HAL Id: jpa-00226514
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00226514
Submitted on 1 Jan 1987
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTIONS IN DEFORMED NUCLEI
E. Moya de Guerra, J. Caballero, P. Sarriguren
To cite this version:
E. Moya de Guerra, J. Caballero, P. Sarriguren. MOMENTUM DISTRIBUTIONS IN DEFORMED NUCLEI. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1987, 48 (C2), pp.C2-295-C2-299.
�10.1051/jphyscol:1987245�. �jpa-00226514�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
C o l l o q u e C 2 , supplgment a u n o 6, Tome 48, j u i n 1987
E. MOYA DE GUERRA, J.A. CABALLERO and P. SARRIGUREN I.E.M., C.S.I.C., Serrano 119, SP-28006 Madrid, Spain
A b s t r a c t . We d i s c u s s some d i s t i n g u i s h i n g f e a t u r e s of momentum d i s t r i - b u t i o n s i n deformed n u c l e i .
Q u a s i e l a s t i c e l e c t r o n s c a t t e r i n g p r o v i d e s a v e r y powerful t o o l t o ( 1
i n v e s t i g a t e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n s of p r o t o n s bound i n n u c l e i
.
U n t i l 1 now t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e h a s been a n a l y z e d i n t e r m s o f t h e i n d e p e n d e n t p a r t i c l e model assuming n u c l e i t o b e
s p h e r i c a l l y symmetric, i n which c a s e t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n t a k e s t h e s i m p l e form
where a s t a n d s f o r t h e quantum numbers of t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e o r b i t a l ( n l j ) ; and n a ( p ) , Ear Na a r e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n ( n o r m a l i z e d t o I ) , t h e b i n d i n g e n e r g y and t h e o c c u p a t i o n number o f said o r b i t a l .
I t i s w e l l known t h a t many n u c l e i a d q u i r e a deformed a x i a l l y symmetric shape i n t h e i r ground s t a t e . For t h e s e n u c l e i t h e ground s t a t e c h a r g e d e n s i t y i n t h e i n t r i n s i c frame i s g i v e n by
s i m i l a r l y t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e o r b i t a l s w i l l have t h e form
While t h e e f f e c t s of n u c l e a r d e f o r m a t i o n i n e l a s t i c and i n e l a s t i c . s c a t t e r i h g have been e x t e n s i v e l y d i s c u s s e d ( 2 ' , t h o s e i n q u a s i - e l a s t i c
uppor ported in part by CAICYT under grant No 1179-84
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1987245
C2-296 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
e l e c t r o n s c a t t e r i n g have, t o o u r knowledge, n e v e r b e f o r e been c o n s i d e r e d .
F o r t h e p r o c e s s A ( e , e ' p V ) B t h e dependence of t h e n u c l e a r s t r u c - t u r e c a n be f a c t o r i z e d o u t ( i n p l a n e wave impulse a p r o x i m a t i o n
(PWIA)) i n t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n ( ' )
where :Y J A , r e p r e s e n t s t h e wave f u n c t i o n of t h e ground s t a t e of t h e t a r g e t , w i t h a n g u l a r momentum J A and t o t a l b i n d i n g energy E,: and YB J t h e wave f u n c t i o n of t h e r e s i d u a l n u c l e u s B , w i t h b i n d i n g e n e r g y
B
E ~ . I n t h i s p a p e r we d i s c u s s t h e form of t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n f o r a x i a l l y symmetric deformed n u c l e i . To s i m p l i f y t h e d i s c u s s i o n we u s e t h e B o h r - M o t t e l ~ o n ' ~ ) f a c t o r i z a t i o n a p p r o x i m a t i o n and N i l s s o n model ( 4 ) s i n g l e p a r t i c l e wave f u n c t i o n s .
