https://doi.org/10.4224/20393386
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Life Cycle Costing of Log Walls for the National Energy Code for Houses
Swinton, M. C.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=8f20c94a-becc-4605-8403-f436687b20e5 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=8f20c94a-becc-4605-8403-f436687b20e5
Life Cycle Costing of Log Walls for the National Energy Code for Houses
Swinton, M.C.
A-3107.1
NATIONAL
ENERGY CODE FOR HOUSES
-
M.C. SwintonApproved
-
&A. tcarakat, Ph.D.
Head, Building Performance Laboratory
Report No: A3107.1
Report Date: January 5,1996
Contract No: A3107
Reference: Letter of Agreement dated September 30, 1994 Laboratory: Building Performance
14 pages
Copy No. 2 of 4 copies
This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of
Report A31 07.1 Page 1 introduction
At
Rs
3Mh meeting, the Standing Committee on Energy Conservation inBuildings requested that a study be undertaken of the life cycle cost of log walls (solid wood walls), to assist
in
determining what should be the appropriateprescriptive requirements for such walls in the National Energy
Code
for Houses. In response to this request, the Building Performance Laboratory, Institute for Research in Construction, performed life cycle cost analysis of log walls in ccnsultation with the Canadian Manufactured Housing Association, with funding from Natural ResourcesCanada.
The study consisted of 3 main tasks:
1. Costing of Solid Log
Waf1
Assemblies2. Determining Assembly R-values for Solid Log Walls 3. Life Cycle Costing for 34 Zones, for each fuel type. Tfw following describes the approach and resuRs of each task.
Costing
of Solid Log Wall AssembliesThe Energy Bw ilding Group, which had previously costed opaque envelope components for the National Energy Code for Houses, was retained to survey the construction costs of:
rectangular-milled log walls round-scribed log walls
The costing method was relatively straight forward: a number of manufacturers and builders
were
suweyedacross
the country to obtain the cost of building log walls in $/m2, for various wall thicknesses (rectangular-milled) or for various mean log diameters (round-scribed).Five manufacturers of rectangular-milled lag homes were surveyed. Wall thicknesses ranging from 100 to 305 mm were costed. All surveyed
manufacturers were found to offer a 200 mm wall, and most offer at
least
oneother
size as well, usually I50 mm.Six builders of round-scribed log homes were
surveyed.
Walls withmean
jog diameters ranging from 305 to 500 mm were costed. Most suweyed builderswere found to offer a 355 mm diameter
log
wall, and most offer at least one other size.A report was issued by Energy Building Group1 which records the results of that survey.
Determining Assembly R-values for Solld
Lag
WallsTo facilitate
the
calculation
of the assembly RSI of a log wall using a simple handcalculation, a new RSI
adjustment
factor called 'profilefactof
was
introduced. The profile factor is defined as the ratio of actual assembly RSI (including airfilms) as determined by detailed heat transfer analysis, to the assembly RSI (including air films) of a hypothetical solid wood wall of the same wood species having a rectangular cross-section, no joints and a thickness equal to the
nominal
thickness
of the wall (rectangular-milled)or
to the mean diameter of thelogs (round-scribed).
A solid piece of wood would have an RSI
value equal to its thickness times the thermal
resistivity of the w o d . A log wall built within
the confines of the cross section of the solid
wood piece would be expected to have some
fraction of that RSI, depending on how much
wood is missing due to the profile, and
depending on the joint detail and insulation material used.
Detailed 2-dimensional computation of heat transfer through log walls was undertaken to derive appropriate prome factors for both types of log walls.
Appendix A describes this approach in more detail. Examples of calculated heat flux lines (generally horizontal) and constant temperature lines (isotherms,
generally vertical) are shown in Fig. 1 for a rectangular-milled log wall and Fig. 2 for a round-scribed log wall. Typical profile
factors
were found to be 0.97 forrectangular-milled walls (i.e.,
close
to 1 as would be expected}, and 0.77 for round-scribed (i.e., considerablyless
than tbecause
the thickness of the wall at the joints is less than the mean diameter of the logs, which leads to short-circuiting). The profile factorof the round-scribed wall includes the effect of
insulation in the grooves. As a result of the insulation, the profile factor is not
directly proportional to the average thickness of the wall. The profile factor of
0.77 pertains to logs that are shaped
in
accordance to the Log BuildingStandards,
and
allows for a proportionately similar amount of insulation in the larger lag sites.With these
profile
factors, the Assembly RSI of log walls can be calculated asReport A31 07.1 Page 3
Assembly RSI = [(mean diameter x resistivity of
wood)
+
RSI air films] x 0.77Assembly RSI
=
[(nom. thickness x resistivity of wood)+
RSI air films] x 0.97As listed in Appendix C of the National Energy Code for Houses, the resistivity of
cedar is 0.0090 RSllrnm and for pine it
is
0.0081 RSHImm, for equilibrium moisture contents. Thetotai
RSI for air films for walls is 0.15.Appendix A presents the details of the derivation procedure followed for determining the profile factors.
