A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
J. M ONTERDE
Higher order graded and berezinian lagrangian densities and their Euler-Lagrange equations
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 57, n
o1 (1992), p. 3-26
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1992__57_1_3_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
3
Higher order graded and Berezinian Lagrangian
densities and their Euler-Lagrange equations
J. MONTERDE
Departamento de Geometria y Topologia,
Universitat de Valencia,
Dr Moliner 50, 46100 Burjasot, Valencia, Spain
Vol. 57,n"l,1992, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. - We obtain the
Euler-Lagrange equations
forhigher
ordergraded Lagrangian
densities. As in the first order case, some of theseequations
are non standard andthey
can beinterpreted
as constraints. If thegraded Lagrangian density
comes from a BerezinianLagrangian
den-sity
we obtain then the standardEuler-Lagrange equations
on thegraded ring
for the BerezinianLagrangian
densities with both even and odd coordinates.Key words : Variational calculus, graded manifolds, Berezinian densities, Euler-Lagrange equations.
RESUME. 2014 Les
equations d’Euler-Lagrange
pour les densitesLagran- giennes graduees
d’ordresuperieur
sont obtenues. Aussi dans cecas-ci, quelques-unes
d’entre elles ne sont pas standard et on peut bien lesinterpreter
comme des contraintes. Si IeLagrangien provient
d’une densiteLagrangienne
Berezinienne alors on obtient lesequations
d’Euler-Lagrange,
pour la densiteLagrangienne Berezinienne,
standard dans 1’an-neau
gradue,
avec les coordonnéespaires
etimpaires.
Classification A.M.S. : 58 E 30, 58 A 50, 58 A 20.
This research has been partially supported by the CICYT grant n° PS87-0115-G03-01.
I want to express my gratitude to Jaime Munoz Masque, who proposed me to do this work, for his help and encouragement.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
4 J. MONTERDE
INTRODUCTION
Dealing
withgraded
manifolds one notes that there are two kinds ofintegration:
thegraded integration,
definedby
means of the naturalmorph-
ism of a
graded
manifold[6],
and the Berezinintegration [7].
Each oneproduces
different variationalproblems.
In this paper we first deduce the variational
equations
forgraded Lagrangian
densities of any order. The definitions ofgraded jet manifolds,
and of
graded Lagrangian densities,
and the deduction of the first order variationalequations
can be found in[2], [3].
As it is well
known,
in classical variationalcalculus,
it isequivalent
totake as
algebra
of variations thesub algebra
of vertical vector fields or thesubalgebra
that commutes with thesubalgebra
of horizontal vector fields.The
resulting
variationalequations
are the same: theEuler-Lagrange equations. However,
in thegraded
case the situation is a little bit different.Each
sub algebra produces
different sets of variationalequations.
To bemore
precise,
the secondsubalgebra gives
moreequations
than the firstone.
Therefore,
we will take asalgebra
of variations thesubalgebra
ofprolongations
of vertical vector fields.The deduction of the variational
equations
is madeby computing
thefirst variation of the functional defined
by
agraded Lagrangian density
with respect to a vertical vector field and
removing
the terms that aretotal differentials. The
equations
that appear areequations
on thering
ofdifferentiable functions of the
underlying manifold,
but not on thegraded ring.
Let us suppose that the variational
problem
is defined on the submersionof
graded
manifolds p :(Y, B) -~ (X, A)
withgraded
dimensionsdim (X, A)=(~, n)
anddim (Y,
The total number of
equations
for ageneral graded Lagrangian
isBut if the order of the
Lagrangian
is rn then the number of nontrivialequations
isn
A subset of the variational
equations
can be seen as theimage by
thenatural
morphism
of thegraded
manifold(X, A)
of the standard Euler-Lagrange equations
for the even coordinates. In[3],
for first ordergraded Lagrangians,
the otherequations
are considered asprevious
constraints and the authorsgive
anexample
withphysical meaning.
We have thusdeduced here the whole set of constraints for a
graded Lagrangian
ofarbitrary
order.In the second part we
define, following [4]
and[5],
the concept of BerezinianLagrangian density.
The main fact of this part establishes the localequivalence
betweengraded
and Berezinian variationalproblems
with respect to the
algebra
ofprolongations
of verticalgraded
vectorde Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
fields. The Berezinian variational
problems
are definedby
means of theBerezin
integral.
