• Aucun résultat trouvé

Adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems 4th Workshop on Quantum Non-Equilibrium Dynamics 24-26 April 2017, University of Nottingham (UK)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems 4th Workshop on Quantum Non-Equilibrium Dynamics 24-26 April 2017, University of Nottingham (UK)"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems 4th Workshop on Quantum Non-Equilibrium Dynamics

24-26 April 2017, University of Nottingham (UK)

Pierre Rouchon

Centre Automatique et Systèmes, Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University Quantic Research Team, Inria

Joint work with R. Azouit, F. Chittaro and A. Sarlette (arXiv.1704.00785)

1 / 18

(2)

Adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems

Slow/fast bipartite master equations

Model reduction and geometric singular perturbations

Geometric singular perturbations for bipartite quantum systems

2 / 18

(3)

Several contributions on adiabatic elimination (partial list)

I Lambda systems :

E. Brion, L.H. Pedersen, K. Mølmer : Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system Journal of Physics A : Mathematical and Theoretical, 2007, 40, 1033.

M. Mirrahimi, PR :. Singular perturbations and Lindblad-Kossakowski differential equations IEEE Trans.

Automatic Control , 2009, 54, 1325-1329

F. Reiter, A. Sørensen : Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems Phys. Rev. A, 2012, 85, 032111-

I Slow/fast Lindblad dynamics :

E.M. Kessler : Generalized Schrieffer-Wolff formalism for dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. A, 2012, 86, 012126-

D. Burgarth et al. : Non-Abelian Phases from a Quantum Zeno Dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042107 (2013) P. Zanardi, L. Campos Venuti : Coherent quantum dynamics in steady-state manifolds of strongly dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 240406 (2014)

K. Macieszczak, M. Guta, I. Lesanovsky,J.P. Garrahan : Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quantum Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240404 (2016)

L. Campos Venuti, P. Zanardi : Dynamical Response Theory for Driven-Dissipative Quantum Systems.

Phys. Rev. A 93, 032101 (2016)

I Quantum stochastic models :

J. Gough, R. van Handel : Singular perturbation of quantum stochastic differential equations with coupling through an oscillator model. J. Stat. Phys. 2007, 127 pp :575.

L. Bouten, A. Silberfarb : Adiabatic elimination in quantum stochastic model, Commun. Math. Phys., 283, 491-505 (2008)

L. Bouten, R. van Handel, A. Silberfarb : Approximation and limit theorems for quantum stochastic models with unbounded coefficients. Journal of Functional Analysis 254 (2008) 3123-3147.

O. Cernotik, D. Vasilyev, K. Hammerer : Adiabatic elimination of Gaussian subsystems from quantum dynamics under continuous measurement Phys. Rev. A, , 92, 012124 (2015)

3 / 18

(4)

Bipartite slow/fast open quantum systems

I Sub-systemAwith Hilbert spaceHArelaxing rapidly towards a unique equilibrium density operatorρAvia the Lindbladian evolution :

d

dtρA=LAA)with lim

t7→+∞ρA(t) =ρA;

I Sub-systemBwith Hilbert spaceHB having a slow Lindbladian evolution

d

dtρB=LBB)with 0≤1

I Weak(A,B)couplingvia the HamiltonianPm

k=1AkBk Bipartite Hilbert space(A,B)with Hilbert spaceH=HA⊗ HBand density operatorρgoverned by

d

dtρ=LA(ρ)−i

" m X

k=1

AkBk , ρ

#

+LB(ρ)

4 / 18

(5)

Adiabatic elim. of fast qubit

A

dispersively coupled to slow qubit

B1

|e

|e

|g

|g

u

yA

zA B z -A

fast qubit A slow qubit B

The slow/fast dynamics dρ

dt =uh

σ+A−σ-A, ρi +κ

σ-Aρσ+Aσ+Aσ-Aρ+ρσ2 +Aσ-A

−iχh

σzA⊗σzB, ρi

Slow dynamics(second order versus=χ/κ) : dρs

dt =iκ2χκ+8u22z, ρs] + (64κχ22u+8u2)(κ22)+2u3 2) σzρsσz−ρs Kraus (CPTP) map:ρ=(I−iQ⊗σz)(ρA⊗ρs)(I+iQ⊗σz)with ρA= κ24κu

+8u2σxκ2+8uκ2 2σz+12I andQ=•σx+•σy+•σz+•I 1. R. Azouit, F. Chittaro, A. Sarlette, P.R., IFAC world congress 2017.

