HAL Id: jpa-00224061
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224061
Submitted on 1 Jan 1984
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
NEW METHOD FOR THE SEARCH FOR THE NEUTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT
SUITABLE FOR SMALL REACTORS
R. Golub
To cite this version:
R. Golub. NEW METHOD FOR THE SEARCH FOR THE NEUTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MO-
MENT SUITABLE FOR SMALL REACTORS. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C3), pp.C3-
265-C3-267. �10.1051/jphyscol:1984344�. �jpa-00224061�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C3, supplbment au n03, Tome
4 5 ,mars 1984 page
C 3 - 2 6 5NEW METHOD FOR THE SEARCH FOR THE NEUTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT SUITABLE FOR SMALL REACTORS
R.
GolubPhysik Department E
21,
Technische U n i v e r s i t a t Miinchen,8046
G a r c h i n g , F.R .G.RQsumB
-
Une s o u r c e "superthermique" de n e u t r o n s u l t r a f r o i d s contenant une s o l u t i o n d i l u e e de fIe3 p o l a r i s d dans ~e~ p e u t s e r v i r en mdme temps c o m e une s o u r c e , un p o l a r i s e u r , une c h m b r e de resonance magnetique e t un ana- l y s e u r de p o l a r i s a t i o n . On p e u t l ' u t i l i s e r pour r e c h e r c h e r l e moment Blec- t r i q u e d i p o l a i r e du n e u t r o n (edm).
A b s t r a c t
-
A superthermal source of Ultra-Cold Neutrons (UCN) c o n t a i n i n g a d i l u t e s o l u t i o n of p o l a r i z e d Re3 i n a e 4 can s e r v e a s a UCN s o u r c e , p o l a r i z e r , magnetic resonance chamber and p o l a r i z a t i o n a n a l y z e r . We d i s c u s s t h e proper- t i e s of such an arrangement when used t o s e a r c h f o r t h e neutron e l e c t r i c d i p o l e moment (edm).With t h e r e c e n t demonstration
(1)
t h a t t h e s t o r a g e time of UCN i n l i q u i d Helium i s i n reasonable agreement w i t h p r e d i c t i o n s and t h a t t h e "superthermal" UCN sourcei s
f e a s i b l e ,it
now seems a p p r o p r i a t e t o c o n s i d e r new methods of applying t h e extremely high UCN d e n s i t i e s( 2 )
made p o s s i b l e by t h i s source.I n t h e "superthermal" UCN source n e u t r o n s w i t h wavelength around
A
-10 a r e s c a t - t e r e d by l i q u i d Eie4 i n t o t h e UCN energy r e g i o n with t h e emission of a phonon. I f t h e l i q u i d Heliumi s
c o n t a i n e d i n s i d e a v e s s e l s u i t a b l e f o r s t o r i n g UCN t h e neutron den- s i t yw i l l
buil/d up t o a v a l u e (pU N) determined by t h e p r o d u c t i o n r a t e Q =+
(Ci s
t h e macroscopic c r o s s s e c t i o n For UCN p r o d u c t i o n and $Ii s
t h e i n c i d e n t f l u g ) an8 t h e s t o r a g e time, T , of UCN i n t h e v e s s e l r e s u l t i n g from t h e e f f e c t s of w a l l l o s s e s ,6
decay, ~ e " ~ s c a t t e r i n g and a b s o r p t i o n by He3.The UCN s o c o l l e c t e d , can be t r a n s p o r t e d t o a n o t h e r v e s s e l f o r use i n experiments.
For t h e s e a r c h f o r t h e neutron edm by t h e "conventional" method t h e n e u t r o n s must p a s s through a p o l a r i z e r b e f o r e e n t e r i n g t h e experimental chamber where t h e y a r e s u b j e c t e d t o e l e c t r i c and magnetic f i e l d s a r r a n g e d s o a s t o a l l o w t h e d e t e c t i o n o f t h e edm ( 3 ) .
The p r e s e n t super-thermal source
i s
mounted on t h e end of a c o l d neutron quide ex- t e r n a l t o t h e ILL r e a c t o r . However p r e v i o u s work ( 2 ) h a s i n d i c a t e d t h a tit
should be p o s s i b l e t o o p e r a t e sucha
source i n s i d e a neutron moderator where t h e e f f e c t i v e f l u x averaged over t h e Helium v e s s e li s
s e v e r a l t i m e s g r e a t e r t h a n 10'' cm-' s e c - l . This can produce UCN d e n s i t i e s on t h e o r d e r of10'
U C N / C ~ ~ . A "conventional" way of u s i n g t h e s e UCN would be t o t r a n s p o r t them t o an a p p a r a t u s s i m i l a r t o t h e p r e s e n t one ( 3 ) l o c a t e d o u t s i d e t h e b i o l o g i c a l s h i e l d i n g , through a p o l a r i z e r . However,it
h a s been suggested( 4 )
t h a t t h e e n t i r e edm experiment can be performed " i n - s i t u " i n t h e Helium v e s s e l l o c a t e d i n s i d e t h e moderator.P o l a r i z e d ~ e " s e l e c t i v e l y absorbs neutrons of o n l y one s p i n ( d i r e c t e d o p p o s i t e t o t h e He3 s p i n ) and h a s long been c o n s i d e r e d a s a p o s s i b l e neutron p o l a r i z e r
( 5 ) .
AArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984344
C3-266 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
superthermal UCN source c o n t a i n i n g p o l a r i z e d He3
w i l l
have d i f f e r e n t s t o r a g e timesr + , r -
( T + / T - = y-/y = Ic>l) f o r t h e two neutron p o l a r i z a t i o n s and hence t h e two p o l a r - i s a t i o n sw i l l
b u i l dzp
t o d i f f e r e n t d e n s i t i e s according t o equ.1.
I f d u r i n g t h e UCN b u i l d up t i m e , a d-c magnetic f i e l d , B o , p a r a l l e l t o t h e ~e~ p o l a r i z a t i o ni s
a p p l i e d t o g e t h e r with a p e r p e n d i c u l a r r o t a t i n g magnetic f i e l d , B , ( f r e q u e n c yw )
t h e t o t a l number of UCN i n t h e chamberw i l l
s e r v e a s an i n d i c a t o r l o f t h e neutron magnetic r e s - onance and one can s e a r c h f o r t h e edm by l o o k i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t of an e l e c t r i c f i e l d on t h e magnetic resonance p r o b a b i l i t y .hXile t h e a b s o r p t i o n r a t e of UCN by t h e p o l a r i z e d He3
i s
a d i r e c t measure of t h e p o p u l a t i o n o f UCN w i t h a n t i - p a r a l l e l s p i n s ( - s t a t e ) and can b e observed by t h e s c i n - t i l l a t i o n s i n t h e l i q u i d Helium following a neutron a b s o r p t i o n ,it
seems more prac- t i c a l t o p e r i o d i c a l l y measure t h e t o t a l number of UCN p r e s e n t by i n s e r t i n g a d e t e c - t o r i n t o t h e Helium f i l l e d chamber while s h u t t i n g o f f t h e i n c i d e n t neutron f l u x . The t o t a l number of UCN p r e s e n t can be c a l c u l a t e d from t h e Schroedinger e q u a t i o n and i s shown v s . U =(w-w
) /y+ I n f i g . 1 f o r K = 4.24 and 52 = 2.12( 5 i s
t h e s t r e n g t h of t h e r o t a t i n g fieldOmeasured i n u n i t s of y ),
t h e parameter v a l u e s which g i v e t h e maximum s l o p e of s i g n a l s t r e n g t h v s . a p p l l e d frequency i . e . t h e maximum s e n s i t i v i t y t f o r t h e edm s e a r c h ( 4 ) . Also showni s
t h e comparable curve f o r t h e "conventional"method where t h e r o t a t i n g f i e l d
i s
a p p l i e d f o r s h o r t p e r i o d s a t t h e beginning and end of the measurement time. The c u r v e s a r e f o r s o u r c e s l o c a t e d a t t h e same p o s i t i o n allowing a f a c t o r of 3 f o r volume d i l u t i o n i n t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l method and assuming100% ~e~ p o l a r i z a t i o n , and t h e same UCN s t o r a g e time i n both v e s s e l s which a r e t a k e n t o be e q u a l i n volume. It i s seen t h a t t h e maximum s l o p e ( p o s i t i o n shown by arrows)
i s
s l i g h t l y l a r g e r f o r t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l method b u t t h i s comparison does n o t allow f o r t r a n s m i s s i o n l o s s e s through t h e n e c e s s a r y UCM g u i d e , p o l a r i z e r s and windows whichw i l l
be n e c e s s a r y i n t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l system. The number of UCN remaining i n t h e v e s s e li s
r e l a t e d t o p ( a ) ~ / 2 y+'
CONVENTIONAL
2 4 6 8 1 0 a
mFig. 1- S i g n a l s t r e n q t h vs. a p p l i e d frequency f o r t h e optimized " i n - s i t u " and
"conventional" methods. Arrows i n d i c a t e p o s i t i o n s of maximum s l o p e .
