• Aucun résultat trouvé

A <span class="mathjax-formula">$ZJ$</span>-theorem for <span class="mathjax-formula">$p^\ast ,p$</span>-injectors in finite groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A <span class="mathjax-formula">$ZJ$</span>-theorem for <span class="mathjax-formula">$p^\ast ,p$</span>-injectors in finite groups"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

R ENDICONTI

del

S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO

della

U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA

M. J. I RANZO

A. M ARTÍNEZ -P ASTOR F. P ÉREZ -M ONASOR

A ZJ-theorem for p

, p-injectors in finite groups

Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 87 (1992), p. 69-76

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1992__87__69_0>

© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1992, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).

Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

M. J. IRANZO - A. MARTÍNEZ-PASTOR - F.

PÉREZ-MONASOR(*)

1. Introduction and notation.

All groups considered in this paper are finite. A group G is said to be

p-stable,

p

prime,

if whenever A is a

p-subgroup

of G and B is

a

p-subgroup

of

NG (A)

such that

[A, B, B]

= 1 then B S

s

Op (NG (A)

mod.

CG (A)).

In

[5]

Glauberman obtained the

following

theo-

rem :

Let p

be an odd

prime

and let P be a

Sylow p-subgroup

of a group G.

Assume that G is

p-stable

and that

CG (Op (G)) _ Op (G).

Then

ZJ(P)

is a

characteristic

subgroup

of

G,

where

ZJ(P)

=

Z(J(P))

and

J(P)

is the

Thompson’s subgroup

of

P,

that

is, subgroup

of P

generated by

the set

of all abelian

subgroups

of maximum order of P.

With the same conditions he also obtained a factorization of the group G.

In the same paper Glauberman introduces the characteristic sub- group

ZJ*(P)

and proves the

following

result:

Let p be an odd

prime

and let P be a

Sylow p-subgroup

of a group G.

Suppose

that

Op (G)

and that

SA(2, p)

is not involved in G. Then

ZJ* (P)

is a characteristic

subgroup

of G and

_ ZJ *

(P).

Some related results were obtained

by Ezquerro [4]

and Pérez

Ramos

[9, 10].

Given a fixed

prime

p, we shall denote

by Sp

the class of all p- (*) Indirizzo

degli

AA.:

Departamento

de

Algebra,

Facultad de MatemAti- cas, Universidad de Valencia, 46100

Burjassot

(Valencia),

Spain.

Work

supported by

the CICYT of the

Spanish Ministry

of Education and Science,

project

PS 87-0055-C02-02. The second author was

supported by

a

scholarship

from the same

Ministry.

(3)

70

groups,

~p *

that all

p*-groups [2]

and that of

the p *,

p-groups;

the

corresponding

radicals in a group G are

denoted,

as

usual, by Op(G), Op.(G)

and

Op *, p (G) respectively. Every

group G possesses

p*, p-injectors

which are the

subgroups

of the form

Op * (G) P

where P

describes the set of

Sylow p-subgroups

of G

[8].

The aim of this paper is to establish the

analogous

to Glauberman’s results with the

subgroups

and where K is a

p*, p-injec-

tor of a group G.

2. The factorization.

LEMMA 2.1. Let G be a group of Then it follows:

COROLLARY 2.2. Let G be a group and K a

p*, p-injector

of G. If

p E then p E Moreover if

Opl (F(G))

s then

7r(F(G»

=

7r(F(K»

= and in

particular

the

following

are

equi-

valent :

i) F(G) ~ 1, ii) F(l~ ~ 1, iii)

1.

PROOF. We can assume that K = where P is a

Sylow

p-

subgroup’

of G. If

Op (G) ~

1 then we have:

If moreover

Op - (F(G)) _ Z(K)

then

Op’ (F(G)) :5

and we can con-

clude that

Tc(F(G))

c

7r(ZJ(K)).

Now Lemma 2.1

applies.

LEMMA 2.3. Let G be a group and K a

p*, p-injector

of G. Assume

that

Op - (F(G)) Z(K).

Let B be a

nilpotent

normal

subgroup

of G and

let A be a

nilpotent subgroup

of

K,

then AB is a

nilpotent subgroup

of

G.

PROOF.

By

a known result of Bialostocki

[3]

it is

enough

to prove that

AOq (B)

is

nilpotent

for every q E

x(B).

Since K is

a p*, p-injector

of G we have B s

F(G) -.5 K

and so

Op’ (F(G)) _ Z(K).