Thecomputation
of suchintegral implies,
as a first step, the differentiation of theexpression
under thesign
of the Berezinintegral
with respect to all the odd variables. With variational
problems,
thesederivatives are transformed into total
derivatives,
andthus,
r-order Berezi- nian variationalproblems
areequivalent
tograded
variationalproblems
of order r + n, where n is the odd dimension of the base manifold.
This is the reason
why
it is necessary to deal withgraded Lagrangian
densities of
arbitrary
order: even for 0-order BerezinianLagrangian
densit-ies,
theequivalent graded Lagrangian
densities are of order n.When we compute the variational
equations corresponding
tograded Lagrangian
densitiescoming
from BerezinianLagrangian
densities all the(m 1 + n 1 )
2n scalarequations
can beexpressed
as m 1+ n 1 equations
on thegraded ring,
and theseequations
are theEuler-Lagrange equation
for allthe
variables,
even and odd.Finally,
westudy
a curiousexample.
It ispossible
tospeak
of variationalproblems
when theunderlying
manifolds are reduced to apoint.
In thiscase, the local sections are determined
by
a set of real numbers and thus theEuler-Lagrange equations
become relations between those real numbers.1. PRELIMINARIES AND NOTATIONS
Let
(X, A)
be agraded
manifold ofgraded
dimensiondim
(X, A) = (m, n) [6],
in thefollowing
sense- X is a ~ real manifold of dimension m.
- A is a sheaf of
Z2 graded
commutativealgebras
such that( 1 )
there exists asurj ective
sheafmorphism
often called the natural
morphism,
(2)
there exists an opencovering {Ui}i~I of X
and sheafisomorphisms
Let p
=(q, q*) : (Y, B) -~ (X, A)
be a submersion ofgraded
mani-folds
([2],
Def.11 )
withgraded
dimensions and Let us denote(~’==1,
... , m;1=1,
...,n)
thegraded
A-coordinates for the coordinate open(U, A (U)),
and
~~ (/= 1,
..., m 1;J =1,
...,n 1 )
thegraded
B-co ordi-nates for the coordinate open
(V, B (V))
with a suitable andVol. 57, n° 1-1992.
6 J. MONTERDE
with
degrees
Let Jk
(B/A)
be thegraded k-jet
bundle ofgraded
sections of p([2],
Def.
17).
Let us denoteby
Xk the base manifold andby
~k thegraded
sheaf of
rings
of thegraded
manifold Let us consider theprojec-
tions
(see [2]
for thedefinitions)
that
satisfy
the relationsBy
the very definition of agraded morphism,
there are canonicprojec-
tions between the base manifolds
satisfying
the relationsand there are canonic
projections
between thegraded
sheafs ofrings
with relations
Let Xoo be the
projective
or inverse limit of theprojective
systemThe induced
projections
will be denotedby
q~, k, q~.Given an open subset U of let
.9100 (D)
be the inductive or direct limit of the inductive systemThe induced
projections
will be denotedby q~,
k,q~.
Let Joo
(B/A) _ (X 00 , .91(0)
be thegraded oo jet
bundle ofgraded
sections of p
[4].
Thegraded
canonicprojections
are denotedby
p~, k=
(q~,
k~q~, k)
and p~ _(q~~ q~)~
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
The
description
of all theseprojections
above can be visualized in thefollowing diagram:
Let
r (P)
be the space of local sectionsof p.
Ifis a local section
of p, then joo
°(a) : (X, A) ~
°(B/A)
is the limit of themorphisms
In order to denote the coordinate functions of JOO
(B/A)
we will need todefine two kinds of multiindexes. An even multiindex a will be an element of i. e.,
a = (a 1,
..., withi =1,
..., m. We will call themeven multiindexes because
they
willonly
appear with derivatives withm
respect to the even
coordinates, {xi}. |03B1|
standsfor 03A3
03B1i, thelength
ofi= 1 a. Let us denote
by 0
the even multiindex(0, 0,
...,0).
For/eA(U),
we setAn odd
multiindex P
will be an ordered subsetof { 1, 2,
... , n},
i. e.,1 _ ~ii n, i = l, -.~.
We will call them odd multiindexes because it willonly
appear with derivatives with respect to the oddcoordinates, {~}.
Let us denoteby d (~i)
the cardinal ofP.
