan 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Inverse problem in electrocardiography via factorization method of boundary problems : how reconstruct epicardial potential maps from measurements of the

torso ?

Julien Bouyssier, Nejib Zemzemi, Jacques Henry

To cite this version:

Julien Bouyssier, Nejib Zemzemi, Jacques Henry. Inverse problem in electrocardiography via factor- ization method of boundary problems : how reconstruct epicardial potential maps from measurements of the torso ?. 2013. �hal-00926344�

(2)

Inverse Problem in Electrocardiography via Factorization Method of Boundary Value Problems :

How reconstruct epicardial potential maps from measurements of the torso ?

Julien Bouyssier, Nejib Zemzemi, Jacques Henry

julien.bouyssier@inria.fr, nejib.zemzemi@inria.fr, jacques.henry@inria.fr

Motivation and goal

Motivation : Solve the inverse problem in electrocardiography from measurements of the torso.

Goal : Use factorization method to compute epicardial potential maps.

This work is a simplified presentation of the method by considering a cylinder as geometry of our problem.

Initial problem : electrical potential u in the domain Ω is governed by

(P

0

)

 

 

∆ u = 0 in Ω , Ω : cylinder

u = 0 on Σ , Σ : lateral surface

u = T on Γ

T

, T : potential on the torso surface Γ

T

∇ u · n = Φ on Γ

T

, Φ : normal derivative of the potential

With T and Φ known, find potential t and his normal derivative φ on the heart surface Γ

H

to complete this ill-posed Cauchy problem.

Optimal control problem

(P

0

) is decomposed into two sub-problems, ∀( η, τ ) :

(1)

 

 

∆ u

1

= 0 in Ω u

1

= 0 on Σ u

1

= T on Γ

T

∇ u

1

· n = η on Γ

H

and (2)

 

 

∆ u

2

= 0 in Ω u

2

= 0 on Σ u

2

= τ on Γ

H

∇ u

2

· n = Φ on Γ

T

Solve (P

0

) :

= ⇒ Define the cost function E ( η, τ ) = R

(∇ u

1

( η ) − ∇ u

2

( τ ))

2

= ⇒ Find ( φ, t ) : minimize E ( η, τ )

New approach : the factorization method by invariant embedding

Principle of invariant embbeding

Principle : transport potential data from torso surface to heart surface

= ⇒ Boundary value problems (1) and (2) are embedded into a family of similar problems on subdomains Ω

S

= ⇒ Ω

S

are bounded by a moving boundary Γ

S

defined at x = s for x = 0 −→ x = a

= ⇒ At each position x = s , we impose a Neumann boundary condition

∂u∂xS1

S

= α for (1) and a Dirichlet boundary condition ( u

S2

)

S

= β for (2) :

(P

S1

)

 

 

∆ u

1S

= 0 in Ω

S

u

1S

= 0 on Σ

S

u

1S

= T on Γ

T

∇ u

1S

· n = α on Γ

S

and (P

S2

)

 

 

∆ u

2S

= 0 in Ω

S

u

2S

= 0 on Σ

S

u

2S

= β on Γ

S

∇ u

2S

· n = Φ on Γ

T

000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111

000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111

000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111

00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111

000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111

000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111

Γ

T

x=s x=a

x=0

Evolution for the moving boundary Ω

S

Γ

S

volume Growing

Γ

H

Σ

S

Ω boundary Moving Σ

Figure 1: Illustration of the moving boundary. The domain Ω is a cylinder of a lenght a with a section O and a lateral surface Σ. The section O = Γ

T

at x = 0 represents the torso surface and the section O = Γ

H

at x = a represents the heart surface. The moving boundary O = Γ

S

at x = s is defined between these two surfaces and moving along the axis of revolution for x ∈ [0; a ]. For each position s , a cylinder with a section O, a lateral surface Σ

S

and a length s is defined and forms a new subdomain Ω

S

.

