C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
M. A. K ENKU
F UMIYUKI M OMOSE
Automorphism groups of the modular curves X
0(N)
Compositio Mathematica, tome 65, n
o1 (1988), p. 51-80
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1988__65_1_51_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1988, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
51
Automorphism groups of the modular
curvesX0(N)
M.A.
KENKU1
& FUMIYUKIMOMOSE2,*
’Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria;
2Department
of Mathematics, Chuo University, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112, Japan (*author for correspondence)Received 15 December 1986; accepted in revised form 31 July 1987
Compositio (1988)
© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Netherlands
Let N 1 be an
integer
andXo (N)
be the modular curve/Q
which corres-ponds
to the modular group03930(N).
We here discuss the group AutXo (N)
of
automorphisms of Xo (N) ~ C (for curves of genus g0(N) 2). Ogg [23]
determined them for square free
integers
N. The determination of AutX0(N)
hasapplications
tostudy
on the rationalpoints
on some modu-lar curves, e.g.,
[10, 19-21].
Letro (N)
be the normalizationof 03930(N)/±
1 inPGL+2 (Q),
and putBo(N) = 0393*0 (N)/ro (N) ( c
AutX0(N)),
which is deter-mined in
[1] §4.
The knownexample
such that AutX0(N) ~ B0(N)
isX0(37) [16] § 5 [22].
The modular curveXo (37)
has thehyperelliptic
involution which sends the cusps to noncuspidal
Q-rationalpoints,
and AutX0(37) ~ (Z/2Z)2, B0(37) ~ Z/2Z.
Our result is thefollowing.
THEOREM 0.1. For
Xo (N)
withg0 (N) 2, Aut Xo(N) = B0(N), provided
N ~
37,
63.We have not determined Aut
Xo (63).
The indexof B0(63)
in AutXo (63)
isone or two, see
proposition
2.18. Theautomorphisms
ofXo (N)
are notdefined over
Q,
in thegeneral
case, and it is not easy toget
the minimal models ofXo (N)
over the baseSpec (!JK
for finite extensions K of Q.By
thefacts as
above,
theproof of the
above theorem becomescomplicated.
In thefirst
place, using
thedescription
of thering
EndJ0(N) (~Q)
of endo-morphisms of the jacobian variety Jo (N) of X0(N) [18, 29],
we show that theautomorphisms of Xo (N)
are defined over thecomposite k(N) of quadratic
fields with discriminant D such that
D2|N, except
for N =28, 29, 22 33, 23 33,
see
corollary 1.11,
remark 1.12. For the sake of thesimplicity,
we here treatthe cases for N =1=
28, 29, 22 33, 23 33,
37.Using corollary
2.5[20],
we showthat
automorphisms
ofXo (N)
are defined over a subfieldF(N)
whichcontained in
k(N)
nQ((8’ -3, 5, -7).
In the secondplace,
for anautomorphism
u ofXo (N),
we show that ifu(0)
oru(~)
is a cusp, then ubelongs
toBo (N),
seecorollary 2.4,
where 0 and oo are the Q-rational cuspscf. § 1.
Further we show that if u is defined overQ,
then ubelongs
toBo (N),
see
proposition
2.8. Now assume thatu(0)
andu(oo)
are not cusps and thatF(N) ~
Q. Let 1 =l (N)
be the leastprime
number notdividing N,
andD =
Dl
=(1
+1)(u(0))
+(Tlu03C3(~)) - (1
+1)(u(~)) - (Tlu03C3(0))
be thedivisor of
Xo (N), where u = a,
is the Frobenius element of the rationalprime
1 andTI
is the Heckeoperator associating
to 1. Under theassumption
on u as
above,
we show that0 ~
D - 0(linearly equivalent),
and thatw*N (D) ~ D,
whereWN is
the fundamental involution ofXo (N),
see lemma2.7, 2.10.
LetSN
be the number of the fixedpoints of wN, which
can beeasily described,
see(1.16).
Then weget
theinequality
thatSN 4(l
+1),
see
corollary
2.11.Let pn
be the n-thprime
number. Thenusing
the esti-mate pn
1.4 x nlog n for n
4[30]
theorem3,
weget
119,
see lemma 2.13. In the lastplace, applying
anOgg’s
idea in[22, 23],
weget
AutXo (N) - B0(N), except
for someintegers,
see lemma2.14,
2.15. Forthe
remaining
cases, because of the finiteness of thecuspidal subgroup
ofJ0(N) [13],
we canapply
lemma 2.16. Weapply
the other methods to thecases for N =
50, 75, 125, 175, 108,
117 and 63.The authors thank L. Murata who informed us the estimate of
prime
numbers
[30].