For/eA(U),
we setLet
W c q ~ 1 (U)
be an open subset of Thegraded
coordinates for(W, .9100 (W)),
suitablereorganized,
are8 J. MONTERDE
where a is an even multi index and
P
is an odd one, withdegrees
and where the last coordinate functions are defined
by
Remarks:
(1)
We willidentify j~ ~ (resp. t ~, ø)
withy’ (resp. tJ).
(2)
Unless otherwisestated,
subindexes will denote derivatives.2. ALGEBRAS OF VECTOR FIELDS ON
(B/A)
A
graded
vector field on agraded
manifold(X, A)
is an ~-derivation of the sheafA,
i. e., an element ofDer~ (A).
A vector field Z on
(Y, B)
is said to bep-projectable
if there exists avector field
p (Z)
on(X, A)
such thatZ ~ p* = p* ~ p (Z).
Horizontal vector fields
[4]
Let Z be a vector field on the
graded
manifold(X, A).
We define thetotal or horizontal
graded lifting
ZH of Z as the vector field on JOO(B/A)
such that for every open subset W for
every f ~ A~ (W),
and every localsection 03C3 = (03C4, ’t*) : (U, A(U))-.(V, B (V)) of p,
with suitable open subsetsU,
V suchthat j~ (’t)* ( f ) E A (U),
we haveNote that Z" is a
p~-projectable
vector field with p~(ZH)=Z.
A
graded
vector field on(B/A), W,
is called horizontal if there exists agraded
vectorfield, Z,
on(X, A)
such that W=Z". Note thatZ~]=[Z~
Thus we have asub algebra
of vectorfields,
the subal-gebra
of horizontal vector fields.Let us take
graded
A-coordinates for the coordinate open(U, A (U))
andgraded B-coordinates {xi, yj, sI, tJ}
for(V, B (V))
suchAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Let us denote the horizontal
graded liftings
of{~ ~xi, ~ ~sI} by d d
. Their localexpression
aregiven by
where the
following
conventions are used: Ifoc = (oc ~,
..., then (x+ i isthe even multiindex
(a 1,
...,1,
..., Note that i is a Latin index.In the second
formula,
theindex ?
runs over the subsets to which I does notbelong. If 03B2={03B2103B22...03B21}
andI~03B2 then 03B2+I
is theodd
multiindex {03B21 03B22
’ - ’P&
I03B2k+1
’ ’ ’03B2l}, i.e.,
the orderedsubset P U {I}. Thus, sg (P, I)
= k.Vertical vector fields
A
graded
vector field Z on(Y, B)
is said to be vertical if forallf E A (U)
we have that
Z(~*(/))=0. Analogously,
agraded
vector field Z onis said to be vertical if for
all
we have thatZ(~(/))=0.
The bracket of two vertical vector fields is another vertical vector field. Then we can define thesubalgebra
of vertical vector fields.Obviously,
we have that if Z isprojectable
vector field on JOO(B/A)
then
Z -p~, (Z)~
is a vertical vectorfield,
an thus Z can beuniquely decomposed
as a sum of a horizontal vector field and a vertical vectorfield. This
spliting
isonly possible
in(B/A).
Graded infinitesimal contact transformations
[2]
In the classical calculus of variations the elements of the
subalgebra
ofinfinitesimal contact transformations
play
the role of tangent vectors of the allowed variations[8].
There are other characterizations of thissubalge- bra ;
foroo-jets,
it ispossible
to define it as thesubalgebra
that commuteswith the
subalgebra
of horizontal vector fields. We willgeneralize
thisconstruction for
graded
manifolds.Let ~ be the
subalgebra
of vector fields on that commuteswith the
subalgebra
of horizontalgraded
vector fields. Thatis,
Wbelongs
to ~ if and
only
if V Z horizontalgraded
vector field we have that[W, Z]
is
again
a horizontalgraded
vector field. It is not hard to see that if theVol. 57, n° 1-1992.
10 J. MONTERDE
local
expression
of W isthen the
following
recurrence relations hold:These
equations
are useful to define thefollowing lifting.
For everygraded
vector field Z on(Y, B)
there exists aunique graded
infinitesimal contacttransformation,
on(B/A)
whichprojects
onto Z. iscalled the
prolongation
of Z to JOO(B/A).
We have the
following
PROPOSITION 2. 1
[4].