For a x i a l l y symmetric deformed n u c l e i we w r i t e t h e wave f u n c t i o n i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y system i n t e r m s of t h e r e l a t i v e o r i e n t a t i o n of t h e body f i x e d system and t h e i n t r i n s i c wave f u n c t i o n . For a g i v e n band, KA, i n t h e A n u c l e u s we w r i t e (same c o n v e n t i o n s and n o t a t i o n s as t h o s e i n r e f . ( 5 ) a r e used h e r e ) ,
and s i m i l a r l y f o r t h e s t a t e s of t h e r e s i d u a l n u c l e u s B. With t h i s approximation t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n t a k e s t h e form
where, i n p a r t i c u l a r , i f t h e t a r g e t A i s even-even, we have f o r t h e t r a n s i t i o n from t h e ground s t a t e (JA=KA=VA=O) t o a o n e q u a s i p a r t i c l e s t a t e (VB=l,KB) i n t h e r e s i d u a l n u c l e u s
where vK 2 i s t h e p r o b a b i l i t y f o r f i n d i n g t h e (deformed) s i n g l e p a r t i c l e B ( s . p . ) s t a t e KB o c c u p i e d i n t h e ground s t a t e of t h e t a r g e t n u c l e u s , and C Z j a r e t h e a m p l i t u d e s o f t h e s.p. s t a t e KB
i n t h e s p h e r i c a l b a s i s
Hence, one can s e e t h a t t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n s i n t h e deformed and s p h e r i c a l c a s e s a r e q u i t e d i f f e r e n t . F i r s t of a l l , t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e b i n d i n g e n e r g i e s Ea a p p e a r i n g i n eq. ( 1 ) a r e r e p l a c e d i n eq. ( 4 ) by
r o t 1 2 J B + l /2
where EJ ( = %(JB(JB+l)-K +6 (-1)
K ~ , 1 / 2
i s t h e r o t a t i o n a l e n e r g y and E t h e q u a s i p a r t i c l e e n e r g y . S i n c e t h i s s p e c t r u m i s i n g e n e r a l much more d e n s e t h a n t h a t c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e s . p . e n e r g i e s E f o r a g i v e n r a n g e of m i s s i n g e n e r g i e s E t h e s p e c t r a l
a t
f u n c t i o n w i l l have many more and c l o s e r p e a k s t h a n i n t h e s p h e r i c a l c a s e . With t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s o l u t i o n a v a i l a b l e a t p r e s e n t , t h e r o t a t i o n a l l e v e l s i n a g i v e n K band may n o t i n g e n e r a l be r e s o l v e d , s e v e r a l p e a k s t h u s r e s u l t i n g i n a s i n g l e b r o a d e r one. On t h e o t h e r hand f o r a narrow r a n g e o f m i s s i n g e n e r g i e s i n t h e neighbourhood of a g i v e n q u a s i p a r t i c l e ( o r h o l e ) energy t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n i n t h e deformed c a s e w i l l i n g e n e r a l be q u i t e d i f f e r e n t . While i n t h e s p h e r i c a l c a s e t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n w i l l be t h a t of a s i n g l e o r b i t a l nu, i n t h e deformed c a s e it w i l l be a l i n e a r combination of many o r b i t a l s .
To i l l u s t r a t e t h i s p o i n t we c o n s i d e r i n what f o l l o w s t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n s o f t h e l a s t o c c u p i e d p r o t o n s t a t e s i n 2 8 ~ i , u s i n g t h e N i l s s o n model and n e g l e c t i n g p a i r i n g c o r r e l a t i o n s . I n t h e N i l s s o n model, w i t h d e f o r m a t i o n p a r a m e t e r i n t h e r a n g e -,256,$.2, t h e l a s t o c a u p i e d s t a t e s i n 2 8 ~ i a r e t h e lower K' =
P I t', 5/2+ i n t h e N = 2 s h e l l . For 6 = 0 ( s p h e r i c a l c a s e ) t h e t h r e e s t a t e s a r e d e q e n e r a t e i n t o t h e Idgl2 o r b i t a l . For Oc 1 6 1z.2 t h e s e p a r a t i o n i n e n e r g y o f t h e s e s t a t e s among t h e m s e l v e s i s less t h a n o r o f t h e o r d e r o f .lhwo, w h i l e t h e s e p a r a t i o n i n energy w i t h r e s p e c t t o remaining o c c u p i e d s t a t e s i s o f t h e o r d e r of Ihwo. T h e r e f o r e i f we a r e i n t e r e s t e d i n t h e
momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n , n ( p ) , o b t a i n e d by i n t e g r a t i o n o f t h e s p e c t r a l f u n c t i o n o v e r a narrow energy r a n g e (c 1 MeV) around t h e minimal removal e n e r g y , we c a n r e s t r i c t o u r a t t e n t i o n t o j u s t t h e s e t h r e e
2 7 ( 6 ) K s.p. s t a t e s . Moreover t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t t h e s p e c t r u m of A x one s e e s t h a t o n l y t h e l o w e s t J B K B = 7
'* , - I-'
s t a t e s w i l l2 2 '
c o n t r i b u t e i n t h i s e n e r g y r a n g e . I n f i g . 1 w e show t h e momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n , n ( p ) =nSl2 5 / 2 + n 1 / 2 / 2 ( i n u n i t s of (b/JfE) 3 ) a s a
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Fig. 1 - Momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r 6=-.2 (-.-)
,
6=-. 1 ( - - - I , 6 = 0 (-1 8 = . I ( .. .
. ) , & = - 2 ( - - .-)f u n c t i o n of P ( i n u n i t s of b-' )
,
f o r d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s of t h e deforma- t i o n parameter. A marked dependence on deformation i s observed. For 6=0 t h e r e i s only a bump a t ~ = f i / b , a s 16 ( i n c r e a s e s t h i s bump i s reduced and d i s p l a c e d t o somewhat l a r g e r p v a l u e s , and o t h e r bump a t p=O a p p e a r s whose s t r e n g t h i n c r e a s e s a s 161
h c r e a s e s . I n f i g . 2 we compare o u r r e s u l t f o r t h e deformed model with & = . I t o t h e expe- r i m e n t a l d a t a and f i t given i n r e f . ( 7 ) ( s e e a l s o r e f . ( 1 ) ).
Fig. 2
-
Comparison of deformed model r e s u l t f o r & = . I ( - - - ) t o t h e ( 7 )experimental d a t a and f i t
.
0
2 W
... -
a.., C: 2 7
2 8 ~ i ( e , e l p ) AI
30
-
10.5 sE <
12.0 MeVI I
50 100 IS0 200 250 P ( U e w
The f i t i n r e f . ( 7 ) was obtained by using q. (1)
,
with Nld -5.5 and NZs = .4,5/2 1/2
i n d i s t o r t e d wave Born a p p r o x i m a t i o n ( D W I A ) w i t h wave f u n c t i o n s o b t a i n e d from a Woods-Saxon p o t e n t i a l . Our r e s u l t shown by t h e
d a s h e d l i n e i n f i g . 2 c o n t a i n s a r e n o r m a l i z a t i o n f a c t o r Q = . 5 t o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h e o v e r a l l r e d u c t i o n i n g o i n g f r o m PWIA t o D W I A ' ~ ) . A l s o t h e b v a l u e u s e d (b = 1.97 fm) was c h o s e n l a r g e t o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h e d i s p l a c e m e n t t o l o w e r momenta i n g o i n g from PWIA t o DWIA")
.
T a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t t h e s e two c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , t h e deformed model g i v e s a v e r y good a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a .R e f e r e n c e s
( 1 ) S. F r u l l a n i and J . Mongey, Adv. i n Nucl. Phys. V.14 ( 1 9 8 5 ) , J . W . Negele a n d E.W. Vogt, Eds.
( 2 ) W. B e r t o z z i , Nucl. Phys.
A374
(1982) 109cE. Moya d e G u e r r a a n d A.E.L. D i e p e r i n k , Phys. Rev. (1978) 1596.
( 3 ) A. Bohr a n d B. M o t t e l s o n , N u c l e a r S t r u c t u r e , Vol. I1 (Benjamin, N . Y . , 1 9 7 5 ) .
( 4 ) S.G. N i l s s o n , Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. S e l s k .
2,
no. 16 (1955) ( 5 ) E. Moya d e G u e r r a , Phys. Rep.138
(1986) 293.( 6 ) C.M. L e d e r e r a n d V.S. S h i r l e y , Eds., T a b l e of L s o t o p e s 7th e d . ( J o h n W i l l e y & S o n s , N . Y . , 1 9 7 8 ) .
( 7 ) J . Mougey e t a l , Nucl. Phys.