Then

AOq (B)

is

nilpotent

for every

prime

q

with q ~

p. Now assume that K =

Op * (G) P

where P is a

Sylow p-sub-

(4)

group of

G,

then:

By

induction on n we can prove that for every n ? 1:

and so, for some

positive integer m

is

(B), A; m]

=

1,

thus A acts

nilpotently

on

Op(B)

and then

AOp (B)

is

nilpotent.

PROPOSITION 2.4. Let G be a

p-stable

group. If I~ is a

p*, p-injec-

tor of G and A is an abelian normal

subgroup

of K then A G and A _

F(G).

In

particular F(G).

On the other hand

CG (Q) S Op *, p (G) [7],

so is a

normal

p-subgroup

of is trivial. So

Op

thus and A

F(G).

THEOREM 2.5. Let G be a

p-stable

group, p odd and

F(G) ~

1. If K

is a

p *, p-inj ector

of G and

Op , (F(G)) :5

then 1 ~ G.

PROOF.

(This proof

is

based,

in

part,

on Glauberman’s

proof

of his

ZJ-theorem

([6],

Th.

8,2.10)).

First note that as the

p*, p-injectors

of G are

coniugated,

the state-

ments and

ZJ(K)

char G are

equivalent.

As a consequence of the above

Proposition

we know that

F(G)

and

by Corollary

2.2 1. Now to obtain the theo-

rem it is

enough

to prove that if B is a

nilpotent

normal

subgroup

of G

then B f1 is normal in G.

Let G be a minimal

counterexample

and B a

nilpotent

normal sub-

group of G of least order such that B fl is not normal in G.

Set Z =

ZJ(~

and let

BI

be the normal closure of B f1

Z in G,

then

B n Z =

BI

n Z an

by

our minimal choice it follows B =

B1.

Now B’ B then hence for every g of G is

[(B n

n

Z)g, B] = [B

f 1

Z,

B ’ f 1 Z. Since B is the normal closure of B f 1 Z

(5)

72

in G it follows that B’:5 B ’ fl Z. In

particular B n Z

centralizes B’ and

by

an

analogue argument

we obtain that

[B, B, B]

= 1.

Consider A E For Lemma 2.3 we know that AB is

nilpotent.

Thus there exists a

positive integer n

such that

[B, A; n]

= 1. Moreo-

ver as

Op, (B) :5 and p

odd it follows that

[A, B]’ - [A,

has odd order.

By ([1],

Cor.

2.8)

there exists A E such that B S

NG (A),

there-

fore = 1. In

particular [Op (B), Op (A), Op (A)]

= 1. Since G is

p-stable

we have:

where C =

Now,

since

Op, (A)

centralizes

Op (B)

it follows

that A ~ T.

If T = G then

G / C

is a p-group so KC = G. Moreover as

s

nZ)

a normal

subgroup of KC,

what

is a contradiction. Thus T G. Since AsK n T it follows

c

a(K), J(K)

and

By

our minimal choice

of char T and so it follows normal in G. Then B In

particular

B is abelian. If then the-

re exists

Al

E such that

Al

there is not a

subgroup

of

T,

then we

must have

[B, Ai ,

1. Set * =

JA

E

[B, A, A] ~ 1},

we choose

such that

I

is maximal.

By ([1],

Th.

2.5)

there exists

such that and Therefore

[B, A2 , A2]

= 1 thus T and S

A2 .

Hence:

what is a contradiction.

Consequently

=

J(K)

and = This

is the last contradiction.

COROLLARY 2.6. Let G be a

p-stable

group, p

odd,

with

F(G) ~

1.

If K is a

p*, p-injector

of G and

Op, (F(G)) Z(K)

then:

PROOF. Let us write Z = and C =

CG (Z).

As Z a G is also

C N G and therefore G =

CNG (K n C). Now,

as

J(K n C)

char K n

C,

it follows G =

C)).

Since

J(K) s K n cJ(K)

=

C).

Mo-

reover as Z we have C S

CG (Z(K)

and we obtain:

(6)

COROLLARY 2.7

(Glauberman’s ZJ-Theorem).

Let G be a group with

Op (G) ~ 1, Op’(G)

=

1,

which is

p-constrained

and

p-stable, p

odd.

If P is a

Sylow p-subgroup

of

G,

then

ZJ(P):5

G.

PROOF. Since G is

p-constrained

then

([2],

Lemma

6.12)

and so K =

Op * (G) P

= P is a

p*, p-injector

of G and Theo-

rem 2.5

applies.

3. A

self-centralizing

characteristic

subgroup.

DEFINITION 3.1

[4].