- Let W be avector field
on(X, A)
and let Z be ap-projectable vector field on (Y, B).
ThenW~]=[~(Z), Wf.
In the deduction of the
Euler-Lagrange equations
for the standard variational calculus onmanifolds,
thesubalgebra
of variations is thesubalgebra
ofprolongations
of vertical vectorfields,
and it is well knownthat if the choice of the
subalgebra
of variations is thesub algebra
thatcommutes with the
subalgebra
of horizontal vectorfields,
then theresulting equations
are the same. It isequivalent
to take any of the twosubalgebras.
But this is not the case for
graded
manifolds. Toenlarge
thesubalgebra
of vertical vector fields with the horizontal vector fields
produce
newequations. (See
remark 5 of theorem4. 2.)
Then we will restrict the subal-gebra
of variations tojust
that of vertical vector fields.3. DIFFERENTIAL FORMS ON
(B/A)
Let be the space of differential r-forms on We put
to denote the module of on that are k times horizontal and l times
vertical,
i. e., such thatthey
vanish whenacting
on more than l vertical vector fields or more than k horizontal vector fields.Let d be the exterior differentiation
([6], pruposition 4.2.3)
andlet be the horizontal differential and let
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
a :
H~+ 1 (B/A)
be the vertical differential. We haveWe can make a local refinement of the
bigraduation.
Let(W, A~ (W))
be a coordinate open set of J °°
(B/A). Since 2014,
i’~}
are a basis of~J
vector
fields,
then we can define as the submodule of differential forms ofH p + q (W)
such thatthey
vanish whenacting
on more than /?vector fields
of { ~}
or morethan
vector fieldsof { 2014 }.
~J (~’j
Therefore
with
projections
~cp, q :H~ (W) -~ Hp, q (W). Considering
the action of D ona fixed
H~ ~ (W),
we define andD1 =D-Do.
If Z is a vector field on of
degree
then the insertionoperator
i (Z),
defined in[6],
prop.4 . 2 . 3,
is a derivation ofbidegree
( - 1, I Z I ).
We can compute,
by
means of the insertion operator with respect to suitable vectorfields,
thefollowing
localexpressions
Let us fix a
global section 11 :
~(X) -~
A(X)
of the naturalmorphism, A(X)-~~~(X) [1].
A coordinate system, on an open subset(U,
A(U)),
is said to becompatible
with the section 11 if there is acoordinate on the open subset
U,
such thatThe section 11 induces a
morphism
A* Q(X) -~
Q(X, A)
andthus,
everyordinary
differential form can be considered as agraded
differential form.Let us assume that X is oriented
by
a volume element T e A"" Q(X)
and letus also denote
by
t the inducedgraded
m-form onA)
and theinduced
graded
m-form onby
the mapDEFINITION
[3].
- Agraded Lagrangian density
on the submersion p isan element such that
there exists
Locally,
if(W, .9100 (W))
is a coordinate open of(B/A),
agraded Lagrangian density
is written asthus À E
H~,
0~w~’
Vol. 57, n° 1-1992.
12 J. MONTERDE
If
(X, A)
is the standard lineargraded
manifoldand cr is a local section then
by
the definition of the naturalmorphism [6],
whereLø (x)
is the first orindependent
coefficient of thedevelopment
as
products
ofthe sJ’s, ¿ Lp (x) sl3.
4. EULER-LAGRANGE
EQUATIONS
FOR GRADEDLAGRANGIAN DENSITIES Let us state the
following
variationalprinciple:
A local section of p, cr :
(X, A) -~ (Y, B)
is agraded
critical section forthe
graded
variationalproblem
definedby
thegraded Lagrangian density
À if for every
p-projectable
vertical vector field Z on(Y, B)
whose support has compactimage
on the domain of a, we have thatWe will need the
following
LEMMA 4 . 1. - Let
(W, .9100 (W))
be a coordinate openof
JOO(B/A).
LetS2 E
Hm_ 1,
o(W)
an let Z be a vertical vectorfield
on o(W),
B
(p~, o (W))),
thenProof -
Bothexpressions
are elements ofH0m,
o(W),
it is thusenough
to check that
they
agreeacting on {d dx1,..., 20142014 }.