NOTATION. For a
prime
number p,Qurp
denotes the maximal unramified extensionof Qp, and W(Fp)
is thering
of Witt vectors with coefficients inFp.
For a finite extension K of
Q, Qp
ofQurp, OK
denotes thering
ofintegers
ofK. For an abelian
variety
A defined overK, A/OK
denotes the Néron model of A over the baseSpec (9K.
For a commutativering R, 03BCn(R)
denotes the group of n-th roots ofunity belonging
to R.§1.
PreliminariesLet N 1 be an
integer,
andXo (N)
be the modular curve/Q
whichcorresponds
to the modular groupro (N).
LetX0(N)
denote the normaliz- ation of theprojective j-line X0(1) ~ P1Z
in the function field ofXo (N).
Fora
positive
divisor M of Nprime
toN/M,
denotes the canonical involution ofX0(N)
which is definedby (E, A) H (E/AM’ (EM
+A)/AM) (at
thegeneric fibre),
where A is acyclic subgroup
of order N andAM
is thecyclic subgroup
of A of order M.Let b
be thecomplex
upper halfplane {z ~ C|
Im(z)
>0}.
Under the canonical identificationof Xo (N) (8) C
with03930(N)/b ~ {i ~, Q},
wM isrepresented by
a matrix(Ma Nc b Md)
forintegers
a,b,
c and d with
M2 ad -
Nbc = M. For a fixed rationalprime
p, and asubscheme Y of
q’o(N), yh
denotes the open subscheme of Y obtainedby
excluding
thesupersingular points
on Y QFp.
For aprime
divisor p with53
pr liN,
thespecial
fibreX0(N)
(DFp
has r + 1 irreduciblecomponents Eo, El , ... , Er .
We choose Z’ -Eo (resp.
Z =Er)
so that Z’h(resp. Zh )
is the coarse moduli space
/Fp
of theisomorphism
classes of thegeneralized elliptic
curves E with acyclic subgroup A isomorphic
toZ/NZ (resp. 03BCN), locally
for the étaletopology [4]V,
VI. thenZ’h
andZ’
are smooth overspec
Fp.
For aprime number p with p 1 IN, Xo (N)
QFp
isreduced,
and Z andZ’ intersect
transversally
at thesupersingular points
onq-o(N)
QFp.
For asupersingular points x
onq-o(N)
~Fp
withp 11 N, let y
be theimage
of xunder the natural
morphism
offi(N) - X0(N/p): (E, A) ~ (E, AM/p),
and
(F, B)
be anobject associating
to y. Then thecompletion
of thelocal
ring OX0(N),x
QW (if p) along
the section x isisomorphic
toW(Fp)[[X, Y]]/(XY - pm )
for m =§)Aut (F, B)| [4]VI (6.9).
Let 0 =(?)
and oc
0
denote the Q-rational cuspsof q-o (N)
which arerepresented by (G.
x7L/ NlL, 71/ N71)
and(Gm, J1N)’ respectively.
(1.1)
LetS2(03930(N))
be the C-vector space ofholomorphic
cusp forms ofweight
2belonging
toro (N).
ThenS2(03930(N))
isspanned by
theeigen
formsof the Hecke
ring Q[Tm](m,N) = 1
e.g.,[1] [33] Chap.
3(3.5). Let f
= 03A3anqn,
al =
1,
be a normalized new formbelonging
toS2(03930(N))
cf.[1].
PutKf
=Q({an}n1),
which is atotally
realalgebraic
number field of finitedegree,
see loc.cit.. For eachisomorphism a
ofKf into C, put uf
= Ea7q n
which is also a normalized new form
belonging
toS2(03930(N)) [33] Chap.
7(7.9).
For apositive
divisor d ofN/(level of f), put f|ed
= 1anqdn,
whichbelongs
toS2 (ro (N))
and has theeigen values an
ofTn
forintegers n prime
to
N [1].
Theset {f|ed}f,d becomes
a basis ofS2(03930(N)), where f runs
over theset of all the normalized new forms
belonging
toS2(03930(N)),
and d are thepositive
divisorsof N/(level of f).
To the set{03C3f}, 03C3
E Isom(Kf, C),
of thenormalized new
forms,
therecorresponds
a factorJjjj (/Q)
of thejacobian variety J0(N)
ofX0(N) [35] §4.
Letm(f) (=m(03C3f))
be the number of thepositive
divisors ofN/(level of f).
ThenJo (N) is isogenous
over Q to theproduct
of the abelian varietieswhere
Qf
runs over the set of the normalized new formsbelonging
toS2(03930(N)).
For each normalized newformf belonging
toS2(03930(N)),
letV (f)
be the C-vector space
spanned by {f|ed}, d|N/(level of f).