For any group K define two sequences of cha- racteristic

subgroups

of K as follows. Set = 1 and

Ko

= K.

Given

and Ki

i &#x3E; 0 let

(K) and Ki + 1

the

subgroups

of K

that contain

ZJi (10

and

satisfy:

Let n be the smallest

integer

such that =

ZJ n + 1 (~,

then

and for every Set

ZJ * (K) _

and

REMARKS.

1)

Notice that if then

by ([4], Prop.II 3.7)

is

nilpotent,

therefore

ZJ(K

*

/ZJ

*

(10

= 1 im-

plies

=

1,

that

is, K *

=

ZJ * (K).

2)

If K is a

p *, p-injector

of G then

ZJi (10

is

p-nilpotent

for

every I b 0. Later we will

improve

this statement.

LEMMA 3.2. Let K be a

p*, p-injector

of G and G such that

:5 N K then

CG (N)

=

Z(N).

PROOF. Observe that

Z(N)

=

CK (N)

=

CG (N)

is a

p*, p-injec-

tor of

CG (N).

On the other hand if x E

CG (N)

then

(x, Z(N))

is an abe-

lian

subgroup

of G and

Z(N)

_

(x, CG (N),

therefore

(x, Z(N)~ _

= Z(N)

and x E

Z(N).

REMARK. Notice that if K is a

p*, p-injector

of G then K is also

p*, p-injector

of

NG (K * ).

Moreover

by ([4], Prop.II 3.7) CK(K*):5

s

CK(ZJ*(K)

S

K * . Thus, by

the above

Lemma,

is =

= CG(K*) K*.

THEOREM 3.3.

Let p

be an odd

prime

and K a

p*, p-injector

of a

group G. Assume that

SA(2, p)

is not involved in G and that

(7)

74

Op’ (F(G))

_

Z(K).

Then

ZJi (10

is a characteristic

subgroup

of G for

every I b 0.

PROOF. Let G be a minimal

counterexample.

As

,SA(2, p)

is not in-

volved in

G,

G is

p-stable.Thus by

Theorem 2.5 we have char G.

If

ZJ(K)

= 1 then = 1

contrary

to the choice of G. So we can as- sume 1 ~

ZJ(K)

S

CG

G. Set C =

CG (ZJ(K)).

Assume C G

then for every I a 0 it follows

0

char C. Since

J(K):5 Kn

C

we have =

J(K

n

C)

and

ZJ(K)

=

ZJ(K

f1

C).

Moreover if

I~1

=

= =

CKnc(ZJ(Kn C»

and

by

induction on i it follows

ZJ i (K)

=

ZJ i (K

fl

C).

Thus char C:5 G for every I a 0 and

by

the

conjugacy

of

p*, p-injectors

of

G,

we obtain

ZJi (10

char G for every i a 0

contrary

to our choice of G. Therefore C =

G,

and so

ZJ(K) _

=

Z(G).

Since 1 we have

I G/Z(G) I ~ IGI I

and we can

conclude

that char

G / Z(G)

for every 0.

Now,

since

K,

=

K, using ([4], Prop.II 3.6)

it follows =

ZJ’(KIZ(G)),

thus

for every i &#x3E;_

0,

char G. That is the last contradiction.

PROPOSITION 3.4. Let K be a

p*, p-injector

of a group G. Assume

Op, (F’(G)) Z(K),

then for

every i ?

0:

PROOF.

Simultaneously

we will prove

i)

and

ii) by

induction on i.

First notice that

Z(CK(ZJ(K))

=

Z(Kl )

thus

=

F(K1 )/ZJ(K)

and = = 1.

Clearly

=

ZJ(K)

is

nilpotent.

Assume that

F(Ki /ZJi (K))

=

F(Ki)/ZJi (K)

is a p-group, then

therefore

Op ~ (ZJ i + 1 (~ )

is a

nilpotent

nor-

mal

subgroup

of K and we have

Z(K).

Now,

since is

p-nilpotent,

we have that

ZJ 2 + 1 (~

is

nilpotent.

On the other hand we have:

(8)

But

and we can conclude:

Moreover as

Op- (F(K)) :5 Z(K)

s

1 (~)

it fol-

lows that

F(I~Z + 1 /ZJi + 1 (~)

is a p-group.

iii) Clearly

= s

Cx (Op (ZJ

*

(K))).

Moreover as

is

nilpotent

it follows: There-

fore

Cx (ZJ * (K))

S

Ki

for every 0.