Now it is easy to see that this
expression
is the same asNOTATION. - In order to avoid o
irrelevant repetitions,
we will denoteby
zeither the variable y
or t.Thus za, p
will be eitherya, ~ or t,
p. TheAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique - theorique
only
differencebetween y
and t is theparity, thus, sg(z)
will denote theparity
of thevariable,
i. e., if z = yand sg (z)
= 1 if z = t.The
following
theorempresents
the deduction of the variational equa- tions associated to the variationalproblem
definedby
agraded Lagrangian density.
Theproof
followsclosely
the methods of[9]
in the sense that welook for a local source form defined
by
theLagrangian.
THEOREM 4 . 2. - A local
section of
p, 03C3:(X, A) ~ (Y, B) is a graded
critical
section for
thegraded variational problem defined by the Lagrangian
Â
only
eachregular
coordinate open( W, ~ °° (W)) (B/A)
such that
the following
$equations
holdProof -
Let(U, A (U))
be a coordinate open set such that(U)-
Let us suppose that Z is a vertical vector field on
(Y, B)
such that(a)* (ðU) = o. Then i
(ZOO)
À =0,
and thusIn the coordinate open
(W))
we haveLet us note that
f(Z~)D~==0
because is vertical and ThereforeVol. 57,n° 1-1992.
14 J. MONTERDE
We define two differential forms on and
as follows:
This form
plays
the role of source form in the statement of[9].
Todefine the second one we need to make the
following
conventions:If
a > QS
is the even multiindex... , am)
and if1 __ i _ m
and1
_ k _ ai
then let be the even multiindex ...,k, 0,
...,0).
where
Now,
let us check thatTo see
this,
let us compute, for eachP and
a >0,
thepartial
termwhere the
following equation
has been usedThe term of the second sum with indexes
((i, k), A;aJ
is the same, butwith
opposite sign,
as the term of the first sum with indexes(i,
k +1).
Theterm of the second sum with indexes
((i, im)
is the same, but withopposite sign,
as the term of the first sum with indexes(i + 1, k =1 ).
The
only
terms that left are that of the second sum with index(m,
and that of the first with index
( 1,1 ) .
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Thus, simplifying
thisequation
we get, for eachP, a > QS,
We get thus the desired
result,
and thereforeBut
according
to lemma 4.1 we have thatLet us compute the other term. If Z = Z’ a , + J a then Let us compute the other term. If Z = ZJ ---: + Z 2014 then
where
Za 2014 2014
zj and the same for ZJ.,
Thus the
integrand
becomesLet us suppose that ZJ = 0
and, given p fixed, /eA(U),
thentherefore the
integrand is f ~ (6) * ~ ~ , ~] ~ .
Since/is arbitrary
we get theequation
We candeduce the other
equation
in a similar way,(6)* n]"
= 0. NRemarks. -
( 1 )
The deduction of theseequations
seems to consider the coordinatesy~, ~, t ~, ~
as fibre coordinates of a fibre bundle onX,
and toidentify a)a
Thus the deduction isjust
a copy, for eachp,
of the classical deduction of the
Euler-Lagrange equations.
(2)
The total number of the variationalequations
for ageneral graded Lagrangian
is(m 1 + n 1 ) 2n.
But if the order of theLagrangian
is rn thenthe number of nontrivial
equations
isn
Vol. 57, n° 1-1992.
16 J. MONTERDE
(3)
For first ordergraded Lagrangian densities,
theequations
agree withequations
of[3]. Indeed,
if(U),
where U is an open subset ofXB
then theequations
are:For P
such that~(P)~2
theequations
are trivial.(4)
In[3]
this last set ofequations
are considered asprevious
constraints and the authorsgive
anexample
withphysical meaning.
With theequations
of the theorem we have now the whole set of constraints for a
graded Lagrangian
ofarbitrary
order.(5)
If thesub algebra
of variations chosen is thesub algebra
that commu-tes with the
subalgebra
of horizontal vectorfields,
then a new set ofequations
appears:This fact
points
out a difference with the classical variational calculus.The
decomposition
of the part inHm,
o of 8À as the sum co +Do
Qis,
ina certain sense,
unique.
For each coordinate opencompatible
with theglobal
section it ispossible
to state ananalogous
oflemma 5.5, p. 560 of
[9].
COROLLARY 4.3. - Let
(W, ~°° (W)) be a
coordinate openLet be
adifferential form in Hm, 0 (W), then
can beuniquely
written as0 +
Do
Q whereform in Hm,
o(W) generated by
n ... /B ...