ThenS2(0393o(N))
is
decomposed
into the direct sum~f V(f)
of theeigen
spacesV(f)
of theHecke
ring Q[Tm](m,N)=1, where f
runs over the set of the normalized newforms
belonging
toS2(03930(N)).
Let
Q(-D)
be animaginary quadratic
field with discriminant D. Let À be a Hecke character ofQ(-D)
with conductor r which satisfies thefollowing
conditions:where Put
where 2I =1= (0)
runs over the set of all theintegral
idealsprime
to r. Thenf is
aneigen
form ofQ[Tm](m,DN(r))=1 belonging
toS2(03930(DN(r))) [34].
We callsuch a
form f a
form withcomplex multiplication.
Theform, f ’is
a normalizednew form if and
only
if 03BB is aprimitive
character. In such a case, r = r and D dividesN(r),
where r is thecomplex conjugate
of r loc.cit.. The C-vector spaceS2(03930(N))
is identified withH0(X0(N)
(DC, QI) by f ~ f(z)
dz. LetVc = VC(N) (resp. VH = VH(N))
be thesubspace
ofH0 (X0(N), n’) - H0(J0(N), 03A91)
such thatVc (8) C (resp. VH
QC)
isspanned by
theeigen
forms with
complex multiplication (resp.
withoutcomplex multiplication).
Let
Tc
andTH
be thesubspaces
of thetangent
space ofJ0(N)
at the unitsection which are associated
with Vc
andVH, respectively.
LetJc = Jc(N)
and
JH = JH (N)
denote the abelian subvarieties/Q of J0(N)
whosetangent
spaces areTc
andTH, respectively.
ThenJo (N)
isisogeneous
over Q to theproduct Jc
xJH,
and EndJ0(N) ~ Q =
EndJc (8) Q
x EndJH (8) Q [28] (4.4) (4.5).
Letk(N) be. the composite of
thequadratic fzelds
with discrimi-nant D whose square divides N. For a modular form
f
ofweight
2 and forg .
(a b d)
EGLI (Q), put
For a normalized new
form f
= 03A3anqn
and for a Dirichlet character~, f(~)
denotes the new form with
eigen
valuesanx(n)
ofTn
forintegers n prime
to(level of f)
x(conductor
ofx).
PROPOSITION 1.3.
Any endomorphism of JH
=JH(N) is defined
overK(N).
Proof
Let k’ be the smallestalgebraic
number field over which all endomor-phisms of JH
are defined. Then k’ is acomposite of quadratic fields,
and anyrational
prime
p withp JIN
is unramified ink’,
see[27]
lemma1, [32]
lemma(1.2), [3]VI,
see also[ 18, 29].
There remains to discuss the2-primary
part of N.Let f
= Sanqn
and g = Grbnqn
be normalized new formsbelonging
toVH.
If Hom(J{03C3f}, J{03C3g))
~{0},
then there exists aprimitive
Dirichletcharacter x of
degree
one or two such thatan~(n) = b(n)’
for an iso-morphism r
ofKg
into C and for allintegers
nprime
toN,
see[28] (4.4) (4.5).
If X = id., then f
= rg. Thering
EndJjjj (8) Q
isspanned by
the twist-ing
operators as a(left) Kf-vector
space[18, 29].
If moreoverEnd
Jo (N) ~ Q ~ Kf,
then allendomorphisms
ofJ{03C3f}
are defined over Q.In the other case,
let q
= tl, be thetwisting operator
associated with aprimitive
Dirichlet character 03BB of order two,then an
=an03BB(n)
for an iso-morphism o
ofKf
into C and for allintegers
n, see[ 18]
remark(2.19).
Thenf(03BB)
=(lf is
a normalized new form. If~ ~ id.,
then sg =f(~) belongs
toS2(03930(N)).
Therefore it isenough
to show that for aprimitive
Dirichletcharacter X
of order2,
iff(~) belongs
toS2(03930(N)),
then the square of the conductor of X divides N. We may assume thatord2 (level of f) ord2 (level
of f(~)).
Let r = 2m t be the conductor of X for an oddinteger
t, andput
~ = Zi X2 for the
primitive
Dirichlet characters XI and X2 with conductors 2m and t,respectively.
As noted asabove, t2
dividesN,
so that(f(~))(~2)
=f(~1) belongs
toS2(03930(N)). Ifm =1= 0,
then4|N
and the second Fouriere coefficientof f(~1)
is zero[1].
Further we have thefollowing
relation:Put N = 2s M for an odd
integer
M. If 2m s, thenBut
using
the above relation(*),
we can see that theequality (**)
can notbe sattisfied. D
LEMMA 1.4.
If g0(N)
> 1 +2gc(N),
then all theautomorphisms of Xo(N)
are
defined
overk(N).
Proof.