Results of Cost
Survey
and RSI EvaluationThe assembly characteristics reported in the cost
survey
by Energy Building Group, and the applicable profile factors were used to calculateassembly
RSI. The cost were then plotted against assembly RSI, as shown in Fig. 3In general, the incremental costs of rectangular-milled walls were consistent from manufacturer to manufacturer, even though the absolute costs differed
significantly. There was more variation in the round-scribed results. One builder reposted very high incremental costs (closer to rectangular-milled construction than round-scribed), whereas another builder reported negative incremental costs with increasing log diameter. It was concluded that no single set of
consistently costed walls from one builder could be used to represent all surveyed costs.
These results posed a problem for the life cycle costing approach used for NECH. The incremental costs of all other components evaluated for NECH, e.g. wood frame walls, were determined by selecting actual assemblies in the dataset to represent the trend of all surveyed costs. This could not be done for log walls, since there was no standard method of costing Fog walls according to log size. Thus, picking representative assemblies from several builders would not yield incremental
costs
of log sizes as muchas
differences in costing approach fromone
builder to the next.It was thus decided to assess the trend in incremental cost of the log walls as a
function of RSI by fitting straight lines through each data set using
standard
statistical techniques. Each cuwe fitting exercise (one
for
rectangular-m illed and one for round-scribed) made use of all data points in each data set. Thiscurve
fitting approach
was
consistent with the approach used for life cycle costing forthe '83 Measures2- the predecessor to the NECH. The curve fitted result thus gives
a
measure of the average incremental cost of building with thickerlogs
toachieve greater R-values.
The slope of the incremental cost per RSI for rectangular-milled walls was
$220/m2/RSI, as illustrated in Fig. 4. For round-scribed log walls, the slope of the incremental cost was $102/m2/RSI, as shown
in
Fig. 5. These compare to about $8/m2/RSI for wood frame walls. The incremental cost of the three wall systems are compared in Fig. 6. Thedata
points for the two log wall types are the fitted costsof
log walls for each thickness or diameter reported in the survey. Since these are now plotted as 'incremental costs' in Fig. 6, each cost curve stam at zero. For each curve, the reference cost used to calculate the increment was the lowest fitted cost in the dataset.Life Cycle Costing
for
34 Zones, for Each Fuel Type.The fitted incremental costs per RSI per m2 shown in Fig. 6 for the
log
walls were used in ths Eife cycle cost analysis. Life cycle costing was performed using thesame computer program, LCCH" and
using
same
economic assumptions as used for life cycle costing ofwood
frame walls for the National Energy Code for Houses.Rectangular-milled Resuks
Fig. 7 shows the result of life cycle cost evaluation of rectangular-milled log walls
for an electrically heated house in Ontario Zone B. This zone and fuel was picked because in combination, the cold climate and high
cost
of fuel should result in relatively stringent requirements, as was the case for all othercomponents, such as wood frame walls. However, as can be seen from Fig. 7, in
spite of the high cost of heating for this fuel and location, the high incremental cost of construction of 150 mm rectangular-milled log wall relative to a 100
rnm
wall is much greater than the present value of energy costs that would be saved. The 100 mm wall was therefore the 'optimum' for this case. This was the result for afrnost all of the populated zones in each province and territory.
Round-scri bed
Resutts
Fig. 8 shows similar
results
for round-scribedlog
walls. The 'optimum' mean logdiameter is 305 mm for the case shown. This was also the result almost all of the populated zones in each province
and
territory.Report A31 07.1 Page 5 Recording the Results in National Energy Code for Houses
The life cycle cast results were recorded in the prescriptive tables for each zone
of the National Energy Code for
Houses4
-
34 zones in total. An example table is attached, with the log wall entries bolded.Since
consultation with the Standing Committee on these results was not possible before publication of the second public review draft of the NECW,a
note explaining the status of these resultswas
included in the published tables, as shown,
All generated graphs
and
tables for 34 zones and for up to four fuels were recordedin
a permanent record. These results were made available to the Standing Committee onEnergy
Conservation in Buildings, to assist in theassessment of what should be the appropriate RSI to be prescribed
for
log walls in the National Energy Code forHouses.