5. BEREZINIAN LAGRANGIAN DENSITIES
Let us recall the intrinsic construction of the Berezinian shearf
given
in
[5].
The Berezinian sheaf can beglobally
described as follows: Let(X, A)
be agraded
manifold ofgraded
dimension(m, n)
and letl’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
be the sheaf of k-order differential operators of A. This sheaf has two
essentially
different structures of A-module: The left structure isgiven by ( f . P) (g) = f . P (g),
and theright
structure isgiven by (P./)(g)=P(/.g) (over
every opensubset).
One has that are A-coordinates in anopen subset
U c X,
thenpk (A (U))
is free with basisfor both structures of A-module.
Let
Q~
be the module of m-forms on(X, A).
Let us consider the sheaf of m-form valued k-order differential operators and for every open subset U c
X,
letKn (U)
be the set of operators such that for every with compact support, there exists an
ordinary
of compact support, (ofulfilling ~co=P(/)".
HenceKn
is a submodule ofpn (A, QD
for itsright
structure and one obtains thefollowing description
of the Berezinian sheaf
(see [5]
th.2.2):
According
to thisdescription
a local basisof PÃ (A)
can begiven explicitly:
are A-coordinates in an open subsetU c X,
thenwhere [ ] stands
for theequivalence
class moduloKn.
Now the Berezin
integral
can be defined over the sections with compact support of the Berezinian sheafby
means of the formula:where X is assumed to be oriented and the
right
hand sideintegral
istaken with respect to this orientation.
If
(X, A)
is the standard lineargraded
manifold(~ (~m)(8)A ~n) and f~C~ (Rm)~^Rn,
thenVol. 57, n° 1-1992.
18 J. MONTERDE
where
f 1, 2, ..., n}
is the last coefficient in thedevelopment f=03A3f03B2.s03B2
inp
products
of the sJ’s.Let us remark that
Note that this definition is
fully opposed
to the definition of thegraded integral.
The Berezinianintegral
is definedby
means of the last(or higher)
coefficient of the
development,
instead of thegraded integral,
definedby
means of the first
(or independent)
coefficient.Infinite order Berezinian sheaf
Let p :
(Y, B) -~ (X, A)
be a submersion ofgraded
manifolds withgraded
dimensions and Given
P E P k (A,
letpH: .9100 H
be k-order operator definedby
We will call PH the total or horizontal
lifting
of P. Let us denoteby
H~) [resp. KHn (.9100)]
the sheafconsisting
of those operatorsH~)
that arehorizontal liftings
of operators[resp.
Kn (A)]. Then,
the infinite order Berezinian sheaf is defined asAccording
to thisdescription
a local basis of(A (0)
can begiven explicitly:
If are thegraded
A-coordinates for the coordinate open(U,
A(U)), and {xi, yj, SI,
are thegraded
B-coordinates for the coordinate open(V, B (V))
with a suitable then if W is anopen subset of X~ such that
W ~ q-~ 1 (U)
we havewhere ’
[ ]
stands for theequivalence
’ class modulo 0KHn.
DEFINITION. - A Berezinian
Lagrangian density
is an elementLet 03C3 :
(X, A) ~ (Y, B)
be a local sectionof p.
Let us defineNote and that if
then, by definition,
PEKn(A).
l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
We will need the
following
lemma that relates Lie derivatives with differential operators of PH"(.9100,
J
LEMMA 5.1. - Let Z be a vertical vector
field
on(Y, B)
and let PH E PH"(.9100, Then,
as operatorsacting
on.9100,
Proo, f : -
Thequestion
is local and linear. Let us suppose thatlocally
P H is written assuch that
|03B1|+d(03B2)=m
and|03B3|+d(03B4)~n,
where weidentify g~A
andThen, for f~A~,
Note that
by
lemma2.1,
for vertical andhomogeneous Z,
we haveand also
Thus
Finally,
for verticalZ, (g) = 0
becausegEA,
and thusThis lemma suggests to
give
thefollowing
definition of Lie derivative of BerezinianLagrangian
densities with respect to theprolongations
ofvertical vector fields.
DEFINITION. - Let Z be a vertical vector field on
(Y, B)
and let[P H] . f E ~ °° (~l °° )
be a BerezinianLagrangian density.
