• Aucun résultat trouvé

Modèles computationnels et neurolinguistiques

Les mots polysyllabiques

10.5. Modèles computationnels et neurolinguistiques

Les modèles computationnels fournissent des descriptions fonctionnelles précises et dy-namiques des systèmes cognitifs. Dans le cas du système de lecture, ces modèles sont des outils théoriques puissants permettant de décrire les interactions multiples entre les différentes composantes linguistiques d'un mot lors de son identification. Ils participent à la réalisation d'une anatomie fonctionnelle du système de lecture.

Par ailleurs, un nombre croissant d'études utilisant des techniques de neuro-imagerie (i.e., potentiels évoqués cognitifs (PEC), tomographie par émission de positrons (TEP), imagerie par résonance magnétique nucléaire (RMN)) tentent de préciser la structure et la dynamique du traitement des mots écrits d'un point de vue anatomo-fonctionnel (Démonet, Chollet, Ram-say, Cardebat, Nespoulous, Wise, Rascol & Frackowiak, 1992 ; Howard, Patterson, Wise, Brown, Friston, Weiller, & Frackowiak, 1992 ; Paulesu, Frith, & Frackowiak, 1993 ; Petersen, Fox, Posner, Mintum, & Raichle, 1989 ; Pugh, Shaywitz, Shaywitz, Constable, Skudlarski, Fulbright, Bronen, Shankweiler, Katz, Fletcher, & Gore, 1996).

Ces deux approches sont évidemment amenées à se rencontrer et à s'enrichir mutuellement (Jacobs & Carr, 1995). Les modèles computationnels permettent de définir le domaine de performance du système de lecture en analysant les performances de sujets dans des proto-coles expérimentaux précis. Ces analyses psycholinguistiques semblent manquer à un grand nombre d'études en imagerie cérébrale qui aboutissent à des résultats inconsistants (d'après

l'analyse de Poeppel, 1996). En couplant les prédictions et les analyses de ces modèles aux études de neuro-imagerie, on pourra à la fois mieux contraindre les interprétations des don-nées d'imagerie et, en retour, apporter de nouvelles contraintes pour l'élaboration des modèles de la lecture.

Bibliographie

Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1983). A model for coding lexical categories during reading. Journal of Experi-mental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 9, 700-725.

Aderman, D., & Smith, E. E. (1971). Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recogni-tion. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 117-129.

Aghababian, V. (1998). Acquisition de la lecture : Aspects développementaux et neuropsychologiques. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université de Provence.

Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. (soumis). Developping normal reading skills : Visual aspects.

Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding : Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575.

Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access : Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.

Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access : Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254. Antis, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14,

589-592.

Appelman, I. B., & Mayzner, M.S. (1982). Application of geometric models to letter recognition : Distance and density. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 111, 60-100.

Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and Performance IV. New York : Academic Press, pp. 583-612.

Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch : Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguis-tic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Babin, J. P. (1996). Derivational morphology and lexical access : prefixed and pseudo-prefixed verbs. Cana-dian Journal of Experimental Psycholology, 50, 371-385.

Bachelard, G. (1927). Essai sur la connaissance approchée. Paris : Editions Vrin.

Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hébert, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound information in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114-133.

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access ? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Percep-tion and Performance, 10, 340-357.

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the prononciation task : Lexical access and/or production frequency ? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 24, 89-106.

Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241-246.

Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.

Baron, J., & Thurston, C. (1973). An analysis of the word superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-228.

Beauvois, M. F., & Derouesne, J. (1979). Phonological dyslexia : Thre dissociations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 42, 1115-1124.

Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology : Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.

Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effect in visual word recognition : An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.

Berent, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task : regularity effects are not necessary evi-dence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1727-1742.

Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a reez : The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in read-ing English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.

Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words : evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39-72.

Berndt, R. S., Lynne D’Autrechy, C., & Reggia, J. A. (1994). Functional pronunciation units in English words. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 977-991.

Berndt, R., Reggia, J., & Mitchum, C. (1987). Empirically-derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 19, 1-19. Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., & Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print : Evidence

from the FDM and the FBI. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading : Perspectives from cog-nitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 121-135). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.

Besner, D., Dennis, I., & Davelaar, E. (1985). Reading without phonology ? Quarterly Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology, 39A, 85-94.

Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the connection between connectionism and data : Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.

Biederman, G. B. (1966). The recognition of tachistoscopically presented five-letter words as a function of digram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 208-209.

Bosman, A., M., & de Groot, A. M. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading : evidence from beginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholology, A, 49, 715-744.

Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178. Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.

Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vi-sion Research, 13, 767-782.

Bouma, H., & Legein, Ch. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69-80.

Bovens, N., & Brysbaert, M. (1990). IBM PC/XT AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolu-tion. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 332-334.

Bower, T. G. R. (1970). Reading by eye. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading (pp. 134-146). New York : Basic Books.

Bowey, J. A., 1990. Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition 18, 419-427.

Bowey, J. A., 1993. Orthographic rime priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A, 247-271.

Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading back-wards. Nature, 271, 746-747.

Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, G. M. (1968). Visual perception of words differing in letter digram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 569-571.

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.

Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency : A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 1-23.

Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect : On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10, 385-395.

Butler, B., & Hains, S. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory & Cognition, 7, 68-76.

Carello, C., Turvey, M. T., & Lukatela, G. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In R. Frost, & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 211-266). Amsterdam : North-Holland.

Carr, T., Davidson, B. J., & Hawkins, H. L. (1978). Perceptual flexibility in word recognition : Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 4, 674-690.

Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words : A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research : Advances in theory and practice 5 (pp. 1-82). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.

Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.

Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of Orthographic neighborhood in visual word reco-gnition  : Cross-task comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Co-gnition 23, 857-871.

Carver, R. P. (1972). Speed readers don’t read ; They skim. Psychology Today, 6, 22-30. Cattel, J. M. (1886).The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220-242.

Clark, A., & Thornton, C. (1997). Trading spaces :Computation, representation, and the limits of uninfor-med learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 57-65.

Clark, H. C. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy : A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.

Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology, 2, 225-252.

Colé, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312-330.

Collyer, C. E. (1985). Comparing strong and weak models by fitting them to computer-generated data. Per-ception and Psychophysics, 38, 476-481.

Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of Informa-tion Processing. London : Academic Press.

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud : Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dor-nic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI. London : Academic Press.

Coltheart, V., & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adult's reading of nonwords : Effects of regularity and con-sistency. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 718-729. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE : Phonological effects in

writ-ten word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.

Connine, C. M., Mullenix, J., Chernov, E., & Yelen, J. (1992). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1084-1096.

Content, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research, 53, 3-12.

Content, A., Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1986). Acquisition de la lecture et analyse segmentale de la parole. Psychologica Belgica, 21, 1-15.

Content, A., Mousty, P., Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX : Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le Français écrit et parlé. Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.

Content, A., & Peereman, R. (1992). Single and multiple process models of print to speech conversion. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 351-375). Amsterdam : North Holland.

Corcoran, D. W. J. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancelation. Nature, 210, 658.

Dell, G. S. (1986).A speading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 405-434.

Delosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation : The Sine Qua Non for abstrac-tion in funcabstrac-tion learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cogniabstrac-tion, 23, 968-986.

Démonet, J.-F., Chollet, F., Ramsay, S., Cardebat, D., Nespoulous, J.-L., Wise, R., Rascol, A., & Frack-owiak, R. (1992). The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain, 115, 1753-1768.

Descola, P. (1993). Les lances du crépuscule. Editions Plon, Paris.

Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon : evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psycholology : Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.

Dorfman, D., & Glanzer, M. (1988). List composition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 633-648.

Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and : Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory and Cognition, 5, 154-168.

Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psycholology : Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098-1116.

Dzhafarof, E. N. (1993). Grice-representability of response time distribution families. Psychometrika, 58, 281-314.

Eco, U. (1973). Segno. Editions Idedi, Milan. (pour la traduction française, 1988, Editions Labor, Bruxelles) Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech : Mechanism in perceptual

coding ? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502-507. Etiemble (1973). L’écriture. Paris : Gallimard.

Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quar-terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 325-350.

Feldman, L. B., & Bentin, S. Q. (1994). Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes : evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 407-435.

Ferrand, L. (1995). Evaluation du rôle de l'information phonologique dans l'identification des mots écrits. L'Année Psychologique, 95, 293-315.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition : evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming : The role of syl-labic units. Journal of Memory and Language.