PROPOSITION 3.5. Let G be a group with

Op, (F(G))

where

K is

a p*, p-injector

of

G,

then the

following

are

equivalent:

i)

G is an fl-constrained group

PROOF.

i) - it)

Set K =

Op * (G) P

where P is a

Sylow p-subgroup

of

G,

then

by ([2],

Lemma

6.11)

it follows

[P,

= 1 and as

Op * (G) _

_

CG (F(G)) _ F(G)

we have K is

nilpotent,

thus

K *

is

nilpotent,

hence

K*

=

ZJ*(K).

ii)

-

iii) By

the remark of Lemma 3.2.

iii) - I)

We know that

[Op * (G),

= 1 therefore

E(G) :5 Op * (G) CG (ZJ * (K)) :5 ZJ * (K), then E(G)

=

1,

i.e. G is an fl-constrai- ned group.

COROLLARY 3.6. Let p be an odd

prime

and K a

p*, p-injector

of a

fl-constrained group G. Assume that

,SA(2, p)

is not involved in G and

Op , (F(G)) _

Then

ZJ* (K)

is a characteristic

subgroup

of G and

ZJ * (K).

As a consequence of the above

Corollary

we can obtain the well- known result of Glauberman:

COROLLARY 3.7.

Let p

be an odd

prime

and P a

Sylow p-subgroup

of a group G.

Suppose

that

CG(Op(G» s

and that

SA(2, p)

is not

involved in G. Then

ZJ* (P)

is a characteristic

subgroup

of G and

CG (ZJ * (P))

s

ZJ * (P).

(9)

76

PROOF.

Clearly Op * (G)

=

Opl (G)

= 1 so P is a

p*, p-injector

of G.

Now

Corollary

3.6

applies.

REFERENCES

[1] Z. ARAD, A characteristic

subgroup of

03C0-stable groups, Canad. J. Math., 26,

no. 6 (1974), pp. 1509-1514.

[2] H. BENDER, On the normal p-structure

of a finite

group and related

topics -

I, Hokkaido Mathematical Journal, 7 (1978), pp. 271-288.

[3] A. BIALOSTOCKI, On

products of two nilpotent subgroups of

a

finite

group, Israel J. Math., 20 (1975), pp. 178-188.

[4] L. M. EZQUERRO, ff-establidad, constricción

y factorización

de

grupos fini-

tos, Tesis Doctoral, U. de Valencia (1983).

[5] G. GLAUBERMAN, A characteristic

subgroup of

a

p-stable

group, Canad. J.

Math., 20 (1968), pp. 1101-1135.

[6] D. GORENSTEIN, Finite

Groups, Harper

and Row, New York (1968).

[7] B. HUPPERT - N. BLACKBURN, Finite

Groups -

III,

Springer-Verlag,

Berlin (1982).

[8] M. J. IRANZO - M. TORRES, The

p*, p-injectors of a finite

group, Rend. Sem.

Mat. Univ. Padova, 82 (1989), pp. 233-237.

[9] M. D. PEREZ RAMOS, A characteristic

subgroup of A-stable

groups, Israel J.

Math., 54 (1986), pp. 51-59.

[10] M. D. PEREZ RAMOS, A

self-centralizing

characteristic

subgroup,

Journal

Austral. Math. Soc., 46 (serie A) (1989), pp. 302-307.

Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione 1’8 ottobre 1990.

Références

Documents relatifs

Dans ce second Mémoire, j'établis de nouveau pour l'espace à n dimensions les formules démontrées pour le plan, ce qui me permettra, non seulement de retrouver tous les résultats

Ayant rencontré dans ma Thèse de doctorat quelques types de gpm (p premier) caractérisés par cette propriété, j'ai été amené ( 1 ) à chercher tous les gpm (p premier) qui

Si s est modérément ramifiée, elle est induite d’un caractère modérément ramifié Il de l’extension quadratique non ramifiée de F, à. valeurs dans

Soit (n, V) une représentation irréductible de G ayant un caractère central, et de dimension infinie.. Les fonctions de Kirillov

We prove that the -çe-adic L-function interpolates the critical values of the classical zeta function of the twists of our form by finite characters of conductor

THEOREM: Let X/k be a smooth weakly unirational surface over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p &amp;#x3E; 0.. Here is Shioda’s example of a

entreprise dans le cas le plus général: nous devons supposer dans toute la suite que F/K et p satisfont aux hypothèses suivantes.. Pour

Pour le module 2 2 , les impairs étant de Tune des deux formes 4^ =t 1, ceux qui correspon- dent au signe + appartiennent à Fexposant 1, ceux qui correspondent au signe —