Let u be anautomorphism
ofXo(N),
andput
v = u,7u-1 for 1 =1= a E Gal(Q/k(N)).
Then theautomorphism
ofJo(N)
inducedby
v actstrivially
onJH by proposition
1.3. Assume that v ~ id. ThengC
1. Letd
( 2)
be thedegree
of v and Y =X0(N)/v>
be thequotient
of genus gY.Then
gy a
g. andg0(N)
= gH + gc. If g" =0,
theng0(N)
= gc 1 +2gc. If gH 1,
then the Riemann-Hurwitz formula leads theinequality
that
go(N) -
1d(gY - 1) ( 1(gH - 1)).
Theng0(N) 2gC
+ 1. DLet D be the discriminant of an
imaginary quadratic field,
and r =1=(0)
bean
integral
ideal ofQ(-D)
with r = r. Letv(D, r)
denote the number of theprimitive
Hecke characters ofQ(-D)
with conductor r which satisfies the condition(1.2).
For aninteger n 1, 03C8(n)
denotes the number of thepositive
divisors of n. We know thefollowing.
LEMMA 1.5
[34].
gC =LD EL v(D, r)4«N/DN(r»,
where D runs over the setof
the discriminants
of imaginary quadratic fields
whose squares divide N, and r ~(0)
are theintegral
idealsof Q(-D) such
thatDIN(r), DN(r)IN
andr = r.
LEMMA 1.6.
If g0(N) 2,
theng0(N)
> 1 +2gC, provide
N =1=26, 2 7, 28, 29, 34, 2 · 33, 2 · 32, 23 · 33.
Proof
For the sakeof simplicity,
we here denote g =go(N).
For a rationalprime p, put rp
=ordp N.
The genus formulaof Xo(N)
is well known:where
if 41N
otherwise
if 9|N
otherwise.
We estimate gC. Let D be the discriminant of the
imaginary quadratic
fieldk =
Q(-D),
and (9= (9k
be thering
ofintegers
of k. For aninteger
n 1 and a rational
prime p, put t/Jp(n) =
1 +ordp(n).
Put(-D) =
~p03BCpfor
primitive characters ;(p and yp
withconductors pr
andD/pr
forr =
ordpD, respectively.
For anintegral
ideal m ~(0)
of k =Q(-D),
let
vp(D, m)
denote the number of theprimitive characters Âp
of(W
~Zp)
whichsatisfy
thefollowing
condition: for a EZp ,
Let
h(-D)
be the class number of k =Q(-D),
and r ~{0}
be anintegral
ideal of k with r = r. LetNp, Dp
andrp
be thep-primary parts
ofN,
D and r. PutPut
p(D, p)
=Lrrp vp (D, p)03C8p(N/DN(r)),
whererp
=1=(0)
runs over the set ofthe ideals
of (9,,
such thatrp = rp, Dp|rp
andDr, IN.
Then the formula in lemma 1.5.gives
thefollowing inequality:
For a
positive integer
m,9(m)
denotes the Euler’s number of m.By
the wellknown formula of the class number
of 0(.,/ --D): h(-D) = 1/[2 - (-D 2)]
03A30aD/2 ( - D/a) for D ~ 4,3
e.g.,[2],
weget
thefollowing inequality:
forD ~ 4 nor
3,
otherwise.
For a
prime divisor p
ofN with p~N, 03BC(D, p) =
2. If811D
andord2N 7,
then
p(D, 2) = 0,
see(1.7).
For an oddprime
divisor p of N withp21N,
put
otherwise.
otherwise.
Further let
p(p)
be the maximal value of03BC’(D, p)
for discriminants D whose squares divide N. Thenby (1.9),
Then the
inequalities (1.8)
and(1.9) gives
thefollowing
estimatesof gC:
One can
easily
calculatep(D, p):
Put r =ordpN
for a fixed rationalprime
p.Cast p ~
2:Case p =
2:Using
the genus formulaof Xo (N)
and the estimate(1.10) of gc,
one can seethat g
> 1 +2gc, except
for someintegers
N. For theremaining
cases, adirect calculation makes
complete
this lemma. D COROLLARY 1.11.Any automorphism of Xo (N) (g0(N) 2)
isdefined
overthe field k(N) provided N ~ 28, 29 , 22 33, 23 33.
Proof.
Lemma1.3,
1.4 and 1.6give
thislemma, except
for N =26, 27, 34, 2 ’ 3B 23 32.
Thering
EndJC ~ Q is
determinedby
the associated Hecke characters[3, 34]. Considering
the condition(1.2),
weget
the result also forthe
remaining
cases. DREMARK 1.12. We here add the results on the fields of definition of endo-
morphisms of JC
for N =2g , 29, 22 33, 23 33.