5 / 18

(6)

Two-photon pumping in super-conducting circuits

2

B A

d

dtρ=LA(ρ)−i[Hint, ρ]+LB(ρ)where LA(ρ)= [ua−ua, ρ] +κDa(ρ)

Hint=g[a(b)2+ab2, ρ]

+χ(aa)(bb) +χ2a(aa)2 LB(ρ)=−iχ2b[(bb)2, ρ]

withκmax

|g|,|χ|,|χa|,|χb| . Theslow dynamics(second order approximation,α=2u/κ) :

d

dtρs=−ih

α2χbb+χ2b(bb)2, ρs

i−iαg[b2+(b)2, ρs]+

4g2 κ

DLs(ρ) withLs =b2+αg

χbb+χa(1+2α2 2)I . Kraus (CPTP) map : ρ= I−iM

|αihα| ⊗ρs

I+iM with M= (a−α)⊗2g

κb2+2αχκ bb+2α(1+2ακ 2aI

+α2κχa(a−α)2I. 2. M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V.V. Albert, S. Touzard, R.J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M.H. Devoret. Dynamically protected cat-qubits : a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. of Physics, 16 :045014, 2014.

6 / 18

(7)

Outline

Slow/fast bipartite master equations

Model reduction and geometric singular perturbations

Geometric singular perturbations for bipartite quantum systems

7 / 18

(8)

What is model reduction ?

A possible answer for dtdx =v(x):

restriction to an attractive invariant manifoldΣ.

8 / 18

(9)

Slow/fast systems (coordinate free setting)

Geometric definition independent of coordinates due to Fenichel3:

I x 7→v(x)close tox 7→v(x).

I v(x) =0 define a manifoldΣof dimensionns<n=dim(x)of steady-states forv(x).

I nf =n−nseigenvalues of ∂v∂x

Σare stable.

3. N. Fenichel : Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Diff. Equations, 1979, 31, 53-98.

9 / 18

(10)

Tikhonov normal form and model reduction

Any slow/fast system, can be put, after a suitable change of coordinates, in to aquasi-vertical vector fieldv :

d

dtxs =vs(xs,xf) =ε˜vs(xs,xf, ε), d

dtxf =vf(xs,xf) with 0< ε1.

The reduced system dtdxs=vs(xs,xf)with 0=vf(xs,xf)is correct if

d

dtξf =vf(xs, ξf)stable for any fixedxs.

In general, modeling variablesx arenotTikhonov variables.

10 / 18

(11)

Model reduction with modeling variables

vf xs xf 0

The reduced model of dtdxs=vs(xs,xf, ), dtdxf =vf(xs,xf, )is4

d

dtxs = 1+∂vs

∂xf

∂vf

∂xf

−2

∂vf

∂xs

!−1

vs(xs,xf, )+O(2), vf(xs,xf, ) =0.

4. J. Carr : Application of Center Manifold Theory. Springer, 1981.

P. Duchêne, P.R. : Kinetic scheme reduction via geometric singular perturbation techniques. Chem. Eng. Science, 1996, 51, 4661-4672.

11 / 18

(12)

Outline

Slow/fast bipartite master equations

Model reduction and geometric singular perturbations

Geometric singular perturbations for bipartite quantum systems

12 / 18

(13)

Geometric singular perturbations for bipartite open quantum systems5

slow invariant attractive sub-manifold 0

s(t)

(t)

s 0

fast relaxation

slow evolution

d

dt A i Hint B

A B

s B

0 1

d

dt s s 1 s

2 s 2 s

s 0 s t

Lindbladian slow dynamicsin a copyHsofHB

d

dtρs =Lss) =Ls,1s) +2Ls,2s) +. . .

withKraus mapto recover the physical density operatorρfromρs: ρ=K(ρs) =K0s) +K1s) +. . .