Acknowledgment
The author wishes to thank Cliff Shirtliffe for implementing IS02 and perForming the heat transfer analyses of tog walls, and for his assistance in documenting that work.
References
1. Construction Costs for Solid Wood Walls in Houses. Contract report by the Energy Building Group for the National Research
Council,
February 1995. 2. Measures For Energy Conservation in New Buildings 1983. Issued by theAssociate
Committee
on the National Building Code, National Research Council of Canada. NRCC No. 22432.3. Swinton, M.C.; Sander, D.M. S~ecification of a Method for Life
Cycle
CostAnalvsis for the Eoerav Code for
Houses,
July, t992.(26th meetingof
the Standing Committee on Energy Conservation in Buildings, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, Appendix0.)
4. National Energy Code for Houses 1995
-
Public Review Draft#2.
CanadianCommission
on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council Canada. March, 1995.1. #I u I* n IW u. IH
*m1*. a : ) an
n
-
:
W - t a c * bn- 1-t-1 I C D ~ m c w - bn- h a t I l u x l r r w m 0 . 1 m n
Report A31 07.1
Page 7
I
f c m l r l 1 1 1 . 1 1
m u m - b r mr r o l l r r n . a I t o h ~ m hn.m w r I lur !.rn.: 0 . l w n
Fig.
2. Heat
Flux Linesand
Isotherms inRound-scribed
Log WallsReport A31 07.1
Fig.
7.
Life
Cycle
Cost
of
Rectangular-Milled
Log Walls
Report A31 07. I
Page 13
Fig.
8.
Life
Cycle
Cost of
Round-Scribed bog Walls
Ontario
-
Zone
B, Electric Heating,
2
Story Full
Bsmt
RSI
Mean Log
Tables of Prescriptive Requirements
Phndpal Hmtinq Source
Ele~wrY, Propane, 011 Mat. Gas Other Meal Pump (as)' Heat Pump(gs)'
*[as3 -air source heat pump; (qs)
-
qround sour- heat pumpTable 3.3.1 .A Mintmum Effective h m a l Res~stana
F m i n g Part of Sentenca 3.3.1.1 . ( I ) RSI-value (mZ*"cAV)
, Abweqround Building Assemblies
&&: I I
Type I
-
attfetype, parallel-ehord trusses andplywood I-joists
S@I
-
AI wans except tog wans 4.7Type 11
-
Log w&~s**-
rsetangular-mnm 1 0 . 91
7.11
4.6 4.6.,
I
T h m RSF vduee shown for log wells are fhm nrsulC of EIfb cycle oosr studtm c a m i d ouf En coopwafton
with the log constru~flon Industry, These studies were completed ImmedIatdy prior to publlcatlot~ of
thEa dmft. The vaIues shown have not been rcvlBWBd by the Standing Cornmiflee on Energy Consematfun In Buildings and fherefom do not refleet the Standlng Committes's vlews.
Fixed glatlng without sash
Farming Part of Sentem:es 3.3.2.1 .[I) wd (2) and RSI-value ( m 2 * " ~
Trpe 1
-
with imbedded h M n g ducts, cablesTable 5.3.1 .A
Forming Part of Sentence 5.3.1 .I.(?)
Heat Remvery
Heat remverj on principal exhaust pottion d the I '
t-twchanid ventilation system in dwsllbng units resuld requlred required
Report A31 07.1 Page A1
Appendix A
Determination
of
Profile
Factors
for Calculating
Effective Thermal
Resistance
of
Round-scribed
and Rectangular-milled Log Walls
0 biect ive
The objective of this Task was to develop a means of calculating assembly RSl's
for solid m o d walls (log walls) using a simple formula, by pre-evaluating the effect of the profile and the joint on the thermal performance of the log wall.
Approach
The following steps were taken to meet the objectives
of
this task:1. Define a 'profile factofto account for the effect of the profile of the log wall and the joint details on the effective RSI of the wall assembly.
2. Select and implement a two-dimensional finite-element or finite-difference model to determine the effect of profile and joint details on the heat loss characteristics of the wall.
