Identification methods for characterizing the mechanical behaviour
of human arteries in vitro
Dr. Stéphane Avril
Center for Health Engineering
CNRS UMR 5146 – INSERM IFR 143 Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines
November 20-23, 2009, Tozeur
In vitro: rationale
• Availability of powerful computational software allowing for more and more complex numerical simulation
→ need of accurate input for the mechanical properties of the arteries
→ complex characterization because of
anisotropy, hyperelasticity, heterogeneity, poroelasticity, residual stresses
Rationale
Numerical models require
experiments
Truestress (MPa)
True strain
diastole systole
Physiological modulus
Traditional protocols for characterizing arteries
More sophisticated testing system
Strain field measurement
INVERSE PROBLEM
I c e F
sym
F X t +
∂ Ψ
= . ∂ .
ρ 0
σ
Ψ
X0= ?
F: deformation gradient tensor e: Green-Lagrange strain tensor σ: Cauchy stress tensor
I: Identity
c: constant for incompressibility
Conservation equation in quasi-static:
div(σ)=0 + boundary conditions Constitutive equations:
Resolution of an inverse problem Basic approach: updating
Parameters Ai
Model: f
Response Mj=f(Ai)
Measurements mj
Matching optimization
Full-field measurements:
alternative approach
Model f is derived from:
- the constitutive equations, - the conservation equations.
g(Ai,M)=0 M=f(Ai)
THE VIRTUAL FIELDS METHOD
0 )
(σ =
div + boundary conditions
σ = C(m,A)
Direct
computation Measurements
m(x,y,z)
Ai g(Ai,m)=0
Explanation through an example
1
Measurements throughout the test
Testing:
→ Applying axial pre-stretching
λZ = 1.1
→ Applying pressure
pressure 0 mmHg → 130 mmHg pressure rate 12 mmHg/s
→ Preconditioning
8 pressure cycles 0 → 120 mmHg 8 axial cycles λZ = 1.1→ λZ = 1.4
Reconstruction of displacement fields across the whole segment
Derivation of strain fields in the local coordinate system
Assume constitutive parameters
( ) ( )
[ ]
(exp 2 + 2 −1)
=
Ψ β αθθ eθθ αzz ezz αθzeθθezz
Green Lagrange strain
Example of anisotropic hyperelastic potential: Fung exponential
I c e F
sym
F X t +
∂ Ψ
= . ∂ .
ρ 0
σ
Reconstruction of Cauchy stress fields: circumferencial direction
Reconstruction of Cauchy stress fields: axial direction
0
: * + * =
−
∫ ∫
∂V
i i V
ij
ij ε dV T u dS
σ
At each measurement step, the following equation should be satisfied:
0 :
) ,
( * + * =
−
∫ ∫
∂V
i i V
ij
ij e A ε dV T u dS
σ
Are the stresses at equilibrium
∑ ∑ ∫ ∫
− +
=
∂ fields
virtual all steps V
i i V
ij
ij e A dV T u dS
A J
2
*
: *
) ,
( )
( σ ε
Iterative approach for reconstructing the stress fields until cost function J is minimized:
Principle of identification
IVW EVW
circumferential:
Choice of virtual fields
axial:
ε*θθ ε*
zz
Optimization => curve fitting
circumferential: axial:
Results
→ Fung exponential anisotropic
Best fitting model:
012 .
0
75 . 0
3 . 7
10 8
. 4
12 22 11
2
=
=
=
×
= −
α α α
β MPa
1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 15 18
20 150
15 30 45 60 75 90 120 135
105
Pressure [mm Hg]
0
Pressure [kPa]
λλλλ
Circumferential elongationλλλλ
Circumferential elongation
Experimental data Neo Hookean
«Yeoh »
Fung exponential
22
Discussion
Z [mm]
Y [mm] Y [mm] Y [mm]
→ Well reproduced experimental trend
→ Significant local discrepancies
Local heterogeneities in mechanical properties, variable thickness, branches
Perspectives
Applications in vivo
to atheromatous plaque
in the carotid artery
Atheromatous plaques
IVUS 25
MRI
In-vivo full-field measurements:
Examples of methods
In-vivo full-field measurements:
Examples of data
Courtesy of Simon Le Floc’h, Jacques Ohayon, TIMC Grenoble
Full-field measurement of the cross section deformation
induced by a change of pressure (diastolic to systolic)
INVERSE PROBLEM
Assume linear elasticity We must find E and ν in each material…
Resolution of an inverse problem Basic approach: updating
Parameters Ai
Model: f
Response Mj=f(Ai)
Measurements mj
Matching optimization
Full-field measurements:
alternative approach
Model f is derived from:
- the constitutive equations, - the conservation equations.
g(Ai,M)=0 M=f(Ai)
THE VIRTUAL FIELDS METHOD
0 )
(σ =
div + boundary conditions
σ = C(M,A)
Direct
computation Measurements
m(x,y,z)
Ai g(Ai,m)=0
Results and discussion
• The VFM can be applied for real time analysis
• Study under progress, still needs to be applied to real experimental data.
CONCLUSION
• Novel efficient approaches for
characterizing the elastic properties of arteries
• What about viscoelasticity or poroelasticity?
• What about fracture?
Acknowledgements
• Students: Ambroise Duprey, Jean-Pierre Vassal, Alexandre Franquet
• Colleagues: Pierre Badel (Ecole des Mines), Katia Genovese (Univ. Basilicata), Jacques Ohayon (TIMC Grenoble), Jean-Noel Albertini and Jean Pierre Favre (CHU St-Etienne)
• Institutions and funding partners: