• Aucun résultat trouvé

On automorphism groups of finite <span class="mathjax-formula">$p$</span>-groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "On automorphism groups of finite <span class="mathjax-formula">$p$</span>-groups"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

R ENDICONTI

del

S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO

della

U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA

I ZABELA M ALINOWSKA

On automorphism groups of finite p-groups

Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 91 (1994), p. 265-271

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1994__91__265_0>

© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1994, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).

Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

IZABELA

MALINOWSKA (*) (**)

Numerous papers on

automorphism

groups of p-groups can be found in the literature. There are a lot of

examples

of p-groups, whose

automorphism

groups have a

given

structure. Most of them are of nil-

potency

class 2 and all their

automorphisms

are central.

In [6]

Jonah and Konvisser constructed a p-group of order

p g ,

whose the automor-

phism

group is

elementary

abelian. In 1979 Heineken

[4]

found a class of finite p-groups all of whose normal

subgroups

are characteristic.

In this paper we answer the

question

of Caranti

([7],

11.46

b)) asking

whether there exists a finite p-group G of

nilpotency

class grea- ter than

2,

with Aut G =

Autc

G ~ Inn

G,

where

Autc

G is the group of cen-

tral

automorphisms

of G. We show that no group G of order up to

p ( p

&#x3E;

2)

has the

property

Aut G =

Autc

G’Inn G. The p-group of the smallest order with this

property

has order

p s

and

nilpotency

class 3.

We also show that for every

prime

p &#x3E; 2 and every

integer % *

7 there

is a p-group G of

order p n

with Aut G =

Autc

G ~ Inn G. Its

automorphism

group is a p-group of

nilpotency

class smaller than the

nilpotency

class of

G.

Throughout

the paper

terminology

and notation will follow

[1, 5].

Let

GI

be a group

generated by

a,

b,

c,

d,

x with the

following

rela-

tions :

apT = bP’ =

cP = xP = 1

(*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Institute of Mathematics, Warsaw

University,

Bia-

lystok

Division, Akademicka 2, 15-267

Bialystok,

Poland.

(**)

Supported by

Polish scientific grant R.P.1.10.

(3)

266

where

p &#x3E; 3,

n ~ 0

(modp), or p=3, k, 1,

m, n ~ 0

(mod 3)

and ln ;e 1

(mod 3).

One can

easily

show that the

following subgroups

of

GI

are

characteristic:

We show

only

that A is characteristic. Of course

for p

&#x3E; 5.

( G1 )

is

regular,

so we have A =

( G1 ).

It is

easily

seen that this holds also for

p = 5.

The case p = 3 is a little more

complicated

since the group

Gi

as well as A is no

longer regular.

But it is easy to check that

~ 1 ( G 1 ) _ ~ a 3r 2, b 3r 2 , c, d, x ~

and

Furthermore

Now,

if d and x

belong

to it follows that

« = 0 and

(mod 3),

so the

subgroups ( a 3 , b ~, ( a 3r -1, b 3r - 2 ,

c,

d, X)

=

(a3, b)

and

((a3r I , b 3r - 2,

c,

d, x))

= A are characte-

ristic in

Gi .

’j ¡

PROPOSITION 1. Aut

GI = Aut~ Gi’

Inn

G1.

PROOF. We prove the

proposition

for r &#x3E; 2. The

proof

of the case

r = 2 is similar.

Lest 9

be an

automorphism

of

Gi . By (13)-(16)

we see at once that

p(c) p(a)

E

CG, (c), p(b)

E

CGl (A)

and

p(d), p(x)

E A. So the

subgroups

H =

(bpr ’)

and B

= ( g

E

Gl:

Vh E Y2

(Gl)

hg

h(mod H)l =

=

(a,

c,

x)

are characteristic in

Gl .

Hence

p(a)

E B fl

cG, (c) =

=

(a, bpr 2, c), p(x) (c,

x, and then

(4)

where «==» means

«congruent

modulo

Z( Gl ) ».

