• Aucun résultat trouvé

The effect of impaired speaker’s voice and noise on children's spoken language processing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The effect of impaired speaker’s voice and noise on children's spoken language processing"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The effect of impaired speaker’s voice and noise

on children's spoken language processing

Isabel Schiller

1

, Dominique Morsomme

1

, Malte Kob

2,

and Angélique Remacle

1, 3 1

Faculty of Psychology, Speech Language Therapy and Educational Sciences, Voice Unit, University of Liège, Belgium

2

Erich-Thienhaus-Institute, University of Music Detmold, Germany

3

Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Brussels, Belgium

Isabel.Schiller@uliege.be

BACKGROUND

Listening to speech in noise may compromise children’s spoken language processing at different linguistic levels [1]. The same has been shown for dysphonic speech [2]. To date, little is known about how a combination of noise and impaired voice may affect speech perception and listening

comprehension in young school-children.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate isolated and combined effects of noise and impaired voice on first-grade primary school children’s spoken language processing using a minimal-pair discrimination task and a sentence-picture matching task.

H1 – Task performance decreases when listening to either an impaired voice or against noise.

H2 – Task performance is lowest when listening to a combination of an impaired voice and noise.

METHODS

Participants: 53 typically-developing children (f = 29, m = 24) aged 5-6 years

Listening Tasks (presented via headphone): Listening conditions (signal-to-noise ratio = 0 dB):

Design: Each child performed both tasks. Within subjects, stimuli were randomly distributed across conditions C1-C4.

Analysis: Task performance (% of correct responses) was calculated per condition per task. Mixed-effects models were used to investigate the effects of impaired voice, noise, and their combination.

RESULTS

• Performance in the Minimal-Pair Discrimination Task (but not the Sentence-Picture Matching Task) decreased in the presence of either impaired voice (C2) or noise (C3).

• For both tasks, performance was lowest in the presence of impaired voice and noise (C4). A significant interaction between the two variables was found for the Sentence-Picture Matching Task.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Results indicate that young school-children’s spoken language processing is negatively affected by a combination of impaired speaker’s voice and noise. This is likely due to increased auditory masking and less cognitive capacity available for linguistic processing. Context cues may promote

children’s decoding of degraded speech signals. This study has implications for the educational sector and show the importance of improving classroom listening conditions.

Minimal-Pair Discrimination Sentence-Picture Matching

„lorse – porse“ „The bear sleeps“

C1 – Normal voice / No noise

C3 – Normal voice / Noise

C2 – Impaired voice / No noise

C4 – Impaired voice / Noise

Références

Documents relatifs

Nous avons appliqué la procédure d’inversion utilisant un modèle de départ homogène de résistivité 100 Ωm à l’étude du modèle 3D contenant les deux corps de

‫اﻟﻔﺼﻞ اﻷول‪..............................................‬ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺣﻜﻢ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻴﻢ اﻟﻘـﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ‬ ‫ﺟزﺋﯾﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ اﻟﻧزاع اﻟذي ﻋرض ﻋﻠﯾﮭم‪ ،‬ﺳواء ﻛﺎن ھذا اﻟﺣﻛم ﻓﻲ

The systems have been trained on two corpora (ANCOR for spoken language and Democrat for written language) annotated with coreference chains, and augmented with syntactic and

The proposed tests were designed to assess most of the auditory skills listed by ASHA: (1) a lateralization test to evaluate the ability to lateralize a sound, (2)

This paper presents a corpus study that investigates the question of word order variations (WOV) in spontaneous spoken French and its consequences on the parsing

The key difference between PRESENCE and the standard models of human speech generation and recognition discussed earlier is the inclusion of mechanisms for perceptual prediction

They comprised specific terms referring only to one distinct emotion, and non specific terms that indicate an emotional valence (such as “unhappy”), or a level of arousal (such

Introduction to the Special Issue “Speaker and Language Characterization and Recognition: Voice Modeling, Conversion, Synthesis and Ethical Aspects”.. Jean-François Bonastre,