3. For various round-scribed and rectangular-milled profiles
used
by industry, determine the profile factor by relating the effective thermal resistance of the log walls found through the detailed 2-dimensional heat transfer analysis to a reference thermal resistance found by simple calculation.4.
Recommend
appropriate profile factors to use for the National energy Codefor
Houses.
Definition
The profie factor is defined as the ratio of actual assembly RSI (including air
films)
as
determined
by detailed heat transferanalysis,
tothe
assembly
RSI(including air films) of a theoretical soiid wood wall of the same wood species having a rectangular cross-section, no joints and a thickness equal to the
nominal thickness of the wall (rectangular-milled) or to the mean diameter of the
In general, the profile factor can be determined by resolving
the
following equation:Once
the appropriate profile factor is determined through analysis, a formula for calculating the assembly RSI of a log wall is developed by reversing the above formula:Assembly RSI = [(reference thickness x thermal resist iviity-)
+
RSI,,,,,I
x profile factor (2) where:the reference thickness is the mean diameter of the logs for round-scn'bed log walls
a the reference thickness is the nominal thickness of the wall for rectangular-milled log
walls
It was postulated that the profile factors would be similar enough for a range of log thicknesses and joint configurations, that a single factor could be used for a broad range of log wails; is., one profile factor for all round-scribed log walls and one for all rectangular-milled log walls. The less the variation in profile factor for different designs and sizes, the broader would be the applicability of the factor. Determining
the
Profile FactorsThe most accurate way of assessing the thermal resistance of jog walls would have been to measure the thermal resistance of each size of log wall available. The measurement data
was
not available and would have been expensive and time consuming to obtain. Modelling of the walls with finite difference or finite element mathematics is the next best method to determine the thermalresistance of the wall configurations
2-0 Finite Difference
Heat
Transfer Analysis ProgramA 2-dimensional finite difference heat transfer analysis program
-
IS02-
wasselected to develop profile factors for a number of round-scribed and rectangular-milled log wall assemblies. It is a Windows or DOS-based program for analyzing the steady state temperature field in 2 dimensional bodies made up of solid sections and air cavities. The program is specifically designed to handle sections of the building envelope. A library of material properties is specific to building constructions. The air spaces and air
surface films relate to building type environmental conditions. Radiation and convection conditions are approximated by surface resistances.
Representation of Log Walls in IS02
Representation of the construction elements is achieved with a series
of
Report A31 07.1
Page A3
and Y axis. A series of steps can be used to produce a sloped boundary. In certain axisymmetric cases, the program's ability to handle circular
boundaries can be utilized. A rectangular mesh
is
overlaid on the drawing of the building element. The mesh divides the element into rectangular cells ofdifferent sizes. The rectangular elements can be used to assemble more complex or symmetrical constructions. The program can zoom in on details to allow accurate dimensioning. A mesh generator selects the mesh size based on the wishes of the operator of the program. The operator can request a
finer mesh or can manually add mesh lines to areas that are of special interest.
The centre of each cell is termed a node. The
number
OF nodes is used as a rough measure of the precision of the model of the element. Tbe finitedifference mathematical routine models the nodes as small concentrated lumps of
material
having the mass and heat capacity of the cell and there are connecting spokes that conduct theheat
in the 2 dimensions at a rate equalto what would flaw through the model at that location.
The
basic mathematical model produces a mesh that resembles a 'Tinker Toy' or'molecular' structure that has the overall form of the construction element. (If the mesh were
extremely
fine it would produce a rational thermal model of the actual molecular structure of the element).The program
can
handle meshes that have up to 16,000 nodes. Thesurfaces can have constant temperature with air films,
constant
heat flow rate, insulated (adiabatic}surface
or contjnuity boundary conditions. Heat sources and sinks such as heating wites can be modeled.Other Features of IS02 Used for the Analysis
The outputs from the program include tabulated resuks and color graphical plots with materials, isotherms, heat flow lines identified. Profiles of the
temperature can be plotted in color. (This can be used to display the potential
for surface condensation and mold growth, for example, for given indoor RH). Integrated heat flow that
crosses
a section of the boundary, the maximum and minimum temperatures on a section of the boundary, selected individual node temperatures, heat flow and its direction at a node, all are plotted asrequired.
IS02
also performs an independent calculation of the simple I-dimensionalthermal transmittance (conductance) from inside air to outside air. This allows easy comparison of the 1-dimensional calculation to the detailed 2-
dimensional results. For the purposes of the calculation of profile factors this eliminates any inconsistencies and added errors.
