• Aucun résultat trouvé

Dermacase. Allergic contact dermatitis.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Dermacase. Allergic contact dermatitis."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Pratique clinique Clinical Pract ice

VOL 50: APRIL • AVRIL 2004dCanadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 553

CAN YOU IDENTIFY THIS CONDITION?

A

43-year-old woman presents with a pruritic, erythematous, edematous eruption on her wrists and the sides of her face.

A. The most likely diagnosis is:

1. Allergic contact dermatitis 2. Scabies

3. Atopic dermatitis 4. Seborrheic dermatitis 5. Psoriasis

B. The test to confi rm the diagnosis is:

1. Skin biopsy 2. Patch testing 3. Serology testing

4. Potassium hydroxide preparation Answer on page 557

Mr Kalia is a medical student at the University of Calgary in Alberta. Dr Adams is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, at the University of Calgary.

Sunil Kalia Stewart P. Adams, MD, FRCPC

Dermacase

(2)

Pratique clinique Clinical Pract ice

VOL 50: APRIL • AVRIL 2004dCanadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 557

A. 1. Allergic contact dermatitis B. 2. Patch testing

T

his patient’s allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was caused by exposure to nickel. Erythema, edema, and often pruritus are signs of ACD.

Physicians should look for patterns deter- mined by an exter- nal cause. Patterns are asymmetrical or unilateral, and their location corresponds to a specific contac- tant. For instance, in nickel contact derma-

titis, patterns appear near rings, bracelets, watch- bands, earrings, buckles, and snaps on clothing.

Th ree key features ensure a diagnosis of ACD1: a suspected allergen is identifi ed, removal of the allergen resolves the eruption, and patch testing has positive results. Patch testing is optional if the allergen can be ascertained from history.

Two phases of disease

Allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed cell- mediated reaction, has two phases.2 The first is induction or sensitization to the antigen. Th e anti- gen is processed by Langerhans cells in the skin and then presented to CD4 T lymphocytes in the lymph nodes. After about 3 weeks, affector and memory cells return to the skin. Th e second step is elicitation, or production of a skin eruption after initial sensitization. Th e eruption is produced by eff ector and memory T cells.

Nickel hypersensitivity is the second most com- mon ACD. About 10% of schoolgirls and adult

women are aff ected because of ear piercing.3 Most alloys in jewelry contain nickel, especially if the objects are bright, shiny, or chrome-plated. A dimethylglyoxime spot test is useful for detecting nickel in objects suspected of containing it.

Management

Th e best way to manage ACD is to prevent it, but this is sometimes diffi cult for patients. It might involve replacing glasses, bracelets, and rings that contain nickel with those made from other metals.4 Removing the allergen results in spontane- ous resolution within 7 to 14 days.

B a r r i e r creams have proven not to be of much benefit. A medium-to-high potency topically applied corticosteroid is usually suffi cient if the ACD is localized.5 It can be applied daily for 2 weeks maximum, but must then be discontinued to avoid corticosteroid-induced side eff ects.

In areas where the skin is thin, such as the face and folds, topical calcineurin inhibitors, such as pimecrolimus and tacrolimus, can be used to pre- vent corticosteroid side effects, such as atrophy.

These drugs have proven useful in treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. Systemic corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are used for more extensive skin involvement. Two weeks’ treat- ment is generally suffi cient.

References

1. Lynch PJ. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 335-9.

2. Budinger L, Hertl M. Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an overview. Allergy 2000;55(2):108-15.

3. Larsson-Stymmne B, Widstrom L. Ear piercing—a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls?

Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:289-93.

4. Basketter DA, Briatico-Vangosa G, Kaestner W, Lally C, Bontinck WJ. Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 1993;28(1):15-25.

5. Levin C, Maibach HI. An overview of the effi cacy of topical corticosteroids in experimen- tal human nickel contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43(6):317-21.

1...2

Answer to Dermacase

continued from page 553

allergen resolves the eruption, and patch testing be of much benefit. A medium-to-high potency

Références

Documents relatifs

Also, this paper represents a continuation of previous research [7, 8], with a refined set of heuristics for best matching human annotations, accompanied by a prediction

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

meta-analyses have convincingly shown that allergen specific immunotherapy can achieve substantial results for patients, improving the allergic individuals ’ quality of life,

Choosing Gaussian random fields as background models we derive non-asymptotic expressions for the probability distribution function of similarity measurements.We present an algorithm

microarray are hold together by magnetic force using array of magnets under the device. a) Microfluidic cartridge composed by PDMS and a magnetic PDMS layer, b)

AIRWAYS ICPs: Integrated Care Pathways for Airway Diseases; AIT: Allergen immunotherapy; ARIA: Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma; CDSS: Clinical decision support system;

The ileal PP of young sheep and cattle are not unique lymphoid tissues, at least from the perspective that many species of veterinary relevance (sheep, cattle, swine, horse, rabbit,

Cependant, l’approche thérapeutique a été différente concernant les patients âgés de notre série (60 ans et plus) chez qui le remplacement prothétique a été le traitement