5. R. Azouit et al. IEEE CDC 2016.

13 / 18

(14)

An iterative procedure based on center manifold approximation

Plugρ=K(ρs) =ρA⊗ρs+K1s) +. . .and

d

dtρs =Lss) =Ls,1s) +2Ls,2s) +. . .into the invariance condition

LA(K(ρs))−i

Hint,K(ρs)

+LB(K(ρs)) = d

dtρ=K(Lss)) and identify terms of same order :

order 1 :LA(K1s)) +Lint(K0s)) +LB(K0s)) =K0(Ls,1s))

order 2 :LA(K2s)) +Lint(K1s)) +LB(K1s)) =K0(Ls,2s)) +K1(Ls,1s)) . . .

At each order

1. take the trace versusAto get the correction toLs

2. compute the correction toKvia−L−1A , a super operator for zero-trace operatorsW onHA

−L−1A (W) = Z +∞

0

etLA(W)dt

that coincides with the restriction to zero-trace operators of a

completely positive (CP) map. 14 / 18

(15)

First order expansion for a bipartite system : Zeno dynamics

6

The full dynamics

d

dtρ=LA(ρ)−i

" m X

k=1

AkBk , ρ

#

+LB(ρ)

can be approximated by

d

dtρs=−i

" m X

k=1

tr(AkρA)Bk, ρs

#

+LBs) +O(2) ρ= IiM

A⊗ρs) I+iM

+O(2) whereM =Pm

k=1FkBk withFk given by

FkρA=−L−1A (Ak ρA −tr(Ak ρAA).

6. A. Azouit et al. arXiv.1704.00785

15 / 18

(16)

Second order dynamics

7 The full dynamics

d

dtρ=LA(ρ)−i

" m X

k=1

AkBk , ρ

#

+LB(ρ)

can be approximated by

d

dtρs =−i

X

k

tr(AkρA)Bk +2X

k,j

yk,jBkBj , ρs

+LBs) +2

m

X

k=1

DLks)+O(3) ρ= I−iM

A⊗ρs) I+iM

+O(2) whereyk,j =2i1 tr

FjρAAkAjρAFk

andLk =Pm

j=1λj,kBj with matrixλgiven byλλ=x andxk,j =tr

FjρAAk +AjρAFk 7. A. Azouit et al. arXiv.1704.00785

16 / 18

(17)

Conclusion

Interest of such geometric adiabatic elimination preserving the quantum structure (Lindblad master equation, CPTP maps) :

Some non Markovian dynamics might be modeled via a Lindbladian dynamics on a small Hilbert space and via a CPTP map towards the physical Hilbert space of large dimension.

Quantum feedback where the quantum controller is designed faster than the quantum system to be controlled ((S,L,H) theory of Gough/James).

Extension whenH=L

kHAk⊗ HBk and the slow manifold is parameterized via

ρs=X

k

ρAk⊗ρs,k withρs,k ≥0 andtr(ρs,k)∈[0,1]

(talk of Katarzyna Macieszczak this Monday).

Conjecture : at any order it is always possible to obtain, up-to higher order terms, Lindbladian dynamics forρsand CPTP maps relatingρtoρs.

17 / 18

(18)

18 / 18

Références

Documents relatifs

The time-scale separation between the uncoupled dynamics and the interaction allows to employ tools from center manifold theory and geometric singular perturbation theory to

Our main result is an explicit solution for the first and second order approximation from the recurrence (9).. Theorem 1 shows that the slow evolution is coher- ent up to second

It has been suggested in many recent works that the type of decay of the Quan- tum Fidelity may help to discriminate between chaotic or regular underlying clas- sical motion ; in

In the weakly coupled and fast driving regime, these statistics is shown to be independent of quantum coherences in the Floquet basis.. This directly

Chez l'enfant après la marche, la chirurgie est presque toujours nécessaire : • En cas de luxation ou de forte subluxation avant l’âge de 5 ans: tou- jours préférer

While Grover’s algorithm stays within the standard paradigm of Quantum Computation, that is a sequence of quantum gates (i. e., unitary operators) successively applied on a

La première présente les sources utilisées et la situation des ordres mendiants au xIIIe siècle, avec une attention particulière portée au rnoment décisif du premier changement

We also prove that, under appropriate rescaling of the system and probe interactions, the state probability distribution and the system density matrix are solutions of