The Lie derivativeof
.fwith respect
to Zoo isdefined,
forhomogeneous
Pand Z, by
We can now define the Berezinian variational
principle.
A local section(X, A) -~ (Y, B)
is a Berezinian critical section for the functional definedby
the BerezinianLagrangian density [P H] . f E ~ °° (~ °°)
if forevery Z vertical vector field on
(Y, B),
whose support has compactimage
20 J. MONTERDE on the domain of or, we have that
Let
(W,
.9100(W))
be a coordinate open of JOO(B/A)
with coordinatefunctions {xi, yj, si,
If
[P ~] . f E ~ °° (~ °° (W))
is a BerezinianLagrangian density
defined on(W, .9100 (W))
then we can define thegraded Lagrangian density o(W)’
This associationis,
in a certain sense,unique.
Twograded Lagrangian
densities areequivalent
ifthey
define the same func- tional and the samegraded
variationalproblem.
Let us suppose that(W))
andthat f~A~ (W),
then thegraded Lagrangian P"(/)
defines a trivial functional and a trivial
graded
variationalproblem. Indeed,
if 03C3 is a local sectionof p
whose support has compactimage
onp~(W),
then
and, by
definition of K(A),
thisexpression
isequal
tod03C9
for an(m -1 )-
form,
00, on(X, A)
whose support thas compactimage
on p~(W).
Thenthe
integral
vanishes and the functional is trivial.Note that if
[PH].f
is a k-order BerezinianLagrangian density,
then P H( f )
is an(n
+k)-order graded Lagrangian density.
The order grows as many times as indicatedby
the odd dimension of the base manifold.THEOREM 5.2
(Higher
OrderComparison Theorem). -
Let(W, .9100 (W))
be a coordinate openof
JOO(B/A)
with coordinatefunctions
~ xi, y’, sI,
and let[PH] (.9100 (W))
be a BerezinianLagrangian density defined
on(W,
.9100(W)). Then,
PH( f ) ~ Hm,
o(W)
is agraded
Lagrangian density defined
on(W,
.9100(W))
thatdefines
anequivalent
variational
problem
becausethey
have the same critical sections, i. e., a local section 6 is a Berezinian criticalseetion for
the Berezinian variationalproblem defined by
andonly if
it is agraded
critical sectionfor
the
graded
variationalproblem defined by
PH( f ).
Moreover, if
then
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ théorique ’
Proof. - By application
of definitions and lemma 5 .1.6. EULER-LAGRANGE
EQUATIONS
FOR THE BEREZINIAN LAGRANGIAN DENSITIESLet T the total odd multiindex
T=={1,2,...,~}.
We will
study
theEuler-Lagrange equations
of theorem 4 . 2 for thegraded Lagrangian
densities that come from BerezinianLagrangian
densit-ies,
i. e.,graded Lagrangian
densities thatlocally
are written asfor a suitable open subset or
equivalently,
thatlocally
are writtenas
where denotes the Lie derivative with respect to the vector field Z.
By corollary 4.3
we knowthat,
in a coordinate open, can beuniquely
written as where(~)~o
denotes the part inH,o
of dh,.
Let us denote
by P
the operator, defined in a coordinate open,° ~ ~ ~ ° ~a~a~~ Then, ~ ~,
is anothergraded Lagrangian density
definedin the same coordinate open, and
by
thecorollary 4 . 3, (dP ~,)m,
o can beuniquely
written asBut, by
definitionof f!J, d~ ~, _ ~ da,,
and then
(d~ ~,j~, o = (~ da,)m,
is a form in theimage
ofDo because, by
definition of P andDo,
we have thatAnd now,
by uniqueness,
The coefficients of such differential form willgive
the variationalequations.
Let us note that the differential is D-closed.
Indeed
D (~ ~’~) = D 1 (~ c~’~)
and this form is a sum of terms likeBy
definitionof, Thus,
This property allows a kind of
partial integration
for the odd coor-dinates.
Vol. 57, n° 1-1992.
22 J. MONTERDE
LEMMA 6 . 1. - Let E
Hm,
o. Then = 0if
andonly if for
each coordi-nate open
(W,
.9100(W))
in Joo(B/A)
there exists adifferential form
such
that, in W, =P03B3, where P=Ld/dsI°...°Ld/dsn.
Let us suppose that
Jl = ¿
dx1 A ... A dxm A~zj03B1, Ø j03B1,03B2
.(Subin-
dexes
of j03B1,
(3 and03B3j03B1
denotescomponents.)