Implementation Issues for Modelling Thermal Resistance
of
Log
Walls Cog DimensionsAccurate modelling requires access to the actual dimensions of the log walls and the range of variation of the log dimensions. It was decided to model log walls of the various
sizes
that are designed according to the Canadian and American Log Builders Association 1 993 Log Building Standards. These define the limits on the overlap of round logs and the site of the groove.Groove
Types
for Round-scribed Log WalbWhile a number
of
groove types for roundlogs
are allowedin
the standard,the
design
of
the groove does not widely affect the thermal resistances of the walls. The Norwegian V-groove and a simplified square groove weremodeled for 203 mm diameter logs. The difference in thermal resistance for logs with similar grooves was not
large.
The choice of a full width squareedged groove represents 'the maximum thermal resistance of conventional groove
designs
so these would be fairor
generous to all round logmanufacturers,
Representation of Round Logs With Rectangular Slices
The
decision was made to model the logs as a series of horizontal slices that for a log of circular shape instead of as logs with an exact circular shape. Smaller slices were used in locations of high curvature in the vertical direction, i.e. at the top and bottom of the logs. There was generally four sizes ofslices
each
thinner than the previous by a factor of two. Thisproduced the stepped boundary shown in Fig A1
.
Calculations were done to show that the stepped shape of the surface added no significant error to the heat transfer results.Insulation in the Grooves
A variety of insulations can be used in the
grooves
in the actuallogs
systems but in the great majorityof
cases glass fibre is used. Glass fibre insulation was modeled in our calculations.Representation of Rectangular-milled Logs
The squarelrectangular logs were simpler to model and the most significant approximation in the shape was the corners on the profile.
Seven
height to width ratios were modeled. Threesires
of 45 degreechamfers
were used for203 mm wide logs; 203 rnm being the predominant size
for
square orrectangular
logs.
Each chamfer was modeled as a series of 10 steps, asReport A31 07.1 Page A5 Figure At - m a m "7 C I I ' N u - e u Y I om1 n r rrt r a nt rr H n 1 4 4
u n o ) !i5 F3 w * 2 LI i Z 4
3::
g s gReport A31 07.1
Page A7 effect
of
log width on the profile factor. The effect of surface film resistance was checkedfor
three chamfer sizes and three height to diameter ratios.Treatment of Air Films
The heat flow through a wail can be calculated by taking the product of the temperature difference across the wall, the cross-sectional area and the inverse
of
the total thermal resistance from air to air. The total thermal resistance accounts for the air films, the thickness of the walland
the shapeof the
logs.
The heat flow is strongly 2-dimensional, especially for round-scribed logs, so the air films form an inherent part of the flow pattern and the overall thermal resistance. ?herefore, the films cannot be removed from the model without
loss
of accuracy. This is also the reason for including the air films in the profile factor calculation. (Calculating the thermal resistance of the wall first without filmsand
then adding air films was judged to be an inappropriate representation of the heat transfer).Wall Profile
Factors
As indicated above, the equivalent shape of the log
and
the films can be represented as the product of a %a! profilefactor"
and the thermal resistance of a square log with the air films.However,
the profile factor varies according to the number of logs in a wall for a given height of wall, sothat we had to investigate the effecl of the number of
logs
on the predictedprofile factor.
Selection of Number of Logs to Model
The variation 05 the wall profile factor was calculated for a wide
range
ofoverlaps on logs of different sizes. This provided a reference point for the
profile factor for logs with insulated
and
uninsulated grooves. The heat flow through logs is more complex than at firstb
evident. The introduction of thegroove makes the heat flow non-symmetrical. There is no plane of symmetry or a position where the heat flow lines are straight across the whole log. The calculations should ideally be done on a full wall as a result, which would be time consuming. The
size
of the error in calculating the heat flow through the single log (two-hafvesand
a joint) has been estimated by comparing the heat flow through the two half logs (Fig A f )and
asection
of two half logs in astack
of
4logs.
Theresults
for two-half logs were judged to be adequate for the calculation of profile factors; i.e. the adiabatic boundaries at the top and bottom of the two-half logs is a good approximation for the boundarylmplementatfon of the Model and Assumptions Round Logs.