Resolution method

At each position x = s of Γ

S

, we define two linear operators :

Neumann-to-Dirichlet application Q ( s ) : α 7−→ u

1S

S

, associated to (P

S1

) Dirichlet-to-Neumann application P ( s ) : β 7−→

∂u∂x2S

S

, associated to (P

S2

)

= ⇒ P and Q depend on s : variable that describes the axis of evolution

= ⇒ P and Q act on functions defined on section O

Let w

1

and w

2

: residual functions, defined on O. ∀ x ∈ [0; a ], we have : (3)

( u

1S

( x ) = Q ( x ) α + w

1

( x )

with Q (0) = 0 and w

1

(0) = T and (4)

(

∂u2

S

∂x

( x ) = P ( x ) β + w

2

( x )

with P (0) = 0 and w

2

(0) = −Φ Let ∆

y

: laplacian operator, defined on the section O. ∀ x ∈ [0; a ], we have :

(5)

dP

dx

+ P

2

= −∆

y

, P (0) = 0

dw2

dx

+ P w

2

= 0 , w

2

(0) = −Φ and (6)

dQ

dx

− Q ∆

y

Q = I, Q (0) = 0

dw1

dx

− Q ∆

y

w

1

= 0 , w

1

(0) = T

= ⇒ First solve Riccati equations for P and Q for x = 0 −→ x = a

= ⇒ Then solve equations for w

1

and w

2

for x = 0 −→ x = a

= ⇒ Compute operators and residuals at x = a .

Rename P ( a ) = P , Q ( a ) = Q , w

1

( a ) = w

1

, w

2

( a ) = w

2

Define the matrix A as : A =

Q − QP

− P Q P

We can rewrite E ( η, τ ) as : E ( η, τ ) = C + [ η, τ ] A [ η, τ ]

− 2 R

ΓH

( w

1

P τ + Qw

2

η ) Finally :

( φ, t ) = arg min E ( η, τ ) ⇐⇒ A [ φ, t ]

= [ Qw

2

, P w

1

]

= ⇒ Find ( φ, t ) : regularize previous system and inverse A

Conclusions and perspectives

Conclusions :

Direct optimal estimation of t and φ before using any discretisation :

= ⇒ Analyse ill-posedness and propose a better regularization and discretization Equations for P and Q depend only of the geometry :

= ⇒ Not necessary to repeat resolution at every time step of cardiac cycle Perspectives :

Apply the method to 3 D case where the moving boundary Γ

S

will be a deformed surface :

= ⇒ First : model of spheres

= ⇒ Then : realistic geometries : how compute 3 D surfaces ? + numerical cost ?

Figure 2: Illustration of Γ

S

for the case of spheres, during the depolarization phase (left) and the repolarization phase (right). The smaller sphere represents the heart surface and the bigger one the torso surface. The heart was stimulated and direct problem was solved. We use computed potential data on the torso surface to apply factorization method and recover potential at heart surface. Spheres between torso and heart represent succesive positions of Γ

S

during invariant embbeding. We also represent the potential recovered by the method.

References

[1] Jacques Henry and Angel Manuel Ramos , La m´ethode de factorisation des probl`emes aux limites, book (in preparation), (2013)

[2] Fadhel Jday, Compl´etion de donn´ees fronti`eres : la m´ethode de plongement invariant, PHD thesis, (2012)

Références

Documents relatifs

In this study, we compare different regularization parameter choice approaches combined with the Method of Funda- mental Solutions using an experimental set of data con-

étudiés;' ils sont le£ plus abondants et les plus recherchés pour. le contrôle bactériologiquý dt::s t::ýux de:

In conclusion, this last example is a rich illustration of our sequential strategy, with a state filter based on a Luenberger approach for the mechanics and on a reduced order

In the next section, we formulate the direct and inverse scattering problem for the wave equation with a Dirchlet obstacle, and define the concept of the far field pattern for

As a prime example, it allows to establish the following result left as an open question in [CK14], saying that the Brownian CRT is the scaling limit of looptrees associated

MFS ECGI reconstructions were performed on data from four studies: (i) Single-site pacing in an isolated ca- nine heart suspended in a human torso-shaped tank; data were obtained

• For both inverse and forward solution the standard deviation of the stochastic solution achieves its maximum at the boundary of the organ for which the uncertainty was

In this thesis we made a comparison between the calculated surface voltage nodal values with different values for the Tikhonov regularization parameter λ, and generated