Then
This
expression
isequal
to zero if andonly if,
for all I and for allB
such that I E
P
By induction,
we can see that for allp
k
(
k-1)
where if
03B2={03B21,...,
Thus,
if we put03B3j03B1 = j03B1,
T, then it is easy to seethat
= q;y. N
Let us
apply
this lemma toAs we have seen
above, then,
its coefficientssatisfy
thefollowing
relations: the coefficients
with 03B2T
are horizontalderivatives,
with respect of the coefficient withP=T.
Let us remember that the variational
equations
of theorem 4. 2 for thegraded Lagrangian density
areThus, substituting,
we getAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ theorique "
By
definition of the horizontallift,
we have thatBut these scalar
equations
areequivalents
to thefollowing equations
inthe
graded ring
Then the system of scalar
equations
of theorem 4 . 2 has been reduced tojust
m 1+ n 1 equations,
one for each fibrecoordinate, but,
theequations
are now defined on thegraded ring.
This fact is the corner- stone of the deduction of the variationalequations
of thegraded Lagrangi-
ans that come from Berezinian
Lagrangians.
Note that we need all the
equations
of theorem 4.2. Even for 0-order BerezinianLagrangian densities,
the associatedgraded Lagrangian
densities are of order n.
To go on with the deduction we need to compute the brackets
Let
hE .9100, then,
where the
following
convention is used: if1ft P
then the second term does not appear. The other bracket iscomputed
in a similar way.Hence we can state the
following.
We can see
by
induction thatwhere
c (P) = (~ + 1) ~(P) + (~ + ~(P)) (~ (z) + ~).
Applying
this lemma to theyoo (6)* (~«, T) = 0,
we can state thefollowing.
Vol. 57, n° 1-1992.
24 J. MONTERDE
THEOREM 6 . 3. - Let
(W, A~(W)) be a
coordinate openof (B/A).
The
variational equations for the graded Lagrangian density
are
for all ...,
~1; ~
..., and where(1)
Note that the naturalmorphism
does not appear. Theequations
live in thegraded ring.
(2)
These are the standardEuler-Lagrange equations
one would expect for the BerezinianLagrangian density ~
/B ... /Bdx(m)~d ds1
~y o...°2014 ~&"J ./
(3) If, f~A1 (W),
the aboveequations
are reduced to7. AN EXAMPLE
As a curious
example
let usstudy
the variationalequations
when bothgraded
manifolds are of zero evendimension,
i. e., when X and Y are reduced to apoint.
ThusA local
section,
6,of p : (X, A) ~ (Y, B)
inducesa Z2-algebra homomorph- ism, o*,
such thato*(~01)=~. Then,
a local section is determinedby
aZ2-algebra homomorphism
from A* into A* and suchhomomorph-
ism is determined
by
theimage
of the generators of A*Let us fix the number of generators, n = 3 and nl =
1,
and lets2, s3 ~
be a coordinate system
of (X, A) s2, s3, t ~
be a coordinate system of(Y, B).
Thus a localsection,
o, is determinedby
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Let us consider the element of
A1, f=1 2 03A3
hI(tI)3, where tI
are the3 1=1...3
coordinate functions of the
graded
manifold of first ordergraded jets,
andwhere h1, h2, h3 ~ A.
Note
that,
in this case, agraded Lagrangian density
is a 0-form. Thevariational
equations
for thegraded Lagrangian density 2014_
are~
Substituting,
we getLet us choice
hI = CI SI,
with It is easy to see that theequation
becomes
equivalent
to thefollowing
set ofequations:
Thus,
thepoints
of the conical surfacescl (ql)2 + c2 (q2)2 + c3 (q3)2 = 0
and
q 12 3 = o give
solutions of the variationalproblem. Taking,
forinstance, c~ = 1,
C2=1,
C3= -1,
we have that thegraded Lagrangian density
achieves a minimum at sections
of p given by
where
(ql,
q2,q3)
is apoint
of the cone x2 +y2 - z2
= o.Another
possible
choice for h’ would be hi = cj sI + dI S1 S2s3,
withd,
dI ~ R such that¿ I 2
= o. The variationalequations
are nowI = 1 ... 3
(d)
2equivalent
to thefollowing
set ofequations:
Solutions are " now found o with