Table 1 a lists the material properties selected for the wood and insulation in the models. (The precise properties of the wood selected for this analysis are not critical
since
the thermal resistance is compared to the thermalresistance of a full,
square
logof
the same thickness; is., the profilefactor is
a ratio of two resistance terms that are each linearly dependent on the conductivity of the wood). Table I b lists the temperature, humidity, and air
film surface conductance used for the modeis. Table 2a lists the
characteristics of the round log walls that were modeled. The diameter of logs in
rnm
and
inches, range of overlap of logs, number of modelscalculated,
groove design, number of slices per half, and the total number of calculation nodes for the finite difference calculations arelisted.
The overlapof
the logs varied from 0.10 to 0.1 2 of the diameter. This produced a face width of 0.44 to 0.46 which is essentially the average of the narrow rangeof
overlaps allowed in the standard for log walls.
Square
CogsTable 2b lists the corresponding characteristics
of
the rectangular / squarelogs
that were modeled. The width of the logs in mm and inches, ratioof
the width to height of the logs, numberof
models calculated, number of steps in the chamfers, and numberof
nodes for the finite difference calculations are listed. The calculations cover the majority of the rectangular logTable 1
a
Properties of Materials Used in the Finite Difference CalculationsTable I b
Surface
Temperatures, Relative Humidity and Air Film ResistancesLocation Temperature Relative Air Film
C Humidity Resistance
Report A31 07.1
Page A10
Table 2b Summary of
Results
for 25 Models of203
and305
mrn WidthSquareJRecZangular Logs
Example Resuf st Isotherms and Heat
Flux
LinesFig. A1 & A2 show example IS02 printouts of the simulations for round-scribed and rectangular-milled
logs
respectively. The heat flux lines (generallyhorizontal) and isotherms (generally vertical) are shown in
these
figures. Two- dimensional effectscan
beseen
near the joint in both cases. The two-dimensional effects are broader in the round-scribed example as would be
expected. As well, those effects are more complex around the insulated
groove,
Resulting Profile
Factors: Round-scribedLogs
The fallowing table summarizes the profile factors obtained
for
theround-scribed
log walls evaluated with the 2-dimensional heat transfer analysis program. Round-scribed
Log
Groove Insulation Depth* ProfileDiameter (mm)
Factor
203
none 0.0 0.71203
tangential21.5
0.72 203 square: 0.94** 20.3 0.74 square: 0.94 35.4 0.78 square: 0.94 60.9 0.84 254 none 254 square: 0.94 square: 0.94 square: 0.94I
"""
none
I
0.01
" Total cut into log is
10.2
and 12.7 mm more for 203.2 and254.0
mrn fogs.**
Insulation
width is 94% of interface between logsThe profile factors is also influenced by the following joint details:
Groove & Insulation Profile Factor
No insulation 0.7 1
Report A31 07.1 Page A12
Resulting Profile Factors: Rectangular-milled
The following table summarizes the profile factors obtained for the rectangular- milled log walls evaluated with the 2-dimensional heat transfer analysis program. Rectanqular-Milled
Thickness Height / RSI RSI profile
1
Thickness Solid Log Wall , Factor
Wood
1
Thermal resistivity
of
the wood at outdoor equilibrium moisture content (usedin
the calculations):
Pine 0.0081 (rn2.~/W) /mm
Cedar 0.0090 (rn2.c/W) /mm
Recommendations
The results would indicate that
for
profile-milled log walls, the National Energy Code for Houses should use a profile factor of 0.77, as this allows for the samebasic geometry according to the Log Building Standards and allows for a
proportionately similar amount of insulation in the larger sizes.
For rectangular-milled log wails, it is recommended that a profile factor of 0.97 be used.
Limited Comparison to Field
Data
Although field
monitored
performanceof
log wallsis
scarce, the thermalperformance of four round-scribed
log
walls (pine) and one squared log wall (cedar) was monitored in the field by acansuttant
using a portable hot box apparatus for CMHCA'. The application of the profile factor of 0.77 in equation (2) for these four walls compared favourably Zo the reported test results, asmilled wall for this comparison, so that a profile factor of 0.97 was assumed. The
calculated
and monitoredresult
werealso
close,
as shownin
the figure.I
7
Fig Al. Cornparism of New Method and CMHC Tast Results
3.00
Pmposed Slmp!e Calwlalion M
2.50 2100
L
%2
1.m Xa
f.00 am am 2U) 2W 280 aOP 820 3*0 880 3110 4 0 0 . A v o w s l o g Dlam- or T M k n r s s (mm) Reference to Appendix AA l . Log Walls Field Tests. Contract report by Scanada Consultants Limited to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Septern ber 1986.