He3 p o l a r i z a t i o n s on t h e o r d e r of 70-80% have a l r e a d y been o b t a i n e d by l a s e r - o p t i c a l pumping and i n s o l i d ~e~ and
it
seems t h a ts t i l l
h i g h e r p o l a r i z a t i o n s can be o b t a i n e d by cryogenic t e c h n i q u e s (6). A ~e~ p o l a r i z a t i o n of 90%w i l l
r e s u l t i n an i n c r e a s e o fY+
by 25% over t h a t due t o t h e w a l l l o s s e s a l o n e f o r K = 4.24.A s shown p r e v i o u s l y
( 2 )
t h e a p p a r a t u sw i l l
have t o be c a r e f u l l y s h i e l d e d by -30 cm o f cooled Bismuth t o reduce t h e h e a t i n p u t t o a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l si n
t h e c a s e o f a h i g h - f l u x source. Under t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s i f we assume t h e s t r u c t u r e surroundinq t h e l i q u i d Helium c o n s i s t s of 4 mm o f Beryllium ( o r Beryllium Oxide) t h e6
decay r a t e a f t e r 1 y e a r of exposure t o t h e neutron f l u xw i l l
be aboutlo-'
of t h e UCN counting r a t e f o r a 20 l i t r e c y l i n d r i c a l Helium v e s s e l and 10 second counting time. I n addi- t i o n i f t h e d e t e c t o ri s
i n s e r t e d near t h e c e n t e r of t h e Helium v e s s e l t h e s e6
r a y s(which have a range o f a few m i l l i m e t e r s i n l i q u i d Helium) w i l l n o t even r e a c h t h e d e t e c t o r . A much h i g h e r decay r a t e would
be
caused by a c t i v a t i o n of t h e d e t e c t o rit-
s e l f . T h i s can be d e a l t w i t h by keeping t h e d e t e c t o r i n a s h i e l d e d a r e a while t h e neutron f l u xi s
a p p l i e d .A t t h e low temperatures under c o n s i d e r a t i o n h e r e
it
seems u n l i k e l y t h a ta
convention- a l UCN d e t e c t o r can be used. However bolometers based on b o t h superconducting g r a i n s( 7 )
and S i l i c o n r e s i s t o r s (8) a r e s e n s i t i v e enough t o d e t e c t n e u t r o n s when coveredw i t h
a Boron o r Uranium containirxg l a y e r . I n t h e c a s e of a B" l a y e r on a S i r e s i s t o r 3x4x.3mm3 a s i n g l e n e u t r o n would produce a p u l s e of about 10 F v o l t s whichi s
about t e n times h i g h e r t h a n t h e thermal n o i s e . I n t h e c a s e of t h e r a t h e r high c o u n t i n g r a t e s t o be expected i n a 20 l i t r e v e s s e l c o n t a i n i n g aroundlo3
UCN/cmbith a 10 s e c emptying time-
2 x 1 0 ~ counts/sec-
t h e n o i s ew i l l
be determined by t h e s t a t i s t i c a l f l u c t u a t i o n s i n t h e neutron c o u n t s r a t h e r t h a n by t h e t h e r m a l n o i s e Ln t h e r e s i s t o r even i n t h e c a s e of analogue measurements.I n
this
p r e l i m i n a r y f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d y we have d e s c r i b e d a method f o r s e a r c h i n g f o r t h e neutron edm which r e p r e s e n t s t h e most s e n s i t i v e technique t h a t one can p r e s e n t l y imagine while o f f e r i n g t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of c a r r y i n g o u t su& experiments a t r e l a - t i v e l y weak neutron sources. I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e problems d i s c u s s e d h e r e t h e r e a r e o t h e r s t h a tw i l l
have t o be addressed (e.g. t h e e f f e c t s of t h e r a d i a t i o n on t h e i n s u l a t i n g a b i l i t y o f t h e l i q u i d Helium) and s e v e r a l t e c h n i c a l developmentsw i l l
be n e c e s s a r y b e f o r e t h e " i n - s i t u " t e c h n i q u e f o r s e a r c h i n g f o r t h e neutron edm can be p u t i n t o p r a c t i c e .REFERENCES
GOLUB R . , JEWELL C., AGERON P., MAMF'E
W.,
HECKEL B . , KILVINTON I.Z . ~ h y s .
B
(1983) 187GOLUB R., B~NING K . , WEBER H. " R e a l i s i e r u n g s s t u d i e zur S p a l l a t i o n s Neutronenquelle, T e i l 111, Ann. C , ed. G.S. Bauer e t
a1 K !
( J i i l i c h ) , KFZ (Karlsruhe) June 1981 PENDLEBURY J . M . , SMITH K.F., GOLUB R., BYRNE J . , MCCOMB T.J.L., S U m R T . , BURNETT S . M . , TAYLOR A.R., HECKEL B., RAMSEY N.F., GREEN K . , MORSE J . , KILVINGTON A . I . , BAKER C.A., CLARKE S.A., MAMPE W . , AGERON P. ( t h i s conference)GOLUB R., J . d e Physique-Lettres
2
(1983) L-321JENKIN J.T., "The F u t u r e o f p o l a r i z i n g f i l t e r s a t t h e I.L.L., (unpublished) and P r i v a t e Communication
FROSSATI G . , J . Physique CollOq.
41
(1980) (27-95 See a d d i t i o n a l r e f e r e n c e s i n r e f e r e n c e 4 ) .DRUKIER A.K., IGALSON J., SNIADAUER L. Nuc. I n s t . Meth.
15$
(1978)91FROSSATI G .
,
IMBERT D.,
PECCOUD L.,
THOULOUZE D.,
WAKSMAN B. PrOC.
1 4I n t ~.
~Conf.on Low Temp. Physics Otaenimi, Finland (North Iiolland) Aug. 1975 p. 80