(1)
N =28, 29:
Let x be a character of the ideal groupof Q(-1)
of order4 which satisfies the
following
conditions:(i) ~((03B1)) = 1
for a EQ(-1)
with a ~ 1 mod" 8.(ii) ~((03B1)) = 1
for a e Zprime
to 2.Let
JC(-1)
andJC(-2)
be the abelian subvarieties/0
ofJc
whosetangent
spaces0 C correspond
to thesubspaces spanned by
theeigen
forms inducedby
the Hecke characters ofQ(-1)
andQ(-2), respectively.
Letk’(N)
be the class field
of Q(-1)
associated with ker(X).
Then anyendomorph-
isms of
JC(-1)
is defined overk’(N)
and EndJC ~ Q ~
EndJC(-1)
(D Q xEnd
JC(-2) (D 0.
The sameargument
as in lemma 1.4 shows that any auto-morphism of Xo (N)
is defined overk’(N).
Note that03BE16 =
exp(203C0-1/16)
does not
belong
tok’(N).
(2)
N =22 33, 23 33: Let ~ ~
1 be a character of the ideal group ofQ(-3)
which satisfies the
following
conditions:(i) ~((03B1)) =
1 for a~ Q(-3)
with a ~ 1 mod 6.(ii) ~((03B1)) = 1
for a E Zprime
to 6.Then any
endomorphism of Jc
is defined over the class fieldk’(N)
associatedwith ker
(x).
Note that(9 and 03B68
do notbelong
tok(N).
Let
p
5 be aprime
number and K be a finite extension ofQ;’
ofdegree
eK. For an
elliptic
curve E defined overK,
and aninteger
m 3prime
top, let Qm be the
representation
ofGK
= Gal(K/K)
inducedby
the Galoisaction of
Gx
on the m-torsionpoints Em(K).
ThenQm(GK)
becomes a sub-group of
71/47L
or7L/671,
and ker(Qm)
isindependent
of theinteger m a
3prime
to p. Let K’ be the extension of K associated with ker(Qm),
ande be the
degree
of the extensionK’/K. Let n = nK
be aprime
elementof the
ring
R =(9K
ofintegers
of K. Then we know that(i)
If the modularinvariant j(E) ~ 0,
1728 mod n, then e = 1 or2, (ii)
If e =4,
thenj(E)
~ 1728 mod n,(iii)
If e = 3 or6, then j(E)
~ 0 mod n e.g.,[31] §5 (5.6) [36]
p. 46. Now assume that E has acyclic subgroup A(/K)
of order Nfor an
integer
N divisibleby p2.
Put e’ = e if e isodd,
and e’ =e/2
if e iseven.
LEMMA 1.13
([20] §
lemma(2.2), (2.3)). If exé
p -1,
then thepair (E, A) defines
a R-valued sectionof
the smooth partof f!£o(N).
COROLLARY 1.14. Let x:
Spec R ~ f!£o(N) be a
sectionof
aninteger
Ndivisible
by p2. If
eK = 1 andp 5,
then x is a sectionof
the smooth partof X0(N). If eK
= 2 andp 7,
then x is a sectionof
the smooth partof
X0 (N).
REMARK 1.15. Under the notation as
above,
we here consider the cases for eK = 2and p
=5,
7. Put N =p’m
forcoprime integers p’
and m(r 2).
Under one of the
following
conditions(i), (ii)
onm, e’
= 1 for p =5,
ande’
2 for p = 7.p = 5: Conditions on m.
(i) 4,
6 or 9 divides m.(ii)
2 or a rationalprime q with q
= 2 mod 3 divides m, and arational
prime q’ with q’ -
3 mod 4 divides m.p = 7:
(i)
2 or 9 divides m.(ii)
A rationalprime q with q =-
2 mod 3 divides m.(1.16)
The fixedpoints
of wN.Let WN be the fundamental involution of
Xo(N): (E, A) H (E/A, EN/A).
Put N =
N¡ N2
for the square freeinteger Nz .
LetkN
be the class field ofQ(-N2)
which is associated with the order ofQ(.J - N2)
with conductorN,.
PuthN
=IkN: Q(-N2)|.
Then as well known(see
e.g.[12] Chapter
8theorem
7)
where (9 is the
ring
ofintegers
ofQ(-N2)
and(9N,
= Z+ NI
(9. LetSN
bethe number of the fixed
points
of wN. ThenLet p 13 (or p = 17, 19,
23 or 29etc.)
be a rationalprime
and M be aninteger prime
to p. Thensupersingular points
onX0(1)
QFp
are allFp-rational
and thesupersingular points
onio (M)
~Fp,
hence those onq’o(pM)
QFp
areall Fp2-rational [3]V
theorem4.17, [36]
table 6 p. 142-144.Let
m(M, p) = go (pM) - 2go(M)
+ 1. For aprime divisor q
ofM, put rq
=ordq M.