Applying 9

to the

(1)

and

(7)

relations

gives f3

= 0

(modp), s

= 1

= 1

(mod p)

and

(17)

Hence

by (9) ~

= 1

(mod p). Applying

it to the

(10)

and

(6)

relations

gi-

ves 6 = 1

(modp),

« = 1

(modp)

and 1 0

(mod p),

so

by (17) y

= 0

(mod p).

Now we see that each

automorphism p

of G has the form:

where a,

~3, y, ~

E Z.

The number 1 + asp can be

expressed

in the form

(1

+

p )°‘ ~ ( mod p r).

Now one can

easily verify that p

acts as the

conjugation by

modulo

Z( Gi ). Thus p belongs

to

Autc

Inn

Gi ,

and then

Aut

GI

=

Autc

Inn

G1.

Let

G2

be a group

generated by

a,

b,

c,

d,

x, z with the

following

re-

lations :

where p &#x3E;

2, r &#x3E; 2, ~, ~

m, n ~ 0

(mod p).

Symilarly

as in the

previous

case it can be

proved

that

PROPOSITION 2. Aut

G2

=

Autc G2 ~ Inn G2 .

(5)

268

This shows that for all % a

7,

there is a p-group G of order with

Aut G = Aut, G - Inn G.

Now we shall see that the smallest p-group with this

property

has order

p 6

and

nilpotency

class 3. First we show that there are no groups with this

property

of

order p4.

We use the list of p-groups of

order p4

found in

[2],

pages 145-146. We use also the

numbering

of the groups as

given replacing

of

P, Q, R, ,S,

E

respectively by

a,

b,

c, d and 1. Since

we want to find a group of

nilpotency

class

greater

than 2

only

groups

(xi), (xii), (xiii), (xv)

should be considered. One can

easily

find for them

automorphisms

which do not

belong

to

Aut,

G - Inn G. For these groups

we define such

automorphisms by indicating images

of

generators.

We

have then

Now let G be of order

p 5 .

It is clear that G is metabelian and for p &#x3E; 3 is

regular.

CASE 1. cl G = 4.

Since

G/Y 2 ( G ) ~ I = P 2

and G is metabelian then

by [3] Aut

G

I

is di-

visible

by p6.

But

Inn G | = p4, I Aut, G |Inn G n Autc G|

&#x3E;

1,

so Hence

CASE 2. cl G = 3.

Let G = &#x3E;

Y2 (G)

&#x3E; &#x3E;

Y4 (G)

= 1 be the lower central series of G. Since for i =

1, 2, 3,

we

have p2

.. p3 = p2 = b .

If G is

metacyclic

then G

= (a,

b : b p -

1, a b

=

a 1 + p ~.

It is

easy to see that the

correspondence:

(6)

determines the

automorphism

of G which does not

belong

to

Aut,

G. Inn G.

Assume that G is not

metacyclic.

If

I = p 2,

then has the

type ( p, ~)

and

by

Theo-

rem

1.5 [ 1 ] IY2(G)/Ys(G)1 I

= p, is

elementary

abelian of order

p 2.

Of course

Z(G)

= 3

(G)

and

Z2 ( G )

= Y 2

(G).

Let G be

generated by

elements a, b. Since G is not

metacyclic

and

by [5],

111.11.3.

Z(G)

and so

(aP)b

= ap . On the other hand we

have

since

y 3 ( G ) = Z( G )

and

Y3(G)

is

elementary

abelian. So we

get exp y2(G) = p.

Now it is easy to see that the

correspondence

determines the

automorphism

of

G,

which does not

belong

to

Aut,G-InnG.

If

then

by

Theorem 1.5

[1] !r2(G)/r3(G)!=

=

= p.

Let

G/Y2(G)

be of the

type ( p , p).

Since G is not

metacyclic

there

exist a,

b such that

G = (a, b)

and

By [5],

III.ll.3

is of the

type (x) (see [2]).

Then the

correspondence

determines the

automorphism

of

G,

which does not

belong

to

Aut, G -

Inn G.