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). The syllable's role in word naming. Memory & Cogni-tion, in press.

Feustel, T. L., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 112, 309-346.

Février, J. G. (1995). Histoire de l’écriture. Paris : Payot.

Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). Visual confusion matrices : Fact or artifact ? Journal of Psychology, 71, 111-125.

Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam : North-Holland, pp. 257-287.

Forster, K. I. (1987). Form priming with masked primes : The best match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII : The psychology of reading (pp. 127-146). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and

Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning Memory and Cognition, 10, 680-698.

Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task : Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1-25.

Forster, K. I., & Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically re-lated forms : Repetition or partial activation ? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.

Forster, K., I., & Shen, D. J. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood : absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 696-713.

Fowler, C., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255. Fraisse, P., & Piaget, J. (1981). Traité de psychologie expérimentale. Paris : Presses Universitaires de

France.

Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 781-804.

Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound : Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361-379.

Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading : Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthog-raphy. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398-408. Frost, R. (1998). toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition : True issues and false

trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.

Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psycholology : Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 829-56.

Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word comparison and orthographic depth : A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.

Funnel, E. (1983). Phonological processes in reading : New evidence from acquired dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 159-180.

Gatuso, B., Smith, L. B., & Treiman, R. (1991). Classifying by dimensions and reading : A comparison of the auditory and visual modalities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 139-169.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 113, 256-281.

Geyer, L. H (1977). Recognition and confusion of lowercase alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 487-490.

Gibson, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Science, 148, 1066-1072.

Gibson, E. J., Pick, A. D., Osser, H., & Hammond, M., 1962. The role of grapheme-phoneme correspon-dence in the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology 75, 554-570.

Gilmore, G. C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425-431.

Glanzer, M., & Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 381-398.

Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.

Goldsmith, J. (1976). An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 23-68. Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental an metrical phonology. Oxford, England : Basil Blackwell.

Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of reading miscues : Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quar-terly, 5, 9-30.

Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision : Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.

Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function : Implications for mecha-nisms of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 631-654.

Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. P. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by eye and by ear (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA : M.I.T. Press.

Gough, P. B., & Cosky, M. J. (1977). One second of reading again. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.

Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Jour-nal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.

Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Jour-nal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.

Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition : Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.

Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming : Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition : Effect of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 19, 951-964.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual-read out model of word context effects in letter perception : Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition : A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1998). On localist connectionism and psychological science. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (Eds.) Symbolic connectionist approaches to human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1-38.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (sous presse). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming. Visual Cognition.

Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition : The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.

Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.

Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition : A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York : Wiley. Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373.

Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., & Spiker, V. A. (1982). Human reaction time : Toward a general theory. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology : General, 111, 135-153.

Haber, R., N., & Hershenson, M. (1965). Effect of repeated brief exposures on the growth of a percept. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 40-46.

Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., Ruderf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondances as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office.

Hansen, D., & Rodgers, T. S. (1965). An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In Proceed-ings of the Symposium on the Psycholinguistic Nature of the Reading Process. Detroit : Wayne State University.

Healy, A.F. (1994). Letter detection : A window to unitization and other cognitive processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333-344.

Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions : An example using the stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347.

van der Heijden, A. H. C., Malhas, M. S. M., & van der Roovaart, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 85-88.

Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London : Academic Press.

Henderson, L. (1985). On the use of the term "grapheme". Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 135-148. Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal

of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6, 598-615.

Howard, D., Patterson, K., Wise, R., Brown, D. W., Friston, K., Weiller, C., Frackowiak, R. (1992). The cortical localization of the lexicons. Brain, 115, 1769-1782.

Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.

Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition : Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 46-58. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. NewYork : Macmillan Press.

Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word proc-essing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740.

Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identifica-tion. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.

Huntsman, L. A., & Lima, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 417-428.

Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1994). Use of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading and in on-line and delayed naming tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 689-713.

Israel, G. (1996). La mathématisation du réel. Paris : Editions du Seuil.

Jacobs, A. M. (1994). On computational theories and multilevel, multitask models of cognition : The case of word recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 670-672.

Jacobs, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Mind mappers and cognitive modelers : Toward cross-fertilization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 362-363.

Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1991). Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 43-52.

Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the Interactive Activation Model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.

Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition : Sampling the state of the art.