Putwhere ç is the Euler’s function. The number of
the Fp2-rational
cusps on!!£o(M) ~ Fp = m(2)m(3) 03A0q|M
2. Therefore§ 2. Automorphisms
ofXo (N)
In this
section,
we discuss theautomorphisms
of the modular curvesXo (N)
of genus g0(N)
2. For anautomorphism
uof X0(N), u
denotes also the62
induced
automorphism
of thejacobian variety J0(N).
Letk(N)
be thecomposite
of thequadratic
fields with discriminants D whose squares divide N. For theintegers
N =2’, 2’, 23 33
and23 33,
letk’(N)
be the fields defined in remark 1.12.(2.1) (see [1] ] § 4).
LetA~ = Aoo(N)
denote thesubgroup
of AutXo (N) consisting
of theautomorphisms
which fix the cusp ~ =(ô),
andput Boo = A~
nBo(N).
ThenAoo
is acyclic
group. Let0[[q]]
be thecompletion
of the local
ring OX0(N),~
with the canonical localparameter q
see[4]
VII. Fory E
Aoo,
y *(q) = (mq
+c2q2
+ ··· for aprimitive
m-throot 03B6m
ofunity and ci
E0.
Then we seeeasily
that the field of definitionof y
isQ(03B6m).
Putr2 = min
{3, [ 2 ord2 N]}, r3
={1, [ 2 ord3 N]}
and m = 2r23r3. ThenAoo
isgenerated by (Ó l;m )
modF(N).
LEMMA 2.2. Under the notation as
above,
suppose that an involution ubelongs
to
A,,,.
Then u isdefined
over 0 and it is not thehyperelliptic
involution.Moreover
4|N.
Proof.
LetQ[[q]]
be thecompletion
of the localring
at the cusp ~ with the canonical localparameter q [3]
VII. Putu * (q) =
c1q +c2q2 + ···
forcl E
Q.
Then one seeseasily
that CI = - 1 and that u is defined over Q. Thehyperelliptic
modular curvesof type X0(N)
are all known[22]
theorem 2. In all cases, thehyperelliptic
involutionof Xo (N)
do not fix the cusp oo .Using
the congruence relation
[3] [33] Chapter
7(7.4),
one sees that u commuteswith the Hecke operators
Tl
forprime
numbers 1prime
to N. For a nor-malized new form g
belonging
toS2(03930(N)),
letV (g)
be thesubspace spanned by gled
forpositive
divisors d ofN/(level of g)
cf.(1.1).
ThenS2(03930(N)) =
~
V (g) as Q[Tl](l, N)=1 -modules,
where g runs over the set of the normalizednew forms
belonging
toS2(03930(N)). If N/(level of g)
isodd,
thenu*|V(g)
becomes a
triangular
matrix with theeigen
values - 1 for a choice of the basis ofV (g).
Henceu * |V(g) = -1V(g).
If N isodd,
then u * = - 1 onS2(03930(N)).
Then u = - 1 onJo (N),
and it is a contradiction. Now consider the case2 JIN.
LetK(/Q)
be the abeliansubvariety of Jo (N)
whosetangent
space
Tano K 0 C corresponds
to thesubspace ~’V(g)
for the normalizednew forms g with even level. Then as noted as
above,
u acts on K under - 1.Let
Plo(N) -+ Spec W(F2)
be the minimal modelof Xo (N)
(8)Qur2,
and 1 bethe dual
graph
of thespecial
fibreYo (N)
QF2.
Let Z and Z’ be theirreducible
components
ofPlo(N)
~F2
which contains the cusps oc QF2
and 0 Q
F2, respectively cf. § 1.
Since the genusgo(N) a 2,
the self-intersection numbers of Z and Z’ are -
3,
and those of the other irre- ducible components are all - 2. Denote alsoby
u the inducedautomorphism
of the minimal model
:io(N).
Note that u is defined over Q. Then usend Z u Z’ to itself.
By
the conditionu(~)
= oo , u fixes Z and ZI. Let P" be the kernel of thedegree
map Pic0(N) ~ Z, po
be the connectedcomponent
of the unit section ofP03C4,
and E be the Zariski closure of the unit section of thegeneric
fibre P" (8)Qur2.
Then the Néron modelJ0(N)/W(F2)
=P03C4/E and P°
n E ={0},
see[25] §8 (8.1), [4]
VI. Let 1 bean odd
prime
number andTl, Vl = Tl
QQl
be the Tate modules. ThenVl(H1(03A3, Z)
QGJ = Vl(P0) = Vl(K)I,
where I is the inertiasubgroup
Gal
(Q2/Qur2) [32]
lemma 1. Then one sees that u acts under - 1 onHl
(X, Z).