Let

G/y2 (G)

be of the

type (~, ~, p).

If

Z(G) #

then G is ei- ther a direct

product

of groups A and B or a central

product

of groups A and

C,

where A is a group of

order p

and class

3,

B is a group of order p, C is a

cyclic

group of order

p 2 .

In both cases we can extend conside- red

automorphisms

of the groups of

order p4

and class 3 to the whole group G. Of course such

automorphisms

do not

belong

to

Aut, G -

Inn G.

Therefore we may assume that

Z( G ) = y 3 ( G ).

Then

by [5], III.2.13a)

is of

exponent

p. Since

I = p2

we can

choose a,

b,

c such that

G = ( a, b, c ~, c e Z(G)

and

Since

Z2 ( G )

is not

cyclic ([5], III.7.7a))

either

y 2 ( G )

is ele-

(7)

270

mentary

abelian or

cyclic.

In the second case there exists

such that cP = 1. In both cases we can find b with

[b, c]

=

1,

as

[a, c], [ b, c] e Z(G)

=

y 3 ( G ).

If =

1,

then the

correspondence

determines the

automorphism

of

G,

which does not

belong

to

Aut,

G - Inn G.

Assume that 1. Since

y 2 ( G )

is

elementary

abelian we have

so aP E

Z( G ) _ ~ c ~° ~

and in the similar way bP E

Z(G).

So there exist ac, b of

orders p

such that G =

(a, b, c)

and

[b, c]

= 1. If

[a, b, b]

= 1 then

the

correspondence

determines the desired

automorphism

of G. If

[a, b, b] ~

1 then there

exists a with

[a, b, a]

= 1. Hence the

correspondence

determines the

automorphism

of

G,

which does not

belong

to

Aut,

G. Inn G.

EXAMPLE. We end the paper with the

example

of the group G of or-

der p6

and class 3 with Aut G =

Aut,

G - Inn G:

where p

&#x3E; 3

and k, I,

0

(modp)

or p =

3, l

=

1,

0

(mod 3).

REFERENCES

[1] N. BLACKBURN, On a

special

class

of

p-groups, Acta Math., 100 (1958), pp.

45-92.

[2] W. BURNSIDE,

Theory of Groups of

Finite Order,

Cambridge University

Press (1911).

(8)

[3] A. CARANTI - C. M. SCOPPOLA,

Endomorphisms of two-generated

metabelian

groups that induce the

identity

modulo the derived

subgroup,

UTM, 286 (Ot-

tobre 1989).

[4] H. HEINEKEN,

Nilpotente

gruppen, deren sämtliche normalteiler characteri- stish sind, Arch.

Math.,

33 (1979), pp. 497-503.

[5] B. HUPPERT, Endliche

Gruppen

I,

Springer-Verlag,

Berlin and New York (1967).

[6] D. JONAH - M. KONVISSER, Some non-abelian p-groups with abelian automor-

phism

groups, Arch. Math., 26 (1975), pp. 131-133.

[7]

Kouroskaja

tetrad’,

Nowosybirsk

(1990).

Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 30

aprile

1992

e, in forma revisionata, il 28 novembre 1992.

Références

Documents relatifs

H ELIEL , On c-normality of certain subgroups of prime power order of finite groups, Arch.. G UO , The influence of c-normality of subgroups on the structure of finite groups

The aim of this paper is to show that if one reformulates the problem in terms of derivations, as we do in Section 2, then the general case of an arbitrary p-group of maximal class

Independent diagonal relation arrays are shown to correspond uniquely to reduced, separable

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » ( http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/ ) implique l’accord avec les

If G is a group such that Aut G is abelian then every automorphism of G is central; so in order to prove that the auto-.. mor~phism group of a given group G is

In both cases the action of the automorphism group on the G-defining subgroups is alternating or symmetric, and this too seems likely to reflect a general

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » ( http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/ ) implique l’accord avec les

and it is easy to see that the maximality is equivalent to all elements of Z(x)-Z(G) having the same centralizer C(x), so P2 shows that the definition of extreme