Since u fixes Z andZ’, considering
the action of u on the dualgraph 1,
one sees thatHl (L, Z) = {0}
orZ, i.e., go(N) = 2go(N/2)
or=
2g0(N/2)
+ 1.By
the result[23],
it suffices to discuss the case whenN/2
is not square free. Then there are at least six cusps on
Xo(N/2),
sinceg0(N/2)
1. Then the Riemann-Hurwitz relationgives
a contradiction. DCOROLLARY 2.3.
A~ = Boo.
Proof. Let Q[[q]]
be thecompletion
of the localring
at the cusp ~ with the canonical localparameter
q. Putu * (q) =
c1q + c2q + ··· forci ~ Q.
Then c, is a root of
unity belonging
to the fieldk(N),
ork"(N)
for N =2s, 29 , 22 33 and 23 33
cf.corollary 1.11,
remark 1.12.Hence cl
E J.L24(k(N)),
seeloc.cit. For the case ord2 N 1, by (2.1)
and lemma2.2, A~ = B~.
For thecase
ord2 N 2, by (2.1), Aoo = B~.
~COROLLARY 2.4. Let C be a
k(N)
ork"(N)-rational
cusp, and u be anautomorphism of X0(N)
such thatu(C)
is a cusp. Then ubelongs
to thesubgroup B0(N).
Proof.
It suffices to note thatB0(N)
actstransitively
on the set of thek(N)
or
k’(N)-rational
cusps onXo (N).
DLet
"F(N)"
be the subfield ofk(N)
nQ(03B68, -3, 5, -7)
whichcontains
k(N)
nQ(03B68, -3)
and satisfies thefollowing
conditionsfor p = 5 and 7: the rational
prime
p = 5(resp.
p =7)
is unramifiedin
F(N)
if one of the conditions(i), (ii)
in(1.15)
for p is satisfied.LEMMA 2.5.
If an automorphism
uof X0(N)
isdefined
overk(N),
then u isdefined
overF(N).
Proof.
It isenough
to show that for each rationalprime p
5 withp21N, if p
is unramified inF (N),
then u is defined overQurp,
seecorollary 1.11,
remark 1.12. First note that the
k(N)-rational
cusps onX0(N)
(8)Z[1/6]
arethe sections of the smooth
part X0(N)smooth
(DZ[1/6]
see lemma1.13, corollary 1.14,
remark1.15, [4]. Let p
be a rationalprime
which is unramifiedin
F(N).
Then we know that anyk(N)-rational point
onXo (N)
defines a(9k(N)
O71p-section
ofPIo(N)smooth,
see loc.cit. For 1 =1= (J E Gal(Op/Q;’),
letx be the section of
J0(N)
definedby
Since
cl((0) - (co))
is of finite order[13], x
is of finite order and is definedover
k(N)
QxQurp. Let p
be aprime
ideal of (9 =(9k(N) lying
over the rationalprime
p, and(Pp
be thecompletion along
p. As noted asabove, u(0), u(oo), u03C3(0)
andu03C3(~)
define the(9,-sections
ofX0(N)smooth
such thatU(O)
OOK(p)
=u°(0)
OOx(p)
andu(oo)
OO03BA(p)
=u03C3(~)
~03BA(p).
Thenby
the universal
property
of the Néronmodel,
we see that x Qx03BA(p)
= 0( =
theunit
section).
Furtherby
the conditions that x is of finite order and that p >ordp (p)
+1,
we see that x is the unit section[26] §3 (3.3.2), [15]
proposition
1.1. Thus weget
thelinearly equivalent
relation:(u(0))
+(u03C3(~)) ~ (u(oo))
+(u03C3(0)).
Now supposethat ua =1=
u.Case u(~)
=u03C3 (~): Put v
= u7 u -(~ id.).
Then v fixes thecusps 0
and oo,so that v
belongs
toBo(N), corollary
2.3. But any non trivialautomorphism belonging
toBo(N)
does not fix both of 0 and oo[1] §4.
Case
u(~) ~ u(J ( (0): By
the above linearequivalence,
there exists thehyperelliptic
involution y ofXo(N)
withyu(0)
=u°(0).
Thenby
the con-dition on p as above and
by
the classificationof hyperelliptic
modular curvesof
type Xo(N) [23]
theorem2,
there remains the case for N = 50. Butk(50)
=F(50) = Q(5), corollary
1.11. DLet 1 be a
prime
numberprime
toN,
andTl
be the Heckeoperator
associated with 1.LEMMA 2.6. Let u be an
automorphism of Xo(N) defined
over acomposite of
quadratic fields,
and ul be a Frobenius elementof
the rationalprime
1. ThenProof. On
J0(N) ~ F,,
we have the congruence relation[3, 33] Chapter
7(7.4):
where F is the Frobenius map and V is the
Verschiebung.
Putu(l)
= u" onJo(N)
QxFl.
Then theassumption
on u as above shows that uF =Fu(l)
anduV = Vu(l).
nLet -q
(resp. D0,
resp.Dl)
be the group of divisors ofXo(N) (resp.
ofdegree 0,
resp. which arelinearly equivalent
to0).
For aprime
number 1prime
toN,
and for anautomorphism
u ofXo(N), T,
and u, u03C3l act onD, D0
and
Dl. Put a,
=uT, - Tlu03C3l
onJo(N).
Thenby
lemma2.6,
a, = 0on
Jo (N) ~ C = D0/Dl.
PutDl
=03B1l((0) - (~)) (= (1
+1)(u(0))
+(Tlu03C3l(~)) - (1
+1)(u(oo)) - (Tlu03C3l(0))).
ThenDl ~ 0, linearly equival-
ent to the zero divisor.
LEMMA 2.7. Under the notation as
above,
let u be anautomorphism of Xo(N) defined
over thefield F(N).
Thenif u(0)
oru(~)
is not a cusp, thenD, =1=
0.Proof.
IfDl
=0,
then(1
+1)(u(0)) = (Tlu03C3l(0))
and(1
+1)(u(~)) = (Tlu03C3l(~)). Suppose
thatDl
= 0 and thatu(0)
is not a cusp. Let ze .5 {z
EC|Im (z)
>01
be thepoint
whichcorresponds
tou03C3l(0)
under thecanonical identification
of Xo(N) (8) C
with03930(N)Bb ~ {i ~, Q}.
ThenThe
corresponding points
onXo (N) 0 C
to(lz)
and(z
+i/l )
are rep- resentedby elliptic
curves E =C/Z
+ Zlz andC/Z
+Z(z
+i/l)
withlevel structures,
respectively.
Thenby
theassumption D, = 0,
E ~C/Z
+Z(z
+i/l) for the integers i, 0
i 1 - 1. Consider thefollowing homomorphisms f
with kernelCi :
Then
Ci
=Z((ill)
+(1/12)lz)
mod L = Z + Zlz arecyclic subgroups
oforder
l2,
and(Ci)l ( = ker (1 : Ci
~Ci))
=(1/l)Zlz
mod L. This is a con-tradiction.
(Because,
there are at most twocyclic subgroups Ai
of orderl’
with
E/Ai ~
E. If 1 = 2 and there are suchsubgroups Ai (i
=1, 2),
then2A1 ~ 2A2.
nPROPOSITION 2.8. Let u be an
automorphism of Xo(N) defined
over Q. Thenu
belongs
to thesubgroup Bo(N), provided
N =1= 37.Proof. By
the results on the rationalpoints
onXo(N) [10, 15, 17],
we knowthat
u(0)
is a cusp,provided
N ~37, 43, 67,
163. The rest of theproof owes
to
corollary
2.4 and[23]
Satz 1. 0The
following
result is immediate fromcorollary 1.11,
remark 1.12 andlemma 2.5.
Now consider the case
F(N) ~
Q. In this case N are divisibleby
the squareof 2, 3,
5 or7,
see lemma 2.5. Let u be anautomorphism of Xo (N)
which isnot defined over Q. If
u(O)
oru(~)
is a cusp, then ubelongs
to thesubgroup Bo(N),
seecorollary
2.4. So we assume thatu(O)
andu(~)
are not cusps. Let 1 be aprime
numberprime
toN, a = a,
be a Frobenius element of the rationalprime l,
andDj
=(1
+1)(u(0))
+(Tlu03C3 (~)) - (1
+1)(u(~)) - (Tlu03C3(0)) (- 0)
be the divisor ofXo (N)
defined asabove,
see lemma2.7,
for N ~2g , 29, 22 33, 23 33
cf.corollary 1.11,
remark 1.12. Under theassumption
on u as
above, Dl ~
0by
lemma 2.7.LEMMA 2.10. Under the
assumption as above for
N ~37, 28, 29, 22 33, 23 33, assumes tha t Dl ~ 0 and l
5.Then wN* (Dl) ~ Dl, and u(0), u(~) are not
the
fixed points of
wN.(Note
thatwN Tl
=TjWN
onJ0(N),
since wN is defined overQ,
see lemma2.6.)
Theassumption Dl ~
0 shows that(1
+1)(u(0)) ~ (TlwNu03C3(~))
nor
(Tlu03C3(0)),
see theproof in
lemma 2.7.Suppose
that WN *(DI)
=Dl.
Thenthe similar
argument
as in theproof of lemma
2.7 shows thatu(0)
andu(~)
are the fixed